Broken Freewheel removal tool......
#26
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Thunder Bay, Ontario, Canada - burrrrr!
Posts: 11,376
Bikes: 1958 Rabeneick 120D, 1968 Legnano Gran Premio, 196? Torpado Professional, 2000 Marinoni Piuma
Mentioned: 204 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1283 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1,433 Times
in
802 Posts
I, too, have broken a freewheel tool or two. Snapped in half, exactly like the OP's. I have also managed to round off the tabs on a two tab freewheel tool and had several bikes come my way with the two tap/slot ruined due to slippage. These days, I employ extreme caution when removing two tab freewheels and, if possible, try to avoid having anything to do with them. Four tap, OK. Splined, just great unless dealing with the kind that won't fit over the axle nut.
I have also gone the pipe wrench route, disassembling the freewheel and then fitting my 18" pipe wrench onto the bare freewheel hub. I used to be worried about the pipe wrench jaws damaging the hub but, so far, no worries.
I have also gone the pipe wrench route, disassembling the freewheel and then fitting my 18" pipe wrench onto the bare freewheel hub. I used to be worried about the pipe wrench jaws damaging the hub but, so far, no worries.
__________________
"98% of the bikes I buy are projects".
"98% of the bikes I buy are projects".
#27
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2020
Location: Saratoga, CA
Posts: 563
Bikes: 1981 Bianchi Specialissim, 1976 Colnago Super. 1971 Bob Jackson. 2012 Kestrel 4000. 2012 Willier. 2016 Fuji Cross 1.1
Mentioned: 22 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 181 Post(s)
Liked 584 Times
in
251 Posts
Likes For SwimmerMike:
#28
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2017
Location: Eastern Shore, MD
Posts: 1,764
Bikes: Road ready: 1993 Koga Miyata City Liner Touring Hybrid, 1989 Centurion Sport DLX, "I Blame GP" Bridgestone CB-1. Projects: Yea, I got a problem....
Mentioned: 17 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 618 Post(s)
Liked 395 Times
in
262 Posts
I did the same thing a while back. I found 1" Milwaukie socket with a a square base that will clamp securely in my bench vice. Works good...
https://www.milwaukeetool.com/Produc...ets/45-34-9108
https://www.milwaukeetool.com/Produc...ets/45-34-9108

Likes For bark_eater:
#29
Old fart
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Appleton WI
Posts: 24,075
Bikes: Several, mostly not name brands.
Mentioned: 147 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3194 Post(s)
Liked 2,503 Times
in
1,471 Posts

https://www.parktool.com/en-us/produ...r-wrench-frw-1
#30
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2020
Location: Saratoga, CA
Posts: 563
Bikes: 1981 Bianchi Specialissim, 1976 Colnago Super. 1971 Bob Jackson. 2012 Kestrel 4000. 2012 Willier. 2016 Fuji Cross 1.1
Mentioned: 22 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 181 Post(s)
Liked 584 Times
in
251 Posts
All Park freewheel tools are designed to fit a 1" box end wrench. Park actually makes a 1" wrench especially for that purpose, the FRW-1. It's better than a standard 1" box-end wrench in that it has a set-screw to secure the remover tool in the handle and can accept a cheater pipe when more leverage is needed.

https://www.parktool.com/en-us/produ...r-wrench-frw-1

https://www.parktool.com/en-us/produ...r-wrench-frw-1
#31
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: PDX
Posts: 11,746
Bikes: Merz x 5 + Specialized Merz Allez x 2, Strawberry/Newlands/DiNucci/Ti x3, Gordon, Fuso/Moulton x2, Bornstein, Paisley,1958-74 Paramounts x3, 3rensho, 74 Moto TC, 73-78 Raleigh Pro's x5, Marinoni x2, 1960 Cinelli SC, 1980 Bianchi SC, PX-10 X 2
Mentioned: 231 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3663 Post(s)
Liked 4,202 Times
in
2,515 Posts
I bought this right after I broke the FR-1.3 in the first post. I had another freewheel to take off last weekend. I was very pleased with the FRW-1. As a side note. When Park was determining if they would replace the FR-1.3 they made it very clear that "Using a vice can destroy the freewheel tool" and that if I used a vice and the tool failed it was NOT a manufacturing defect.

#32
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: PDX
Posts: 11,746
Bikes: Merz x 5 + Specialized Merz Allez x 2, Strawberry/Newlands/DiNucci/Ti x3, Gordon, Fuso/Moulton x2, Bornstein, Paisley,1958-74 Paramounts x3, 3rensho, 74 Moto TC, 73-78 Raleigh Pro's x5, Marinoni x2, 1960 Cinelli SC, 1980 Bianchi SC, PX-10 X 2
Mentioned: 231 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3663 Post(s)
Liked 4,202 Times
in
2,515 Posts
All Park freewheel tools are designed to fit a 1" box end wrench. Park actually makes a 1" wrench especially for that purpose, the FRW-1. It's better than a standard 1" box-end wrench in that it has a set-screw to secure the remover tool in the handle and can accept a cheater pipe when more leverage is needed.

https://www.parktool.com/en-us/produ...r-wrench-frw-1

https://www.parktool.com/en-us/produ...r-wrench-frw-1
Based on the vise story Mike got, I doubt they would replace either tool if you told them you used a cheater pipe.
Parks prices are in Snap-on territory and I already have 2 or 3 of those plus some very stout cheaper versions that would never break anyway.
As most of us know, Snap-on will replace almost any regular handtool with no questions asked, they would laugh you out of the truck if you told them you broke one of their tools working on a bicycle.
And then they would replace it anyway.
And yes, many of us know they are very expensive, but that's only until you start saving time and making money with them.
If I thought any of my real tools were as potentially weak as some Parks seem to be, they would never make to into the work or dragstrip tool box.

#33
Senior Member
Looks like using the Milwaukee 1” socket (with flats) secured in a vise is the way to go! (At least when making a claim to ParkTool
). I’ve been mostly successful with the freewheel tool in the vise and have never damaged a tool. I have had to resort to the “disassemble freewheel then use a pipe wrench” method but only a couple of times. Applying anti-sieze compound prior to reassembly is a great idea but of no help on a freewheel that’s never before been removed.
RE: the high-end, professional mechanic tools (Snap-On, Matco, etc.) I see the trucks frequently making the rounds to local independent repair shops as well as many automotive, truck and farm equipment dealerships and repair facilities. It seems to me that there would be little need for that if the tools were of such high quality
. Are the mobile units replacing damaged tools or are mechanics buying specialty tools as the need arises?

RE: the high-end, professional mechanic tools (Snap-On, Matco, etc.) I see the trucks frequently making the rounds to local independent repair shops as well as many automotive, truck and farm equipment dealerships and repair facilities. It seems to me that there would be little need for that if the tools were of such high quality

#34
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2019
Location: Bloomington, IN
Posts: 2,170
Bikes: Paramount, Faggin, Ochsner, Ciocc, Ugly Bill
Mentioned: 81 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 910 Post(s)
Liked 1,040 Times
in
687 Posts
sovende,
Yes to both questions. I have Snap-On and Mac and they both have specialty tools and they have lifetime replacement. The specialty tools are for a lot of different applications, like replacing the marzelvanes in a turbo encabulator. Smiles, MH
Yes to both questions. I have Snap-On and Mac and they both have specialty tools and they have lifetime replacement. The specialty tools are for a lot of different applications, like replacing the marzelvanes in a turbo encabulator. Smiles, MH
Last edited by Mad Honk; 07-02-22 at 02:20 PM.
#35
Wrench Savant
I expect the problem is actually the use of the "pipe wrench". If it is the traditional style, it was designed with slightly inclined jaws and a loose clamp such that it can grip a round pipe. The harder you turn it, the more clamping force is on the pipe until the teeth dig in and the pipe turns. What likely happened is that the sides of the pipe wrench did not (and could not) hold the tool squarely, and the harder you pushed on the wrench, the more crushing force was applied to the tool, eventually crushing it.
FWIW, for stubborn freewheels, I clamp the tool in a vice and use the wheel as the lever arm to torque the freewheel off.
FWIW, for stubborn freewheels, I clamp the tool in a vice and use the wheel as the lever arm to torque the freewheel off.
Last edited by balindamood; 07-02-22 at 11:37 AM.
#36
Senior Member


Likes For sovende:
#37
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2019
Location: Bloomington, IN
Posts: 2,170
Bikes: Paramount, Faggin, Ochsner, Ciocc, Ugly Bill
Mentioned: 81 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 910 Post(s)
Liked 1,040 Times
in
687 Posts
sovende,
I couldn't resist posting the joke for you. I hope you got a chuckle out of the presentation. Smiles, MH
BTW, I use a black steel socket and an impact wrench to remove freewheels. About a 20 second procedure to remove them, and very little chance of breaking anything.
I couldn't resist posting the joke for you. I hope you got a chuckle out of the presentation. Smiles, MH
BTW, I use a black steel socket and an impact wrench to remove freewheels. About a 20 second procedure to remove them, and very little chance of breaking anything.
Last edited by Mad Honk; 07-02-22 at 01:00 PM.
Likes For Mad Honk:
#38
Senior Member
sovende,
I couldn't resist posting the joke for you. I hope you got a chuckle out of the presentation. Smiles, MH
BTW, I use a black steel socket and an impact wrench to remove freewheels. About a 20 second procedure to remove them, and very little chance of breaking anything.
I couldn't resist posting the joke for you. I hope you got a chuckle out of the presentation. Smiles, MH
BTW, I use a black steel socket and an impact wrench to remove freewheels. About a 20 second procedure to remove them, and very little chance of breaking anything.
Likes For sovende:
#39
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: PDX
Posts: 11,746
Bikes: Merz x 5 + Specialized Merz Allez x 2, Strawberry/Newlands/DiNucci/Ti x3, Gordon, Fuso/Moulton x2, Bornstein, Paisley,1958-74 Paramounts x3, 3rensho, 74 Moto TC, 73-78 Raleigh Pro's x5, Marinoni x2, 1960 Cinelli SC, 1980 Bianchi SC, PX-10 X 2
Mentioned: 231 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3663 Post(s)
Liked 4,202 Times
in
2,515 Posts
Looks like using the Milwaukee 1” socket (with flats) secured in a vise is the way to go! (At least when making a claim to ParkTool
). I’ve been mostly successful with the freewheel tool in the vise and have never damaged a tool. I have had to resort to the “disassemble freewheel then use a pipe wrench” method but only a couple of times. Applying anti-sieze compound prior to reassembly is a great idea but of no help on a freewheel that’s never before been removed.
RE: the high-end, professional mechanic tools (Snap-On, Matco, etc.) I see the trucks frequently making the rounds to local independent repair shops as well as many automotive, truck and farm equipment dealerships and repair facilities. It seems to me that there would be little need for that if the tools were of such high quality
. Are the mobile units replacing damaged tools or are mechanics buying specialty tools as the need arises?

RE: the high-end, professional mechanic tools (Snap-On, Matco, etc.) I see the trucks frequently making the rounds to local independent repair shops as well as many automotive, truck and farm equipment dealerships and repair facilities. It seems to me that there would be little need for that if the tools were of such high quality


Mech/techs are an odd lot, I knew several that had well over $100K in tools, I probably have at least $20-$30K but I almost never carried a balance, some guys have a $1K a month tool payment and more.

#40
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2019
Location: Bloomington, IN
Posts: 2,170
Bikes: Paramount, Faggin, Ochsner, Ciocc, Ugly Bill
Mentioned: 81 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 910 Post(s)
Liked 1,040 Times
in
687 Posts
merziac, as we have discussed before the three boxes here likely contain enough for the War Department to spend freely after my demise. I just hope she doesn't wheel them out to the curb with a $10 price on each one.
sovende, The narrator was the innovator who began using hidden ear pieces to recite the program. He would record the printed text before and then use it to do the actual presentation. The ruse started in the 40's with some engineer folks creating a technical sounding document with no actual meaning. There was a follow up with a mechanic "Sparky" with a torch appearing to work on a Viper in the background while the presentation was going on. Sparky set the Viper aflame and a volunteer FD put the fire out. That one was very funny, but somehow has been lost in the series. I'm glad your wife got to see the humor in what we bike mechanics do for fun. Smiles, MH
sovende, The narrator was the innovator who began using hidden ear pieces to recite the program. He would record the printed text before and then use it to do the actual presentation. The ruse started in the 40's with some engineer folks creating a technical sounding document with no actual meaning. There was a follow up with a mechanic "Sparky" with a torch appearing to work on a Viper in the background while the presentation was going on. Sparky set the Viper aflame and a volunteer FD put the fire out. That one was very funny, but somehow has been lost in the series. I'm glad your wife got to see the humor in what we bike mechanics do for fun. Smiles, MH
Last edited by Mad Honk; 07-03-22 at 09:01 AM.