Bike Forums

Bike Forums (https://www.bikeforums.net/forum.php)
-   Classic & Vintage (https://www.bikeforums.net/classic-vintage/)
-   -   I hate to admit the truth (https://www.bikeforums.net/classic-vintage/1255920-i-hate-admit-truth.html)

cudak888 07-30-22 01:17 PM


Originally Posted by Hondo6 (Post 22592748)
Me too. Especially if you start talking about some hot-button subjects (example: early STIs) that are now well over 35 years old.

Wasn't that decreed not C&V when this forum was opened? https://www.bikeforums.net/early-bri...s-7-8-9-speed/

-Kurt

curbtender 07-30-22 03:48 PM

I saw one to ID all frames including motorcycles and they had an Ebike. I'm ok with getting the dang thing wrong but I should at least get the image with the correct answer.

Hondo6 08-01-22 05:33 AM


Originally Posted by cudak888 (Post 22593008)
Wasn't that decreed not C&V when this forum was opened? https://www.bikeforums.net/early-bri...s-7-8-9-speed/

-Kurt

Dunno if "early brifters" have ever been explicitly stated to be "not C&V". I've never been able to find an explicit definition of what is and isn't "C&V" for the purposes of this forum, and I wasn't a member when the C&V forum was created. But yes, the creation of the "early brifter bikes" near-ghost-town forum does imply that.

However, that decision is questionable IMO. Plus, as time passes the definition of what is considered "C&V" changes in every field of human activity. Cycling is no different.

Case in point, from the automotive world: when the first Ford Mustang was sold in the mid-1960s, it was certainly not "vintage" and most didn't yet consider it a classic (though some did from nearly day one). 30 years later, it was generally considered a prime example of both. Today? If you want to obtain one, well, good luck finding one for sale - and if you do, bring serious $$$.

Minor error in my original post: I had mis-remembered the intro date of STI's - they were introduced in 1990, not the mid-1980s as I'd erroneously recalled (that was STI). They're thus "only" been around 30+ years, not 35+. :)

cudak888 08-01-22 06:32 AM


Originally Posted by Hondo6 (Post 22594436)
Dunno if "early brifters" have ever been explicitly stated to be "not C&V"...

I probably should have put an "/s" at the end of my post, if you get my brift ;)

-Kurt

Hondo6 08-01-22 06:54 AM


Originally Posted by cudak888 (Post 22594476)
I probably should have put an "/s" at the end of my post, if you get my brift ;)

-Kurt

That would have helped. Otherwise a responder can misinterpret and brift off-course a bit.

Kinda like I did. :)

Steel Charlie 08-01-22 01:57 PM


Originally Posted by Hondo6 (Post 22594436)
Case in point, from the automotive world: when the first Ford Mustang was sold in the mid-1960s, it was certainly not "vintage" and most didn't yet consider it a classic (though some did from nearly day one). 30 years later, it was generally considered a prime example of both. Today? If you want to obtain one, well, good luck finding one for sale - and if you do, bring serious $$$..

I've always thought that was beyond funny. When I was young we laughed at kids whose parents got them a Mustang. The old ones are still one of the most unattractive cars Ford ever built no matter what they sell for. I mean, just plain goofy looking.

curbtender 08-01-22 02:22 PM

https://cimg3.ibsrv.net/gimg/bikefor...41a571459a.jpg

Hondo6 08-01-22 02:30 PM


Originally Posted by Steel Charlie (Post 22595011)
I've always thought that was beyond funny. When I was young we laughed at kids whose parents got them a Mustang. The old ones are still one of the most unattractive cars Ford ever built no matter what they sell for. I mean, just plain goofy looking.

To each his own. Along with many car aficionados, I've always considered the first Mustang body style (1964-½ through 1967) among the cleanest and nicest auto designs Detroit ever made.

Now, when you start talking some of the later models, well . . . you've got a point. Especially when you get to the Pinto-chassis-based Mustang IIs.

ThermionicScott 08-01-22 03:11 PM


Originally Posted by cudak888 (Post 22592053)
Yes, the sound at 1:28 right here:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wSdLfvvQLhI

The same background music plays too ;)

-Kurt

One of my favorite movies as a kid (just ask my folks!) Fun fact: the hippie next to them at the drive-in diner was also Dean Jones. ;)

cudak888 08-01-22 04:47 PM


Originally Posted by ThermionicScott (Post 22595126)
One of my favorite movies as a kid (just ask my folks!) Fun fact: the hippie next to them at the drive-in diner was also Dean Jones. ;)

And "Guinevere" was Buddy Hackett. "Couple of weirdos, eh, Guinevere?"

The main bug used for the racing shots ran on 15x7 track-spec Firestones and (at the time) had a Super 90 out of a 356B shoved in it.

-Kurt

madpogue 08-01-22 04:59 PM

If the movie was meant to be some sort of film noir cautionary tale of a dystopian future featuring cars that drive themselves, imprisoning their hapless occupants, it kinda missed the mark....

stevel610 08-01-22 05:05 PM


Originally Posted by 52telecaster (Post 22591856)
And perhaps one of the most important studies on this topic found that most riders will take a red light on a clear intersection to get away from the drivers behind them that can't be trusted:
https://daily.jstor.org/are-cyclists...s-lawbreakers/

I do this all the time. An intersection is a great place to get killed on your bike. I only stay if I have to.

My wife sits at red lights with all the cars waiting for it to turn green because she thinks it's safer. I tell her "cars kill" and I use them being stopped to get away from them for safety.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 06:58 PM.


Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.