![]() |
Originally Posted by Hondo6
(Post 22592748)
Me too. Especially if you start talking about some hot-button subjects (example: early STIs) that are now well over 35 years old.
-Kurt |
I saw one to ID all frames including motorcycles and they had an Ebike. I'm ok with getting the dang thing wrong but I should at least get the image with the correct answer.
|
Originally Posted by cudak888
(Post 22593008)
Wasn't that decreed not C&V when this forum was opened? https://www.bikeforums.net/early-bri...s-7-8-9-speed/
-Kurt However, that decision is questionable IMO. Plus, as time passes the definition of what is considered "C&V" changes in every field of human activity. Cycling is no different. Case in point, from the automotive world: when the first Ford Mustang was sold in the mid-1960s, it was certainly not "vintage" and most didn't yet consider it a classic (though some did from nearly day one). 30 years later, it was generally considered a prime example of both. Today? If you want to obtain one, well, good luck finding one for sale - and if you do, bring serious $$$. Minor error in my original post: I had mis-remembered the intro date of STI's - they were introduced in 1990, not the mid-1980s as I'd erroneously recalled (that was STI). They're thus "only" been around 30+ years, not 35+. :) |
Originally Posted by Hondo6
(Post 22594436)
Dunno if "early brifters" have ever been explicitly stated to be "not C&V"...
-Kurt |
Originally Posted by cudak888
(Post 22594476)
I probably should have put an "/s" at the end of my post, if you get my brift ;)
-Kurt Kinda like I did. :) |
Originally Posted by Hondo6
(Post 22594436)
Case in point, from the automotive world: when the first Ford Mustang was sold in the mid-1960s, it was certainly not "vintage" and most didn't yet consider it a classic (though some did from nearly day one). 30 years later, it was generally considered a prime example of both. Today? If you want to obtain one, well, good luck finding one for sale - and if you do, bring serious $$$..
|
|
Originally Posted by Steel Charlie
(Post 22595011)
I've always thought that was beyond funny. When I was young we laughed at kids whose parents got them a Mustang. The old ones are still one of the most unattractive cars Ford ever built no matter what they sell for. I mean, just plain goofy looking.
Now, when you start talking some of the later models, well . . . you've got a point. Especially when you get to the Pinto-chassis-based Mustang IIs. |
Originally Posted by cudak888
(Post 22592053)
Yes, the sound at 1:28 right here:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wSdLfvvQLhI The same background music plays too ;) -Kurt |
Originally Posted by ThermionicScott
(Post 22595126)
One of my favorite movies as a kid (just ask my folks!) Fun fact: the hippie next to them at the drive-in diner was also Dean Jones. ;)
The main bug used for the racing shots ran on 15x7 track-spec Firestones and (at the time) had a Super 90 out of a 356B shoved in it. -Kurt |
If the movie was meant to be some sort of film noir cautionary tale of a dystopian future featuring cars that drive themselves, imprisoning their hapless occupants, it kinda missed the mark....
|
Originally Posted by 52telecaster
(Post 22591856)
And perhaps one of the most important studies on this topic found that most riders will take a red light on a clear intersection to get away from the drivers behind them that can't be trusted:
https://daily.jstor.org/are-cyclists...s-lawbreakers/ I do this all the time. An intersection is a great place to get killed on your bike. I only stay if I have to. |
| All times are GMT -6. The time now is 06:58 PM. |
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.