Need advice on doing a somewhat modern build on a 87 Schwinn Super Sport frame.
Likes For icemilkcoffee:
Likes For Sierra:
#28
Newbie
Thread Starter
Thank you everyone for your input, you have helped me with my decision. I am selling the bike and will put that money towards a bike with more my taste. What did it was someone pointing out that I already have 2 bikes with identical frame geometry.
I still fancy the idea of building up a vintage steel bike frame for my long rides.
Tom
I still fancy the idea of building up a vintage steel bike frame for my long rides.
Tom
#29
Newbie
Thread Starter
Just a side note to some of the excellent advice already given. Am a YUGE late 80’s Schwinn fan, for context.
The Prologue and Tempo (have owned multiple examples of both) you also own have virtually identical geometry to the SS(have owned a bunch of these as well). Only difference I can tell between the Tempo and SS of that year is the fork crown.
So, building it up as a light touring bike is pretty much like doing that to something you already own. And if that’s what you want, OK.
But.
Consider selling the SS and using the funds to find a low mileage Schwinn Voyageur of the same vintage. Still a Tenax tube frameset, but longer chainstays and designed for exactly what you want to do- credit card touring or long rides. Same ability to accept literally any modern, semi-modern or vintage component group. Cantilver brakes can be easily replaced with Tektro dual pivot calipers. Original components are VERY saleable in today’s market.
On the other hand, if you really want to do a total refurb on the SS including paint go for it. Lifetime bike.
The Prologue and Tempo (have owned multiple examples of both) you also own have virtually identical geometry to the SS(have owned a bunch of these as well). Only difference I can tell between the Tempo and SS of that year is the fork crown.
So, building it up as a light touring bike is pretty much like doing that to something you already own. And if that’s what you want, OK.
But.
Consider selling the SS and using the funds to find a low mileage Schwinn Voyageur of the same vintage. Still a Tenax tube frameset, but longer chainstays and designed for exactly what you want to do- credit card touring or long rides. Same ability to accept literally any modern, semi-modern or vintage component group. Cantilver brakes can be easily replaced with Tektro dual pivot calipers. Original components are VERY saleable in today’s market.
On the other hand, if you really want to do a total refurb on the SS including paint go for it. Lifetime bike.
Tom
#30
Uff Da!
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 1,148
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 50 Post(s)
Liked 122 Times
in
65 Posts
I think that's a great choice.
I don't have an '87 Voyageur, but I do have an '84-'85 Voyageur SP.
Although it's a 58 cm, and too big for me(Doc tells me that I'm down to 5' 5") I can ride it and I think it's the most comfortable bike that I own(of 75 or so).
They really got something right with those models!
I don't have an '87 Voyageur, but I do have an '84-'85 Voyageur SP.
Although it's a 58 cm, and too big for me(Doc tells me that I'm down to 5' 5") I can ride it and I think it's the most comfortable bike that I own(of 75 or so).
They really got something right with those models!
Likes For Sierra:
#31
Master Parts Rearranger
Join Date: Mar 2015
Location: Portlandia's Kuiper Belt, OR
Posts: 4,315
Bikes: 1989 Schwinn Paramount OS - 1982 Trek 720 - 1985 Trek 620 - 1985 Schwinn Voyageur SP - 1989 Cannondale SR - 2006 Orbea Onix - 2012 Specialized Tricross
Mentioned: 213 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1418 Post(s)
Liked 1,548 Times
in
787 Posts
Definitely another vote for a Voyageur SP or any later versions. The SPs got the full complement of modern amenities, namely downtube shifter braze-ons, three bottle cage mounts, pump peg, vertical dropouts(!), and a 27.2mm seatpost diameter(!). I am unsure of the seatpost diameter of post-'85 non-SP Voyageurs. This does come with a 120mm spaced rear triangle, so cold setting for a 130mm axle is advised. Columbus SL/SP tubing, which basically means it's a touring version of a same-year Peloton (which I also had). They are similar in spirit.
Pictured below is mine, with original 27" wheels. You could work the cantis to get 700C, or go side pull calipers with 700C wheels. Good wheels and better tires will definitely elevate/make the bike.
Pictured below is mine, with original 27" wheels. You could work the cantis to get 700C, or go side pull calipers with 700C wheels. Good wheels and better tires will definitely elevate/make the bike.


Last edited by RiddleOfSteel; 10-06-22 at 11:54 PM.
Likes For RiddleOfSteel:
Likes For RustyJames:
#33
Master Parts Rearranger
Join Date: Mar 2015
Location: Portlandia's Kuiper Belt, OR
Posts: 4,315
Bikes: 1989 Schwinn Paramount OS - 1982 Trek 720 - 1985 Trek 620 - 1985 Schwinn Voyageur SP - 1989 Cannondale SR - 2006 Orbea Onix - 2012 Specialized Tricross
Mentioned: 213 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1418 Post(s)
Liked 1,548 Times
in
787 Posts
I figure if I can break even on the eventual selling of said part or bike or parts-plus-frame-into-bike-build-to-sell, then I'm a happy camper. I got the chance to build, learn, and restore/renovate to riding condition again. I may have even enjoyed it as my own bike in the fleet for a while. Lots of "profit" there for me.
Likes For RiddleOfSteel:
#34
Junior Member
Join Date: Nov 2018
Location: Falmouth, ME
Posts: 133
Bikes: 2010 Cannondale CAAD 5 Potenza 66cm, 1984 Basso Gap Nuovo Record 65cm, 1989 Cannondale ST Racing Triple 27", 1974 Schwinn Paramount Nuovo Record 26", 198? Scapin MKII 66cm Victory
Mentioned: 7 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 42 Post(s)
Liked 85 Times
in
40 Posts
Definitely another vote for a Voyageur SP or any later versions. The SPs got the full complement of modern amenities, namely downtube shifter braze-ons, three bottle cage mounts, pump peg, vertical dropouts(!), and a 27.2mm seatpost diameter(!). I am unsure of the seatpost diameter of post-'85 non-SP Voyageurs. This does come with a 120mm spaced rear triangle, so cold setting for a 130mm axle is advised. Columbus SL/SP tubing, which basically means it's a touring version of a same-year Peloton (which I also had). They are similar in spirit.
Pictured below is mine, with original 27" wheels. You could work the cantis to get 700C, or go side pull calipers with 700C wheels. Good wheels and better tires will definitely elevate/make the bike.

Pictured below is mine, with original 27" wheels. You could work the cantis to get 700C, or go side pull calipers with 700C wheels. Good wheels and better tires will definitely elevate/make the bike.


Likes For jrg1244:
#35
Master Parts Rearranger
Join Date: Mar 2015
Location: Portlandia's Kuiper Belt, OR
Posts: 4,315
Bikes: 1989 Schwinn Paramount OS - 1982 Trek 720 - 1985 Trek 620 - 1985 Schwinn Voyageur SP - 1989 Cannondale SR - 2006 Orbea Onix - 2012 Specialized Tricross
Mentioned: 213 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1418 Post(s)
Liked 1,548 Times
in
787 Posts
#36
Newbie
Thread Starter
Definitely another vote for a Voyageur SP or any later versions. The SPs got the full complement of modern amenities, namely downtube shifter braze-ons, three bottle cage mounts, pump peg, vertical dropouts(!), and a 27.2mm seatpost diameter(!). I am unsure of the seatpost diameter of post-'85 non-SP Voyageurs. This does come with a 120mm spaced rear triangle, so cold setting for a 130mm axle is advised. Columbus SL/SP tubing, which basically means it's a touring version of a same-year Peloton (which I also had). They are similar in spirit.
Pictured below is mine, with original 27" wheels. You could work the cantis to get 700C, or go side pull calipers with 700C wheels. Good wheels and better tires will definitely elevate/make the bike.

Pictured below is mine, with original 27" wheels. You could work the cantis to get 700C, or go side pull calipers with 700C wheels. Good wheels and better tires will definitely elevate/make the bike.


Likes For Indytriumph:
#37
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Austin,Texas
Posts: 802
Bikes: 73 Super Sport, 86 Tempo, 86 Peloton, 87 Super Sport, 83 Peugeot PFN10, 76 Super Course MK IV, 94 Univega Alpina 5.5
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 175 Post(s)
Liked 69 Times
in
33 Posts
__________________
1973 Schwinn Super Sport
1986 Schwinn Peloton
1976 Raleigh Super Course Mk II(for wife)
1983 Gitane Super Corsa
1991 Trek 750 Multitrack
1973 Schwinn Super Sport
1986 Schwinn Peloton
1976 Raleigh Super Course Mk II(for wife)
1983 Gitane Super Corsa
1991 Trek 750 Multitrack
Likes For vonfilm:
#38
Newbie
Join Date: Aug 2017
Location: Oregon
Posts: 68
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 16 Post(s)
Liked 89 Times
in
32 Posts
Just like with other tools and work spaces, it’s hard to justify the cost of setting up to paint one bike frame. But once you do, it’s a big part of the fun to create bikes that are just the color(s) you want or to experiment. I even kept watch for a another bike to customize just so I could use a purple pearl paint that caught my eye. The cost of high-quality custom auto paint is reasonable in the small quantities needed for bikes, and urethane top coats are very durable (although require extra precautions to use).
And I agree with the sentiments that hobbies cost money and you shouldn’t worry about resale value to build up a bike you love. But one of the things I like about customizing bicycles is that the cost is still relatively modest even if you think you’ll have to eat it. Think about people who put tens of thousands of dollars into custom cars and can only hope to see a fraction of it back when they sell.
And I agree with the sentiments that hobbies cost money and you shouldn’t worry about resale value to build up a bike you love. But one of the things I like about customizing bicycles is that the cost is still relatively modest even if you think you’ll have to eat it. Think about people who put tens of thousands of dollars into custom cars and can only hope to see a fraction of it back when they sell.
Likes For daywood:
#39
Newbie
Thread Starter
Likes For Indytriumph:
#40
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Austin,Texas
Posts: 802
Bikes: 73 Super Sport, 86 Tempo, 86 Peloton, 87 Super Sport, 83 Peugeot PFN10, 76 Super Course MK IV, 94 Univega Alpina 5.5
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 175 Post(s)
Liked 69 Times
in
33 Posts
Thanks. It was a lot of fun. I should never have sold it.
__________________
1973 Schwinn Super Sport
1986 Schwinn Peloton
1976 Raleigh Super Course Mk II(for wife)
1983 Gitane Super Corsa
1991 Trek 750 Multitrack
1973 Schwinn Super Sport
1986 Schwinn Peloton
1976 Raleigh Super Course Mk II(for wife)
1983 Gitane Super Corsa
1991 Trek 750 Multitrack
#41
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: 700 Ft. above sea level.
Posts: 3,046
Bikes: Not as many as there were awhile ago.
Mentioned: 17 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 548 Post(s)
Liked 997 Times
in
492 Posts
I thought 1987 was modern......

__________________
".....distasteful and easily triggered."
".....distasteful and easily triggered."