Factors for a soft ride on a sport tourer
#26
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2019
Location: Toledo Ohio
Posts: 1,286
Bikes: 1964 Frejus,1972 Fuji Newest, 1973 Schwinn Super Sport, 1983 Trek 700, 1985 Ironman, 1985 Torpado, 1983 Peugeot UO14, 1989 Miyata 1000LT and others
Mentioned: 18 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 478 Post(s)
Liked 557 Times
in
310 Posts
Can anyone comment on 4x spoke lacing being softer as I’ve seen rumored? I will also say that the standard Pasela had a quite different feel than the Pro Tite version. I was really curious as to whether and how much factors besides tires entered into the picture.
#27
ambulatory senior
Join Date: Dec 2016
Location: Peoria Il
Posts: 6,027
Bikes: Austro Daimler modified by Gugie! Raleigh Professional and lots of other bikes.
Mentioned: 71 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1848 Post(s)
Liked 3,175 Times
in
1,474 Posts
I almost exclusively ride 4 cross but it's because I like how forgiving the spoke length calculations are when changing hub diameter. 4 cross thirty six spoke has the spokes almost tangent as they leave the hub. This means as hub size changes spoke length changes very little. As to ride quality, I like em. I can't say there is a huge difference but it feels better to me.
#28
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2016
Location: Long Island, NY
Posts: 1,988
Bikes: Trek 800 x 2, Schwinn Heavy Duti, Schwinn Traveler, Schwinn Le Tour Luxe, Schwinn Continental, Cannondale M400 and Lambert, Schwinn Super Sport
Mentioned: 11 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 759 Post(s)
Liked 893 Times
in
599 Posts
The old guys said that 4X gives a softer ride because the spokes are longer than the standard 3X pattern. Those old guys must be in their 90's now since I'm an old guy. I don't know if my Butt-o-meter would be able to tell the difference. I've done some 4X wheels in the past. Recently, I have been going with 3X patterns, however, I like @52telecaster 's reasoning behind going to 4X. For ride quality, if you use double butted spokes laced 4X maybe you can feel it with a Brook Cambium saddle. I don't know. The tire width, sidewall stiffness and tire pressure are, I believe, the biggest variables.
I believe that some smart people have also mentioned the Air Volume of the tire as an important factor as well. Since we are generally talking about comparing like size diameter tires, that would go back to the width. Then it would make width doubly important.
I believe that some smart people have also mentioned the Air Volume of the tire as an important factor as well. Since we are generally talking about comparing like size diameter tires, that would go back to the width. Then it would make width doubly important.
Likes For Velo Mule:
#29
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2015
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 4,371
Bikes: 82 Medici, 2011 Richard Sachs, 2011 Milwaukee Road
Mentioned: 50 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1794 Post(s)
Liked 1,667 Times
in
952 Posts
Wouldn't it make sense that the more spokes you have the less tension you need which makes for more give at the rim? And of course we all ride low profile rims.
__________________
I don't do: disks, tubeless, e-shifting, or bead head nymphs.
I don't do: disks, tubeless, e-shifting, or bead head nymphs.
Last edited by Classtime; 10-13-22 at 01:33 PM. Reason: clarity
#30
ambulatory senior
Join Date: Dec 2016
Location: Peoria Il
Posts: 6,027
Bikes: Austro Daimler modified by Gugie! Raleigh Professional and lots of other bikes.
Mentioned: 71 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1848 Post(s)
Liked 3,175 Times
in
1,474 Posts
The old guys said that 4X gives a softer ride because the spokes are longer than the standard 3X pattern. Those old guys must be in their 90's now since I'm an old guy. I don't know if my Butt-o-meter would be able to tell the difference. I've done some 4X wheels in the past. Recently, I have been going with 3X patterns, however, I like @52telecaster 's reasoning behind going to 4X. For ride quality, if you use double butted spokes laced 4X maybe you can feel it with a Brook Cambium saddle. I don't know. The tire width, sidewall stiffness and tire pressure are, I believe, the biggest variables.
I believe that some smart people have also mentioned the Air Volume of the tire as an important factor as well. Since we are generally talking about comparing like size diameter tires, that would go back to the width. Then it would make width doubly important.
I believe that some smart people have also mentioned the Air Volume of the tire as an important factor as well. Since we are generally talking about comparing like size diameter tires, that would go back to the width. Then it would make width doubly important.
#31
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Peoria, IL
Posts: 4,144
Mentioned: 83 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1681 Post(s)
Liked 2,869 Times
in
1,363 Posts
If you are looking for stretchier spokes (i.e. less stiff, or will stretch further with a given load), then a thinner spoke is what you are looking for.
Or, you could design a spoke that wasn't straight, so that it acts like a spring. That's what was done for the Otto Dicycle...

Steve in Peoria
Likes For steelbikeguy:
#32
Full Member
Join Date: May 2019
Location: Burien WA
Posts: 475
Bikes: Cannondale Synapse, LeMond Victoire, Bianchi Campione d'Italia, Kona Hei Hei, Ritchey Ultra, Schwinn "Paramount" PDG, '83 Trek 640
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 202 Post(s)
Liked 237 Times
in
157 Posts
I'm with you guys about tires and frame geometry. And I believe that a fork should have bend and that the bend helps take the sting out of bumps. The sidewall and the pressure in the tire are the biggest suspension components on the bike.
We might be able to do more about the bumps getting to our bum. This is where the older saddles were more helpful than the newer plastic or hard bodied saddles. CyclingAbout recommends suspension seatpost and has some good experience and logic to back it up. He rides primitive roads, so that level of shock absorbing may not be relevant for the road bikes that we tend to ride. For me it was good for further perspective on the issue. I haven't changed to a suspension seat post either. But it got me thinking that perhaps a Brooks Flyer may not be as weird as I thought.
CyclingAbout - Why Suspension Seatposts are the Ultimate Comfort Upgrade!
We might be able to do more about the bumps getting to our bum. This is where the older saddles were more helpful than the newer plastic or hard bodied saddles. CyclingAbout recommends suspension seatpost and has some good experience and logic to back it up. He rides primitive roads, so that level of shock absorbing may not be relevant for the road bikes that we tend to ride. For me it was good for further perspective on the issue. I haven't changed to a suspension seat post either. But it got me thinking that perhaps a Brooks Flyer may not be as weird as I thought.
CyclingAbout - Why Suspension Seatposts are the Ultimate Comfort Upgrade!
Not really C&V, but I give each of them two thumbs up, if you're thinking about trying them out.
Last edited by mhespenheide; 10-13-22 at 10:34 PM.
#33
Senior Member
It all matters. Sure tires are biggest and easiest. Yes, four cross feels softer. Yes, thin butted spokes. Yes, flat rims. Lower spoke tension works, although the wheel may be less durable. Light gauge tubing and especially light fork blades. Nice long chain stays, not 80s criterium stuff. Also try plain long fork blades with a lot of rake and a lot of air above the tire and below the crown.
I own two bikes such that on first ride ordinary pavement cracks and bumps are not felt at all from the front wheel. Then the back wheel slams hard because the front wheel never signaled to lift off the saddle. Takes a while to readjust perception and notice the bumps again. The'50 Bates has the diadrant fork plus huge clearance above the tire. The '60 Carré has 65mm of rake and again lots of air above tire. Of course both of those bikes live on sewups, wide ones.
Then there is the Eastman DL-1 clone with 47" of wheelbase, 66 degree angles, 3-1/2" of rake, and Herse 700x42 tires. Every little thing matters. The OEM fork with 3-1/4 rake had a bike rack incident, the replacement fork had 1/4" more rake. Which made a difference. Also put the bike closer to neutral trail. 47" of wheelbase and Herse tires floats.
Just avoid the aberrant bikes with 40cm chain stays and no clearance for more than 700x19 and most bikes ride pretty good. Stiff stiff stiff stiff stiff stiff stiff is for marketing not for riding. Stiff leads to brittle fracture and first thing to fracture is the rider. Also for gods sake put your saddle down and let some air out of the tire. After tires the primary shock absorber is your knees. That function is locked out when you sit high.
I own two bikes such that on first ride ordinary pavement cracks and bumps are not felt at all from the front wheel. Then the back wheel slams hard because the front wheel never signaled to lift off the saddle. Takes a while to readjust perception and notice the bumps again. The'50 Bates has the diadrant fork plus huge clearance above the tire. The '60 Carré has 65mm of rake and again lots of air above tire. Of course both of those bikes live on sewups, wide ones.
Then there is the Eastman DL-1 clone with 47" of wheelbase, 66 degree angles, 3-1/2" of rake, and Herse 700x42 tires. Every little thing matters. The OEM fork with 3-1/4 rake had a bike rack incident, the replacement fork had 1/4" more rake. Which made a difference. Also put the bike closer to neutral trail. 47" of wheelbase and Herse tires floats.
Just avoid the aberrant bikes with 40cm chain stays and no clearance for more than 700x19 and most bikes ride pretty good. Stiff stiff stiff stiff stiff stiff stiff is for marketing not for riding. Stiff leads to brittle fracture and first thing to fracture is the rider. Also for gods sake put your saddle down and let some air out of the tire. After tires the primary shock absorber is your knees. That function is locked out when you sit high.
Likes For 63rickert:
#34
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2015
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 4,371
Bikes: 82 Medici, 2011 Richard Sachs, 2011 Milwaukee Road
Mentioned: 50 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1794 Post(s)
Liked 1,667 Times
in
952 Posts
And that is all folks.
__________________
I don't do: disks, tubeless, e-shifting, or bead head nymphs.
I don't do: disks, tubeless, e-shifting, or bead head nymphs.
Likes For Classtime: