$1,000 derailleur system with 1930's technology
#176
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 12,888
Bikes: (2) ti TiCycles, 2007 w/ triple and 2011 fixed, 1979 Peter Mooney, ~1983 Trek 420 now fixed and ~1973 Raleigh Carlton Competition gravel grinder
Mentioned: 129 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4788 Post(s)
Liked 3,909 Times
in
2,542 Posts
There's a place for Chuck Harris's home-built aesthetic and a place for the Campy Record (and NR and SR, etc) aesthetic. I practice both, and each has their place.
The argument that the derailleur should meet the same aesthetic standard of the cranks is good. I definitely see the logic of that! I'll let Jan offer the definitive reason why that wasn't done, but let me offer my own guess.
The cranks require dies for forging (they are forged cranks, aren't they?). The tools are expensive, but it's one set of tools per crank arm, and they expected to sell many thousands of set.
The derailleur would need that same sort of look/feel for at least the four parts of the parallelogram... so that's the front plate, the rear plate, the forward pivot, and the aft pivot. I'll guess that they could be produced with die casting instead of forging, but that tooling still isn't cheap. That's twice the amount of tooling, roughly.
When I was involved with electronics design, a common number for the cost of the tooling for a small injection molded plastic part was $10,000. That's a nice rough number to work with, but I'd love to hear from mechanical or manufacturing engineers who know the real numbers. If you figure a total of $40k for just the tooling (because there are 4 pieces to be created), and 100 derailleurs produced, that's $400 per derailleur just for the tooling! With the usual markup of 50% to 100% to get to the retail price, that's $600 to $800 of the final price. With that sort of estimate, there's no way anyone would go ahead with that sort of production process.
Again, this is a marginally informed estimate, but I haven't seen anyone produce a better estimate yet. I think Jan's decision was appropriate.
However, if someone was inclined to come forward with $40k plus the NRE for the tooling design, maybe he'd produce a prettier version?
Steve in Peoria (with fond memories of my old Erector set)
The argument that the derailleur should meet the same aesthetic standard of the cranks is good. I definitely see the logic of that! I'll let Jan offer the definitive reason why that wasn't done, but let me offer my own guess.
The cranks require dies for forging (they are forged cranks, aren't they?). The tools are expensive, but it's one set of tools per crank arm, and they expected to sell many thousands of set.
The derailleur would need that same sort of look/feel for at least the four parts of the parallelogram... so that's the front plate, the rear plate, the forward pivot, and the aft pivot. I'll guess that they could be produced with die casting instead of forging, but that tooling still isn't cheap. That's twice the amount of tooling, roughly.
When I was involved with electronics design, a common number for the cost of the tooling for a small injection molded plastic part was $10,000. That's a nice rough number to work with, but I'd love to hear from mechanical or manufacturing engineers who know the real numbers. If you figure a total of $40k for just the tooling (because there are 4 pieces to be created), and 100 derailleurs produced, that's $400 per derailleur just for the tooling! With the usual markup of 50% to 100% to get to the retail price, that's $600 to $800 of the final price. With that sort of estimate, there's no way anyone would go ahead with that sort of production process.
Again, this is a marginally informed estimate, but I haven't seen anyone produce a better estimate yet. I think Jan's decision was appropriate.
However, if someone was inclined to come forward with $40k plus the NRE for the tooling design, maybe he'd produce a prettier version?
Steve in Peoria (with fond memories of my old Erector set)
#177
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Peoria, IL
Posts: 4,463
Mentioned: 86 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1824 Post(s)
Liked 3,366 Times
in
1,572 Posts
And - If you tool up to make that sweet, pleasing RD, the incentive to toss those parts and start over because you have a hunch that if "we shortened this 1 mm and tweaked that a shade, shifting ought to be a little better"; well that incentive is completely gone. Like I said many posts ago,I hope RH does not finalized this into a jewel until after the "slant parallelagram" moment has arrived. For the traditional RD, the SunTour invention that became the go to for just about everybody once the patent expired,
I thought that was the whole point of this hobby.
(I'm assuming that sarcasm was intended?)
Steve in Peoria
Likes For steelbikeguy:
#178
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2017
Location: Germany
Posts: 1,090
Bikes: 80s Alan Super Record, 79' Somec Special, 90s Rossin(?) Columbus Ego Triathlon, previously: Bianchi SBX Reparto Corse (stolen) and so on...
Mentioned: 16 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 391 Post(s)
Liked 812 Times
in
602 Posts
Clever but original? Isn't it the method Cinelli also "borrowed" from the fashion industry? And pretty much everybody else?
The "main product" for big momo for the lucky few is just to raise and keep interest towards the brand to make way for the ants to buy millions of the cheap(er, but not necessary cheap or bad) products.
Imagine any of the brand's fashion line if the'd discontinue the main product... who would care about the T-shirt / perfume / mobile case, license for Lego set you name it...
On the other side only a really few brands could/would say no to the huge amount of money from the affordable products.
The "main product" for big momo for the lucky few is just to raise and keep interest towards the brand to make way for the ants to buy millions of the cheap(er, but not necessary cheap or bad) products.
Imagine any of the brand's fashion line if the'd discontinue the main product... who would care about the T-shirt / perfume / mobile case, license for Lego set you name it...
On the other side only a really few brands could/would say no to the huge amount of money from the affordable products.
#179
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: NW Burbs, Chicago
Posts: 12,045
Mentioned: 201 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3009 Post(s)
Liked 3,785 Times
in
1,405 Posts
@steelbikeguy Why not expect more?
As a stand alone piece, I would disagree with you about the aesthetics of the derailleur. It is obvious to me that it is likely Mr. Heine employed an industrial designer who in my opinion created a pretty good updated design. If you will, like the updated versions of old-timey cars (Charger, Mustang, etc.). I would also opine that the CNC aesthetic was a willful choice to romance the production process in the design, a common tactic of industrial designers. While it may not fit your tastes, you cannot please 100% of the people. I would never own this nor Campagnolo Nuovo Record, but I prefer this. That isn't to say I would expect more from NR, I just find its gaudiness not to fit what I prefer.
Where I do agree with you and where Mr. Heine misses, is that this piece does not complement the Rene Herse crank. The brand language between them does not exist and is my biggest problem. But then I think, this is just some poor schmuck in Seattle and not a multi-billion dollar corporation who also misses with their brand language. Again, just speculating, that an automated CNC is the driver in this case. I can get a single stem (pretty complicated design), cut on a CNC for $125. I find that cheap. It is a single piece, not bulk, at a full retail price. Using this methods avoids the minimum of $250K needed in tooling costs to make something with this many parts of the derailleur. It is a way to hedge your investment in case sales are lower than forecast. That said, it is like the industrial designer did not even consider the crank in the design of the derailleur. I would hate to think that as it would be entirely unprofessional. But it certainly seems that way to my eye.
#180
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 20,305
Mentioned: 130 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3464 Post(s)
Liked 2,826 Times
in
1,994 Posts
@iab -
you made me recall the "Snow White" design language that frogdesign did for Apple decades ago. Good, then gone. Perhaps tied to the tech of the Apple llc and the Stylewiter too strongly.
Jan did not include probably in a design brief the other products he has or is working on.
Also quite possible it was an engineering focused design, no Industrial Designer consulted.
No family styling considered.
Too bad.
Stamp Paul on it and it visually works
you made me recall the "Snow White" design language that frogdesign did for Apple decades ago. Good, then gone. Perhaps tied to the tech of the Apple llc and the Stylewiter too strongly.
Jan did not include probably in a design brief the other products he has or is working on.
Also quite possible it was an engineering focused design, no Industrial Designer consulted.
No family styling considered.
Too bad.
Stamp Paul on it and it visually works
Likes For repechage:
#181
elcraft
I have been a Jewelery designer for more than 35 years; creating a piece to augment ( think a custom wedding band to go with a one off custom engagement ring) or accentuate an existing or heirloom piece has been the focus of much of my work. Understanding both the design aesthetic and the manufacturing process used is key to a successful design that works on an aesthetic level.
#182
Senior Member
Where I do agree with you and where Mr. Heine misses, is that this piece does not complement the Rene Herse crank. The brand language between them does not exist and is my biggest problem. But then I think, this is just some poor schmuck in Seattle and not a multi-billion dollar corporation who also misses with their brand language. Again, just speculating, that an automated CNC is the driver in this case. I can get a single stem (pretty complicated design), cut on a CNC for $125. I find that cheap. It is a single piece, not bulk, at a full retail price. Using this methods avoids the minimum of $250K needed in tooling costs to make something with this many parts of the derailleur. It is a way to hedge your investment in case sales are lower than forecast. That said, it is like the industrial designer did not even consider the crank in the design of the derailleur. I would hate to think that as it would be entirely unprofessional. But it certainly seems that way to my eye.
Last edited by daka; 12-18-22 at 11:45 AM.
#183
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: NW Burbs, Chicago
Posts: 12,045
Mentioned: 201 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3009 Post(s)
Liked 3,785 Times
in
1,405 Posts
Correct me if I am wrong, but aren't the current RH cranksets legacy-parts based on the original French Herse design? Perhaps even from the original dies? JH claims that they are "Net-shaped forged for ultimate strength" so they are not CNC and the difference in appearance is easily seen both in the shape of the parts as well as the difference between the anodized and polished finishes. As you state, a different design language, not cohesive between components
Now, you can be deliberate in not using your brand's language. But as a whole, that strategy does not work as well as having a common look and feel for your brand.
#184
www.theheadbadge.com
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Southern Florida
Posts: 28,506
Bikes: https://www.theheadbadge.com
Mentioned: 124 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2419 Post(s)
Liked 4,381 Times
in
2,090 Posts
Likes For cudak888:
#185
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 12,888
Bikes: (2) ti TiCycles, 2007 w/ triple and 2011 fixed, 1979 Peter Mooney, ~1983 Trek 420 now fixed and ~1973 Raleigh Carlton Competition gravel grinder
Mentioned: 129 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4788 Post(s)
Liked 3,909 Times
in
2,542 Posts
Yes, of course. But there is no reason why a new design can't incorporate the design language of a previous design. That is pretty much standard operating procedure in most industries. A 2023 Porsche 911 looks like a 911 like a 1973 911 looks like a 911. And the rest of Porsche's offerings look like it came from Porsche. You line up the cars and it looks like they are sisters/brothers/cousins/etc. Brand language. Whether it was in Mr. Heine's design brief or not, it should have been considered because the company is called Rene Herse Cycles.
Now, you can be deliberate in not using your brand's language. But as a whole, that strategy does not work as well as having a common look and feel for your brand.
Now, you can be deliberate in not using your brand's language. But as a whole, that strategy does not work as well as having a common look and feel for your brand.
Those of us here who need both this RD and the RH look are free to buy this RD, take it apart, reverse engineer the offending parts into satisfying RH looks and send out those plans to be C&C'd. Assemble and ride on in style.
#186
Full Member
Join Date: Aug 2019
Location: Arizona
Posts: 364
Bikes: Many!
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 186 Post(s)
Liked 206 Times
in
124 Posts
"Why would anybody create a new derailleur, when there are already many out there that work very well? The answer is simple: Because we want a different derailleur."
"I want my derailleur to operate with consistency throughout the gear range, for up- and downshifts alike. I want the shifts to happen instantaneously, so that I can let up slightly on the pedals to reduce the chain tension. Then I want to get back on the power immediately, before the bike loses any perceptible speed. All this should happen intuitively. My bike should feel like an extension of my body, not something that requires thought for something as simple as a gear shift."
I thought the beginning of the article was a bit funny. The author writes like they only ride eTap!
The price is not my cup of tea, but I don't think that makes anyone a grouch. Nor did I read anything in the thread that warranted a defense for the $1,000 derailleur. Cyclists will buy it...
"I want my derailleur to operate with consistency throughout the gear range, for up- and downshifts alike. I want the shifts to happen instantaneously, so that I can let up slightly on the pedals to reduce the chain tension. Then I want to get back on the power immediately, before the bike loses any perceptible speed. All this should happen intuitively. My bike should feel like an extension of my body, not something that requires thought for something as simple as a gear shift."
I thought the beginning of the article was a bit funny. The author writes like they only ride eTap!
The price is not my cup of tea, but I don't think that makes anyone a grouch. Nor did I read anything in the thread that warranted a defense for the $1,000 derailleur. Cyclists will buy it...
#187
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 20,305
Mentioned: 130 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3464 Post(s)
Liked 2,826 Times
in
1,994 Posts
Correct me if I am wrong, but aren't the current RH cranksets legacy-parts based on the original French Herse design? Perhaps even from the original dies? JH claims that they are "Net-shaped forged for ultimate strength" so they are not CNC and the difference in appearance is easily seen both in the shape of the parts as well as the difference between the anodized and polished finishes. As you state, a different design language, not cohesive between components
there is a complete change about the interconnection around the chainring bolts.
the current is a vast simplification. Too bad, CNC machining could be employed to recreate the original appearance. Make a difference? nah, only aesthetics and lower cost to mfg.
originals-
Last edited by repechage; 12-18-22 at 01:13 PM.
Likes For repechage:
#188
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 20,305
Mentioned: 130 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3464 Post(s)
Liked 2,826 Times
in
1,994 Posts
#189
www.theheadbadge.com
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Southern Florida
Posts: 28,506
Bikes: https://www.theheadbadge.com
Mentioned: 124 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2419 Post(s)
Liked 4,381 Times
in
2,090 Posts
#190
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: NW Burbs, Chicago
Posts: 12,045
Mentioned: 201 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3009 Post(s)
Liked 3,785 Times
in
1,405 Posts
All the analogies presented here, yours and ones above, are evolutions of products that are proven. This RD is new. There is no last year's model to refer to and tweak. The original many years ago might have nailed it Cyclone-like first try but no one alive knows if that was the case.
So the current Rene Herse crank is core, it is a next gen version of the original. At best, the Nivex is adjacent, it is just an RD. It is not a game changer to a company that makes bike parts.
Sure. That is a strategy. I would say reducing industrial design to "pretty up the end result" and depending on your engineering team has created many more market failures than a proper collaboration of the two.
Likes For iab:
#191
Senior Member
I wonder what the original Nivex derailleur cost.
#192
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: San Diego, California
Posts: 4,077
Bikes: Velo Orange Piolet
Mentioned: 28 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2228 Post(s)
Liked 2,011 Times
in
972 Posts
I must say I did spend $216 on a couple of Rene Herse tires and it seemed so excessive, but in hindsight I do not regret it. Having said that, I'm not going to buy a $1000 RD.
Likes For tyrion:
#193
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: PDX
Posts: 13,029
Bikes: Merz x 5 + Specialized Merz Allez x 2, Strawberry/Newlands/DiNucci/Ti x3, Gordon, Fuso/Moulton x2, Bornstein, Paisley,1958-74 Paramounts x3, 3rensho, 74 Moto TC, 73-78 Raleigh Pro's x5, Marinoni x2, 1960 Cinelli SC, 1980 Bianchi SC, PX-10 X 2
Mentioned: 267 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4507 Post(s)
Liked 6,373 Times
in
3,665 Posts
Sold out as of right now.
Likes For merziac:
Likes For Germany_chris:
#195
www.theheadbadge.com
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Southern Florida
Posts: 28,506
Bikes: https://www.theheadbadge.com
Mentioned: 124 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2419 Post(s)
Liked 4,381 Times
in
2,090 Posts
#196
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: PDX
Posts: 13,029
Bikes: Merz x 5 + Specialized Merz Allez x 2, Strawberry/Newlands/DiNucci/Ti x3, Gordon, Fuso/Moulton x2, Bornstein, Paisley,1958-74 Paramounts x3, 3rensho, 74 Moto TC, 73-78 Raleigh Pro's x5, Marinoni x2, 1960 Cinelli SC, 1980 Bianchi SC, PX-10 X 2
Mentioned: 267 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4507 Post(s)
Liked 6,373 Times
in
3,665 Posts
#197
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: San Jose (Willow Glen) Ca
Posts: 9,832
Bikes: Kirk Custom JK Special, '84 Team Miyata,(dura ace old school) 80?? SR Semi-Pro 600 Arabesque
Mentioned: 106 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2336 Post(s)
Liked 2,806 Times
in
1,533 Posts
the design thing is so interesting, even more so when you apply it to an entire bike build.
I am in the process of what will be super nice build in the end (don't want to call it ultimate or grail)
throughout the build and design process I am trying to envision my final look, with a mix of classic, modern and other features including flexibility and future needs (down to lug lining and cable color)
At one point I considered the rene herse cranksets, because of the ability to go super low in future
I decided against for a couple of reasons 1) I really don't love the rene herse crank (kinda like when I was looking at a VW awd station wagon,,,it met all the technical criteria, but I just did not love or even like the design) 2) overall it did not work with the other components (Shimano mechanical R8000)
consistent "design language" is real
i would love to have a modern 11/12 speed component group in silver/alloy, don't except that to happen so that will be for vintage builds only
I am in the process of what will be super nice build in the end (don't want to call it ultimate or grail)
throughout the build and design process I am trying to envision my final look, with a mix of classic, modern and other features including flexibility and future needs (down to lug lining and cable color)
At one point I considered the rene herse cranksets, because of the ability to go super low in future
I decided against for a couple of reasons 1) I really don't love the rene herse crank (kinda like when I was looking at a VW awd station wagon,,,it met all the technical criteria, but I just did not love or even like the design) 2) overall it did not work with the other components (Shimano mechanical R8000)
consistent "design language" is real
i would love to have a modern 11/12 speed component group in silver/alloy, don't except that to happen so that will be for vintage builds only
__________________
Life is too short not to ride the best bike you have, as much as you can
(looking for Torpado Super light frame/fork or for Raleigh International frame fork 58cm)
Life is too short not to ride the best bike you have, as much as you can
(looking for Torpado Super light frame/fork or for Raleigh International frame fork 58cm)
#198
ignominious poltroon
Join Date: Jan 2022
Posts: 3,995
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2221 Post(s)
Liked 3,405 Times
in
1,778 Posts
Jan compares this to the shifting on electronic drivetrains, which by implication he also appreciates, fwiw.
SRAM 12 speed mechanical eagle derailleurs, on the other hand, ...
#199
www.theheadbadge.com
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Southern Florida
Posts: 28,506
Bikes: https://www.theheadbadge.com
Mentioned: 124 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2419 Post(s)
Liked 4,381 Times
in
2,090 Posts
Very true, and it doesn't even necessarily mean using the same component group or manufacturer. Case in point:
With exception to the Record seatpost, Nuovo Gran Sport headset, and hubs, nothing on this entire build shares the same component manufacturer. Yet, it all just works.
I can see the David Nivex complementing a TA Pro 5 crankset and rings under the right circumstances, but even then, it'd probably need to be polished to complement it.
-Kurt
With exception to the Record seatpost, Nuovo Gran Sport headset, and hubs, nothing on this entire build shares the same component manufacturer. Yet, it all just works.
I can see the David Nivex complementing a TA Pro 5 crankset and rings under the right circumstances, but even then, it'd probably need to be polished to complement it.
-Kurt
Likes For cudak888:
#200
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 17,143
Mentioned: 481 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3803 Post(s)
Liked 6,632 Times
in
2,599 Posts
Well, here's an even more expensive shifting system--and one that's much more interesting to me:
https://www.cyclingweekly.com/review...st-ride-review
https://www.cyclingweekly.com/review...st-ride-review