Help me choose plz! Caad 5 SI vs Trek 2200 ZR
#1
Newbie
Thread Starter
Help me choose plz! Caad 5 SI vs Trek 2200 ZR
Hello all!
I’m looking to add a road rig to my fleet. I have a drop bar gravel bike with big 650b tires that fulfills my adventuring needs but is a bit much when I’m just trying to put in some road miles for exercise.
i live in Portland or and am currently between these 2 bikes. Im 5 10 and I’m looking for a 56cm.
https://offerup.co/2u616xrrYvb
https://offerup.co/UEium9YoYvb
im leaning towards the trek with its carbon fork, seat stays, and seat post. It’s also newer so Al is probs lighter and group set a bit more modern.
the cannondale is imo a “cooler” bike though and has more appeal aesthetically but is a bit outdated. Albeit both r but the cannondale more so. The trek also has nicer wheels…
Was wondering if anyone could give me a hand helping me choose
again only looking for a light and quick bike that will work well without much upkeep for doing purely road rides. No racing in mind
I’m looking to add a road rig to my fleet. I have a drop bar gravel bike with big 650b tires that fulfills my adventuring needs but is a bit much when I’m just trying to put in some road miles for exercise.
i live in Portland or and am currently between these 2 bikes. Im 5 10 and I’m looking for a 56cm.
https://offerup.co/2u616xrrYvb
https://offerup.co/UEium9YoYvb
im leaning towards the trek with its carbon fork, seat stays, and seat post. It’s also newer so Al is probs lighter and group set a bit more modern.
the cannondale is imo a “cooler” bike though and has more appeal aesthetically but is a bit outdated. Albeit both r but the cannondale more so. The trek also has nicer wheels…
Was wondering if anyone could give me a hand helping me choose

again only looking for a light and quick bike that will work well without much upkeep for doing purely road rides. No racing in mind
Last edited by Tyler26; 12-22-22 at 03:43 PM.
#2
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: South of the Twin Cities, MN
Posts: 5,422
Mentioned: 27 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1041 Post(s)
Liked 1,602 Times
in
1,024 Posts
pic assist
The Trek is $450 and the C-dale is $500
The Trek is $450 and the C-dale is $500


#3
Phyllo-buster
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Nova Scotia
Posts: 8,546
Bikes: roadsters, club bikes, fixed and classic
Mentioned: 127 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2200 Post(s)
Liked 1,769 Times
in
1,092 Posts
Likes For clubman:
#4
Newbie
Thread Starter
#5
Phyllo-buster
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Nova Scotia
Posts: 8,546
Bikes: roadsters, club bikes, fixed and classic
Mentioned: 127 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2200 Post(s)
Liked 1,769 Times
in
1,092 Posts
No biggie but you are on the C&V sub-forum so mine is a pretty common response. Both bikes are cheap so really, it's a matter of picking the red bike you like best.
I'm currently down to 218 lbs so you know strength wins over weight imo. Just don't wait too long to commit.
I'm currently down to 218 lbs so you know strength wins over weight imo. Just don't wait too long to commit.
Likes For clubman:
#6
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Beaverton, OR
Posts: 14,261
Bikes: Yes
Mentioned: 491 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2907 Post(s)
Liked 2,776 Times
in
1,119 Posts
Have you talked to either seller? The ads are a bit old.
Both bikes are pretty modern by the standards of this forum. It's hard to tell from the pictures, but I think the shifters on both are from the same generation of Shimano components. The Trek has Ultegra, I think, which is a step up from the 105 on the C-dale, but I don't think there's much difference between them.
I'd choose the Cannondale because of the triple crankset, but you being a lighter rider might choose the Trek for the same reason. They both look pretty nice.
Both bikes are pretty modern by the standards of this forum. It's hard to tell from the pictures, but I think the shifters on both are from the same generation of Shimano components. The Trek has Ultegra, I think, which is a step up from the 105 on the C-dale, but I don't think there's much difference between them.
I'd choose the Cannondale because of the triple crankset, but you being a lighter rider might choose the Trek for the same reason. They both look pretty nice.
__________________
My Bikes
My Bikes
#7
www.theheadbadge.com
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Southern Florida
Posts: 27,885
Bikes: https://www.theheadbadge.com
Mentioned: 102 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2083 Post(s)
Liked 3,252 Times
in
1,652 Posts
What you really want is the cheaper Trek. It's a soulless, dead-reliable appliance which will serve your needs.
Wrong forum to get the answer you want!
-Kurt
#8
Senior Member
I have a 2000 CAD3 C’dale. The Slice fork is carbon on mine, probably carbon on the CAD5. I have 105 on mine and, though it is not as cool as Ultegra and not a chick magnet, it’s bullet proof, which very much counts for me. I also greatly like my triple. Very nice when I need it and, for me, the “weight penalty “ is irrelevant. Get the Cannondale.
#9
Captain Dorkdisk
Join Date: Oct 2022
Location: The CV of California
Posts: 757
Bikes: More than I need, less than I want.
Mentioned: 8 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 286 Post(s)
Liked 439 Times
in
230 Posts
Hello all!
I’m looking to add a road rig to my fleet. I have a drop bar gravel bike with big 650b tires that fulfills my adventuring needs but is a bit much when I’m just trying to put in some road miles for exercise.
i live in Portland or and am currently between these 2 bikes. Im 5 10 and I’m looking for a 56cm.
I’m looking to add a road rig to my fleet. I have a drop bar gravel bike with big 650b tires that fulfills my adventuring needs but is a bit much when I’m just trying to put in some road miles for exercise.
i live in Portland or and am currently between these 2 bikes. Im 5 10 and I’m looking for a 56cm.
The CD is more upright and busy. I also like the stem angle and the whole setup on the CD
There's something about the seatstay/chainstay that says quick to me.
#10
Phyllo-buster
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Nova Scotia
Posts: 8,546
Bikes: roadsters, club bikes, fixed and classic
Mentioned: 127 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2200 Post(s)
Liked 1,769 Times
in
1,092 Posts
As much as he was a bit of a putz, I loved seeing Cipollini win sprints on his red C-dale.
#12
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2015
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 3,948
Bikes: 82 Medici, 2011 Richard Sachs, 2011 Milwaukee Road
Mentioned: 46 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1574 Post(s)
Liked 1,257 Times
in
750 Posts
Keep looking. 500 bucks will get you a really nice bike.
__________________
I don't do: disks, tubeless, e-shifting, or bead head nymphs.
I don't do: disks, tubeless, e-shifting, or bead head nymphs.
#13
Steel is real
Join Date: Mar 2013
Posts: 814
Bikes: 1992Giant Tourer,1992MeridaAlbon,1996Scapin,1997KonaKilaueua,1993Peugeot Prestige,1991RaleighTeamZ(to be upgraded),1998 Jamis Dragon(to be built),1992CTWallis(to be built),1998VettaTeam(to be built),1995Coppi(to be built),1993Grandis(to be built)
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 185 Post(s)
Liked 316 Times
in
197 Posts
Cannondale because of welds finish and Alcoa Alcalyte frame. I am not fan of the carbon seat stays on the Trek
#14
Bianchi Goddess
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Shady Pines Retirement Fort Wayne, In
Posts: 29,231
Bikes: Too many to list here check my signature.
Mentioned: 174 Post(s)
Tagged: 2 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2720 Post(s)
Liked 2,188 Times
in
1,219 Posts
I wouldn’t touch either with a 39.5 foot pole.

__________________
“One morning you wake up, the girl is gone, the bikes are gone, all that's left behind is a pair of old tires and a tube of tubular glue, all squeezed out"
Sugar "Kane" Kowalczyk
“One morning you wake up, the girl is gone, the bikes are gone, all that's left behind is a pair of old tires and a tube of tubular glue, all squeezed out"
Sugar "Kane" Kowalczyk
Likes For Bianchigirll:
#15
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2015
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 3,948
Bikes: 82 Medici, 2011 Richard Sachs, 2011 Milwaukee Road
Mentioned: 46 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1574 Post(s)
Liked 1,257 Times
in
750 Posts
__________________
I don't do: disks, tubeless, e-shifting, or bead head nymphs.
I don't do: disks, tubeless, e-shifting, or bead head nymphs.
#16
Newbie
Thread Starter
#17
Phyllo-buster
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Nova Scotia
Posts: 8,546
Bikes: roadsters, club bikes, fixed and classic
Mentioned: 127 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2200 Post(s)
Liked 1,769 Times
in
1,092 Posts
Yes don't delay. Again, C&V forum attitude prevails. I have a 97 in True Temper and it's a fave ride. And it's Campy 8's.
Last edited by clubman; 12-23-22 at 03:00 PM.
#18
Newbie
Join Date: Aug 2019
Location: Copenhagen
Posts: 65
Bikes: 1991 Centurion Oxygen, 1997 Centurion Invincible, 1995+- Fondriest Wind, 1982 Grand Master Nissan Pro 2000, 1992 Olmo Racing (The racing part of the name HAS to be a joke).
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 28 Post(s)
Liked 24 Times
in
15 Posts
That is an easy one. Lance Armstrong rode Trek, so the Trek is totally unacceptable (An older pre-Armstrong steel Trek would be a different matter). I also hate anything carbon, So for me it would definitively be the Cannondale.
#19
Newbie
Thread Starter
Appreciate all the help y’all! It’s funny, I shouod have forsean all of you voting for the Cdale