Tubs vs. Cinchers- ride/suppleness
#26
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Maryland, USA
Posts: 2,110
Bikes: Drysdale/Gitane/Zeus/Masi/Falcon/Palo Alto/Raleigh/Legnano
Mentioned: 31 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 808 Post(s)
Liked 437 Times
in
296 Posts
Wow -- how long did that take? 
Looks like I'll be riding tubulars on one bike; just bought wheels which fortunately came with tires. Digesting Totally Tubular looks daunting.

Looks like I'll be riding tubulars on one bike; just bought wheels which fortunately came with tires. Digesting Totally Tubular looks daunting.
__________________
Larry:1958 Drysdale, 1961 Gitane Gran Sport, 1974 Zeus track, 1988 Masi Gran Corsa, 1974 Falcon, 1980 Palo Alto, 1973 Raleigh Gran Sport, 1974 Legnano. Susan: 1976 Windsor Profesional.
Larry:1958 Drysdale, 1961 Gitane Gran Sport, 1974 Zeus track, 1988 Masi Gran Corsa, 1974 Falcon, 1980 Palo Alto, 1973 Raleigh Gran Sport, 1974 Legnano. Susan: 1976 Windsor Profesional.
#27
Standard Member
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Brunswick, Maine
Posts: 3,640
Bikes: 1948 P. Barnard & Son, 1962 Rudge Sports, 1963 Freddie Grubb Routier, 1980 Manufrance Hirondelle, 1983 F. Moser Sprint, 1989 Raleigh Technium Pre, 2001 Raleigh M80
Mentioned: 23 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1061 Post(s)
Liked 469 Times
in
257 Posts
Subjective, of course, but this is what I was looking for!
I'm starting to see a set of tubular wheels in my future... The original reason for inquiring is I've got an old Holdsworth Professional I'm building up now. I can just squeeze 700x35c tires into it, but it's pretty close. In my recent experience, with all the wonderful 'gifts' of aging (& crappy roads) I feel like 35c is about the narrowest I can be comfortable on, at least with clinchers. The Holdsworth will be my 'go-fast(ish)-on-the-slightly-less-crappy-local-roads-on-nice-days' bike, so if I could get a really nice ride on tubulars (& even lose a little weight, too), why not give 'em a try?
I'm starting to see a set of tubular wheels in my future... The original reason for inquiring is I've got an old Holdsworth Professional I'm building up now. I can just squeeze 700x35c tires into it, but it's pretty close. In my recent experience, with all the wonderful 'gifts' of aging (& crappy roads) I feel like 35c is about the narrowest I can be comfortable on, at least with clinchers. The Holdsworth will be my 'go-fast(ish)-on-the-slightly-less-crappy-local-roads-on-nice-days' bike, so if I could get a really nice ride on tubulars (& even lose a little weight, too), why not give 'em a try?
#28
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2015
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 4,075
Bikes: 82 Medici, 2011 Richard Sachs, 2011 Milwaukee Road
Mentioned: 48 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1627 Post(s)
Liked 1,376 Times
in
813 Posts
My 22mm Continental Sprinters on Nemesis rims built with 32 DT Comps 3x on 7900 hubs ride nicer than my 23mm GP4000s on Open Pros and 32 DT Comps 3x on 7700 hubs at the same pressures. Nicer still are Continental Competition$ on GL330 rims. My only experience with wide tires are with nice CX tubulars which rode nicer than whatever CX clinchers I trained on.
BUT—Good Tubulars on nice wheels are so light, and so cool, and so perfect on a vintage race bike in vintage race bike configuration, that if one has such a bike, one needs such a wheel set.
(Tape goes with tubeless, electronic shifting, disc brakes, carbon, and bead head nymphs.)
BUT—Good Tubulars on nice wheels are so light, and so cool, and so perfect on a vintage race bike in vintage race bike configuration, that if one has such a bike, one needs such a wheel set.
(Tape goes with tubeless, electronic shifting, disc brakes, carbon, and bead head nymphs.)
__________________
I don't do: disks, tubeless, e-shifting, or bead head nymphs.
I don't do: disks, tubeless, e-shifting, or bead head nymphs.
#30
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: NW Burbs, Chicago
Posts: 11,734
Mentioned: 192 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2759 Post(s)
Liked 2,897 Times
in
1,153 Posts
Just ignore all the tests that show they are slower because I say so.
You have no idea about tubeless.
Glueing tubulars is not a time wasting PITA?
How do you repair your tubular on the side of the road, with a sewing kit?
Who is behind this big bike conspiracy against the superior tubular tire?
You have no idea about tubeless.
Glueing tubulars is not a time wasting PITA?
How do you repair your tubular on the side of the road, with a sewing kit?
Who is behind this big bike conspiracy against the superior tubular tire?
First, tubular tape. Literally takes seconds.
Second, for small punctures, sealant. Literally takes seconds.
Third, for complete blowouts, you carry a spare. Swapping literally takes seconds.
Fourth, for repairing that blowout, Tire Alert. Shipping literally takes seconds.
Ever try to put on tight clinchers? Ever try to repair tight clinchers on the road? Ever changed a clincher flat and have it go flat in literally seconds after repair because you didn't find the tiny shard from the original flat still stuck in the clincher? Ever get a snakebite flat?
The only, and I mean only, downside to tubulars, is cost. Not cheap by any means. So if you do want the full experience for great tubulars, which you really need to be better than modern clinchers, you have to commit to emptying your wallet. Is that worth it? ymmv.
Likes For iab:
#31
Full Member
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Durango, CO
Posts: 470
Bikes: too many old steel bikes
Mentioned: 73 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 132 Post(s)
Liked 836 Times
in
162 Posts
This is exactly the myth non-tubular owners perpetuate.
First, tubular tape. Literally takes seconds.
Second, for small punctures, sealant. Literally takes seconds.
Third, for complete blowouts, you carry a spare. Swapping literally takes seconds.
Fourth, for repairing that blowout, Tire Alert. Shipping literally takes seconds.
Ever try to put on tight clinchers? Ever try to repair tight clinchers on the road? Ever changed a clincher flat and have it go flat in literally seconds after repair because you didn't find the tiny shard from the original flat still stuck in the clincher? Ever get a snakebite flat?
The only, and I mean only, downside to tubulars, is cost. Not cheap by any means. So if you do want the full experience for great tubulars, which you really need to be better than modern clinchers, you have to commit to emptying your wallet. Is that worth it? ymmv.
First, tubular tape. Literally takes seconds.
Second, for small punctures, sealant. Literally takes seconds.
Third, for complete blowouts, you carry a spare. Swapping literally takes seconds.
Fourth, for repairing that blowout, Tire Alert. Shipping literally takes seconds.
Ever try to put on tight clinchers? Ever try to repair tight clinchers on the road? Ever changed a clincher flat and have it go flat in literally seconds after repair because you didn't find the tiny shard from the original flat still stuck in the clincher? Ever get a snakebite flat?
The only, and I mean only, downside to tubulars, is cost. Not cheap by any means. So if you do want the full experience for great tubulars, which you really need to be better than modern clinchers, you have to commit to emptying your wallet. Is that worth it? ymmv.
Likes For Andy Antipas:
#32
Cat 6
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Mountain Brook, AL
Posts: 7,496
Mentioned: 27 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 494 Post(s)
Liked 163 Times
in
109 Posts
To give you an idea, when I started riding tubulars again I pumped up a set of Vitt Corsa CX's to 145# and went on one of our ~30mi group rides. I was truly amazed how well they rode even on normal just OK pavement.
Now that doesn't mean I keep 'em there. But I think that pressure would be teeth-rattling and not fun with clinchers.
.
Now that doesn't mean I keep 'em there. But I think that pressure would be teeth-rattling and not fun with clinchers.
.
__________________
72 Frejus (for sale), Holdsworth Record (for sale) & special CNC / 74 Italvega NR (for sale) / c80 ?French? / 82 Raleigh Intl MkII (for sale)/ 83 Trek 620 (for sale)/ 84 Bruce Gordon Chinook (for sale)/ 85 Ron Cooper / 87 Centurion IM MV (for sale) / 03 Casati Dardo / 08 BF IRO / 09 Dogma FPX / 10 Vassago Fisticuff
72 Frejus (for sale), Holdsworth Record (for sale) & special CNC / 74 Italvega NR (for sale) / c80 ?French? / 82 Raleigh Intl MkII (for sale)/ 83 Trek 620 (for sale)/ 84 Bruce Gordon Chinook (for sale)/ 85 Ron Cooper / 87 Centurion IM MV (for sale) / 03 Casati Dardo / 08 BF IRO / 09 Dogma FPX / 10 Vassago Fisticuff
#33
Full Member
And to add to iab 's excellent points, if you shop around you can get the excellent Veloflex Roubaix's or Vlaanderens for less that top end clinchers. I just bought 2 Veloflex Roubaix's (25mm) for $50 each shipped. Top end clinchers are generally quite a bit more expensive than that. Most of us C&Vers are pretty good bargain hunters. If you haven't tried tubulars you owe it to yourself to try them.

Likes For daka:
#34
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: NW Burbs, Chicago
Posts: 11,734
Mentioned: 192 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2759 Post(s)
Liked 2,897 Times
in
1,153 Posts

But yes, you can find some bargains like Andy pointed out. There has been a guy at the Madison swap selling 25mm FMB PRs for $20 each. But if you want something else (I prefer the 30mm), getting lucky is rare and again, they ain't cheap.
#35
Full Member
I had enough fun on those crap Yellow Jersey tires that I have gathered parts to build a tubular wheelset for my Raleigh International. When I build those wheels, I will make sure to ante-up for better tires as recommended in this thread.
#37
It's MY mountain
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Mt.Diablo
Posts: 9,836
Bikes: Klein, Merckx, Trek
Mentioned: 70 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3946 Post(s)
Liked 2,449 Times
in
1,333 Posts
I don't think the improved ride quality or reduced pinch flat frequency is reason enough for anyone to decide to try tubulars - you have to have another reason... like you got a bike you like that came with tubular wheels, or someone gave you a free pair or tubular wheels, or you really like learning old-timey skills.

Likes For DiabloScott:
#38
Junior Member
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: PNW - Skagit Valley
Posts: 131
Bikes: 1970 Schwinn Suburban, 1973 Raleigh Sports, 1978 De Rosa
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4 Post(s)
Liked 92 Times
in
19 Posts
I ride both. Tubulars are worth the expense - skip the Starbucks and give them a try. 
How many times have you heard a statement to the effect of “…these tubulars ride as well as clinchers.”?
*edited to add that I weigh 200 lbs, and have prefer running tubulars at about 6 bar*

How many times have you heard a statement to the effect of “…these tubulars ride as well as clinchers.”?
*edited to add that I weigh 200 lbs, and have prefer running tubulars at about 6 bar*
Last edited by tremolo1965; 01-14-23 at 12:44 PM.
#39
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2015
Posts: 4,152
Mentioned: 101 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1491 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 627 Times
in
415 Posts
People who are still skeptical on tubs should just try them before they knock em......And do it with at least decent quality tubs and not Rallies and Giros.......Once you get to feel the fast, magic carpet ride good tubs gives its rider, you might never look back.......
#40
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 1,171
Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 842 Post(s)
Liked 919 Times
in
457 Posts
Sorry you can’t use the term “fast, magic carpet ride” that was taken by the titanium advocates years ago. Given the demographics that participate in these forums most of us started the sport riding tubulars and remember very well the PIA they are, and the drastic improvement in modern clincher tire technology. Whether it is a top end supple clincher with latex tubes or tubeless there is no perceptible difference in ride quality and a huge improvement in ease of use. There is a reason outside of a very small group of C&V riders no one uses them and there is no resurgence in users. Take wool clothing or steel frames both are dated technologies yet have a strong and active following of both young and old riders the same can’t be said regarding tubulars.
Likes For Atlas Shrugged:
#41
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2021
Posts: 1,489
Bikes: '38 Schwinn New World, ’69 Peugeot PX-10, '72 Peugeot PX-10, ‘7? Valgan, ’79 Holdsworth Pro, ’80 Peugeot TH-8 tandem, '87 Trek 400T, ‘7? Raleigh Sports, ‘7? Raleigh Superbe, ‘6? Hercules
Mentioned: 13 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 612 Post(s)
Liked 1,175 Times
in
581 Posts
There've been a couple comments along the line of try good clinchers first- I've got 38c RH, 35c RH, 42c Soma EX Randos and 42c GB Hetres on my various bikes, so I've got a fair idea of what good clinchers feel like. I don't have a ton of miles on the Somas yet, but comfort/feel-wise I'd rate them at the top, followed by the RH Barlows, then the Hetres and finally the RH Bon Jons. If I could achieve the comfort level of the Somas or the Barlows with, say, 30c tubs (& save some weight & learn another old-timey skill too!) I'd love it. But as suggested, I think I'll just keep my eye out for a bargain on a set of tubular wheels to try. I still need to paint/get the frame painted/powedercoated and source mechs for this build, so I'm definitely already approaching the budget limit!
#42
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: SW Ohio
Posts: 3,506
Bikes: Puch Marco Polo, Saint Tropez, Masi Gran Criterium
Mentioned: 24 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1055 Post(s)
Liked 387 Times
in
272 Posts
There've been a couple comments along the line of try good clinchers first- I've got 38c RH, 35c RH, 42c Soma EX Randos and 42c GB Hetres on my various bikes, so I've got a fair idea of what good clinchers feel like. I don't have a ton of miles on the Somas yet, but comfort/feel-wise I'd rate them at the top, followed by the RH Barlows, then the Hetres and finally the RH Bon Jons. If I could achieve the comfort level of the Somas or the Barlows with, say, 30c tubs (& save some weight & learn another old-timey skill too!) I'd love it. But as suggested, I think I'll just keep my eye out for a bargain on a set of tubular wheels to try. I still need to paint/get the frame painted/powedercoated and source mechs for this build, so I'm definitely already approaching the budget limit!
Call me nuts but my stable of road bikes is about to be expanded to cover latex tubed clinchers, tubeless clinchers and now for this year I should have at least one tubular tired bike on the road.
A few remarks about running 30mm tubulars. That is getting into cyclocross size territory. For wider tubulars like that you might want to consider building up some hubs of your choice with a wider tubular rim. the only one I know of is the Velocity Major Tom. Some eBay sellers still have these, I saw some today advertised for ~$68 each, a pretty good deal. These were the 28 hole. I have a nice set of custom Major Toms in a 28 front, 32 rear.with some lightweight hubs coulld build a very light wheelset! I have a brand new set of these rims built up with Chris King R45 28f/28r eleven speed hubs that I was going to try out on a used (California) Masi Gran Criterium that I am about finished with . The rear will be clad with a 30 mm Schwalbe tubular in the rear. My front does not have the clearance for a 30 so it will get a Tufo 25 mm in the front.
No one has mentioned a lack of machined sidewalls with their vintage tubular wheels but I will put this out there that if I am sticking with rim brakes, I would prefer machined sidewalls for their improved braking performance. Also, I bought my Schwalbe 30mm tubular tires from Bike24.com in Germany for a ridiculous blow out price of like $18 each. I'm at work now and I don't recall the model number of that Schwalbe tire but it might be one of those that has the popular "basketball" tread profile. These are more of what you might consider "commuter" grade tubulars since they weigh in at a more hefty weight of about 375 grams per tire. I intend to glue these on with regular tubular tire glue painted onto both the base tape and the rim base using the "Belgian method" that I have seen documented on some YouTube videos.
Last edited by masi61; 01-14-23 at 05:36 PM.
#43
Senior Member
This is exactly the myth non-tubular owners perpetuate.
First, tubular tape. Literally takes seconds.
Second, for small punctures, sealant. Literally takes seconds.
Third, for complete blowouts, you carry a spare. Swapping literally takes seconds.
Fourth, for repairing that blowout, Tire Alert. Shipping literally takes seconds.
Ever try to put on tight clinchers? Ever try to repair tight clinchers on the road? Ever changed a clincher flat and have it go flat in literally seconds after repair because you didn't find the tiny shard from the original flat still stuck in the clincher? Ever get a snakebite flat?
The only, and I mean only, downside to tubulars, is cost. Not cheap by any means. So if you do want the full experience for great tubulars, which you really need to be better than modern clinchers, you have to commit to emptying your wallet. Is that worth it? ymmv.
First, tubular tape. Literally takes seconds.
Second, for small punctures, sealant. Literally takes seconds.
Third, for complete blowouts, you carry a spare. Swapping literally takes seconds.
Fourth, for repairing that blowout, Tire Alert. Shipping literally takes seconds.
Ever try to put on tight clinchers? Ever try to repair tight clinchers on the road? Ever changed a clincher flat and have it go flat in literally seconds after repair because you didn't find the tiny shard from the original flat still stuck in the clincher? Ever get a snakebite flat?
The only, and I mean only, downside to tubulars, is cost. Not cheap by any means. So if you do want the full experience for great tubulars, which you really need to be better than modern clinchers, you have to commit to emptying your wallet. Is that worth it? ymmv.
Tubular tape is not needed on a clincher but maybe rim tape is a close equivalent, so not much difference there.
Sealant works as well on clinchers as it does in tubulars. It either seals, or you need to patch.
Blow outs - I've had both blow out due to the terrible roads I was on which broke the cords. If you want to protect against a blow out, you have to carry a spare - same for both; doable for both, as modern clinchers are foldable.
Shipping to "Tire Alert" does not take "seconds". Packaging has to be done and you have to go to the UPS Store. It is nowhere close to free (~$40/tire), and makes that tire inaccessible for quite a while. I think the approach of repairing them yourself is more closely analogous to the clincher repair. Tubulars are easily and well repaired at home (while watching TV or whatever).
Yes, I just mounted a set of very tight clinchers. There is a technique to it but they are very doable. Is this a hand strength issue, similar to how some cannot get enough braking power? <-- honest question, here.
Tubulars are demonstrably lighter, overall. They do have a different feel when riding (I suspect some of this is the latex tubes). Latex tubes are available for clinchers, too. If you don't mind pumping before every single ride, try latex clincher tubes, first. You'll be doing that with your tubulars, as well.
I did not find anything above that was a major discriminator.
For me, that minor weight difference and the feel of latex tubes are not worth the hassle of tubular tires, especially if you are on poor road surfaces.
Last edited by Bad Lag; 01-14-23 at 01:57 PM.
Likes For Bad Lag:
#44
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: SW Ohio
Posts: 3,506
Bikes: Puch Marco Polo, Saint Tropez, Masi Gran Criterium
Mentioned: 24 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1055 Post(s)
Liked 387 Times
in
272 Posts
Sorry you can’t use the term “fast, magic carpet ride” that was taken by the titanium advocates years ago. Given the demographics that participate in these forums most of us started the sport riding tubulars and remember very well the PIA they are, and the drastic improvement in modern clincher tire technology. Whether it is a top end supple clincher with latex tubes or tubeless there is no perceptible difference in ride quality and a huge improvement in ease of use. There is a reason outside of a very small group of C&V riders no one uses them and there is no resurgence in users. Take wool clothing or steel frames both are dated technologies yet have a strong and active following of both young and old riders the same can’t be said regarding tubulars.
#45
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: NW Burbs, Chicago
Posts: 11,734
Mentioned: 192 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2759 Post(s)
Liked 2,897 Times
in
1,153 Posts
Let's have a rational discussion where we look at differences and try to find discriminators between the two.
Tubular tape is not needed on a clincher but maybe rim tape is a close equivalent, so not much difference there.
Sealant works as well on clinchers as it does in tubulars. It either seals, or you need to patch.
Blow outs - I've had both blow out due to the terrible roads I was on which broke the cords. If you want to protect against a blow out, you have to carry a spare - same for both; doable for both, as modern clinchers are foldable.
Shipping to "Tire Alert" does not take "seconds". Packaging has to be done and you have to go to the UPS Store. It is nowhere close to free (~$40/tire), and makes that tire inaccessible for quite a while. I think the approach of repairing them yourself is more closely analogous to the clincher repair. Tubulars are easily and well repaired at home (while watching TV or whatever).
Yes, I just mounted a set of very tight clinchers. There is a technique to it but they are very doable. Is this a hand strength issue, similar to how some cannot get enough braking power? <-- honest question, here.
Tubulars are demonstrably lighter, overall. They do have a different feel when riding (I suspect some of this is the latex tubes). Latex tubes are available for clinchers, too. If you don't mind pumping before every single ride, try latex clincher tubes, first. You'll be doing that with your tubulars, as well.
I did not find anything above that was a major discriminator.
For me, that minor weight difference and the feel of latex tubes are not worth the hassle of tubular tires, especially if you are on poor road surfaces.
Tubular tape is not needed on a clincher but maybe rim tape is a close equivalent, so not much difference there.
Sealant works as well on clinchers as it does in tubulars. It either seals, or you need to patch.
Blow outs - I've had both blow out due to the terrible roads I was on which broke the cords. If you want to protect against a blow out, you have to carry a spare - same for both; doable for both, as modern clinchers are foldable.
Shipping to "Tire Alert" does not take "seconds". Packaging has to be done and you have to go to the UPS Store. It is nowhere close to free (~$40/tire), and makes that tire inaccessible for quite a while. I think the approach of repairing them yourself is more closely analogous to the clincher repair. Tubulars are easily and well repaired at home (while watching TV or whatever).
Yes, I just mounted a set of very tight clinchers. There is a technique to it but they are very doable. Is this a hand strength issue, similar to how some cannot get enough braking power? <-- honest question, here.
Tubulars are demonstrably lighter, overall. They do have a different feel when riding (I suspect some of this is the latex tubes). Latex tubes are available for clinchers, too. If you don't mind pumping before every single ride, try latex clincher tubes, first. You'll be doing that with your tubulars, as well.
I did not find anything above that was a major discriminator.
For me, that minor weight difference and the feel of latex tubes are not worth the hassle of tubular tires, especially if you are on poor road surfaces.
I throw a tubular in a box, trust me, it is not fragile, print a label and put it in my mailbox where it is collected. What country do you live in where that doesn't take seconds? Are you still using something other than a computer?
Also, there is no way possible you can change a tight clincher on the road faster than I can change a tubular. How many people actually carry a spare clincher, or need to? Spare tube, sure, I do that. And how you conflate stopping power with broken tire irons is beyond me.
One more thing, raise your hand if your tire iron punctured your tube. Never gonna happen with tubulars.
There is no doubt tubulars of equivalent size can be run a lower pressure which makes for a more comfortable ride.
Likes For iab:
#46
Senior Member
(post deleted by author)
Last edited by Bad Lag; 01-14-23 at 04:53 PM.
#47
It's MY mountain
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Mt.Diablo
Posts: 9,836
Bikes: Klein, Merckx, Trek
Mentioned: 70 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3946 Post(s)
Liked 2,449 Times
in
1,333 Posts
When foldable clinchers first came out - there were a lot of posers who wanted that "folded tubular under the saddle" look. Never fooled no one; ridicule was dispensed.
These days not so much, but people who ride with a spare clincher are usually on really long tours (backups of everything) or they know their mounted tire is about shot but can't bring themselves to throw it away until it's ruined.
These days not so much, but people who ride with a spare clincher are usually on really long tours (backups of everything) or they know their mounted tire is about shot but can't bring themselves to throw it away until it's ruined.
#48
Full Member
Join Date: Dec 2021
Location: Massachusetts
Posts: 256
Bikes: 1980 Dawes Super Galaxy + 1981 Lotus Classique + 1986 Bianchi Sport SX + 2005 Van Dessel Project WR + 2021 Zizzo Liberté
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 120 Post(s)
Liked 320 Times
in
151 Posts
TBH I only ever passed through on Route 1, and then only outside of the summer craziness; we used to have a second home down in Stonington. Quite possibly I'm misremembering. Our preferred route was via Augusta and Belfast. All I know is some of the worst roads I ever drove were in Maine but that would have been the peninsula roads, come to think of it. Route 15 was once listed as literally the worst road in Maine. Some of the drivers weren't much better...
Back to regularly scheduled bike content.
Back to regularly scheduled bike content.
Likes For EVlove:
#49
Full Member
Join Date: Dec 2021
Location: Massachusetts
Posts: 256
Bikes: 1980 Dawes Super Galaxy + 1981 Lotus Classique + 1986 Bianchi Sport SX + 2005 Van Dessel Project WR + 2021 Zizzo Liberté
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 120 Post(s)
Liked 320 Times
in
151 Posts
I wasn't aware of this service, thanks for mentioning it. I'm just getting back into tubulars and while my first pair of Sprinter Gatorskins was a $35 bargain (pricing error on Amazon, snatched it first and went looking for wheels later), I probably won't be that lucky again.
#50
Standard Member
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Brunswick, Maine
Posts: 3,640
Bikes: 1948 P. Barnard & Son, 1962 Rudge Sports, 1963 Freddie Grubb Routier, 1980 Manufrance Hirondelle, 1983 F. Moser Sprint, 1989 Raleigh Technium Pre, 2001 Raleigh M80
Mentioned: 23 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1061 Post(s)
Liked 469 Times
in
257 Posts
Got my first tubulars in the mail today. 320tpi, skinwall and $55.00 apiece.
Recommended pressure 90-180? That was a surprise.
Recommended pressure 90-180? That was a surprise.

Likes For 1989Pre: