Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Classic & Vintage
Reload this Page >

Miyata 210 frame same as 610? And what to expect.

Notices
Classic & Vintage This forum is to discuss the many aspects of classic and vintage bicycles, including musclebikes, lightweights, middleweights, hi-wheelers, bone-shakers, safety bikes and much more.

Miyata 210 frame same as 610? And what to expect.

Old 01-19-23, 12:08 PM
  #1  
polymorphself 
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Oct 2017
Posts: 1,783
Mentioned: 23 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 727 Post(s)
Liked 865 Times in 428 Posts
Miyata 210 frame same as 610? And what to expect.

I'm picking up a single owner, apparent garage queen 1986 210 today as my next project. It won't need much but I'll be swapping a few things and kitting it out for a touring partner to make use of.

Was the 210 frame of this era the same as the 610? My assumption is the materials and geometry are the same, just that the 210 is lacking the extra bottle cage mount.

I see "sport tourer" thrown around a lot for these frames as the chain stays are a bit shorter than typical tourers of the time, but they are still long. Does anybody have an idea of what one could expect with the ride quality when loaded? Front load handling?

Thanks!
polymorphself is offline  
Old 01-19-23, 12:44 PM
  #2  
icemilkcoffee 
Senior Member
 
icemilkcoffee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 1,682
Mentioned: 9 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 990 Post(s)
Liked 901 Times in 536 Posts
FWIW, the catalog does say that the 610 uses 700c wheels while the 210 uses 27"
But enough minutiae! Let's see the bike!
icemilkcoffee is offline  
Likes For icemilkcoffee:
Old 01-19-23, 12:50 PM
  #3  
polymorphself 
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Oct 2017
Posts: 1,783
Mentioned: 23 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 727 Post(s)
Liked 865 Times in 428 Posts
Originally Posted by icemilkcoffee View Post
FWIW, the catalog does say that the 610 uses 700c wheels while the 210 uses 27"
But enough minutiae! Let's see the bike!
Not in my hands yet but should be by this evening! Good call on the wheel differences, I've got a nice set of 700s I'll probably drop in, seems the brakes should reach. Also likely means the two frames are different geometry and perhaps the 610 and the 1000 are the ones that are the same (minus the forks).

Last edited by polymorphself; 01-19-23 at 02:19 PM.
polymorphself is offline  
Old 01-19-23, 03:12 PM
  #4  
USAZorro
Seor Member
 
USAZorro's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Hardy, VA
Posts: 17,379

Bikes: Mostly English - predominantly Raleighs

Mentioned: 64 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1243 Post(s)
Liked 627 Times in 402 Posts
I had one for a summer or two - I think it was an '84. I never loaded it for touring, but between water bottles, front and rear rack and bags. had to have added 20 or so lbs to it. It handled pretty much the same with those things or without. It was very stable. This meant it was not nimble. I've since gotten an '81 1000 for my wife. THAT handles more responsively when empty than the 210 did. Haven't loaded the 1000 up to give a report on it.
__________________
In search of what to search for.
USAZorro is offline  
Likes For USAZorro:
Old 01-19-23, 04:45 PM
  #5  
scarlson 
Senior Member
 
scarlson's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Medford MA
Posts: 1,960

Bikes: Ron Cooper touring, 1959 Jack Taylor 650b ladyback touring tandem, Vitus 979, Joe Bell painted Claud Butler Dalesman, Colin Laing curved tube tandem, heavily-Dilberted 1982 Trek 6xx, Ren Herse tandem

Mentioned: 71 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 910 Post(s)
Liked 1,251 Times in 651 Posts
The 210 got cantilever brakes later than the others, I believe. Also, the 210 may have never gotten mid-blade fork eyelets for low-rider front racks. These features, which are in my mind essential, trickled down the Miyata product line from the 1000 to the 610 to the 210, sometime in the '80s IIRC.

I don't know about tubing, but I would welcome any knowledge!

I also think the Miyata tourers are pretty much the same as (and I believe were made in the same factory as) the Univega tourers (e.g. Specialissima, Gran Turismo). The Univegas are usually sold at a lower price point because fewer people know what they've got.
__________________
Owner & co-founder, Cycles Ren Hubris. Unfortunately attaching questionable braze-ons to perfectly good frames since about 2015. With style.
scarlson is online now  
Old 01-19-23, 06:04 PM
  #6  
polymorphself 
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Oct 2017
Posts: 1,783
Mentioned: 23 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 727 Post(s)
Liked 865 Times in 428 Posts
Originally Posted by scarlson View Post
The 210 got cantilever brakes later than the others, I believe. Also, the 210 may have never gotten mid-blade fork eyelets for low-rider front racks. These features, which are in my mind essential, trickled down the Miyata product line from the 1000 to the 610 to the 210, sometime in the '80s IIRC.

I don't know about tubing, but I would welcome any knowledge!

I also think the Miyata tourers are pretty much the same as (and I believe were made in the same factory as) the Univega tourers (e.g. Specialissima, Gran Turismo). The Univegas are usually sold at a lower price point because fewer people know what they've got.
Its true the 210 never received mid fork mounts, although the 610 also didn't have them until the end of the 80s, and then lost them again in the early 90s, so not much difference there. And correct, this model has cantis, I believe the 210s received them around 1984, and certainly by 1985. So no difference there either. A campeur-type rack should do find if front panniers are needed, though I'm still curious about front loading experiences.
polymorphself is offline  
Old 01-19-23, 08:36 PM
  #7  
John Nolan 
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Ottawa, Canada
Posts: 718

Bikes: Raleigh Classic 15, 84; Miyata 912, 85; Miyata Ridge Runner SE, 85; Miyata 610, 86; Miyata 100M, 86; Miyata Valley Runner, 88; Miyata Triple Cross, 89; GT Karakoram, 90; Miyata Elevation 300, 91; Marinoni Touring, 95; Long Haul Trucker, 2013

Mentioned: 9 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 144 Post(s)
Liked 92 Times in 55 Posts
Seems the 210 had Dia-compe 960 brakes, Not sure, but they may not work too well when converting to 700c.

Last edited by John Nolan; 01-20-23 at 04:23 AM.
John Nolan is offline  
Old 01-19-23, 11:33 PM
  #8  
C9H13N 
Full Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: North Seattle
Posts: 348

Bikes: Davidson 81

Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 101 Post(s)
Liked 185 Times in 96 Posts
Originally Posted by polymorphself View Post
Its true the 210 never received mid fork mounts, although the 610 also didn't have them until the end of the 80s, and then lost them again in the early 90s, so not much difference there. And correct, this model has cantis, I believe the 210s received them around 1984, and certainly by 1985. So no difference there either. A campeur-type rack should do find if front panniers are needed, though I'm still curious about front loading experiences.
I have an 89 618 GT and it lacks mid fork braze ons. It also has single eyelets and no threaded adjusters on the rear dropouts.

Miyata must have really been feeling the heat on the yen price by then and going cheap on seemingly minor details to compensate.
C9H13N is offline  
Likes For C9H13N:
Old 01-19-23, 11:50 PM
  #9  
SurferRosa
seor miembro
 
SurferRosa's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2018
Location: Pac NW
Posts: 6,714

Bikes: Old school lightweights

Mentioned: 77 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2826 Post(s)
Liked 4,053 Times in 2,150 Posts
Originally Posted by polymorphself View Post
Was the 210 frame of this era the same as the 610?
Based on the '86 catalog, I think the 610 has the nicer rear triangle.
SurferRosa is offline  
Likes For SurferRosa:
Old 01-20-23, 08:26 AM
  #10  
polymorphself 
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Oct 2017
Posts: 1,783
Mentioned: 23 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 727 Post(s)
Liked 865 Times in 428 Posts
Originally Posted by C9H13N View Post
I have an 89 618 GT and it lacks mid fork braze ons. It also has single eyelets and no threaded adjusters on the rear dropouts.

Miyata must have really been feeling the heat on the yen price by then and going cheap on seemingly minor details to compensate.
The single eyelets is especially surprising there.
polymorphself is offline  
Old 01-20-23, 06:04 PM
  #11  
billew
meandering nomad
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Newport,Rhode Island
Posts: 431

Bikes: eleven bikes no car

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 9 Post(s)
Liked 7 Times in 6 Posts
I guess I am the only owner of a 210 here, in fact I have two of them. The frame isn't the same as a 610, the 1000 and 610 share the splined quad butted tubing with the main difference being the gruppo used and maybe a bottle cage. The 210 has a triple butted frame the fork doesn't have mid level braze ons and would need canti rack. I run my 210 with a hanging handlebar bag and use the rear rack and large saddle bag. I don't ride the bike loaded for tour but around 40lb. load with one mid-size pannier. I use it for gravel/dirt rail trail/ two track and road and it handles dodging cobbles and branches with quickness but it is stable ride and I can century on it and feel ok the next day. As the french say "it carries a tired rider well". I run the bike stock with the original wheels and I have Kenda K 161 27"x1" 3/8" tires and fenders, I love all the Miyata touring bikes I have a mint 615 GT and restored two 1000s you can't beat them.
billew is offline  
Likes For billew:
Old 01-20-23, 06:14 PM
  #12  
dddd
Ride, Wrench, Swap, Race
 
dddd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Northern California
Posts: 8,640

Bikes: Cheltenham-Pedersen racer, Boulder F/S Paris-Roubaix, Varsity racer, '52 Christophe, '62 Continental, '92 Merckx, '75 Limongi, '76 Presto, '72 Gitane SC, '71 Schwinn SS, etc.

Mentioned: 126 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1317 Post(s)
Liked 880 Times in 616 Posts
I recall the 210 and 1000 having slacker (72 versus 73 degrees) frame angles than the steeper Six-Ten. I have both 210 and 610 in the same ~58cm frame size and can feel the difference, both using 10cm stems and 27" wheels.
The 210 feels smaller because the top tube and head tube are moved rearward by .9cm relative to the BB (due to the shallower ST angle).
dddd is offline  
Likes For dddd:
Old 01-20-23, 06:38 PM
  #13  
r0ckh0und 
Senior Member
 
r0ckh0und's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Plano, IL.
Posts: 1,561
Mentioned: 7 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 116 Post(s)
Liked 117 Times in 73 Posts
I bought a stripped down 610 a couple years ago from a member here, not sure of the year. It has 3 bottle cage mounts and mid fork mounts and is built for 27" wheels. This past year I was fortunate enough to find a 210 mixte complete. I intend to transfer everything to the 610 . The colors are similar and the decals and frame tubing are exactly the same. Based on the clamp on DT shifters that were left on the 610, the component package was also the same.
__________________
They say I'm lazy but it takes all my time.
r0ckh0und is offline  
Likes For r0ckh0und:
Old 01-20-23, 10:05 PM
  #14  
polymorphself 
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Oct 2017
Posts: 1,783
Mentioned: 23 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 727 Post(s)
Liked 865 Times in 428 Posts
Thanks for the input everyone, any additional commentary is welcome. Im very excited to dig into this. Its in great shape but will get the typical overhaul, clean/polish, burgundy newbaums, black b17 and either a canti rack or campeur type rack up front.

Its really strange how glancing at this bicycle one simultaneously notices both the budget choices and the high quality here. I cant think of another bike that is so very much both.

Some quick pics as found:










Last edited by polymorphself; 01-20-23 at 11:52 PM.
polymorphself is offline  
Likes For polymorphself:
Old 01-21-23, 08:43 AM
  #15  
Wharf Rat
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Location: South Jersey
Posts: 148

Bikes: Miyata 610, Miyata 710, Cannondale SM500

Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 53 Post(s)
Liked 32 Times in 28 Posts
Wow. That is shockingly clean. Great find. I had an 83 610 that I loved, I only sold it because I found an 82 710 that I converted to 650b that I loved more. For me, these 80’s Miyatas are just about perfect. Yours looks like a real winner.
Wharf Rat is offline  
Old 01-23-23, 12:12 PM
  #16  
polymorphself 
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Oct 2017
Posts: 1,783
Mentioned: 23 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 727 Post(s)
Liked 865 Times in 428 Posts
Seat post clamp crack or just paint? How do we feel about this?


polymorphself is offline  
Old 01-23-23, 12:22 PM
  #17  
icemilkcoffee 
Senior Member
 
icemilkcoffee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 1,682
Mentioned: 9 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 990 Post(s)
Liked 901 Times in 536 Posts
Originally Posted by polymorphself View Post
Seat post clamp crack or just paint? How do we feel about this?


That looks like a real crack to me. But you can scrape off the peeling paint and check to make sure
icemilkcoffee is offline  
Old 01-23-23, 12:38 PM
  #18  
polymorphself 
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Oct 2017
Posts: 1,783
Mentioned: 23 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 727 Post(s)
Liked 865 Times in 428 Posts
Originally Posted by icemilkcoffee View Post
That looks like a real crack to me. But you can scrape off the peeling paint and check to make sure
Will do that shortly. If it turns out to be a crack, what are we talking about structurally here? I assume the fear would be it spreading to the actual seat tube? Or a potential for the seat post to randomly drop if the clamp gives out?

I do have a relationship with a local frame-builder. Worst case I imagine this would be a quick job for him.
polymorphself is offline  
Old 01-23-23, 01:05 PM
  #19  
sd5782 
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2019
Location: Toledo Ohio
Posts: 1,138

Bikes: 1964 Frejus,1972 Fuji Newest, 1973 Schwinn Super Sport, 1983 Trek 700, 1985 Ironman, 1985 Torpado, 1983 Peugeot UO14, 1989 Miyata 1000LT and others

Mentioned: 18 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 418 Post(s)
Liked 453 Times in 255 Posts
My bet is crack in the paint from tightening over the years. I worked on a 210 mixte for a niece once and was impressed how nice it was made. Nice bike you have there.
sd5782 is offline  
Likes For sd5782:
Old 01-23-23, 01:14 PM
  #20  
Pompiere
Senior Member
 
Pompiere's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: NW Ohio
Posts: 3,056

Bikes: 1984 Miyata 310, 1986 Schwinn Sierra, 2011 Jamis Quest, 1980 Peugeot TH8 Tandem, 1992 Performance Parabola, 1987 Ross Mt. Hood, 1988 Schwinn LeTour, 1988 Trek 400T, 1981 Fuji S12-S LTD

Mentioned: 20 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 380 Post(s)
Liked 434 Times in 266 Posts
Originally Posted by polymorphself View Post
I have a pair of those shift levers, new old stock. I bought them on clearance from Nashbar many years ago. I should to put them on a bike, but I just haven't found the right one yet.
Pompiere is offline  
Likes For Pompiere:
Old 01-23-23, 01:46 PM
  #21  
polymorphself 
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Oct 2017
Posts: 1,783
Mentioned: 23 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 727 Post(s)
Liked 865 Times in 428 Posts
Originally Posted by sd5782 View Post
My bet is crack in the paint from tightening over the years. I worked on a 210 mixte for a niece once and was impressed how nice it was made. Nice bike you have there.
Here's hoping! And yep, as we always say all over these forums, Miyatas punched above their weight, especially from 1984-1989!
polymorphself is offline  
Old 01-23-23, 01:53 PM
  #22  
polymorphself 
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Oct 2017
Posts: 1,783
Mentioned: 23 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 727 Post(s)
Liked 865 Times in 428 Posts
Originally Posted by Pompiere View Post
I have a pair of those shift levers, new old stock. I bought them on clearance from Nashbar many years ago. I should to put them on a bike, but I just haven't found the right one yet.
I like them, they are also on my 86 Voyageur, though not clamp on.
polymorphself is offline  
Old 01-23-23, 02:24 PM
  #23  
dddd
Ride, Wrench, Swap, Race
 
dddd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Northern California
Posts: 8,640

Bikes: Cheltenham-Pedersen racer, Boulder F/S Paris-Roubaix, Varsity racer, '52 Christophe, '62 Continental, '92 Merckx, '75 Limongi, '76 Presto, '72 Gitane SC, '71 Schwinn SS, etc.

Mentioned: 126 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1317 Post(s)
Liked 880 Times in 616 Posts
Almost certainly not a crack, though I would check that the ear isn't bent in far enough to create any sharp seatpost scraper feature on the inside of the tube.

For tilted-inward lug ears, I insert the post about 1" in and then lean rearward to restore the opening and to perhaps(?) bring the ears back to where there is better parallelism at the bolt heads.

Pretty normal to see on steel frames, I would not start scraping paint, it will come off in big flakes making a cosmetic blemish on your nice frame.
dddd is offline  
Likes For dddd:
Old 01-23-23, 03:36 PM
  #24  
sd5782 
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2019
Location: Toledo Ohio
Posts: 1,138

Bikes: 1964 Frejus,1972 Fuji Newest, 1973 Schwinn Super Sport, 1983 Trek 700, 1985 Ironman, 1985 Torpado, 1983 Peugeot UO14, 1989 Miyata 1000LT and others

Mentioned: 18 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 418 Post(s)
Liked 453 Times in 255 Posts
Are those Shimano ratcheting shifters? I have several Suntour ones but have never tried the Shimano. Wasn’t there also a nicely equipped Miyata 215GT in the eighties? It seems like I saw one posted, or saw in the catalogs and was impressed with it also.
sd5782 is offline  
Old 01-23-23, 04:13 PM
  #25  
polymorphself 
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Oct 2017
Posts: 1,783
Mentioned: 23 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 727 Post(s)
Liked 865 Times in 428 Posts
Originally Posted by dddd View Post
Almost certainly not a crack, though I would check that the ear isn't bent in far enough to create any sharp seatpost scraper feature on the inside of the tube.

For tilted-inward lug ears, I insert the post about 1" in and then lean rearward to restore the opening and to perhaps(?) bring the ears back to where there is better parallelism at the bolt heads.

Pretty normal to see on steel frames, I would not start scraping paint, it will come off in big flakes making a cosmetic blemish on your nice frame.
Thank you. They aren't bent in at all actually. No signs of any over adjustment aside from the two marks/lines in the photos.
polymorphself is offline  

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service - Do Not Sell or Share My Personal Information -

Copyright © 2023 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.