Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Classic & Vintage
Reload this Page >

Roller Cam bottom mount rear brake?

Notices
Classic & Vintage This forum is to discuss the many aspects of classic and vintage bicycles, including musclebikes, lightweights, middleweights, hi-wheelers, bone-shakers, safety bikes and much more.

Roller Cam bottom mount rear brake?

Old 02-02-23, 01:39 PM
  #26  
John E
feros ferio
 
John E's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: www.ci.encinitas.ca.us
Posts: 21,299

Bikes: 1959 Capo Modell Campagnolo; 1960 Capo Sieger (2); 1962 Carlton Franco Suisse; 1970 Peugeot UO-8; 1982 Bianchi Campione d'Italia; 1988 Schwinn Project KOM-10;

Mentioned: 41 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1251 Post(s)
Liked 925 Times in 620 Posts
Originally Posted by ClydeClydeson View Post
I don't recall ever seeing chainstay mounted roller cam brakes - this (terrible) position was exclusively used with U brakes IIRC. The distance between the bottom bracket, under which the cable was routed, and the brake would generaly be too short for roller cams. I know this because the distance was damn near too short for U brakes, which are shorter than roller cams. In fact, if I correctly recall the under-BB-brake bikes I worked on BITD, unless U brakes are set up with an extremely short straddle cable, the cable yoke was always at risk of bottoming out against the cable guide. Roller cam brake arms are longer than U brake arms, and the 'cam' took up a lot more space than the yoke did on U brakes.
Thank you -- as a RollerCam and U-brake owner, I concur 100% with your observations. As much as I like my fork-mounted RollerCam, I would not consider putting one under the chainstays.
__________________
"Far and away the best prize that life offers is the chance to work hard at work worth doing." --Theodore Roosevelt
Capo: 1959 Modell Campagnolo, S/N 40324; 1960 Sieger (2), S/N 42624, 42597
Carlton: 1962 Franco Suisse, S/N K7911
Peugeot: 1970 UO-8, S/N 0010468
Bianchi: 1982 Campione d'Italia, S/N 1.M9914
Schwinn: 1988 Project KOM-10, S/N F804069
John E is offline  
Old 02-02-23, 01:53 PM
  #27  
bulgie 
blahblahblah chrome moly
 
bulgie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Seattle
Posts: 1,301
Mentioned: 62 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 770 Post(s)
Liked 1,520 Times in 672 Posts
Originally Posted by ClydeClydeson View Post
I don't recall ever seeing chainstay mounted roller cam brakes - this (terrible) position was exclusively used with U brakes IIRC. The distance between the bottom bracket, under which the cable was routed, and the brake would generaly be too short for roller cams. I know this because the distance was damn near too short for U brakes, which are shorter than roller cams. In fact, if I correctly recall the under-BB-brake bikes I worked on BITD, unless U brakes are set up with an extremely short straddle cable, the cable yoke was always at risk of bottoming out against the cable guide. Roller cam brake arms are longer than U brake arms, and the 'cam' took up a lot more space than the yoke did on U brakes.
The first-ever rollercams were exclusively under-chainstay mounted. Made by Charlie Cunningham for his uber-custom aluminum MTBs. Then sold as WTB brand and anyone could use them, but many people still put them under the BB. Then WTB licensed it to Suntour, and even Suntours were put under the BB quite a bit as I recall, though I can't tell you any brand/model that for sure came that way.

Remember, early mass-produced MTBs had long chainstays.

Mark B
bulgie is offline  
Likes For bulgie:
Old 02-02-23, 02:22 PM
  #28  
bulgie 
blahblahblah chrome moly
 
bulgie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Seattle
Posts: 1,301
Mentioned: 62 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 770 Post(s)
Liked 1,520 Times in 672 Posts

Above is a frame made at UBI, by one of the instructors.

This one (link) is on the Flickr belonging to Black Mountain Cycles. It's a WTB brake, on a Steve Potts frame. BTW, don't shorten Black Mountain to "BMC", there's already a bike company by that name. With multiple Tour De France victories, so it's not like they're unknown!

Here's a great view of the WTB brake on another Potts, on Bike Radar. Go to image #6


This one above is on an Ibis. Poor focus but you can tell it's a WTB brake.

Finally I'll leave you with this Fisher with a Suntour rollercam under the chainstays, on Wombat. (Go to image #2)

Five examples should be enough to prove it's "a thing".

Mark B
bulgie is offline  
Likes For bulgie:
Old 02-02-23, 04:04 PM
  #29  
merziac
Senior Member
 
merziac's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: PDX
Posts: 12,025

Bikes: Merz x 5 + Specialized Merz Allez x 2, Strawberry/Newlands/DiNucci/Ti x3, Gordon, Fuso/Moulton x2, Bornstein, Paisley,1958-74 Paramounts x3, 3rensho, 74 Moto TC, 73-78 Raleigh Pro's x5, Marinoni x2, 1960 Cinelli SC, 1980 Bianchi SC, PX-10 X 2

Mentioned: 240 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3766 Post(s)
Liked 4,411 Times in 2,636 Posts
Originally Posted by ClydeClydeson View Post
I don't recall ever seeing chainstay mounted roller cam brakes - this (terrible) position was exclusively used with U brakes IIRC. The distance between the bottom bracket, under which the cable was routed, and the brake would generaly be too short for roller cams. I know this because the distance was damn near too short for U brakes, which are shorter than roller cams. In fact, if I correctly recall the under-BB-brake bikes I worked on BITD, unless U brakes are set up with an extremely short straddle cable, the cable yoke was always at risk of bottoming out against the cable guide. Roller cam brake arms are longer than U brake arms, and the 'cam' took up a lot more space than the yoke did on U brakes.
As Mark states, chainstay roller cams precede U brakes and were the only thing for them when they first appeared, U brakes were the supposed "fix" for the perceived roller cam shortcomings but roller cams were the foundation of posts on the bottom.
merziac is online now  
Likes For merziac:
Old 02-02-23, 04:15 PM
  #30  
Trakhak
Senior Member
 
Trakhak's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Baltimore, MD
Posts: 3,830
Mentioned: 11 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1536 Post(s)
Liked 1,563 Times in 912 Posts
Originally Posted by RustyJames View Post
Very Mark Twain-esque line. Good one…
I thought George Bernard Shaw came up with that when he wrote it in a letter to a friend. But, from a search:


In his Lettres Provinciales, the French philosopher and mathematician Blaise Pascal famously wrote: I would have written a shorter letter, but I did not have the time.
Trakhak is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off


Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service - Do Not Sell or Share My Personal Information -

Copyright © 2023 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.