Steel touring decision: '88 Panasonic DX-3000 or '85 Fuji Del Rey
#1
Newbie
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2023
Posts: 6
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 7 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times
in
2 Posts
Steel touring decision: '88 Panasonic DX-3000 or '85 Fuji Del Rey
Hi all, first time poster here.
I've been in the market for a used vintage steel bike that I could use for as a heavy-duty commuter and touring bike. After diving into quite the rabbit hole these last few weeks, I've given myself the deadline of this weekend to pick a bike. My criteria are: steel frame (hopefully indestructible) for more comfortable, longer rides; eyelets and mounting points for front and rear racks; and sufficient fork clearance for thicker, more comfortable tires (though the vast majority of my riding will be road riding). I've narrowed it down to two: a 1988 Panasonic DX-3000 and a 1985(?) Fuji Del Rey.
My question is: which would be better for longer road touring rides? I recognize that these aren't traditional touring bikes and weren't back in the day, either, but I really love the looks of them. I haven't done bike touring before, but I'd like to load one of these up with racks and gear and get on some long rides now that the weather is getting nicer. Is there something I'm not considering that might make one bike deficient compared to the other or otherwise unsuitable for touring? From what I can tell, they both have eyelets that I can use for racks. Any red flags that I should know about before I pull the trigger on one? The site isn't allowing me to post photos, but imagine that both are in equivalently good-to-fair condition.
I've been in the market for a used vintage steel bike that I could use for as a heavy-duty commuter and touring bike. After diving into quite the rabbit hole these last few weeks, I've given myself the deadline of this weekend to pick a bike. My criteria are: steel frame (hopefully indestructible) for more comfortable, longer rides; eyelets and mounting points for front and rear racks; and sufficient fork clearance for thicker, more comfortable tires (though the vast majority of my riding will be road riding). I've narrowed it down to two: a 1988 Panasonic DX-3000 and a 1985(?) Fuji Del Rey.
My question is: which would be better for longer road touring rides? I recognize that these aren't traditional touring bikes and weren't back in the day, either, but I really love the looks of them. I haven't done bike touring before, but I'd like to load one of these up with racks and gear and get on some long rides now that the weather is getting nicer. Is there something I'm not considering that might make one bike deficient compared to the other or otherwise unsuitable for touring? From what I can tell, they both have eyelets that I can use for racks. Any red flags that I should know about before I pull the trigger on one? The site isn't allowing me to post photos, but imagine that both are in equivalently good-to-fair condition.
#2
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2017
Posts: 1,841
Mentioned: 24 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 747 Post(s)
Liked 928 Times
in
446 Posts
I haven't done bike touring before, but I'd like to load one of these up with racks and gear and get on some long rides now that the weather is getting nicer. Is there something I'm not considering that might make one bike deficient compared to the other or otherwise unsuitable for touring?
- Relaxed geometry/long wheelbase, this provides a more stable ride while loaded. Without this you will have poor handling, especially on descents and ascents. Speed wobble/shimmy is a concern.
- Eyelets for both front and rear racks as well as fenders. This typically means two eyelets in both front and back. Fenders are of course not a requirement, but they really can come in hand in conditions that call for them and you'll be glad for them.
- A triple chainring for lower gearing options, especially helpful for climbs when loaded. There are other setups that can achieve close to similar, but I'm talking about the baseline for vintage touring bikes.
- More than one water bottle mount, often three.
- At least 36 spokes on both wheels, often 40 in the rear.
- Cantilver breaks for increased stopping power when loaded.
I'd have to look at the Del Rey again to be sure, but off the top of my head I'm pretty sure neither of these bikes meet any of the above criteria. Some will say you can tour on any bike, and that is of course true, but you seem to be looking for an honest answer on how those bikes compare to an actual touring bike. I think frame geo/wheelbase and gearing are most key here.
That being said, vintage touring bikes are quite easy to find, either on this very forum in the Classic & Vintage sales section or on CL and Offerup. If you let us know your location somebody may know of something available. It's also worth looking through this thread to get an idea of models and features: Show us your vintage touring bikes.
Some popular options are trek 520/620/720, Schwinn Voyageur, Miyata 210/610/1000, Centurion Pro Tour, Panasonic PT-3500, Fuji Touring Series, Nishiki Cresta. The list goes on. ~1984-1988 are the years I'd look at for any/all vintage touring bike models (unless I wanted something very specific from earlier years for my own niche reasons).
Last edited by polymorphself; 03-31-23 at 01:37 PM.
Likes For polymorphself:
#3
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2015
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 4,078
Bikes: 82 Medici, 2011 Richard Sachs, 2011 Milwaukee Road
Mentioned: 48 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1629 Post(s)
Liked 1,377 Times
in
813 Posts
If they are both complete and unmolested and available now, I’d go with the 88 Panasonic for the 105 SIS group. It’s got some brazeons for two bottles and racks and if you like the touring/camping thing, get a Tourer later.
__________________
I don't do: disks, tubeless, e-shifting, or bead head nymphs.
I don't do: disks, tubeless, e-shifting, or bead head nymphs.
#4
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Pacific Northwest
Posts: 1,950
Bikes: ‘87 Marinoni SLX Sports Tourer, ‘79 Miyata 912 by Gugificazione
Mentioned: 162 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 488 Post(s)
Liked 394 Times
in
233 Posts
Hi all, first time poster here.
I've been in the market for a used vintage steel bike that I could use for as a heavy-duty commuter and touring bike. After diving into quite the rabbit hole these last few weeks, I've given myself the deadline of this weekend to pick a bike. My criteria are: steel frame (hopefully indestructible) for more comfortable, longer rides; eyelets and mounting points for front and rear racks; and sufficient fork clearance for thicker, more comfortable tires (though the vast majority of my riding will be road riding). I've narrowed it down to two: a 1988 Panasonic DX-3000 and a 1985(?) Fuji Del Rey.
My question is: which would be better for longer road touring rides? I recognize that these aren't traditional touring bikes and weren't back in the day, either, but I really love the looks of them. I haven't done bike touring before, but I'd like to load one of these up with racks and gear and get on some long rides now that the weather is getting nicer. Is there something I'm not considering that might make one bike deficient compared to the other or otherwise unsuitable for touring? From what I can tell, they both have eyelets that I can use for racks. Any red flags that I should know about before I pull the trigger on one? The site isn't allowing me to post photos, but imagine that both are in equivalently good-to-fair condition.
I've been in the market for a used vintage steel bike that I could use for as a heavy-duty commuter and touring bike. After diving into quite the rabbit hole these last few weeks, I've given myself the deadline of this weekend to pick a bike. My criteria are: steel frame (hopefully indestructible) for more comfortable, longer rides; eyelets and mounting points for front and rear racks; and sufficient fork clearance for thicker, more comfortable tires (though the vast majority of my riding will be road riding). I've narrowed it down to two: a 1988 Panasonic DX-3000 and a 1985(?) Fuji Del Rey.
My question is: which would be better for longer road touring rides? I recognize that these aren't traditional touring bikes and weren't back in the day, either, but I really love the looks of them. I haven't done bike touring before, but I'd like to load one of these up with racks and gear and get on some long rides now that the weather is getting nicer. Is there something I'm not considering that might make one bike deficient compared to the other or otherwise unsuitable for touring? From what I can tell, they both have eyelets that I can use for racks. Any red flags that I should know about before I pull the trigger on one? The site isn't allowing me to post photos, but imagine that both are in equivalently good-to-fair condition.
@polymorphself has identified a number of seriously good candidates to also consider.
If you are quite sure that you’ll do fully loaded touring, I.e., with camping equipment, etc., as opposed to lighter “credit card” touring that doesn’t require carrying all the camping stuff? Your candidates fall into the latter category. Worth saying is that many around here on C&V find that those additional suggested models are also wonderful everyday bikes, especially with good wheels and fat (not “thick”) supple tires that are now available. For myself, I wouldn’t worry about 36/40 spoke wheels unless I was heavy myself with a huge touring load front and back. Well-built 32-spoke wheels should be plenty sufficient.
Likes For Dfrost:
#6
Edumacator
Join Date: Jan 2018
Location: Goose Creek, SC
Posts: 6,045
Bikes: '87 Crestdale, '87 Basso Gap, '92 Rossin Performance EL-OS, 1990 VanTuyl, 1980s Losa, 1985 Trek 670, 1982 AD SLE, 1987 PX10, etc...
Mentioned: 46 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1942 Post(s)
Liked 2,169 Times
in
1,434 Posts
Echoing the above...and a twist. A good few rules of thumb are
(1) two eyelets in the rear and/or front
(2) clearance that you imagine a fender or bigger tire fitting between the rear tire and seat tube
(3) Cantilever brakes
(1) two eyelets in the rear and/or front
(2) clearance that you imagine a fender or bigger tire fitting between the rear tire and seat tube
(3) Cantilever brakes

Last edited by jdawginsc; 03-31-23 at 03:07 PM.
Likes For jdawginsc:
#7
Steel is real
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Not far from Paris
Posts: 1,247
Bikes: 1992Giant Tourer,1992MeridaAlbon,1996Scapin,1997KonaKilaueua,1993Peugeot Prestige,1991RaleighTeamZ(to be upgraded),1998 Jamis Dragon(to be built),1992CTWallis(to be built),1998VettaTeam(to be built),1995Coppi(to be built),1993Grandis(to be built)
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 347 Post(s)
Liked 482 Times
in
307 Posts
88Panasonic DX3000 would be my choice
#8
Newbie
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2023
Posts: 6
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 7 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times
in
2 Posts
Thanks, all for the replies! I’ve done some considerable searching in CL and FB marketplace for most of those bikes that were mentioned by name in this thread but haven’t found any in my size. The DX3000 and the Del Rey are in my size — they correspond to specific bike postings that are available near me.
I’m leaning towards the DX3000 - as noted above it’s got two eyelets on the rear that, with a nice rack and bags, I think will be sufficient for my caliber of touring, at least for the time being. Plus the 88 model has a super slick 80s look with purple and blue highlights.
I think I’ll do a final sweep of the online marketplaces for those more established touring bike models before I pull the trigger
I’m leaning towards the DX3000 - as noted above it’s got two eyelets on the rear that, with a nice rack and bags, I think will be sufficient for my caliber of touring, at least for the time being. Plus the 88 model has a super slick 80s look with purple and blue highlights.
I think I’ll do a final sweep of the online marketplaces for those more established touring bike models before I pull the trigger
Likes For oship:
#9
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2015
Location: Richmond, Virginia
Posts: 8,773
Bikes: Waterford Paramount Touring, Giant CFM-2, Raleigh Sports 3-speeds in M23 & L23, Schwinn Cimarron oddball build, Marin Palisades Trail dropbar conversion, Nishiki Cresta GT
Mentioned: 65 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2556 Post(s)
Liked 2,078 Times
in
1,352 Posts
Welcome! Either of those bikes is better than what I toured on the first time, a steel-framed (NoCroMo dontcha know) with cottered crank, steel wheels and a 40-52/14-28 freewheel. I crossed the Alps with that gearing but would never attempt it now. People have toured on less-nice bikes than either one of yours for generations. Make sure the bike's in good mechanical shape, be careful out there and have a blast.
Likes For thumpism:
#10
Edumacator
Join Date: Jan 2018
Location: Goose Creek, SC
Posts: 6,045
Bikes: '87 Crestdale, '87 Basso Gap, '92 Rossin Performance EL-OS, 1990 VanTuyl, 1980s Losa, 1985 Trek 670, 1982 AD SLE, 1987 PX10, etc...
Mentioned: 46 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1942 Post(s)
Liked 2,169 Times
in
1,434 Posts
Thanks, all for the replies! I’ve done some considerable searching in CL and FB marketplace for most of those bikes that were mentioned by name in this thread but haven’t found any in my size. The DX3000 and the Del Rey are in my size — they correspond to specific bike postings that are available near me.
I’m leaning towards the DX3000 - as noted above it’s got two eyelets on the rear that, with a nice rack and bags, I think will be sufficient for my caliber of touring, at least for the time being. Plus the 88 model has a super slick 80s look with purple and blue highlights.
I think I’ll do a final sweep of the online marketplaces for those more established touring bike models before I pull the trigger
I’m leaning towards the DX3000 - as noted above it’s got two eyelets on the rear that, with a nice rack and bags, I think will be sufficient for my caliber of touring, at least for the time being. Plus the 88 model has a super slick 80s look with purple and blue highlights.
I think I’ll do a final sweep of the online marketplaces for those more established touring bike models before I pull the trigger
Honestly unfamiliar with the DX 3000 but Panasonics are well regarded...my friend had a sprightly DX2000 back in the day.
__________________
1987 Crest Cannondale, 1987 Basso Gap, 1992 Rossin Performance EL, 1990ish Van Tuyl, 1980s Vanni Losa Cassani thingy, 1985 Trek 670, 1982 AD SLE, 2003 Pinarello Surprise, 1990ish MBK Atlantique, 1987 Peugeot Competition, 1987 Nishiki Tri-A, 1981? Faggin, 1996ish Cannondale M500, 1984 Mercian, 1982 AD SuperLeicht, 1985 Massi (model unknown), 1988 Daccordi Griffe (most not finished of course), 1989 Fauxsin MTB, 1981 Ciocc Mockba...I...am...done....
1987 Crest Cannondale, 1987 Basso Gap, 1992 Rossin Performance EL, 1990ish Van Tuyl, 1980s Vanni Losa Cassani thingy, 1985 Trek 670, 1982 AD SLE, 2003 Pinarello Surprise, 1990ish MBK Atlantique, 1987 Peugeot Competition, 1987 Nishiki Tri-A, 1981? Faggin, 1996ish Cannondale M500, 1984 Mercian, 1982 AD SuperLeicht, 1985 Massi (model unknown), 1988 Daccordi Griffe (most not finished of course), 1989 Fauxsin MTB, 1981 Ciocc Mockba...I...am...done....
#11
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2017
Posts: 1,841
Mentioned: 24 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 747 Post(s)
Liked 928 Times
in
446 Posts
Agree if either is going to be the one go with the Panasonic. Well regarded frames, especially by the late 80s, and I do love their late 80s paint jobs. It screams 1988 without being tacky.
#12
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2022
Location: USA
Posts: 1,798
Bikes: Cannondale - Gary Fisher - Giant - Litespeed - Schwinn Paramount - Schwinn (lugged steel) - Trek OCLV
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 829 Post(s)
Liked 835 Times
in
537 Posts
I have a DX3000 - I believe it is an 87 model
I believe the OEM gearing would be a little tall for touring use
not too familiar with the drivetrain - not sure which would be the best way to provide lower gearing
also not sure of the tire max width
I believe the OEM gearing would be a little tall for touring use
not too familiar with the drivetrain - not sure which would be the best way to provide lower gearing
also not sure of the tire max width
#15
Extraordinary Magnitude
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Waukesha WI
Posts: 13,387
Bikes: 1978 Trek TX700; 1978/79 Trek 736; 1984 Specialized Stumpjumper Sport; 1984 Schwinn Voyageur SP; 1985 Trek 620; 1985 Trek 720; 1986 Trek 400 Elance; 1987 Schwinn High Sierra; 1990 Miyata 1000LT
Mentioned: 83 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2503 Post(s)
Liked 1,396 Times
in
789 Posts

Seriously, people LOVE to search CL and marketplace and present good options for you- heck- even a state or quarter of a state (eg: SE WI) if you don't feel like putting in a city or anything.
__________________
*Recipient of the 2006 Time Magazine "Person Of The Year" Award*
Commence to jigglin’ huh?!?!
"But hey, always love to hear from opinionated amateurs." -says some guy to Mr. Marshall.
Commence to jigglin’ huh?!?!
"But hey, always love to hear from opinionated amateurs." -says some guy to Mr. Marshall.
Likes For The Golden Boy:
#16
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: Baton Rouge La
Posts: 1,132
Mentioned: 21 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 356 Post(s)
Liked 290 Times
in
199 Posts
There's this: 1985 Miyata 610, 58 cm
#17
Master Parts Rearranger
Join Date: Mar 2015
Location: Portlandia's Kuiper Belt, OR
Posts: 4,372
Bikes: 1989 Schwinn Paramount OS - 1982 Trek 720 - 1982 Trek 715 - 1981 Trek 710 - 1985 Trek 620 - 1985 Schwinn Voyageur SP - 1989 Cannondale SR - 2006 Orbea Onix - 2009 Specialized Tricross
Mentioned: 214 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1431 Post(s)
Liked 1,619 Times
in
815 Posts
I had a 1985 Fuji del Rey for a little bit. 32s and fenders were tight but could be done. Nice braze-on features, solid frame, longer chain stays. Great commuter for sure. I built it up for a 6'9" guy and he loved it!

Likes For RiddleOfSteel:
#18
Newbie
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2023
Posts: 6
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 7 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times
in
2 Posts
Update: I tried out the Panasonic, which was a 21”, and found that it was too small for my liking. It was tough to pass on it, but I wanted something more substantial. I passed on the Fuji, which I think would make a great city bike, but didn’t sound like it quite hit the mark for my intentions.
Instead, I ended up buying a 1991 Trek 520 with a 23” frame. The thing is a beast no doubt — a little on the big size for me (I wish they made 22” frames) — but it’s comfortable when riding, in great shape, and has many of the original components. Plus it came outfitted with a lot of the touring accessories I need. Needless to say I’m very excited about it!
Does anyone know of resources (books, e-books, manuals, video series) that I could reference when looking to do maintenance work for this bike? Any must-haves in the world of vintage bike maintenance?
Instead, I ended up buying a 1991 Trek 520 with a 23” frame. The thing is a beast no doubt — a little on the big size for me (I wish they made 22” frames) — but it’s comfortable when riding, in great shape, and has many of the original components. Plus it came outfitted with a lot of the touring accessories I need. Needless to say I’m very excited about it!
Does anyone know of resources (books, e-books, manuals, video series) that I could reference when looking to do maintenance work for this bike? Any must-haves in the world of vintage bike maintenance?
Likes For oship:
#19
Humble Administrator
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Kalamazoo MI
Posts: 20,870
Bikes: Fuji SL2.1 Carbon Di2 Cannondale Synapse Alloy 4 Trek Checkpoint ALR gravel Viscount Aerospace Pro Colnago Classic Rabobank Schwinn Paramount
Mentioned: 56 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2896 Post(s)
Liked 5,370 Times
in
3,143 Posts
__________________
#20
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: San Jose (Willow Glen) Ca
Posts: 9,269
Bikes: Kirk Custom 85 team Miyata (modern 5800 105) on the sale block , '84 Team Miyata,(dura ace old school) 80?? SR Semi-Pro 600 Arabesque
Mentioned: 98 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2031 Post(s)
Liked 2,104 Times
in
1,188 Posts
Update: I tried out the Panasonic, which was a 21”, and found that it was too small for my liking. It was tough to pass on it, but I wanted something more substantial. I passed on the Fuji, which I think would make a great city bike, but didn’t sound like it quite hit the mark for my intentions.
Instead, I ended up buying a 1991 Trek 520 with a 23” frame. The thing is a beast no doubt — a little on the big size for me (I wish they made 22” frames) — but it’s comfortable when riding, in great shape, and has many of the original components. Plus it came outfitted with a lot of the touring accessories I need. Needless to say I’m very excited about it!
Does anyone know of resources (books, e-books, manuals, video series) that I could reference when looking to do maintenance work for this bike? Any must-haves in the world of vintage bike maintenance?
Instead, I ended up buying a 1991 Trek 520 with a 23” frame. The thing is a beast no doubt — a little on the big size for me (I wish they made 22” frames) — but it’s comfortable when riding, in great shape, and has many of the original components. Plus it came outfitted with a lot of the touring accessories I need. Needless to say I’m very excited about it!
Does anyone know of resources (books, e-books, manuals, video series) that I could reference when looking to do maintenance work for this bike? Any must-haves in the world of vintage bike maintenance?
paper book... I like this one covers vintage and modern
https://www.amazon.com/Zinn-Art-Road...0633660&sr=8-1
__________________
Life is too short not to ride the best bike you have, as much as you can
(looking for Torpado Super light frame/fork or whole biked 57,58)
Life is too short not to ride the best bike you have, as much as you can
(looking for Torpado Super light frame/fork or whole biked 57,58)