Peugeot HLE tubing: What exactly is it?
#1
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Tampa, Florida
Posts: 13,954
Mentioned: 40 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 413 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 109 Times
in
78 Posts
Peugeot HLE tubing: What exactly is it?
The gaspipe thread got me thinking....what exactly is it? I checked bike weights and the lightest of all HLE models is the PH10LE at 24.5 lbs.
I know exactly what HLE is made of. Lets hear what you guys think its made of then I'll tell you in a day or so.
Jim
I know exactly what HLE is made of. Lets hear what you guys think its made of then I'll tell you in a day or so.
Jim
#2
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 580
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
manganese steel
#4
Ron Wood is cool.
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Midwest
Posts: 114
Bikes: 1980 Peugeot PKN10, '82 PSV10, '88PH10 and a 2002 LeMond Alp d'Huez.
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I've got a 1988 Peugeot Versailles with an HLE frame and its weight is 27lbs. HLE is entry level steel- manganese alloy.
#5
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Minneapolis
Posts: 8,101
Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 52 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 17 Times
in
13 Posts
Gaspipe that was cut to length and then submerged under the Siene in special casks for 10 years so that it was aged properly before being assembled into a complete frame.
Italian bike manufacturer's merely had their house tubing blessed by the Pope.
Italian bike manufacturer's merely had their house tubing blessed by the Pope.
#6
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Denver, CO
Posts: 1,358
Bikes: March [B]'71 Schwinn Sports Tourer [/B] [B]
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 5 Times
in
5 Posts
Tasteless crap, just like all things French
Not as good as American steel either.....
Ok,Ok, it was actually a fairly smart use of average material because it was strong and readily available...HLE tubing started as manganese ore at the French mines, which was then processed into suitable metallic alloy form for the bicycle framesets....
All of this despite the fact that America and Japan were far ahead of France in metallurgical research and development in the 1960's and 70's...
Some of the Francophiles may be able to correct me, but I thought that Peugeot's steel was purchased from Usinor as far back as the 1950's, one of the biggest and most powerful French steel companies.
Not as good as American steel either.....
Ok,Ok, it was actually a fairly smart use of average material because it was strong and readily available...HLE tubing started as manganese ore at the French mines, which was then processed into suitable metallic alloy form for the bicycle framesets....
All of this despite the fact that America and Japan were far ahead of France in metallurgical research and development in the 1960's and 70's...
Some of the Francophiles may be able to correct me, but I thought that Peugeot's steel was purchased from Usinor as far back as the 1950's, one of the biggest and most powerful French steel companies.
Last edited by bigwoo; 10-11-07 at 05:30 PM.
#9
Stop reading my posts!
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 12,582
Mentioned: 90 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1443 Post(s)
Liked 1,062 Times
in
787 Posts
501 is chrome-moly, not manganese-moly like 531...Peugeot used plenty of 531 as well as nearly all of Reynold's output of 501 for a spell (some have said 501 was developed at Peugeot's request, maybe true/maybe myth), but they also used plenty of French-sourced steel tubing as well. Huge tubing appetite.
#11
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Minneapolis
Posts: 8,101
Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 52 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 17 Times
in
13 Posts
I can't remember if it was T-Mar or somebody else who used seat post diameter to measure the quality of the frame. I believe the logic was that if the outside diameter of the seat tube is consistent, a larger inside diameter means thinner wall, which = higher quality.
My bike has a small seat post diameter, but the entire seatpost gets thinner (both inside and outside diameter) at the top where the seat post joins the top tube and stays.
#12
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 23,223
Mentioned: 654 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4722 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 3,036 Times
in
1,874 Posts
#13
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 23,223
Mentioned: 654 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4722 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 3,036 Times
in
1,874 Posts
I guess my question is how much heavier is HLE vs. Reynolds 531 from a material perspective? If there was such a thing as butted HLE frame, would it be much, if at all heavier? With Reynolds, are you paying for the name as much as the quality of the material?
I can't remember if it was T-Mar or somebody else who used seat post diameter to measure the quality of the frame. I believe the logic was that if the outside diameter of the seat tube is consistent, a larger inside diameter means thinner wall, which = higher quality.
My bike has a small seat post diameter, but the entire seatpost gets thinner (both inside and outside diameter) at the top where the seat post joins the top tube and stays.
I can't remember if it was T-Mar or somebody else who used seat post diameter to measure the quality of the frame. I believe the logic was that if the outside diameter of the seat tube is consistent, a larger inside diameter means thinner wall, which = higher quality.
My bike has a small seat post diameter, but the entire seatpost gets thinner (both inside and outside diameter) at the top where the seat post joins the top tube and stays.
Most people get really excited over frame weight, but the majority of extra weight in an entry level bicycle comes from the heavier components.
I have never seen any reference to a butted HLE frame.
Undubtedly, there is some cost to the Reynolds name, but it's probably not as much as most people think. In the case of 531 a lot of the cost is in the process to produce a seamless tube, which is theoretically stronger, but has little practical benefit over the seamed tubesets introduced in the mid-1980s.
As a rule of thumb, smaller diameter seatposts equate to thicker tubes and weaker steels. However, depending of the era, French bicycles used 0.6mm smaller outer diameter seat tubes and you have to compensate. Also, while most manufacturers used single butted seat tubes, some manufacturers. such as Tange, used double butted seat tubes. Like most rules, there are exceptions.
#14
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Minneapolis
Posts: 8,101
Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 52 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 17 Times
in
13 Posts
<snip>
As a rule of thumb, smaller diameter seatposts equate to thicker tubes and weaker steels. However, depending of the era, French bicycles used 0.6mm smaller outer diameter seat tubes and you have to compensate. Also, while most manufacturers used single butted seat tubes, some manufacturers. such as Tange, used double butted seat tubes. Like most rules, there are exceptions.
As a rule of thumb, smaller diameter seatposts equate to thicker tubes and weaker steels. However, depending of the era, French bicycles used 0.6mm smaller outer diameter seat tubes and you have to compensate. Also, while most manufacturers used single butted seat tubes, some manufacturers. such as Tange, used double butted seat tubes. Like most rules, there are exceptions.
#15
Bottecchia fan
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Colorado Springs, CO
Posts: 3,520
Bikes: 1959 Bottecchia Milano-Sanremo (frame), 1966 Bottecchia Professional (frame), 1971 Bottecchia Professional (frame), 1973 Bottecchia Gran Turismo, 1974 Bottecchia Special, 1977 Bottecchia Special (frame), 1974 Peugeot UO-8
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 33 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 12 Times
in
9 Posts
And I have no idea what HLE is made out of but I sure wish I hadn't tossed that old Peugeot
__________________
1959 Bottecchia Milano-Sanremo(frame), 1966 Bottecchia Professional (frame), 1971 Bottecchia Professional (frame),
1973 Bottecchia Gran Turismo, 1974 Bottecchia Special, 1977 Bottecchia Special (frame),
1974 Peugeot UO-8, 1988 Panasonic PT-3500, 2002 Bianchi Veloce, 2004 Bianchi Pista
1959 Bottecchia Milano-Sanremo(frame), 1966 Bottecchia Professional (frame), 1971 Bottecchia Professional (frame),
1973 Bottecchia Gran Turismo, 1974 Bottecchia Special, 1977 Bottecchia Special (frame),
1974 Peugeot UO-8, 1988 Panasonic PT-3500, 2002 Bianchi Veloce, 2004 Bianchi Pista
Last edited by cb400bill; 12-19-15 at 05:48 PM.
#16
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Tampa, Florida
Posts: 13,954
Mentioned: 40 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 413 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 109 Times
in
78 Posts
Here it is. I did a comaprison of weights. Peugeot readily states that an HLE frmae is .7lbs lighter than a conventional frame (carbolite 103)
The heaviest 501 bike I could find was 24.1 while the lightest HLE I could find was 24.5. Comparing to 103 tubing the lightest 103 I could find was 26.6 while the heaviest HLE I could find was 25.9.
To sum it up an HLE bike can be built with similar components as a 501 bike with .4 lbs disadvantage while an HLE bike would be atleast .6lbs than a similar 103 bike.
The heaviest 501 bike I could find was 24.1 while the lightest HLE I could find was 24.5. Comparing to 103 tubing the lightest 103 I could find was 26.6 while the heaviest HLE I could find was 25.9.
To sum it up an HLE bike can be built with similar components as a 501 bike with .4 lbs disadvantage while an HLE bike would be atleast .6lbs than a similar 103 bike.
#17
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Minneapolis
Posts: 8,101
Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 52 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 17 Times
in
13 Posts
Here it is. I did a comaprison of weights. Peugeot readily states that an HLE frmae is .7lbs lighter than a conventional frame (carbolite 103)
The heaviest 501 bike I could find was 24.1 while the lightest HLE I could find was 24.5. Comparing to 103 tubing the lightest 103 I could find was 26.6 while the heaviest HLE I could find was 25.9.
To sum it up an HLE bike can be built with similar components as a 501 bike with .4 lbs disadvantage while an HLE bike would be atleast .6lbs than a similar 103 bike.
<snip>
The heaviest 501 bike I could find was 24.1 while the lightest HLE I could find was 24.5. Comparing to 103 tubing the lightest 103 I could find was 26.6 while the heaviest HLE I could find was 25.9.
To sum it up an HLE bike can be built with similar components as a 501 bike with .4 lbs disadvantage while an HLE bike would be atleast .6lbs than a similar 103 bike.
<snip>
Just curious, - the heaviest 501 bike you could find... Was is butted or straight gauge?
#18
Bottecchia fan
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Colorado Springs, CO
Posts: 3,520
Bikes: 1959 Bottecchia Milano-Sanremo (frame), 1966 Bottecchia Professional (frame), 1971 Bottecchia Professional (frame), 1973 Bottecchia Gran Turismo, 1974 Bottecchia Special, 1977 Bottecchia Special (frame), 1974 Peugeot UO-8
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 33 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 12 Times
in
9 Posts
&^%#&&#&^%#&
And I tossed that HLE frame bike
And I tossed that HLE frame bike
__________________
1959 Bottecchia Milano-Sanremo(frame), 1966 Bottecchia Professional (frame), 1971 Bottecchia Professional (frame),
1973 Bottecchia Gran Turismo, 1974 Bottecchia Special, 1977 Bottecchia Special (frame),
1974 Peugeot UO-8, 1988 Panasonic PT-3500, 2002 Bianchi Veloce, 2004 Bianchi Pista
1959 Bottecchia Milano-Sanremo(frame), 1966 Bottecchia Professional (frame), 1971 Bottecchia Professional (frame),
1973 Bottecchia Gran Turismo, 1974 Bottecchia Special, 1977 Bottecchia Special (frame),
1974 Peugeot UO-8, 1988 Panasonic PT-3500, 2002 Bianchi Veloce, 2004 Bianchi Pista
#20
.
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Rocket City, No'ala
Posts: 12,763
Bikes: 2014 Trek Domane 5.2, 1985 Pinarello Treviso, 1990 Gardin Shred, 2006 Bianchi San Jose
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 62 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 28 Times
in
13 Posts
There's a French patio furniture maker that uses HLE steel. Tafus is their name.
#22
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 23,223
Mentioned: 654 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4722 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 3,036 Times
in
1,874 Posts
Originally Posted by Kommisar89
...how you could tell the difference between Columbus SL/SP tubes and was told that the outside diameter is the same and the seat tube diameter would be bored to 27.2 on either so that wouldn't help for that kind of tubing at least. It was suggested that you could use some kind of small micrometer to measure the inside of the tubing through the bottom bracket. I don't really care that much - I was just curious
#23
Lanky Lass
It's a very informative thread.
East Hill
__________________
___________________________________________________
TRY EMPATHY & HAVE LOVE IN YOUR HEART, PERHAPS I'LL SEE YOU ON THE ROAD...
___________________________________________________
TRY EMPATHY & HAVE LOVE IN YOUR HEART, PERHAPS I'LL SEE YOU ON THE ROAD...
#24
Señor Member
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Hardy, VA
Posts: 17,923
Bikes: Mostly English - predominantly Raleighs
Mentioned: 70 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1491 Post(s)
Liked 1,090 Times
in
638 Posts
Resurrecting from the dead here, I picked up one of these from the LBS yesterday for nada. They told medthe foame was bent, and I grabbed it primarily for the components. For certain the handlebars are toast (bloody shame too as they were really nice with internal routing), but as I stripped it down, I stared good and hard at the frame, and did some measurements, and I don't see any signs that there's anything wrong with it.
I'm torn between cleaning it up and building it back up, and just scavenging the parts and chucking the frame (which I'd really prefer not to do if it's ok). It's a really nice frame if one can look past it not having lugs.
I'm torn between cleaning it up and building it back up, and just scavenging the parts and chucking the frame (which I'd really prefer not to do if it's ok). It's a really nice frame if one can look past it not having lugs.
__________________
In search of what to search for.
In search of what to search for.
#25
Newbie
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 2
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Reynolds 103 tubing
I have a circa 1980 Peugeot touring cycle in need of some serious restoration.
Is a frame made out of Reynolds 103 tubing worth investung the time and money on or is it a piece of scrap?
Is a frame made out of Reynolds 103 tubing worth investung the time and money on or is it a piece of scrap?