Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Classic & Vintage
Reload this Page >

What's a good S-A AW 3-speed hub strategy?

Notices
Classic & Vintage This forum is to discuss the many aspects of classic and vintage bicycles, including musclebikes, lightweights, middleweights, hi-wheelers, bone-shakers, safety bikes and much more.

What's a good S-A AW 3-speed hub strategy?

Old 12-11-07, 09:17 PM
  #1  
Disraeli Gears
Thread Starter
 
Charles Wahl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: NYC
Posts: 4,093
Mentioned: 26 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 504 Post(s)
Liked 369 Times in 214 Posts
What's a good S-A AW 3-speed hub strategy?

Okay, the gears are wide. Is there an advantage to setting up gearing so that one uses the middle gear (1:1 at the hub) mainly, or the high gear?

I'm commuting, it's fairly flat terrain, and using a bike with 7 rear, 2 front, I don't shift a lot; just depends on if I'm feeling perky/competitive or lazy/old, whether I'll use 52 or 42, and I stay mainly in the middle gears like 17, 19, 21. But even that 52/42 shift is a smaller change than between any two gears on the S-A hub. And, I prefer a fairly high cadence, compared to most people I see cycling.

Thanks,
Charles Wahl is offline  
Old 12-11-07, 10:07 PM
  #2  
The Improbable Bulk
 
Little Darwin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Wilkes-Barre, PA
Posts: 8,379

Bikes: Many

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 7 Times in 7 Posts
I have no knowledge on gearing for your situation, but I would probably target flat cruising in the highest gear, since I don't mind coasting or soft pedalling on descents.

There is no case I can think of where a higher gear is necessary, but I can think of plenty where a higher gear is.

Along with changing the chainring, remember you can also change the cog on the hub. Harris Cyclery lists sizes from 14 to 24.

https://sheldonbrown.com/harris/sturm...her-parts.html
Little Darwin is offline  
Old 12-11-07, 10:17 PM
  #3  
Senior Member
 
King of Kadence's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: sf
Posts: 539
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
I was going to say shoot for second, but realized I spend most of my riding in high gear, but at the hint of any headwind or incline I'm shifting into second because in my mind it's the sturmey's most efficient gear.
King of Kadence is offline  
Old 12-11-07, 10:37 PM
  #4  
The Improbable Bulk
 
Little Darwin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Wilkes-Barre, PA
Posts: 8,379

Bikes: Many

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 7 Times in 7 Posts
Originally Posted by King of Kadence
I was going to say shoot for second, but realized I spend most of my riding in high gear, but at the hint of any headwind or incline I'm shifting into second because in my mind it's the sturmey's most efficient gear.
had the same thought, and then when I thought about the middle gear for cruising, it just seemed to have issues.

If you cruise in high, you have the middle gear for headwinds or when you are tired, and the low gear for hills.

By the way, for any that want to use SA hubs on your lightweight frames not built for the hub, Harris has the 9.5 mm serated washers back in stock. I just ordered some.
Little Darwin is offline  
Old 12-11-07, 11:49 PM
  #5  
Senior Member
 
g-funk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Annadel
Posts: 585
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4 Post(s)
Liked 12 Times in 5 Posts
I purchased a few rear cogs from harris at 23 and a 21(I think). I live in northern california and have a fairly steep but short climb up to my house the 23 seems a bit easy as I'm in high gear most of the time on the flats but the low gear gets me to the driveway, this is on the bike I tow my kids with. on the other bike I have the 21 and I can make it up the hill to my house ok without kids or groceries, but a load usually has me pushing or cutting some switchbacks, much to the amusement of my neighbors. I say run the stock 18 and adjust accordingly.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg
IMG_2531.JPG (61.1 KB, 25 views)
g-funk is offline  
Old 12-12-07, 12:16 AM
  #6  
Elitest Murray Owner
 
Mos6502's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 2,657

Bikes: 1972 Columbia Tourist Expert III, Columbia Roadster

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times in 2 Posts
2nd is supposed to be used as the "flat" gear. 1st is for going uphill, and 3rd for going downhill. I have my 3 speed set up with about 70" in 2nd, and pretty much just use 1st and 2nd.
If you live where there are steep hills, you could conceivably just gear really low so that you have two hill gears, and use 3rd as your "normal" or just use a dérailleur and use more gears.
Mos6502 is offline  
Old 12-12-07, 06:07 AM
  #7  
Senior Member
 
Mooo's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 729
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 13 Post(s)
Liked 5 Times in 2 Posts
I set up the Fuji conversion with about a 60" 2nd gear.

cadence * 0.002975 * gear inches = speed.

and 60 rpm in 2nd gives me about 11mph (~60 * 60 * .003) - happy enough for around town, giving a first of 45" (enough for many hills near town) and high is 80" - fast enough for low 20's if I'm feeling saucy.

If I was setting one up for recreational riding, I'd probably bump that up a little.
Mooo is offline  
Old 12-12-07, 07:35 AM
  #8  
tcs
Palmer
 
tcs's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Parts Unknown
Posts: 8,600

Bikes: Mike Melton custom, Alex Moulton AM, Dahon Curl

Mentioned: 37 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1659 Post(s)
Liked 1,806 Times in 1,052 Posts
Funny how everybody anguishes over efficiencies in hub gears and worries about being in the most efficient ratio - but nobody ever gives a second's thought about riding in the more efficient ratios when using derailleurs!

Originally Posted by Mos6502
...and 3rd for going downhill.
Coast!

Tom
tcs is offline  
Likes For tcs:
Old 12-12-07, 10:33 AM
  #9  
Senior Member
 
mconlonx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 7,558
Mentioned: 47 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 7148 Post(s)
Liked 134 Times in 92 Posts
My impression after reading Sheldon's website and others is that the middle gear of a 3sp SA hub is direct drive. The high and low gear engage the transmission and produce [your personal modifier] more drag compared to direct drive. I'd set a bike up so that gearing for 2nd was my most comfortable, most-of-the-time gear.
mconlonx is offline  
Old 12-12-07, 10:59 AM
  #10  
Senior Member
 
Pompiere's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: NW Ohio
Posts: 3,410

Bikes: 1984 Miyata 310, 1986 Schwinn Sierra, 2011 Jamis Quest, 1980 Peugeot TH8 Tandem, 1992 Performance Parabola, 1987 Ross Mt. Hood, 1988 Schwinn LeTour, 1988 Trek 400T, 1981 Fuji S12-S LTD, 197? FW Evans

Mentioned: 24 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 524 Post(s)
Liked 976 Times in 509 Posts
When I set up my Kabuki, I looked at the gearing that I typically used on my deraileur bikes. I normally use about 55-60 inches for flats, so I made that my middle gear. I started with 39-19, but the cadence seemed a little fast, so I switched the cog to an 18. That gives me 44, 59, 78 inches, which covers the same as the lower 2/3 of most deraileur bikes. There aren't any hills around here to worry about needing anything higher or lower. A lot of older 3 speeds have a 46-18 combination which gives them much taller gearing. The low gear ends up being around 50 inches. Switching to a 22 cog gives you a more useful 41, 54, 72 inches.
Pompiere is offline  
Old 12-12-07, 04:14 PM
  #11  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 1,218
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
I use 18 mostly, but I have a 21T for my wife who doesn't ride often and likes to go slow.

I also use a 17/25T combo with a derailer for hilly rides on one bike, and a 14T for my club bike for when I feel frisky.

I just set my 17-year-old son up with a 3 speed on his Super Course, and he went with 17T. I think 17T/18T is the all-purpose; less if you are a speed demon, more if you have hills to climb. In any case, remember; you do not want to stand up on third gear. Plan accordingly.
sciencemonster is offline  
Old 12-12-07, 05:26 PM
  #12  
Senior Member
 
Grand Bois's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Pinole, CA, USA
Posts: 17,392
Mentioned: 24 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 443 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 27 Times in 25 Posts
I've got a 21T cog on mine. That tells you nothing because you don't know my chainring or tire size. It's 52T and 28c, and that works out to 49.7, 58.3 and 88.3 gear inches. That's a bit too tall for me, so I'm going to switch to a 22T cog. I hate to do it because the 21T is chrome and the 22T is black.
Grand Bois is offline  
Old 12-12-07, 05:39 PM
  #13  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 17,146
Mentioned: 481 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3803 Post(s)
Liked 6,637 Times in 2,602 Posts
The Shimano Nexus cog fits an SW driver and comes in 22t silver:

https://www.bikemannetwork.com/biking/p/FW7022

Neal
nlerner is offline  
Old 12-12-07, 06:25 PM
  #14  
Senior Member
 
Grand Bois's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Pinole, CA, USA
Posts: 17,392
Mentioned: 24 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 443 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 27 Times in 25 Posts
Thank you Neal! I didn't ralize that Bikeman had all that SA stuff. I like that site.

Have you got a link to the site where they're selling stainless steel fulcrum sleeves for $10? I had it and then I lost it.
Grand Bois is offline  
Old 12-12-07, 07:13 PM
  #15  
Senior Member
 
g-funk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Annadel
Posts: 585
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4 Post(s)
Liked 12 Times in 5 Posts
[QUOTE=sciencemonster;5796680 In any case, remember; you do not want to stand up on third gear. Plan accordingly.[/QUOTE]

why don't you want to stand up? I haven't heard this before. Mark, How's the trip planning coming
g-funk is offline  
Old 12-12-07, 07:48 PM
  #16  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 17,146
Mentioned: 481 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3803 Post(s)
Liked 6,637 Times in 2,602 Posts
Originally Posted by Dirtdrop
Thank you Neal! I didn't ralize that Bikeman had all that SA stuff. I like that site.

Have you got a link to the site where they're selling stainless steel fulcrum sleeves for $10? I had it and then I lost it.
It's actually off of the Lake Pepin 3-speed tour page: https://www.3speedtour.com/

Click on "Parts."

Neal
nlerner is offline  
Old 12-12-07, 07:49 PM
  #17  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 1,218
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Under pressure, it could give way and you'll find yourself freewheeling over the handlebars. This is if maybe you are a little out of adjustment, or if the doohickeys are a little too worn. Only when you really pump hard, like going up a hill in 3rd. It could slip into that place between 2nd and 3rd that freewheels forward.

I took your advice and found a place to park in Sebastopol and forget Sonoma. I'm undecided whether to bike to Guerneville and do day trips out of there, or go city-to-city. My wife's sister's husband and I are fine just biking around and worrying about a dry place to sleep each night, where ever we find ourselves. I don't know that it'll be all that crowded that weekend. We could probably roll into a town and find a couple rooms. Of course, the girls would rather have reservations every night. THey have some kind of a problem with the remote possibility that we'd get stuck sleeping out in the rain in January
sciencemonster is offline  
Old 12-12-07, 07:55 PM
  #18  
Senior Member
 
Grand Bois's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Pinole, CA, USA
Posts: 17,392
Mentioned: 24 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 443 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 27 Times in 25 Posts
Originally Posted by nlerner
It's actually off of the Lake Pepin 3-speed tour page: https://www.3speedtour.com/

Click on "Parts."

Neal
Thanks!

I don't trust plastic parts.

I guess you don't stand in third because of the danger of slipping into the neutral between 2nd and 3rd. One of the advantages of the new SA hubs like I have is that the neutral has been eliminated.

Last edited by Grand Bois; 12-12-07 at 08:38 PM.
Grand Bois is offline  
Old 12-12-07, 08:20 PM
  #19  
feros ferio
 
John E's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: www.ci.encinitas.ca.us
Posts: 21,793

Bikes: 1959 Capo Modell Campagnolo; 1960 Capo Sieger (2); 1962 Carlton Franco Suisse; 1970 Peugeot UO-8; 1982 Bianchi Campione d'Italia; 1988 Schwinn Project KOM-10;

Mentioned: 44 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1390 Post(s)
Liked 1,322 Times in 835 Posts
The AW hub gear ratios are 3/4, 1/1, and 4/3 (rear wheel revolutions / crank revolution). They are way too far apart for my tastes -- shifting a 3-speed hub is exactly shifting between a 39 and a 52 tooth chainring, with no option to find an in-between ratio by shifting the rear derailleur.

My favorite 3-speed setup by far was my 12-speed hybrid, which comprised a 14-16-18-20 cogset on an AW hub, with a 40T chainring. With 26" wheels, I had pretty decent ratiometric progression from 40 to 100 gear-inches. Since the 3-speed ranges almost overlapped, I tended to use low gear with the 20, 18, and 16-tooth cogs, second gear with all four cogs, and high gear with the 18, 16, and 14-tooth cogs, giving me 10 great ratios, 40 percent of which were in the most efficient direct drive gear.
__________________
"Far and away the best prize that life offers is the chance to work hard at work worth doing." --Theodore Roosevelt
Capo: 1959 Modell Campagnolo, S/N 40324; 1960 Sieger (2), S/N 42624, 42597
Carlton: 1962 Franco Suisse, S/N K7911
Peugeot: 1970 UO-8, S/N 0010468
Bianchi: 1982 Campione d'Italia, S/N 1.M9914
Schwinn: 1988 Project KOM-10, S/N F804069
John E is offline  
Old 12-12-07, 09:04 PM
  #20  
Senior Member
 
Grand Bois's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Pinole, CA, USA
Posts: 17,392
Mentioned: 24 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 443 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 27 Times in 25 Posts
Three speed gears are too widely spaced. They sure are fun to ride, though. I think part of it is the simplicity of the system. You'd lose that by adding a derailer and another shifter.
Grand Bois is offline  
Old 12-12-07, 09:35 PM
  #21  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 17,146
Mentioned: 481 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3803 Post(s)
Liked 6,637 Times in 2,602 Posts
Sure, the AW gears might be spaced too widely for club riding, but that's why SA made the FM and AM hubs. With an AM hub, your 52/21 set up would give you gearing of 76.6, 66.3, and 57.3.

Neal
nlerner is offline  
Old 12-13-07, 09:01 AM
  #22  
Membership Not Required
 
wahoonc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: On the road-USA
Posts: 16,855

Bikes: Giant Excursion, Raleigh Sports, Raleigh R.S.W. Compact, Motobecane? and about 20 more! OMG

Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 70 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 15 Times in 14 Posts
Originally Posted by Dirtdrop
Thanks!

I don't trust plastic parts.

I guess you don't stand in third because of the danger of slipping into the neutral between 2nd and 3rd. One of the advantages of the new SA hubs like I have is that the neutral has been eliminated.
Ditto and my brother found out why not to stand and hammer in 3rd gear 14 stitches, a new off side crank arm and a donor fork

Aaron
__________________
Webshots is bailing out, if you find any of my posts with corrupt picture files and want to see them corrected please let me know. :(

ISO: A late 1980's Giant Iguana MTB frameset (or complete bike) 23" Red with yellow graphics.

"Cycling should be a way of life, not a hobby.
RIDE, YOU FOOL, RIDE!"
_Nicodemus

"Steel: nearly a thousand years of metallurgical development
Aluminum: barely a hundred
Which one would you rather have under your butt at 30mph?"
_krazygluon

Last edited by wahoonc; 12-13-07 at 06:09 PM.
wahoonc is offline  
Old 12-13-07, 09:27 AM
  #23  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 1,218
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
What he say!

Not sure if you are talking about the AW or an aluminum crank snapping, but nevertheless, that's why I recommend the Town & Country to everyone. Bicycles are dangerous! And for heavens sake! Stay in first and stay sitting! Don't go out in the street! Watch out for meteorites! Wear a helmet!
sciencemonster is offline  
Old 12-13-07, 12:32 PM
  #24  
Senior Member
 
g-funk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Annadel
Posts: 585
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4 Post(s)
Liked 12 Times in 5 Posts
Originally Posted by sciencemonster
I took your advice and found a place to park in Sebastopol and forget Sonoma. I'm undecided whether to bike to Guerneville and do day trips out of there, or go city-to-city. My wife's sister's husband and I are fine just biking around and worrying about a dry place to sleep each night, where ever we find ourselves. I don't know that it'll be all that crowded that weekend. We could probably roll into a town and find a couple rooms. Of course, the girls would rather have reservations every night. THey have some kind of a problem with the remote possibility that we'd get stuck sleeping out in the rain in January
there are plenty of places to stay along the way. if you do decide to do day trip out of guerneville or even if you don't check out fort ross road out of cazedero off 116. it's a bit steep but relatively short and once you are on top on seaview looking over the coast it's amazing I see Tom Ritchey out there regularly. then the bomb down meyers grade and back into jenner or bodega is very nice. the stretch of hwy 1 between marshall(Hog Island Oysters!!!) and Bodega Bay is also very nice. Have Fun. the weather out here now is amazing. I hope it holds up for you.........
g-funk is offline  
Old 12-13-07, 06:22 PM
  #25  
Membership Not Required
 
wahoonc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: On the road-USA
Posts: 16,855

Bikes: Giant Excursion, Raleigh Sports, Raleigh R.S.W. Compact, Motobecane? and about 20 more! OMG

Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 70 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 15 Times in 14 Posts
Originally Posted by sciencemonster
What he say!

Not sure if you are talking about the AW or an aluminum crank snapping, but nevertheless, that's why I recommend the Town & Country to everyone. Bicycles are dangerous! And for heavens sake! Stay in first and stay sitting! Don't go out in the street! Watch out for meteorites! Wear a helmet!
Worse...steel crank! Broke right where the pedal goes thru. Still have the bike, it is my 1971 Sports Standard that I use as a beater. It has in excess of 15k miles on it, looks like crap and still rides pretty sweet if you don't use the brakes (big dings in the rims). It is going to be getting a nice new rear wheel built up this winter using Weinman alloy rims and an FG hub that I have.

Aaron
__________________
Webshots is bailing out, if you find any of my posts with corrupt picture files and want to see them corrected please let me know. :(

ISO: A late 1980's Giant Iguana MTB frameset (or complete bike) 23" Red with yellow graphics.

"Cycling should be a way of life, not a hobby.
RIDE, YOU FOOL, RIDE!"
_Nicodemus

"Steel: nearly a thousand years of metallurgical development
Aluminum: barely a hundred
Which one would you rather have under your butt at 30mph?"
_krazygluon
wahoonc is offline  

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.