If you were buying an early Trek . . .
#1
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 58
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
If you were buying an early Trek . . .
I love old steel Treks. What late 70 or early 80 Trek road bike, with original components, is considered a a good find today - from a collector and rider perspective?
#2
<3s bikes
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: CA
Posts: 1,060
Bikes: lots
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
I would venture that every trek from that era was to some degree desirable. https://www.vintage-trek.com/ may have a better answer.
#4
Super Course fan
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Lost on the windswept plains of the Great Black Swamp
Posts: 2,720
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 8 Times
in
8 Posts
I've had a 330, 400, 460 and a 520.
330 is my trainer bike, made in Taiwan in '89 so it's not an "early" Trek, but no complaints.
400 was too small for me, but it was a nice riding reliable machine.
460 was too "Race" so I traded it off to a fellow forum member, very well made frame though.
520 I love my 520, mine is an '83, first year for the 520, last year for the panel decal. It's getting restored this year.
Can't say much about the better Treks I've never had anything in R531 ect...
330 is my trainer bike, made in Taiwan in '89 so it's not an "early" Trek, but no complaints.
400 was too small for me, but it was a nice riding reliable machine.
460 was too "Race" so I traded it off to a fellow forum member, very well made frame though.
520 I love my 520, mine is an '83, first year for the 520, last year for the panel decal. It's getting restored this year.
Can't say much about the better Treks I've never had anything in R531 ect...
#5
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Berwyn PA
Posts: 6,408
Bikes: I hate bikes!
Mentioned: 39 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 431 Post(s)
Liked 710 Times
in
233 Posts
I have a 1981 24" 710 that I like. Reynolds 531 Frame and fork. It can flex a bit when pressed hard with a load but all in all a fine ride. Mine has no original components and has been repainted.
[IMG][/IMG]
[IMG][/IMG]
#9
Senior Member
I LOVE my 1983 560. Reynolds 501, so it handles my 225 pounds very well. A little heavier than the 531 models, but I don't mind. VERY stable ride and handling, predictable to say the least.,,,,BD
__________________
So many bikes, so little dime.
So many bikes, so little dime.
#10
Ho-Jahm
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Manchester, NH
Posts: 4,228
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I have a Reynolds 531 1986 Trek 560 that handles beautifully. I would love a bike with modern steel tubing and the same geometry, it just corners so well. This does come at the cost of significant toe overlap, but that has yet to be an issue (it hasn't made me crash yet).
#11
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 71
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Vintage Trek...
Here's one I just rebuilt. Bought it new...way back when. The paint was just getting too shabby, so I had it powdercoated. It's a mid-eighties trek 560 Pro Series, Reynolds 531, 60cm. It rides like nothing else I own. These old Treks are real classy rides, definitely worth the trouble.
Last edited by sop; 01-28-08 at 10:50 AM.
#12
Old Fogy
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Murray, Utah
Posts: 1,225
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
I love my Campy equipped '85 600. Thinking of selling my '06 1000 and keeping the older one, just feels so smooth and responsive. Weighs 21 lbs but feels lighter.
#13
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Ann Arbor, MI
Posts: 16,874
Bikes: 1980 Masi, 1984 Mondonico, 1984 Trek 610, 1980 Woodrup Giro, 2005 Mondonico Futura Leggera ELOS, 1967 PX10E, 1971 Peugeot UO-8
Mentioned: 49 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1856 Post(s)
Liked 664 Times
in
506 Posts
In terms of pure class, I would look for a '70s TX900, Trek's Columbus-based frame. The 930 was the racing bike with a wheelbase of 99 cm in a 56 cm frame, while the 910 was a tourer with 103.5 cm in a 56 cm. The racer had less rake, hence more trail, and a slightly higher BB.
Road Fan
#14
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Mass
Posts: 874
Bikes: I just ride them, they own me.
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
My son and I are doing an '83 760 frame restoration. It's royal blue with a silver head tube. The lug work is same as the tubes, but there are numerous cutouts, that I painted in yellow. I am the original owner (actually had 3 of them, but this is the only one still left.) I just finished stripping the paint and will be sending her off for new paint and panel and Reynolds 5-3-1 labels soon. I am keeping it to original colors.
Haven't decided to what to hang back on her yet. I originally built it with Suntour SuperbePro (and still have a new in the box complete group), But I will most likely reinstall what I was riding on her: Campy NR. My son is amazed how simple it is to work with that old Campy stuff!
zac
Haven't decided to what to hang back on her yet. I originally built it with Suntour SuperbePro (and still have a new in the box complete group), But I will most likely reinstall what I was riding on her: Campy NR. My son is amazed how simple it is to work with that old Campy stuff!
zac
#15
# BF-STL-00020
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Austin
Posts: 323
Bikes: Cinelli, Pinarello, Rossin, Gitane, Trek
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
I have an '85 400, I believe that was the only year that 531 construction overlapped with the cast lugs and that's why I bought it. I like it very much, however with a replacement fork, powdercoat, coldset and lacking a single original component it could hardly be considered collectable.
My point is this: the valve of a given bike to you depends on what you like and how you intend to use it, I like 531, I like the cast lugs, the fastback seat cluster, I was thinking of building something more modern than the rest of my bikes, so when this frame came along I was willing to pay $150 for it and consider it a bargain. Many people here would think that too much, there are often stories of members finding comparable complete original bikes for less than I paid for this frame.
We can't really answer your question: do some research, look at a lot of bikes, figure out what exactly appeals to you and when you find it you'll know what to do.
My point is this: the valve of a given bike to you depends on what you like and how you intend to use it, I like 531, I like the cast lugs, the fastback seat cluster, I was thinking of building something more modern than the rest of my bikes, so when this frame came along I was willing to pay $150 for it and consider it a bargain. Many people here would think that too much, there are often stories of members finding comparable complete original bikes for less than I paid for this frame.
We can't really answer your question: do some research, look at a lot of bikes, figure out what exactly appeals to you and when you find it you'll know what to do.
#16
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Western North Carolina
Posts: 434
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
#17
beatz down lo|seatz up hi
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Missouri, USA
Posts: 1,062
Bikes: A 2007 Trek 4300. 22.5", 1981 Trek 610 24" (61cm)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
#18
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Scottsdale, AZ
Posts: 4,466
Bikes: many
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 18 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 16 Times
in
13 Posts
I'm going to suggest something a little different. I have owned or ridden a number of Treks. My favorite model is the 1989 660. I have two of them. For me, this model was the hot rod or street racer of the earlier line. It is a true steel criterium bike with a short wheelbase, relatively sharp head and seat tube angles(73.5/73.5), and weighed in at, for what was then, a respectable 22.5 lbs. It came with also respectable components -- Shimano 600, the predecessor to Ultegra, and index shifting. Of course, all of this is a function of personal asthetics and fit. I have found that my body and its dimensions seem to fit and function best on bikes with sharper angles, i.e., criterium, track, and TT/Triathlon. Actually, I have one of my 660's set up as close as I can get it to my 2007 Schwinn Madison and they are very similar in ride and feel. I use these two bikes when I want an aggressive, over-the-top workout. The 660 also can be accuartely described with almost all of the standard slang, including "tight," "quick," "responsive," etc.
Here is a pic of one of mine
Here is a pic of one of mine
#19
Bike Junkie
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: South of Raleigh, North of New Hill, East of Harris Lake, NC
Posts: 9,622
Bikes: Specialized Tarmac, Specialized Roubaix, Giant OCR-C, Specialized Stumpjumper FSR, Stumpjumper Comp, 88 & 92Nishiki Ariel, 87 Centurion Ironman, 92 Paramount, 84 Nishiki Medalist
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 68 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 37 Times
in
27 Posts
I also have a 400 with 27" rims, not quite as nice, but in its own way, I like that bike too. I had a 330 with Accushift. It had a really nice ride, but it was a 48cm frame, too small so I sold it late last year.
If you can find one of these Treks at a flea market or a yard sale, I'd say buy it, regardless of the model you can't go wrong.
__________________
Roccobike BF Official Thread Terminator
Roccobike BF Official Thread Terminator
#20
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Ann Arbor, MI
Posts: 16,874
Bikes: 1980 Masi, 1984 Mondonico, 1984 Trek 610, 1980 Woodrup Giro, 2005 Mondonico Futura Leggera ELOS, 1967 PX10E, 1971 Peugeot UO-8
Mentioned: 49 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1856 Post(s)
Liked 664 Times
in
506 Posts
In short, 43.5 cm chainstays, 531 db main tubes, ishiwata non-chromoly forks and stays, silver brazed. I think mine is very similar. I might want one or an earlier one as a piece of history, but I think it'll ride like mine does.
#21
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Sacramento, California, USA
Posts: 40,865
Bikes: Specialized Tarmac, Canyon Exceed, Specialized Transition, Ellsworth Roots, Ridley Excalibur
Mentioned: 68 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2952 Post(s)
Liked 3,106 Times
in
1,417 Posts
I'm going to suggest something a little different. I have owned or ridden a number of Treks. My favorite model is the 1989 660. I have two of them. For me, this model was the hot rod or street racer of the earlier line. It is a true steel criterium bike with a short wheelbase, relatively sharp head and seat tube angles(73.5/73.5), and weighed in at, for what was then, a respectable 22.5 lbs. It came with also respectable components -- Shimano 600, the predecessor to Ultegra, and index shifting. Of course, all of this is a function of personal asthetics and fit. I have found that my body and its dimensions seem to fit and function best on bikes with sharper angles, i.e., criterium, track, and TT/Triathlon. Actually, I have one of my 660's set up as close as I can get it to my 2007 Schwinn Madison and they are very similar in ride and feel. I use these two bikes when I want an aggressive, over-the-top workout. The 660 also can be accuartely described with almost all of the standard slang, including "tight," "quick," "responsive," etc.
Here is a pic of one of mine
Here is a pic of one of mine
I had the same paint scheme as RFC's but it was getting pretty shabby so I had it powdercoated last month. Here's a picture after I got it rebuilt.
Still haven't decided on restoring the decals. I think I may leave it in stealth mode.
#22
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: n.w. superdrome
Posts: 17,687
Bikes: 1 trek, serotta, rih, de Reus, Pogliaghi and finally a Zieleman! and got a DeRosa
Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 15 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 9 Times
in
9 Posts
I had and sold an 85 670 which was a very smooth riding bike. I have an 84 770 which I
haven't built up yet. According to one of the guys who built the 170 series the 770 was the
same frame only it was 531P tubing (and the same as the 760 which had suntour superbe components).
Personally I think the steel treks are some of the most undervalued/underrated bikes out there.
Marty
haven't built up yet. According to one of the guys who built the 170 series the 770 was the
same frame only it was 531P tubing (and the same as the 760 which had suntour superbe components).
Personally I think the steel treks are some of the most undervalued/underrated bikes out there.
Marty
__________________
Sono pił lento di quel che sembra.
Odio la gente, tutti.
Want to upgrade your membership? Click Here.
Sono pił lento di quel che sembra.
Odio la gente, tutti.
Want to upgrade your membership? Click Here.
#24
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 58
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
Interesting that you showed a pic of 83 Trek mountain bike; looking for a raodbike. However, I have an 84 850 MTB in near new condition with the 531 frame. This bike has never seen a dirt path and is awesome to ride. You could throw it off a cliff and it would be fine.