Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Classic & Vintage
Reload this Page >

If you were buying an early Trek . . .

Search
Notices
Classic & Vintage This forum is to discuss the many aspects of classic and vintage bicycles, including musclebikes, lightweights, middleweights, hi-wheelers, bone-shakers, safety bikes and much more.

If you were buying an early Trek . . .

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-25-08, 07:17 PM
  #1  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 58
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
If you were buying an early Trek . . .

I love old steel Treks. What late 70 or early 80 Trek road bike, with original components, is considered a a good find today - from a collector and rider perspective?
John Ummel is offline  
Old 01-25-08, 07:32 PM
  #2  
<3s bikes
 
Re-Cycle's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: CA
Posts: 1,060

Bikes: lots

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
I would venture that every trek from that era was to some degree desirable. https://www.vintage-trek.com/ may have a better answer.
Re-Cycle is offline  
Old 01-25-08, 10:14 PM
  #3  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 58
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
Yes, I have been all over that site but I am looking for the opinions of other early Trek fans.
John Ummel is offline  
Old 01-25-08, 10:18 PM
  #4  
Super Course fan
 
redneckwes's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Lost on the windswept plains of the Great Black Swamp
Posts: 2,720
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 8 Times in 8 Posts
I've had a 330, 400, 460 and a 520.

330 is my trainer bike, made in Taiwan in '89 so it's not an "early" Trek, but no complaints.

400 was too small for me, but it was a nice riding reliable machine.

460 was too "Race" so I traded it off to a fellow forum member, very well made frame though.

520 I love my 520, mine is an '83, first year for the 520, last year for the panel decal. It's getting restored this year.

Can't say much about the better Treks I've never had anything in R531 ect...
redneckwes is offline  
Old 01-25-08, 10:23 PM
  #5  
Senior Member
 
fender1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Berwyn PA
Posts: 6,408

Bikes: I hate bikes!

Mentioned: 39 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 431 Post(s)
Liked 710 Times in 233 Posts
I have a 1981 24" 710 that I like. Reynolds 531 Frame and fork. It can flex a bit when pressed hard with a load but all in all a fine ride. Mine has no original components and has been repainted.

[IMG][/IMG]
fender1 is offline  
Old 01-25-08, 10:26 PM
  #6  
Seńor Member
 
USAZorro's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Hardy, VA
Posts: 17,923

Bikes: Mostly English - predominantly Raleighs

Mentioned: 70 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1491 Post(s)
Liked 1,090 Times in 638 Posts
I'd say a 170 or a 720
__________________
In search of what to search for.
USAZorro is offline  
Old 01-27-08, 07:31 PM
  #7  
Senior Member
 
leftthread's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Land of Cheese
Posts: 1,078
Mentioned: 8 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 111 Post(s)
Liked 213 Times in 105 Posts
What frame size are you looking for?
leftthread is offline  
Old 01-27-08, 07:47 PM
  #8  
Senior Member
 
yellowjeep's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Lenexa KS
Posts: 3,268
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times in 2 Posts
where is ridethecliché
yellowjeep is offline  
Old 01-27-08, 09:20 PM
  #9  
Senior Member
 
Bikedued's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 10,963
Mentioned: 10 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 205 Post(s)
Liked 107 Times in 60 Posts
I LOVE my 1983 560. Reynolds 501, so it handles my 225 pounds very well. A little heavier than the 531 models, but I don't mind. VERY stable ride and handling, predictable to say the least.,,,,BD

__________________
So many bikes, so little dime.
Bikedued is offline  
Old 01-27-08, 09:32 PM
  #10  
Ho-Jahm
 
Hocam's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Manchester, NH
Posts: 4,228
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
I have a Reynolds 531 1986 Trek 560 that handles beautifully. I would love a bike with modern steel tubing and the same geometry, it just corners so well. This does come at the cost of significant toe overlap, but that has yet to be an issue (it hasn't made me crash yet).
Hocam is offline  
Old 01-27-08, 09:34 PM
  #11  
sop
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 71
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Vintage Trek...

Here's one I just rebuilt. Bought it new...way back when. The paint was just getting too shabby, so I had it powdercoated. It's a mid-eighties trek 560 Pro Series, Reynolds 531, 60cm. It rides like nothing else I own. These old Treks are real classy rides, definitely worth the trouble.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg
trek-image.jpg (82.3 KB, 86 views)

Last edited by sop; 01-28-08 at 10:50 AM.
sop is offline  
Old 01-27-08, 09:35 PM
  #12  
Old Fogy
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Murray, Utah
Posts: 1,225
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
I love my Campy equipped '85 600. Thinking of selling my '06 1000 and keeping the older one, just feels so smooth and responsive. Weighs 21 lbs but feels lighter.
waldowales is offline  
Old 01-27-08, 09:49 PM
  #13  
Senior Member
 
Road Fan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Ann Arbor, MI
Posts: 16,874

Bikes: 1980 Masi, 1984 Mondonico, 1984 Trek 610, 1980 Woodrup Giro, 2005 Mondonico Futura Leggera ELOS, 1967 PX10E, 1971 Peugeot UO-8

Mentioned: 49 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1856 Post(s)
Liked 664 Times in 506 Posts
Originally Posted by John Ummel
I love old steel Treks. What late 70 or early 80 Trek road bike, with original components, is considered a a good find today - from a collector and rider perspective?
I've got a 1984 610 and a friend's 1983 600 on hand, and both frames are well made, both have IMO funny steering.

In terms of pure class, I would look for a '70s TX900, Trek's Columbus-based frame. The 930 was the racing bike with a wheelbase of 99 cm in a 56 cm frame, while the 910 was a tourer with 103.5 cm in a 56 cm. The racer had less rake, hence more trail, and a slightly higher BB.

Road Fan
Road Fan is offline  
Old 01-27-08, 10:13 PM
  #14  
zac
Senior Member
 
zac's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Mass
Posts: 874

Bikes: I just ride them, they own me.

Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
My son and I are doing an '83 760 frame restoration. It's royal blue with a silver head tube. The lug work is same as the tubes, but there are numerous cutouts, that I painted in yellow. I am the original owner (actually had 3 of them, but this is the only one still left.) I just finished stripping the paint and will be sending her off for new paint and panel and Reynolds 5-3-1 labels soon. I am keeping it to original colors.

Haven't decided to what to hang back on her yet. I originally built it with Suntour SuperbePro (and still have a new in the box complete group), But I will most likely reinstall what I was riding on her: Campy NR. My son is amazed how simple it is to work with that old Campy stuff!

zac
zac is offline  
Old 01-27-08, 10:13 PM
  #15  
# BF-STL-00020
 
marengo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Austin
Posts: 323

Bikes: Cinelli, Pinarello, Rossin, Gitane, Trek

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
I have an '85 400, I believe that was the only year that 531 construction overlapped with the cast lugs and that's why I bought it. I like it very much, however with a replacement fork, powdercoat, coldset and lacking a single original component it could hardly be considered collectable.

My point is this: the valve of a given bike to you depends on what you like and how you intend to use it, I like 531, I like the cast lugs, the fastback seat cluster, I was thinking of building something more modern than the rest of my bikes, so when this frame came along I was willing to pay $150 for it and consider it a bargain. Many people here would think that too much, there are often stories of members finding comparable complete original bikes for less than I paid for this frame.

We can't really answer your question: do some research, look at a lot of bikes, figure out what exactly appeals to you and when you find it you'll know what to do.

marengo is offline  
Old 01-27-08, 10:16 PM
  #16  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Western North Carolina
Posts: 434
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by USAZorro
I'd say a 170 or a 720
True, or a 970. But if you want a great bike at a good price, go with a 660, undervalued IMO. Also, the Reynolds 531-tubed 620 tourer is a great bargain, there's one on Tucson CL right now for $125.
digitalbicycle is offline  
Old 01-27-08, 10:24 PM
  #17  
beatz down lo|seatz up hi
 
paulwwalters's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Missouri, USA
Posts: 1,062

Bikes: A 2007 Trek 4300. 22.5", 1981 Trek 610 24" (61cm)

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Road Fan
I've got a 1984 610 and a friend's 1983 600 on hand, and both frames are well made, both have IMO funny steering.
Hi Road Fan,
I just got an '81 610 today, do you know anything about it?
paulwwalters is offline  
Old 01-28-08, 12:03 AM
  #18  
RFC
Senior Member
 
RFC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Scottsdale, AZ
Posts: 4,466

Bikes: many

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 18 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 16 Times in 13 Posts
I'm going to suggest something a little different. I have owned or ridden a number of Treks. My favorite model is the 1989 660. I have two of them. For me, this model was the hot rod or street racer of the earlier line. It is a true steel criterium bike with a short wheelbase, relatively sharp head and seat tube angles(73.5/73.5), and weighed in at, for what was then, a respectable 22.5 lbs. It came with also respectable components -- Shimano 600, the predecessor to Ultegra, and index shifting. Of course, all of this is a function of personal asthetics and fit. I have found that my body and its dimensions seem to fit and function best on bikes with sharper angles, i.e., criterium, track, and TT/Triathlon. Actually, I have one of my 660's set up as close as I can get it to my 2007 Schwinn Madison and they are very similar in ride and feel. I use these two bikes when I want an aggressive, over-the-top workout. The 660 also can be accuartely described with almost all of the standard slang, including "tight," "quick," "responsive," etc.

Here is a pic of one of mine

RFC is offline  
Old 01-28-08, 11:27 AM
  #19  
Bike Junkie
 
roccobike's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: South of Raleigh, North of New Hill, East of Harris Lake, NC
Posts: 9,622

Bikes: Specialized Tarmac, Specialized Roubaix, Giant OCR-C, Specialized Stumpjumper FSR, Stumpjumper Comp, 88 & 92Nishiki Ariel, 87 Centurion Ironman, 92 Paramount, 84 Nishiki Medalist

Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 68 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 37 Times in 27 Posts
Originally Posted by Bikedued
I LOVE my 1983 560. Reynolds 501, so it handles my 225 pounds very well. A little heavier than the 531 models, but I don't mind. VERY stable ride and handling, predictable to say the least.,,,,BD
I have the same bike, only a smaller frame (56cm) and I like it too. It is my favorite vintage road bike.
I also have a 400 with 27" rims, not quite as nice, but in its own way, I like that bike too. I had a 330 with Accushift. It had a really nice ride, but it was a 48cm frame, too small so I sold it late last year.
If you can find one of these Treks at a flea market or a yard sale, I'd say buy it, regardless of the model you can't go wrong.
__________________
Roccobike BF Official Thread Terminator
roccobike is offline  
Old 01-28-08, 11:40 AM
  #20  
Senior Member
 
Road Fan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Ann Arbor, MI
Posts: 16,874

Bikes: 1980 Masi, 1984 Mondonico, 1984 Trek 610, 1980 Woodrup Giro, 2005 Mondonico Futura Leggera ELOS, 1967 PX10E, 1971 Peugeot UO-8

Mentioned: 49 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1856 Post(s)
Liked 664 Times in 506 Posts
Originally Posted by paulwwalters
Hi Road Fan,
I just got an '81 610 today, do you know anything about it?
You can learn about what I know by looking up www.vintage-trek.com, finding your correct model and year based on teh serial number, and looking through the pdf'd brochures and specs. Don't be surprised if the equipment is different from "stock" or if the SN lists as something other than a 610 and other than a 1981. It can be a detective game, and some people have sold bikes that were not identified consistent with the web site. It's claimed that exceptions exist, but I've seen a lot of truth.

In short, 43.5 cm chainstays, 531 db main tubes, ishiwata non-chromoly forks and stays, silver brazed. I think mine is very similar. I might want one or an earlier one as a piece of history, but I think it'll ride like mine does.
Road Fan is offline  
Old 01-28-08, 11:51 AM
  #21  
Senior Member
 
caloso's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Sacramento, California, USA
Posts: 40,865

Bikes: Specialized Tarmac, Canyon Exceed, Specialized Transition, Ellsworth Roots, Ridley Excalibur

Mentioned: 68 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2952 Post(s)
Liked 3,106 Times in 1,417 Posts
Originally Posted by RFC
I'm going to suggest something a little different. I have owned or ridden a number of Treks. My favorite model is the 1989 660. I have two of them. For me, this model was the hot rod or street racer of the earlier line. It is a true steel criterium bike with a short wheelbase, relatively sharp head and seat tube angles(73.5/73.5), and weighed in at, for what was then, a respectable 22.5 lbs. It came with also respectable components -- Shimano 600, the predecessor to Ultegra, and index shifting. Of course, all of this is a function of personal asthetics and fit. I have found that my body and its dimensions seem to fit and function best on bikes with sharper angles, i.e., criterium, track, and TT/Triathlon. Actually, I have one of my 660's set up as close as I can get it to my 2007 Schwinn Madison and they are very similar in ride and feel. I use these two bikes when I want an aggressive, over-the-top workout. The 660 also can be accuartely described with almost all of the standard slang, including "tight," "quick," "responsive," etc.

Here is a pic of one of mine
I love my '89 660 too. I made an eBay score by getting the frame and fork for $50 + shipping. I've set it up as a fixed gear rain commuter/training bike and the fit mimics my race bike, which also happens to be a Trek (but in carbon fiber). As RFC says, it's light and quick. I bet the 660 won quite a few races on the domestic amateur circuit in its day.

I had the same paint scheme as RFC's but it was getting pretty shabby so I had it powdercoated last month. Here's a picture after I got it rebuilt.



Still haven't decided on restoring the decals. I think I may leave it in stealth mode.
caloso is offline  
Old 01-28-08, 12:03 PM
  #22  
Senior Member
 
lotek's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: n.w. superdrome
Posts: 17,687

Bikes: 1 trek, serotta, rih, de Reus, Pogliaghi and finally a Zieleman! and got a DeRosa

Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 15 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 9 Times in 9 Posts
I had and sold an 85 670 which was a very smooth riding bike. I have an 84 770 which I
haven't built up yet. According to one of the guys who built the 170 series the 770 was the
same frame only it was 531P tubing (and the same as the 760 which had suntour superbe components).

Personally I think the steel treks are some of the most undervalued/underrated bikes out there.

Marty
__________________
Sono pił lento di quel che sembra.
Odio la gente, tutti.


Want to upgrade your membership? Click Here.
lotek is offline  
Old 01-28-08, 02:08 PM
  #23  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 58
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
22". Standover of 32"
John Ummel is offline  
Old 01-28-08, 02:10 PM
  #24  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 58
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
Interesting that you showed a pic of 83 Trek mountain bike; looking for a raodbike. However, I have an 84 850 MTB in near new condition with the 531 frame. This bike has never seen a dirt path and is awesome to ride. You could throw it off a cliff and it would be fine.
John Ummel is offline  
Old 01-28-08, 02:16 PM
  #25  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 58
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
I was following a TX 930 on ebay just several days ago; which appeared to have just one bidder. Did you see that one. I wonder what it went for?
John Ummel is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.