Columbus 'Zeta' tubing?
#1
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Belgium
Posts: 664
Bikes: ca.1975 Gitane Interclub - 90's Colnago Master Competition- ca.'84 Merckx Corsa - '77 Groene Leeuw - ca. '78 Guerciotti - ca.1984 L'Express - 1974 Gitane 'Super Olympic' - Peugeot 1981 PXN10 - 1975 Peugeot PR10 -1974 Norta -1974 Peugeot PX10 LE
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
Columbus 'Zeta' tubing?
Anyone familiar with 'Zeta' tubing? I'm interested in a Faggin bike built with this. Can't seem to find much info,
thanks,
Joe
thanks,
Joe
#2
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 2,756
Mentioned: 8 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 81 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 9 Times
in
9 Posts
It's their lower end non butted tubeset, later called Alle. But it's not bad stuff. Still can build into a light nice riding frame.
Not sure on the Faggin, but I had a Zeta Bianchi that rode very nicely and built into a honest 21.5 lb complete bike.
Not sure on the Faggin, but I had a Zeta Bianchi that rode very nicely and built into a honest 21.5 lb complete bike.
#3
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 89
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Zeta was the cheapest tubeset that Columbus produced in the late 70s/early 80s. Straight gauge tubing like Aelle but not the same, Zeta was 0.9mm in thickness and Aelle 0.8mm. Still it´s good quality stuff that will build into a nice frame as you say. I remember Faggin used to build a lot of very nice, very detailed frames in the 80s using mainly Aelle tubing.
#4
Junior Member
Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 22
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Good info mike- I just found this[PDF] [h=3]TUBI SPECIALI PER BICICLETÏE SPEGIALI[/h]www.os2.dhs.org/~john/catalogs/Columbus-tubes.pdf
You +1'd this publicly. Undo
File Format: PDF/Adobe Acrobat - Quick View
costituiscono la serie ZETA. Le serie COLUMBUS' AELLE e ZETA vengcno fornite in tre iunghezze di tubi. difierenti: Composizicne A per teiai fino ai 57 ...
people tend to argue that if a bike has a 27.2 seatpost it must be Columbus SL- but columbus SL is listed as having the same wall thickness as zeta (at the columbus site above) and I see bikes with zeta tubing-like one of mine-having 27.2 seatposts-what's up?
You +1'd this publicly. Undo
File Format: PDF/Adobe Acrobat - Quick View
costituiscono la serie ZETA. Le serie COLUMBUS' AELLE e ZETA vengcno fornite in tre iunghezze di tubi. difierenti: Composizicne A per teiai fino ai 57 ...
people tend to argue that if a bike has a 27.2 seatpost it must be Columbus SL- but columbus SL is listed as having the same wall thickness as zeta (at the columbus site above) and I see bikes with zeta tubing-like one of mine-having 27.2 seatposts-what's up?
Zeta was the cheapest tubeset that Columbus produced in the late 70s/early 80s. Straight gauge tubing like Aelle but not the same, Zeta was 0.9mm in thickness and Aelle 0.8mm. Still it´s good quality stuff that will build into a nice frame as you say. I remember Faggin used to build a lot of very nice, very detailed frames in the 80s using mainly Aelle tubing.
#5
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 23,233
Mentioned: 645 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4710 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2,999 Times
in
1,854 Posts
SL has a theoretical inner diameter of 27.4mm while Zeta's is 26.8mm. For clearance, manufacturers use a post 0.2mm under this, typically 27.2mm for SL and 26.6mm for Zeta. Now, some manufacturers did ream out the seat tubes so they have to stock less sizes of posts and it's a fairly common practice on SP tubesets (which is 01mm thicker than SL) but I have never heard of this being done on Zeta. That's removing a lot of material consider that Zeta is a carbon steel and not anywhere near as strong as the chromium molybdenum steel alloy used in SL. Zeta was basically a very lightweight hi-tensile steel. Are you sure your frame is Zeta?