Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Classic & Vintage
Reload this Page >

gear inchs formula

Notices
Classic & Vintage This forum is to discuss the many aspects of classic and vintage bicycles, including musclebikes, lightweights, middleweights, hi-wheelers, bone-shakers, safety bikes and much more.

gear inchs formula

Old 10-26-08, 02:09 PM
  #1  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: yreka, ca
Posts: 542

Bikes: like 15. my favorite a 1951 schwinn spitfire cruiser. also have a 1959 amf roadmaster, 1962 jch deluxe cruiser among others.

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
gear inchs formula

it has been years since i figured out "gear inchs" for my bikes. isn't it like chainring x wheel divided by ? if anyone has the formula, id appreciate it. also, is their a different number i plug in for wheel size if i calculate bikes with 26x1.95/2.125 tires vs 26x1 3/8 and 700c wheels. and what does gear inchs actually measure? distance traveled on one rev? thanks
ogbigbird is offline  
Old 10-26-08, 02:16 PM
  #2  
Forum Moderator
 
cb400bill's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Kalamazoo MI
Posts: 21,324

Bikes: Fuji SL2.1 Carbon Di2 Cannondale Synapse Alloy 4 Trek Checkpoint ALR-5 Viscount Aerospace Pro Colnago Classic Rabobank Schwinn Waterford PMount Raleigh C50 Cromoly Hybrid Legnano Tipo Roma Pista

Mentioned: 58 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3059 Post(s)
Liked 6,379 Times in 3,692 Posts
https://www.sheldonbrown.com/gears/
__________________












cb400bill is offline  
Old 10-26-08, 04:08 PM
  #3  
Senior Member
 
Road Fan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Ann Arbor, MI
Posts: 16,853

Bikes: 1980 Masi, 1984 Mondonico, 1984 Trek 610, 1980 Woodrup Giro, 2005 Mondonico Futura Leggera ELOS, 1967 PX10E, 1971 Peugeot UO-8

Mentioned: 49 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1851 Post(s)
Liked 654 Times in 498 Posts
Gear inch is the diameter of a hypothetical front wheel from high-wheeler, that will travel as far in one pedal revolution as your bike will. Gear used to be adjusted by buying a bike with a bigger front wheel.

The distance it will travel in one rev, the "development," is the gear inch number multiplied by the constant PI, equal to around 3.14, or 22/7.

The formula for gear inch is GI=wheel_diameter * chainring_teeth / cog_teeth, so yes, you had it real close. I don't think it needs to be extremely precise, so if you measure the wheel diameter with the tires inflated to 1/8 inch with a yardstick, I think you have good enough data for studying the spread and stepping of a gear system.

There are some standard ISO values for wheel diameter for all the standard tire types, but I'm not sure those are true for all commercial tires. I'd recommend just getting out a yardstick and measuring. Besides, the ISO documents cost significant $$$.

I know Sheldon recommended using "gain ratios" but I'm not sure that number helps. It doesn't help me, at least. It's just a different way of looking at measuring gear.
Road Fan is offline  
Old 10-26-08, 04:46 PM
  #4  
El Duderino
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Madison, WI
Posts: 492

Bikes: 84 Raleigh Portage, 83 Trek 620

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 7 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Road Fan

I know Sheldon recommended using "gain ratios" but I'm not sure that number helps. It doesn't help me, at least. It's just a different way of looking at measuring gear.
Gear ratio is what I use. I like that it takes into consideration the crank length as that can make a big difference. I also like that it is a ratio and is not based on this or that measurement system.
IceNine is offline  
Old 10-27-08, 05:53 AM
  #5  
Senior Member
 
Road Fan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Ann Arbor, MI
Posts: 16,853

Bikes: 1980 Masi, 1984 Mondonico, 1984 Trek 610, 1980 Woodrup Giro, 2005 Mondonico Futura Leggera ELOS, 1967 PX10E, 1971 Peugeot UO-8

Mentioned: 49 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1851 Post(s)
Liked 654 Times in 498 Posts
Gear ratio is fine (really all these measures are fine!), but it depends on what you're trying to accomplish. If you're just trying to see if the distribution of gears is even and what the best gear shifting progression is, any measure should work as long as you have criteria for deciding what's good. If you're trying to estimate leg effort (pedal force, power, aerobic load, or ??), fitting crank length into the mix is worthwhile. But if you don't think an objective analysis of effort is meaningful, which I don't, then spread is what's important, and effort is judged subjectively. That's what I mean when I say gain ratios or gear ratios are not useful for me.

Road Fan
Road Fan is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.