Frames: Record v. Grand Prix
#1
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Falls Church, VA
Posts: 217
Bikes: 1979 Trek 3-sp, 1886 Unknown 52”hiwheel, 1970 Viscount fixed gear
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Frames: Record v. Grand Prix
As far as the frame is concerned is there anything different between the two? I'm trying to move up the food chain but never seem to find right size frame until this Grand Prix came along. On a trade, I'm getting a 77 Grand Prix frame/fork. On Sheldon's site it says the Record frame is made of 20/30 high-carbon steel. Are the lugs any different or did the models differ in components but with same frame?
I've sat back and looked for a year now and this is the best that has come my way although plenty of stuff in the 60-64cm range. Just wondering if I'm moving up the food chain or not really.
KEN
I've sat back and looked for a year now and this is the best that has come my way although plenty of stuff in the 60-64cm range. Just wondering if I'm moving up the food chain or not really.
KEN
Last edited by ken_matthews; 01-22-09 at 06:12 AM. Reason: grammar
#2
Super Course fan
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Lost on the windswept plains of the Great Black Swamp
Posts: 2,720
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 8 Times
in
8 Posts
Same steel, some slightly different details like the wrap around seatstays on the Grand Prix. From having both, in a given year the GP's workmanship might be slightly better, depending on the plant that made it. But these were workmanlike machines to begin with.
W,G,or R coded Grand Prix's would likely have a slightly higher quality level. But I have an "N" Nottingham made GP and it's a perfectly serviceable, comfortable ride.
W,G,or R coded Grand Prix's would likely have a slightly higher quality level. But I have an "N" Nottingham made GP and it's a perfectly serviceable, comfortable ride.
__________________
I have a white PX-10, a Green Dawes Galaxy and an Orange Falcon, now I'm done.
I have a white PX-10, a Green Dawes Galaxy and an Orange Falcon, now I'm done.
#3
multimodal commuter
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: NJ, NYC, LI
Posts: 19,852
Bikes: 1940s Fothergill, 1959 Allegro Special, 1963? Claud Butler Olympic Sprint, Lambert 'Clubman', 1974 Fuji "the Ace", 1976 Holdsworth 650b conversion rando bike, 1983 Trek 720 tourer, 1984 Counterpoint Opus II, 1993 Basso Gap, 2010 Downtube 8h, and...
Mentioned: 584 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1908 Post(s)
Liked 574 Times
in
339 Posts
The Grand Prix was ten or twenty bucks more expensive than the Record, the main difference that I can remember was that the GP had quick release wheels, and maybe one or two other parts were a little higher quality, maybe Weinmann brakes instead of Altenburgers or something like that; but the frames were basically of the same quality except for some details as redneckwes mentioned. It is strange, now that I think about it, that such similar bikes had different frames; I wouldn't really think of the Grand Prix frame as a higher quality one than the Record.
So to answer your question, the Grand Prix was higher up the food chain thirty years ago; but only slightly so. Which one is more desirable today would come down to condition. So if you're only looking at a frame & fork, I would consider it an upgrade only if you see some obvious reason to prefer one over the other; better paint, better color, better condition, more attractive lugs, etc.
For a noticeably better frame on a Raleigh of that period you have to move up to the Super Course or higher still something with a "531" or at least a "Carlton" decal on the seat tube.
So to answer your question, the Grand Prix was higher up the food chain thirty years ago; but only slightly so. Which one is more desirable today would come down to condition. So if you're only looking at a frame & fork, I would consider it an upgrade only if you see some obvious reason to prefer one over the other; better paint, better color, better condition, more attractive lugs, etc.
For a noticeably better frame on a Raleigh of that period you have to move up to the Super Course or higher still something with a "531" or at least a "Carlton" decal on the seat tube.
#4
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Falls Church, VA
Posts: 217
Bikes: 1979 Trek 3-sp, 1886 Unknown 52”hiwheel, 1970 Viscount fixed gear
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Thanks REDNECK and RHM. Now with frame in hand and swapping it for a pair of handlebars, I feel it was worthy trade. As far as heading up the food chain, I think you're right that I might have only cut a few places in line towards the front. But fwd progress is fwd progress. I'll keep my eyes out for a Super Course (in 54 or 56).
BTW. I want to use the bike for some touring and randoneurring. Would the Super Course be a good option?
BTW. I want to use the bike for some touring and randoneurring. Would the Super Course be a good option?
#5
Super Course fan
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Lost on the windswept plains of the Great Black Swamp
Posts: 2,720
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 8 Times
in
8 Posts
A Super Course will have both a 531 and Carlton decal, they were made in the Carlton facility in Worksop.
Most SC's have a pretty tight geometry, especially the last generation of English built models. They have fairly short wheelbases, and short chainstays. Not usually the hallmarks of a Rando or touring machine. A 60's or 70's Dawes Galaxy is generally considered the standard english touring machine, at least in production bikes.
Most SC's have a pretty tight geometry, especially the last generation of English built models. They have fairly short wheelbases, and short chainstays. Not usually the hallmarks of a Rando or touring machine. A 60's or 70's Dawes Galaxy is generally considered the standard english touring machine, at least in production bikes.
__________________
I have a white PX-10, a Green Dawes Galaxy and an Orange Falcon, now I'm done.
I have a white PX-10, a Green Dawes Galaxy and an Orange Falcon, now I'm done.
#6
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 17,127
Mentioned: 480 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3788 Post(s)
Liked 6,574 Times
in
2,580 Posts
Thanks REDNECK and RHM. Now with frame in hand and swapping it for a pair of handlebars, I feel it was worthy trade. As far as heading up the food chain, I think you're right that I might have only cut a few places in line towards the front. But fwd progress is fwd progress. I'll keep my eyes out for a Super Course (in 54 or 56).
BTW. I want to use the bike for some touring and randoneurring. Would the Super Course be a good option?
BTW. I want to use the bike for some touring and randoneurring. Would the Super Course be a good option?
Neal
#7
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Falls Church, VA
Posts: 217
Bikes: 1979 Trek 3-sp, 1886 Unknown 52”hiwheel, 1970 Viscount fixed gear
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Yeah Neal you nailed it! I AM looking for a Super Course (or if MOTOBECANE, then the Grand Touring) but what I find always seems to come up too large framesize. As I reread RHM's post, it seemed there was very little difference btwn the 2. But the more I studied the frame last night and compared it to my Record, there are noticeable differences mostly because I have the two frames side-by-side. To anyone else, I agree there isn't much folks would pick up on unless they have studied both bikes. All in all, I'm happy with the acquisition and will begin the transfer of components from Record to the Grand Prix. I'm planning another overnight trip in late Feb. so that will give me enough time.
Bottom line, this will do for now.
Bottom line, this will do for now.
#8
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 17,127
Mentioned: 480 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3788 Post(s)
Liked 6,574 Times
in
2,580 Posts
Snag this one, Ken, though you'll have to find a BF member in Wisconsin to ship it to you:
https://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll...m=170295681097
Neal
https://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll...m=170295681097
Neal
#9
aka: Mike J.
Snag this one, Ken, though you'll have to find a BF member in Wisconsin to ship it to you:
https://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll...m=170295681097
Neal
https://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll...m=170295681097
Neal
I'm not bidding on it, mostly just pinged him in case nobody bit oh him opening bid price.
#10
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Falls Church, VA
Posts: 217
Bikes: 1979 Trek 3-sp, 1886 Unknown 52”hiwheel, 1970 Viscount fixed gear
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Frame Size
TREEBOUND, I'll bet it's either a 54 or 56cm just eyeballing the headtube.
KEN
KEN
#11
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Knoxville, TN
Posts: 1,978
Bikes: Schwinn Paramount P15, Fisher Montare, Proteus, Rivendell Quickbeam
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 12 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 4 Times
in
4 Posts
Super Courses do have short wheel bases. I just got a 73 Super Course and I can't run a front fender on it because my big feet hit it. I had the same fender on my Motobecane Grand Record (touring bike) and my feet never hit it. I'd look for a Grand Touring if I were you.
#12
Senior Member
Ken, as I was reading this thread, I was thinking you needed to upgrade to a Super Course! Or get more high-zoot and get your hands on an early 70s Competition or Gran Sport (both with full 531 frames). I think an early Super Course would be fine for touring as the chainstays were fairly long, and you can retrofit them to 700c wheels if you choose by using longer reach brakes. Later in the 70s, the geometry became much more race-like.
Neal
Neal
I much prefer the late '60s Competitions.
#13
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Falls Church, VA
Posts: 217
Bikes: 1979 Trek 3-sp, 1886 Unknown 52”hiwheel, 1970 Viscount fixed gear
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Valuable Feedback
Super Courses do have short wheel bases. I just got a 73 Super Course and I can't run a front fender on it because my big feet hit it. I had the same fender on my Motobecane Grand Record (touring bike) and my feet never hit it. I'd look for a Grand Touring if I were you.
This is one of the reasons I love this site. Where else are you going to get this kind of valuable feedback!?
KEN
#14
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 17,127
Mentioned: 480 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3788 Post(s)
Liked 6,574 Times
in
2,580 Posts
Hey, I'd love one of those; unfortunately, they show up fairly rarely (as opposed to late 70s Competitions, which show up regularly). Seems like there are a literal ton of Super Courses out there showing up regularly for auction or sale.
Neal
Neal
#15
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Falls Church, VA
Posts: 217
Bikes: 1979 Trek 3-sp, 1886 Unknown 52”hiwheel, 1970 Viscount fixed gear
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Super Courses do have short wheel bases. I just got a 73 Super Course and I can't run a front fender on it because my big feet hit it. I had the same fender on my Motobecane Grand Record (touring bike) and my feet never hit it. I'd look for a Grand Touring if I were you.
https://cgi.ebay.com/53-cm-20-3-4-Mot...3%3A1|294%3A50
#16
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 17,127
Mentioned: 480 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3788 Post(s)
Liked 6,574 Times
in
2,580 Posts
This guesstimation about wheelbase got me out measuring. Here are some Raleigh comparisons:
1971 Super Course: wheelbase = 41", chainstay = 18"
1971 International: wheelbase = 42", chainstay = 18"
1975 Super Course MkII: wheelbase = 41", chainstay = 17.5"
1971 Competition: wheelbase = 40.15" (no chainstay measurement as I don't own this one any longer)
1978 Competition GS: wheelbase = 39.5", chainstay = 16.5"
Neal
1971 Super Course: wheelbase = 41", chainstay = 18"
1971 International: wheelbase = 42", chainstay = 18"
1975 Super Course MkII: wheelbase = 41", chainstay = 17.5"
1971 Competition: wheelbase = 40.15" (no chainstay measurement as I don't own this one any longer)
1978 Competition GS: wheelbase = 39.5", chainstay = 16.5"
Neal
#17
Bike Junkie
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: South of Raleigh, North of New Hill, East of Harris Lake, NC
Posts: 9,622
Bikes: Specialized Tarmac, Specialized Roubaix, Giant OCR-C, Specialized Stumpjumper FSR, Stumpjumper Comp, 88 & 92Nishiki Ariel, 87 Centurion Ironman, 92 Paramount, 84 Nishiki Medalist
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 68 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 37 Times
in
27 Posts
Ken, You can move up with a Super Course or you can move up with a newer Raleigh, like a mid to late 80's Marathon or Record. They have Chromoly main tubes and alloy rims and a much nicer ride than the 70's Raleighs. Granted they're not as sexy as a Super Course, but it is another alternative.
__________________
Roccobike BF Official Thread Terminator
Roccobike BF Official Thread Terminator
#18
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Yukon, Canada
Posts: 8,775
Mentioned: 13 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 113 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 16 Times
in
14 Posts
I was going to suggest an international for randonneuring. WHat does everyone else say?
This baby is a little high priced:
https://www.usedvictoria.com/classified-ad/8059465
I would offer to pick it up for you but the cost of shipping from Canada would probably make it unreasonable.
This baby is a little high priced:
https://www.usedvictoria.com/classified-ad/8059465
I would offer to pick it up for you but the cost of shipping from Canada would probably make it unreasonable.
__________________
1 Super Record bike, 1 Nuovo Record bike, 1 Pista, 1 Road, 1 Cyclocross/Allrounder, 1 MTB, 1 Touring, 1 Fixed gear
1 Super Record bike, 1 Nuovo Record bike, 1 Pista, 1 Road, 1 Cyclocross/Allrounder, 1 MTB, 1 Touring, 1 Fixed gear
#19
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Knoxville, TN
Posts: 1,978
Bikes: Schwinn Paramount P15, Fisher Montare, Proteus, Rivendell Quickbeam
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 12 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 4 Times
in
4 Posts
There's a frame from the 80s on ebay - he wants $135 (buy it now) which ain't too bad. But it's an 80s frame, and I'd prefer something from 60s-70s.
https://cgi.ebay.com/53-cm-20-3-4-Mot...3%3A1|294%3A50
https://cgi.ebay.com/53-cm-20-3-4-Mot...3%3A1|294%3A50
#20
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Falls Church, VA
Posts: 217
Bikes: 1979 Trek 3-sp, 1886 Unknown 52”hiwheel, 1970 Viscount fixed gear
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Well I'm happy to live with the Grand Prix for now. I see it as paying dues before "earning" something better. I did however notice, as I was piecing things together that this has an upgraded squared end BB spindle installed. I assume the outer cups are original, but what does this mean as far as crank arm setup? Will I need to go to cotterless cranks and if so, what sort of measurements do I need to take to ensure proper fit?
Here's a pic for quick reference...
Other option is I could switch back to cottered crank BB since I have one from another frame that is also raleigh of similar vintage.
KEN
Here's a pic for quick reference...
Other option is I could switch back to cottered crank BB since I have one from another frame that is also raleigh of similar vintage.
KEN
#21
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 17,127
Mentioned: 480 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3788 Post(s)
Liked 6,574 Times
in
2,580 Posts
Ken, You can move up with a Super Course or you can move up with a newer Raleigh, like a mid to late 80's Marathon or Record. They have Chromoly main tubes and alloy rims and a much nicer ride than the 70's Raleighs. Granted they're not as sexy as a Super Course, but it is another alternative.
Neal
#22
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Silver Comet Trail
Posts: 155
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times
in
2 Posts
If you want to keep the "upgraded" cotterless BB, you will want to make sure that it gives you the correct chain line. I'm most familiar with the early to mid '70s Gran Prix. According to my notes, I've measured the chainline on a GranPrix at 44mm.
The Gran Prix BTW has a much better front fork than the Record. I haven't seen a Record yet that doesn't have a bent fork. They are quite weak and prone to bending.
I believe the Record and the GP had the same 26 tpi cup and spindle cottered crankset.
The Gran Prix BTW has a much better front fork than the Record. I haven't seen a Record yet that doesn't have a bent fork. They are quite weak and prone to bending.
I believe the Record and the GP had the same 26 tpi cup and spindle cottered crankset.
#23
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Falls Church, VA
Posts: 217
Bikes: 1979 Trek 3-sp, 1886 Unknown 52”hiwheel, 1970 Viscount fixed gear
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
KRANZ, your comment above concurs with Sheldon Brown's site stating 26tpi threads. How would I measure the width? I've seen measurements for ex. 70mm or 74mm and wondering how to take that msrmt. Is that measuring the width of BB of frame only (not including lock ring, etc.)?
#24
Señor Member
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Hardy, VA
Posts: 17,935
Bikes: Mostly English - predominantly Raleighs
Mentioned: 70 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1491 Post(s)
Liked 1,072 Times
in
634 Posts
Better ride than the 20-30 frames from the 70's? - sure.
Better ride than the 531 frames from the 70's? - I doubt it. The finish might be nicer, but the riding qualities would be very close to the same, provided the geometry didn''t get messed with a lot.
Better ride than the 531 frames from the 70's? - I doubt it. The finish might be nicer, but the riding qualities would be very close to the same, provided the geometry didn''t get messed with a lot.
__________________
In search of what to search for.
In search of what to search for.
#25
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Silver Comet Trail
Posts: 155
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times
in
2 Posts
KRANZ, your comment above concurs with Sheldon Brown's site stating 26tpi threads. How would I measure the width? I've seen measurements for ex. 70mm or 74mm and wondering how to take that msrmt. Is that measuring the width of BB of frame only (not including lock ring, etc.)?