Peugeot
#1
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Santa Cruz, California
Posts: 182
Bikes: Surly Steamroller, Fuji Cross, Scwhinn S96
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Peugeot
My girlfriend asked me if I could buy her dad a cheap road bike to commute and I found this Peugot and got it for 5 bucks, its just the frame, pretty good condition, some rust spots no knowledge of old bike was just wondering what it was.
I was also wondering how the old school rear deraillaur system works with the hangar piece and if I needed an older one to make it work.
here are some pictures.
Yes i know the rear wheel is in backwards, I was in a rush when I got home to get somewhere
I was also wondering how the old school rear deraillaur system works with the hangar piece and if I needed an older one to make it work.
here are some pictures.
Yes i know the rear wheel is in backwards, I was in a rush when I got home to get somewhere
#2
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 23,223
Mentioned: 654 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4722 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 3,036 Times
in
1,874 Posts
Dropouts without an integral hanger use a deralleur with a claw. The claw is a simple bracket that attaches to the top pivot of the derailleur body. It has a notch that aligns with the droput slot and the axle fits into. It is held onto the dropout using a small bolt and flanged nut that fits into the dropout slot.
Derailleurs with claws are still used on entry level bicycles and should be available though your LBS for about $10.00.
The frame appears to be an AO8 or UO8 model with a replacement front fork. Unfortunately, we would need the original fork to determine exactly which model it is. Circa 1975/1976.
Derailleurs with claws are still used on entry level bicycles and should be available though your LBS for about $10.00.
The frame appears to be an AO8 or UO8 model with a replacement front fork. Unfortunately, we would need the original fork to determine exactly which model it is. Circa 1975/1976.
Last edited by T-Mar; 08-15-09 at 04:42 AM.
#4
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Gold Coast, Australia
Posts: 1,485
Bikes: Casati, ,Peugot,Mitchell,Raliegh,Nishiki
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times
in
2 Posts
Oh No ! A "Pug" has suckered another one ! lol (welcome to the land of the lost)
#5
aka Tom Reingold
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: New York, NY, and High Falls, NY, USA
Posts: 40,502
Bikes: 1962 Rudge Sports, 1971 Raleigh Super Course, 1971 Raleigh Pro Track, 1974 Raleigh International, 1975 Viscount Fixie, 1982 McLean, 1996 Lemond (Ti), 2002 Burley Zydeco tandem
Mentioned: 511 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 7348 Post(s)
Liked 2,460 Times
in
1,432 Posts
It's a perfectly good frame for building a bike, but if you don't have at least some parts lying around to put on the bike, the cost is going to exceed that of a new bike.
__________________
Tom Reingold, tom@noglider.com
New York City and High Falls, NY
Blogs: The Experienced Cyclist; noglider's ride blog
“When man invented the bicycle he reached the peak of his attainments.” — Elizabeth West, US author
Please email me rather than PM'ing me. Thanks.
Tom Reingold, tom@noglider.com
New York City and High Falls, NY
Blogs: The Experienced Cyclist; noglider's ride blog
“When man invented the bicycle he reached the peak of his attainments.” — Elizabeth West, US author
Please email me rather than PM'ing me. Thanks.
#6
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Santa Cruz, California
Posts: 182
Bikes: Surly Steamroller, Fuji Cross, Scwhinn S96
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Thank you T-Mar!I have parts laying around from previous bikes that I am going to throw on it, I just need Cables, housing and bars.
Also becuase of the replacement fork the rear caliper brake that I was going to put on it won't fit(short reach) would it be okay to put a long reach on the back and a short on the front?
Recently I have been looking through the C&V forums and found it so much more fascinating to me.
I love older bikes.
Also becuase of the replacement fork the rear caliper brake that I was going to put on it won't fit(short reach) would it be okay to put a long reach on the back and a short on the front?
Recently I have been looking through the C&V forums and found it so much more fascinating to me.
I love older bikes.
Last edited by CamelDane; 08-15-09 at 11:14 AM.
#7
Old fart
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Appleton WI
Posts: 24,782
Bikes: Several, mostly not name brands.
Mentioned: 153 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3587 Post(s)
Liked 3,398 Times
in
1,932 Posts
Thank you T-Mar!I have parts laying around from previous bikes that I am going to throw on it, I just need Cables, housing and bars.
Also becuase of the replacement fork the rear caliper brake that I was going to put on it won't fit(short reach) would it be okay to put a long reach on the back and a short on the front?
Recently I have been looking through the C&V forums and found it so much more fascinating to me.
I love older bikes.
Also becuase of the replacement fork the rear caliper brake that I was going to put on it won't fit(short reach) would it be okay to put a long reach on the back and a short on the front?
Recently I have been looking through the C&V forums and found it so much more fascinating to me.
I love older bikes.
#8
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Santa Cruz, California
Posts: 182
Bikes: Surly Steamroller, Fuji Cross, Scwhinn S96
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
could i use the existing spindle with be bike as is?
For the shifting, there is nothing for the friction shifting to go on, is it on the stem itself kind>
For the shifting, there is nothing for the friction shifting to go on, is it on the stem itself kind>
#9
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 11,128
Bikes: 1986 Alan Record Carbonio, 1985 Vitus Plus Carbone 7, 1984 Peugeot PSV, 1972 Line Seeker, 1986(est.) Medici Aerodynamic (Project), 1985(est.) Peugeot PY10FC
Mentioned: 22 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 150 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 34 Times
in
27 Posts
I see the logic with choosing an old Peugeot as a "cheap" rebuild project for a commute bike because of lower intial cost, but I will have some concern about finding all the parts you will need. There could be a whole bunch of parts on that frame that will need French threaded and sized components that are getting harder and harder to find. God forbid that it might also have a Swiss threaded bottom bracket which was rare even when they were making these olde Peugeots.
Just something to consider when getting into the classic French bike thing....
If you do like to get into classic French bikes, it would much easier to find parts for them if the frame is a later (at least 1980's) model with 531 Reynolds tubing. These would most likely have Italian or British threading and diameters. JMOs
I still hope you could find all the parts to build up that old Peugeot. It's still worth saving such classics.
BTW, the fork seems to be non-original but it looks like it's of decent quality.
Chombi
84 Peugeot PSV
Just something to consider when getting into the classic French bike thing....
If you do like to get into classic French bikes, it would much easier to find parts for them if the frame is a later (at least 1980's) model with 531 Reynolds tubing. These would most likely have Italian or British threading and diameters. JMOs
I still hope you could find all the parts to build up that old Peugeot. It's still worth saving such classics.
BTW, the fork seems to be non-original but it looks like it's of decent quality.
Chombi
84 Peugeot PSV