Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Classic & Vintage
Reload this Page >

Strange Trek Tourer - Please help satisfy my curiosity

Search
Notices
Classic & Vintage This forum is to discuss the many aspects of classic and vintage bicycles, including musclebikes, lightweights, middleweights, hi-wheelers, bone-shakers, safety bikes and much more.

Strange Trek Tourer - Please help satisfy my curiosity

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-22-10, 05:40 PM
  #1  
)) <> ((
Thread Starter
 
illwafer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: San Diego, CA
Posts: 2,409
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 9 Post(s)
Liked 3 Times in 3 Posts
Strange Trek Tourer - Please help satisfy my curiosity

So I went to look at this Trek on the San Diego CL today:


I didn't end up buying it because it was so similar to my current 520, but I've been looking for a few hours trying to figure out what bike it is exactly. All the decals were removed. There was a "73" stamped on the head tube. I'm just assuming everything is original.

Here are the details:
The guy says he thinks it's around 1982.
27" wheels.
3 water bottle mounts on the downtube.
No shifter bosses; Suntour barcons.
Campy headset.
Black Dia-compe Royal Gran Compe 500 sidepull brakes (no cantis).
Sugino AT crankset.
Suntour Mountech FD and RD.
Front rack braze ons on the fork (halfway up).
Suntour GS dropouts.

I suppose some of the parts could have been swapped out and/or the fork braze ons added later, but it all looked original to me.

Last edited by illwafer; 01-22-10 at 05:46 PM.
illwafer is offline  
Old 01-22-10, 06:01 PM
  #2  
sultan of schwinn
 
EjustE's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Lehigh Valley, PA
Posts: 3,536
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 15 Times in 9 Posts
There are a few things that seem mixed up in this bike.

My guess is that it could be any 1982 entry/mid trek bike. They all came without DT shifter bosses. The fork braze ons have to be later. The first Trek to get a fork braze on was the 83 720, but also had canti brakes. I suspect that the additional water bottle mounts were added later. No Trek bikes came with Mountech derailleurs in 1982.
EjustE is offline  
Old 01-22-10, 06:05 PM
  #3  
)) <> ((
Thread Starter
 
illwafer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: San Diego, CA
Posts: 2,409
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 9 Post(s)
Liked 3 Times in 3 Posts
this bike didn't have shifter bosses, just brazed on cable stops, which gave ample room for the extra water bottle mounts.

edit: misread. you said WITHOUT DT shifter bosses.
illwafer is offline  
Old 01-22-10, 06:07 PM
  #4  
Prefers Cicero
 
cooker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Toronto
Posts: 12,872

Bikes: 1984 Trek 520; 2007 Bike Friday NWT; misc others

Mentioned: 86 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3943 Post(s)
Liked 117 Times in 92 Posts
vintage-trek.com
cooker is offline  
Old 01-22-10, 06:39 PM
  #5  
Thrifty Bill
 
wrk101's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Mountains of Western NC
Posts: 23,524

Bikes: 86 Katakura Silk, 87 Prologue X2, 88 Cimarron LE, 1975 Sekai 4000 Professional, 73 Paramount, plus more

Mentioned: 96 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1236 Post(s)
Liked 964 Times in 628 Posts
Too bad you didn't get the serial number, as you can look them up directly at the vintage Trek site and know exactly what model the bike is.

Perhaps you can have the owner supply the serial number?
wrk101 is offline  
Old 01-22-10, 07:09 PM
  #6  
)) <> ((
Thread Starter
 
illwafer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: San Diego, CA
Posts: 2,409
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 9 Post(s)
Liked 3 Times in 3 Posts
I peeked at the serial when I was there. I'm 99% it started with an E. E = TX500.
illwafer is offline  
Old 01-22-10, 07:19 PM
  #7  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 912
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 34 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 8 Times in 7 Posts
Are you sure this is a Trek to begin with? Earlier frames had Trek engraved on the seatstay caps. Later frames had it cast in the seatpost lug. The only exception to this is the early fastback stay racing frames (TX900). This frame in the picture is clearly not a touring frame, as the chainstays are too short. I am guessing a Japanese frame? If it has the Trek engravings, then perhaps a 600 series frame with a later touring fork?
MetinUz is offline  
Old 01-22-10, 07:26 PM
  #8  
)) <> ((
Thread Starter
 
illwafer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: San Diego, CA
Posts: 2,409
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 9 Post(s)
Liked 3 Times in 3 Posts
It does have TREK engraved on the seatstay caps. This was virtually the only indentifcation that it is a Trek.

I think the TREK was actually embossed/raised instead of stamped. Maybe not.
illwafer is offline  
Old 01-22-10, 07:26 PM
  #9  
sultan of schwinn
 
EjustE's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Lehigh Valley, PA
Posts: 3,536
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 15 Times in 9 Posts
Originally Posted by MetinUz
perhaps a 600 series frame with a later touring fork?
The problem with this is that a touring fork would have canti brake bosses. This doesn't.
EjustE is offline  
Old 01-22-10, 08:53 PM
  #10  
)) <> ((
Thread Starter
 
illwafer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: San Diego, CA
Posts: 2,409
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 9 Post(s)
Liked 3 Times in 3 Posts
SN is: E5K7C84

E = TX500,
5 = 25.5",
K= November
7 = 1977

So, 1977 TX500 with
Ishiwata 022. Strange how this was modded then. Lots of upgrades that probably occurred around 1983-4?
illwafer is offline  
Old 01-22-10, 09:21 PM
  #11  
vintage motor
 
kroozer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Tepic, Nayarit, Mexico
Posts: 1,595

Bikes: 48 Automoto, 49 Stallard, 50 Rotrax, 62 Jack Taylor, 67 Atala, 68 Lejeune, 72-74-75 Motobecanes, 73 RIH, 71 Zieleman, 74 Raleigh, 78 Windsor, 83 Messina (Villata), 84 Brazzo (Losa), 85 Davidson, 90 Diamondback, 92 Kestrel

Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 164 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 102 Times in 79 Posts
Are you sure the "73" isn't the frame size?
kroozer is offline  
Old 01-22-10, 09:35 PM
  #12  
Old fart
 
JohnDThompson's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Appleton WI
Posts: 24,784

Bikes: Several, mostly not name brands.

Mentioned: 153 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3587 Post(s)
Liked 3,400 Times in 1,934 Posts
Originally Posted by illwafer
It does have TREK engraved on the seatstay caps. This was virtually the only indentifcation that it is a Trek.

I think the TREK was actually embossed/raised instead of stamped. Maybe not.
TREKs of that era had stamped seat stay caps. The "TREK" name was stamped into sheet metal and brazed over the end of the stay, then sanded to blend with stay tubing.

Some 600 level frames had lowrider mounts on the fork blades, but no cantilever bosses. Does the fork crown have "TREK" on it anywhere? If so, where? Crown shoulders or over the brake hole?
JohnDThompson is offline  
Old 01-22-10, 09:39 PM
  #13  
Old fart
 
JohnDThompson's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Appleton WI
Posts: 24,784

Bikes: Several, mostly not name brands.

Mentioned: 153 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3587 Post(s)
Liked 3,400 Times in 1,934 Posts
Originally Posted by kroozer
Are you sure the "73" isn't the frame size?
No, "73" is the lug angle.
JohnDThompson is offline  
Old 01-22-10, 09:39 PM
  #14  
Dropped
 
JunkYardBike's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Northwestern NJ
Posts: 6,080
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 19 Post(s)
Liked 20 Times in 17 Posts
The early Treks were also available as framesets only, so they were often built up at the LBS according to owner's preference. Also, it's my understanding that custom details could be ordered (eyelets, tubing changes, braze-ons) directly from the factory. I'm not sure geometry could be changed, however.

Or, as EjustE postulates, the braze-ons were added later. Is the frame a light metallic blue? I've got a '78 TX 500, but no mid-fork braze-ons.


Last edited by JunkYardBike; 01-22-10 at 10:24 PM. Reason: add the word 'also' to first sentence...omitting it changed my intended meaning!
JunkYardBike is offline  
Old 01-22-10, 09:45 PM
  #15  
)) <> ((
Thread Starter
 
illwafer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: San Diego, CA
Posts: 2,409
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 9 Post(s)
Liked 3 Times in 3 Posts
it was silver (solid) and a lighter shade than the 520/620/720. My 1985 520 has sparkly stuff in it. This done does not. Similar to yours above.
illwafer is offline  
Old 01-22-10, 09:54 PM
  #16  
Dropped
 
JunkYardBike's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Northwestern NJ
Posts: 6,080
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 19 Post(s)
Liked 20 Times in 17 Posts
Well, I'm fairly certain pewter was a common color, but it was metallic. Mine is metallic as well, though you can't see it well in that photo.
JunkYardBike is offline  
Old 01-22-10, 10:09 PM
  #17  
sultan of schwinn
 
EjustE's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Lehigh Valley, PA
Posts: 3,536
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 15 Times in 9 Posts
Originally Posted by illwafer
SN is: E5K7C84

E = TX500,
5 = 25.5",
K= November
7 = 1977

So, 1977 TX500 with
Ishiwata 022. Strange how this was modded then. Lots of upgrades that probably occurred around 1983-4?
This is consistent with the SunTour GS dropouts as well. Mountech derailleurs were introduced at 1983, so I think you are correct about the timing of those upgrades
EjustE is offline  
Old 01-23-10, 12:04 AM
  #18  
Randomhead
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Happy Valley, Pennsylvania
Posts: 24,395
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4 Post(s)
Liked 3,696 Times in 2,517 Posts
every Trek built in '77 was custom ordered, even the ones that were just a bare frame. Used to drive me nuts. We had zero stock of built up bikes or even painted frames. You could order almost any braze ons you wanted, but I don't remember ever seeing a cantilever boss at the time and I don't know if they would have taken that order or one for low rider mounts or water bottle mounts under the DT.

You couldn't order a different geometry. The jigs were fixed geometry. A fork crown on a '77 would have been from Hayden and not specifically a Trek part.

Last edited by unterhausen; 01-23-10 at 12:11 AM.
unterhausen is offline  
Old 01-23-10, 12:07 AM
  #19  
Bicycle Repair Man !!!
 
Sixty Fiver's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: YEG
Posts: 27,267

Bikes: See my sig...

Mentioned: 12 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 67 Post(s)
Liked 129 Times in 96 Posts
Some early 80's Trek touring bikes were fitted with side pull brakes...
Sixty Fiver is offline  
Old 01-23-10, 01:45 AM
  #20  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 912
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 34 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 8 Times in 7 Posts
Originally Posted by Sixty Fiver
Some early 80's Trek touring bikes were fitted with side pull brakes...
True, but apparently these did not have low-rider mounting holes in the fork. Perhaps a framebuilder added these these to the original fork?
MetinUz is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
LuckyChow99
Classic & Vintage
8
05-11-23 01:19 PM
crank_addict
Classic & Vintage
44
03-18-16 08:42 PM
anixi
Classic and Vintage Bicycles: Whats it Worth? Appraisals.
10
10-01-13 10:58 PM
kc0yef
Classic & Vintage
6
12-07-11 11:56 PM
Brutal.Roadrnr
Bicycle Mechanics
3
07-01-11 07:34 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.