Rant - Is 10 speed gearing so confusing?
#1
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Rant - Is 10 speed gearing so confusing?
Here we go. There is squat on CL in Chicago these days. Everyone is turning nice old 10 speeds into single speed trash. My favorite line in any CL or ebay ad is "Gears need adjusting". Or "I think its a 10 speed, maybe 12". Is the concept of gearing so difficult. Is it that difficult to shift gears.
I would say 9 out of 10 bikes that I flip the gears are in perfect order prior to me working on the bike. Yet when I buy the bike I hear, "The gears dont work". You push the lever back and forth and the little spring mechanism in the back moves and the chain moves up and down. Whats the big deal.
I know, Chicago is as flat as a pancake, who needs gears? We got WIND? How these people manage to pedal enormous gears into the wind is beyond me. Single speeds eveywhere and they are barely functional for normal riding.
Its a bike - 4 cables, 4 sets of bearings, its a simple machine. How people can make something so simple, so complicated, is beyond me.
Thats all for now.
I would say 9 out of 10 bikes that I flip the gears are in perfect order prior to me working on the bike. Yet when I buy the bike I hear, "The gears dont work". You push the lever back and forth and the little spring mechanism in the back moves and the chain moves up and down. Whats the big deal.
I know, Chicago is as flat as a pancake, who needs gears? We got WIND? How these people manage to pedal enormous gears into the wind is beyond me. Single speeds eveywhere and they are barely functional for normal riding.
Its a bike - 4 cables, 4 sets of bearings, its a simple machine. How people can make something so simple, so complicated, is beyond me.
Thats all for now.
#2
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: New York Metro Area
Posts: 3,862
Bikes: '02 Litespeed, '99 Bianchi Alfana. '91 Fuji Saratoga, '84 Peugeot Canyon Express, '82 Moto GR, '81 Fuji America, '81 Fuji Royale; '78 Bridgestone Diamond Touring, '76 Fuji America, plus many more!
Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 180 Post(s)
Liked 224 Times
in
127 Posts
Have you been harboring these feelings for some time now?
#4
Too many bikes
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Boston MA
Posts: 1,257
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I feel your pain.
Advertised a bike as a 10 speed (you know downtube shifters). Made sure it worked for all 10 gears. Met the buyer at
the parking lot across the street. He rode it around a few times. Said he liked it, but then asked me "it is a single speed,
right?". Ah, well you push these little levers here. He got it, but he had never seen them before. Had no idea where to
look for them.
Advertised a bike as a 10 speed (you know downtube shifters). Made sure it worked for all 10 gears. Met the buyer at
the parking lot across the street. He rode it around a few times. Said he liked it, but then asked me "it is a single speed,
right?". Ah, well you push these little levers here. He got it, but he had never seen them before. Had no idea where to
look for them.
#5
Senior Member
#6
Have bike, will travel
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Lake Geneva, WI
Posts: 12,284
Bikes: Ridley Helium SLX, Canyon Endurance SL, De Rosa Professional, Eddy Merckx Corsa Extra, Schwinn Paramount (1 painted, 1 chrome), Peugeot PX10, Serotta Nova X, Simoncini Cyclocross Special, Raleigh Roker, Pedal Force CG2 and CX2
Mentioned: 46 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 910 Post(s)
Liked 288 Times
in
158 Posts
If the hipsters want to take a low value old bike and make a SS, let 'em.
#7
Extraordinary Magnitude
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Waukesha WI
Posts: 13,646
Bikes: 1978 Trek TX700; 1978/79 Trek 736; 1984 Specialized Stumpjumper Sport; 1984 Schwinn Voyageur SP; 1985 Trek 620; 1985 Trek 720; 1986 Trek 400 Elance; 1987 Schwinn High Sierra; 1990 Miyata 1000LT
Mentioned: 84 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2608 Post(s)
Liked 1,699 Times
in
935 Posts
I don't understand the SS thing at all...
__________________
*Recipient of the 2006 Time Magazine "Person Of The Year" Award*
Commence to jigglin’ huh?!?!
"But hey, always love to hear from opinionated amateurs." -says some guy to Mr. Marshall.
Commence to jigglin’ huh?!?!
"But hey, always love to hear from opinionated amateurs." -says some guy to Mr. Marshall.
#9
FBoD Member at Large
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Woodbury, MN
Posts: 6,094
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 30 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 7 Times
in
7 Posts
But the problem is they don't discriminate. Beautiful, functional frames get killed. I mean, if you;re going to strip, grind, and powdercoat something why not use the crappiest and cheapest frame?
#10
Thrifty Bill
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Mountains of Western NC
Posts: 23,524
Bikes: 86 Katakura Silk, 87 Prologue X2, 88 Cimarron LE, 1975 Sekai 4000 Professional, 73 Paramount, plus more
Mentioned: 96 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1236 Post(s)
Liked 964 Times
in
628 Posts
I find most sellers can't count cogs. They also cannot read decals, or labels on components, or a tape measure, or post decent pictures. But these bicycle challenged sellers tend to not know values either. So sometimes they think an old Schwinn Varsity is rare and worth $500. Other times they think an old bike is just heavy, obsolete, and trash (like the Peugeot I picked up last week).
So it cuts both ways.
So it cuts both ways.
#11
Senior Member
#12
Extraordinary Magnitude
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Waukesha WI
Posts: 13,646
Bikes: 1978 Trek TX700; 1978/79 Trek 736; 1984 Specialized Stumpjumper Sport; 1984 Schwinn Voyageur SP; 1985 Trek 620; 1985 Trek 720; 1986 Trek 400 Elance; 1987 Schwinn High Sierra; 1990 Miyata 1000LT
Mentioned: 84 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2608 Post(s)
Liked 1,699 Times
in
935 Posts
I guess, for where I'm living, I'm riding miles in the middle of nowhere.
Maybe I'd see the advantage living in town and using it in town... maybe.
Maybe I'd see the advantage living in town and using it in town... maybe.
__________________
*Recipient of the 2006 Time Magazine "Person Of The Year" Award*
Commence to jigglin’ huh?!?!
"But hey, always love to hear from opinionated amateurs." -says some guy to Mr. Marshall.
Commence to jigglin’ huh?!?!
"But hey, always love to hear from opinionated amateurs." -says some guy to Mr. Marshall.
#14
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Portsmouth, NH
Posts: 2,190
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 12 Times
in
8 Posts
I'd build one, but I live amongst hills and getting going in a tall gear is unpleasant.
#15
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 2,929
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
I get it. It's simple.
Single speed = much less complicated, almost bullet-proof but not problem-free
Multi-speed hubs = less complicated (to the user), not problem-free
Derailleur equipped bicycle = VERY complicated (to the user), very easily damaged, very problematic, harder to ride, seats are misery
From the point of view of the non-enthusiast, single speed bikes are the way to go. You can throw the chain, you can break a spoke and you can still get flats but that's about it. Just jump on and ride. They will put up with the extra effort required by the single speed in lieu of all the non-stop adjusting and noise and lack of reliability of the derailleur equipped bike.
A multi-speed hub is a bit better than a single speed, if it stays in adjustment. Heck, even I've been wanting to try one of the eight speed hubs. Actually, I'm surprised these do not OWN! the market. Must be a marketing problem.
Derailleur-eqiuipped bike are a PITA for the non-enthusiast.
Single speed = much less complicated, almost bullet-proof but not problem-free
Multi-speed hubs = less complicated (to the user), not problem-free
Derailleur equipped bicycle = VERY complicated (to the user), very easily damaged, very problematic, harder to ride, seats are misery
From the point of view of the non-enthusiast, single speed bikes are the way to go. You can throw the chain, you can break a spoke and you can still get flats but that's about it. Just jump on and ride. They will put up with the extra effort required by the single speed in lieu of all the non-stop adjusting and noise and lack of reliability of the derailleur equipped bike.
A multi-speed hub is a bit better than a single speed, if it stays in adjustment. Heck, even I've been wanting to try one of the eight speed hubs. Actually, I'm surprised these do not OWN! the market. Must be a marketing problem.
Derailleur-eqiuipped bike are a PITA for the non-enthusiast.
Last edited by Mike Mills; 03-10-10 at 03:27 PM.
#16
PanGalacticGargleBlaster
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Smugglers Notch, Vermont
Posts: 7,531
Bikes: Upright and Recumbent....too many to list, mostly Vintage.
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 19 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 5 Times
in
4 Posts
Doesn't cost a dime to see what it feels like.... Just put your 10 speed in 7th gear or so and don't shift it for the whole ride. Then imagine exactly that with less chain slap, and minus the weight of 2 derailleurs, a set of shifters, 4 cogs and 1 chainwheel.
Personally I see the lack of ratios on my SS as a challenge to be tackled. When you encounter a grade or feel like you might prefer to shift....your only option is HTFU and crank. It's fun when you're in the mood for it.
#17
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Boston, MA
Posts: 351
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I have 3 1974 Raleigh Competitions, all with working Huret Jubilee Derailleurs. I may try one as a fixie to see what that feels like, but I don't get the SS thing. If I understand it right, I can subtract 9 gears and about 1.5 lbs from a 22lb 10-speed? (Rear derailleur = 4 oz, Front = 2.5 oz., two short cables, one short piece of housing and light downtube levers brings the weight savings to about 0.5 lbs, I'll allow a whole 'nother pound for 4 cogs, 1 Chainring, and few chain links also jettisoned). And the "that many more things not to break" doesn't hold any water either, as except for a snapped cable every 8 years or so, everything has worked fine for the last 36 years, including the ball bearings in the derailleur pulleys.
#18
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Boise, ID.
Posts: 1,251
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
I'll agree with this - your average newb doesn't get it.
Case in point - I fixed up two Trek mtn bikes for a couple I'm friends with. The girl got a 3x7 with friction thumbies, and even after I showed her how they work she still doesn't get it. O'well, at least they ride now.
Case in point - I fixed up two Trek mtn bikes for a couple I'm friends with. The girl got a 3x7 with friction thumbies, and even after I showed her how they work she still doesn't get it. O'well, at least they ride now.
#19
Extraordinary Magnitude
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Waukesha WI
Posts: 13,646
Bikes: 1978 Trek TX700; 1978/79 Trek 736; 1984 Specialized Stumpjumper Sport; 1984 Schwinn Voyageur SP; 1985 Trek 620; 1985 Trek 720; 1986 Trek 400 Elance; 1987 Schwinn High Sierra; 1990 Miyata 1000LT
Mentioned: 84 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2608 Post(s)
Liked 1,699 Times
in
935 Posts
That sounds like "not fun" with "inconsequence."
__________________
*Recipient of the 2006 Time Magazine "Person Of The Year" Award*
Commence to jigglin’ huh?!?!
"But hey, always love to hear from opinionated amateurs." -says some guy to Mr. Marshall.
Commence to jigglin’ huh?!?!
"But hey, always love to hear from opinionated amateurs." -says some guy to Mr. Marshall.
#20
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Scottsdale, AZ
Posts: 4,466
Bikes: many
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 18 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 16 Times
in
13 Posts
You've jomped and are way off. Nobody is talking about grinding. Don't join the handwringing little old ladies in their neurosis.
#21
Phyllo-buster
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Nova Scotia
Posts: 8,847
Bikes: roadsters, club bikes, fixed and classic
Mentioned: 133 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2298 Post(s)
Liked 2,054 Times
in
1,254 Posts
No, there's no advantage in singlespeed and even less in fixies.
And the funny thing is that most of the times it's people that were or could be latest technology hard core geeks.
I don't want to offend anyone
I guess that's going to trigger some violent reactions, I'm sorry for that.
And the funny thing is that most of the times it's people that were or could be latest technology hard core geeks.
I don't want to offend anyone
I guess that's going to trigger some violent reactions, I'm sorry for that.
Have you ever looked at the world hour record? Have you ever watched a flying 200 at the Olympics? Ever watched a live Madison?
There's a reason why speed records are set on track and fixed gears. There's no other ride that transmits so much energy energy back into the rider and bike. You obviously haven't spent a lot of time on one.
This is not purity or mysticism. Look at the great Tour riders...Merckx, Rominger, Indurain...all rode track with dedication and passion. Don't tell me riding fixed is not for enthusiasts.
There's room for many bikes in the stable but don't look down at people who first discover the joys of a fixed or singlespeed before they try being "pack fill" in a peloton. I was fortunate enough to have mentor introduce me to a Claude Butler track bike when I was 30 and 22 years later I've got 3 vintage fixed bikes in amongst the Sturmeys and Suntours and delivery bikes .Gotta Ride em all.
Last edited by clubman; 03-10-10 at 04:13 PM.
#22
PanGalacticGargleBlaster
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Smugglers Notch, Vermont
Posts: 7,531
Bikes: Upright and Recumbent....too many to list, mostly Vintage.
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 19 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 5 Times
in
4 Posts
Like I said, Its not for everybody.
You should go down to your LBS and try one...won't cost you anything but the time you spend riding it.... then you can say Equivocally "Its not Fun" rather than just sticking by your assumptions.
Of course there's always the risk you might *gasp* Enjoy it
#23
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Zang's Spur, CO
Posts: 9,083
Mentioned: 11 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3375 Post(s)
Liked 5,513 Times
in
2,856 Posts
#25
I'm shovel-ready!
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 136
Bikes: Raleigh Sports All-Gold
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 6 Times
in
5 Posts
People who are incapable of figuring out how to operate a multispeed bike are one thing; people who simply prefer not to are quite another. It's mostly a matter of taste, and to a lesser extent a matter of where and how one rides. I completely understand the attraction of a SS, but I'm much too old, fat, and out-of-shape to do it. On the other hand, given that I mostly ride to the pub and back, a 10+ speed is more than I need - hence, my attraction to 3-speeds. If I were 20 again and trying to impress cute girls on Critical Mass rides - or, on the other hand, if I were planning a 3-week trek down Pacific Coast Highway - I would choose differently.