Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Classic & Vintage
Reload this Page >

1974 Schwinn Sports Tourer help needed!

Notices
Classic & Vintage This forum is to discuss the many aspects of classic and vintage bicycles, including musclebikes, lightweights, middleweights, hi-wheelers, bone-shakers, safety bikes and much more.

1974 Schwinn Sports Tourer help needed!

Old 08-16-10, 08:12 PM
  #1  
Newbie
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Minneapolis
Posts: 2
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
1974 Schwinn Sports Tourer help needed!

Hi, I am thinking about picking up a used 10 sp Sports Tourer. The asking price is $240, does anyone have any advice as to what size offer I should make for the bike? Description I got is pasted below, but I haven't yet seen it in person.

61cm or 24" frame with 33" standover. Back in the day this bike was 2nd only to the Paramount. This one has been completely reconditioned with new grease, re-cabled with NOS Schwinn brake cable/housing, re-cabled with Dura Ace shifter housing, NOS HuntWilde/Schwinn handlebar tape, Specailized Armidillo 125psi tires, new chain and NOS Shimano freewheel. Bike is 100% original except newly added parts.

Thanks!
Kris
Attached Images
File Type: jpg
ImageFetch.ashx..jpg (16.0 KB, 174 views)
kristopherjhoff is offline  
Old 08-16-10, 09:21 PM
  #2  
Chrome Freak
 
Rabid Koala's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Kuna, ID
Posts: 3,208

Bikes: 71 Chrome Paramount P13-9, 73 Opaque Blue Paramount P15, 74 Blue Mink Raleigh Pro, 91 Waterford Paramount, Holland Titanium x2

Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 26 Times in 14 Posts
I'd say it was a reasonable price. I'd like to have a Sports Tourer one of these days.
__________________
1971 Paramount P-13 Chrome
1973 Paramount P-15 Opaque Blue
1974 Raleigh Professional Blue Mink
1991 Waterford Paramount
Holland Titanium Dura Ace Group
Holland Titanium Ultegra Triple Group
Rabid Koala is offline  
Old 08-16-10, 10:01 PM
  #3  
Senior Member
 
sailorbenjamin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Rhode Island (an obscure suburb of Connecticut)
Posts: 5,703

Bikes: one of each

Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 8 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 12 Times in 12 Posts
I spent more than that putting mine together.
But then I couldn't get anywhere near that on Ebay.
sailorbenjamin is offline  
Old 08-17-10, 04:38 AM
  #4  
Freewheel Medic
 
pastorbobnlnh's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: An Island on the Coast of GA!
Posts: 12,878

Bikes: Snazzy* Schwinns, Classy Cannondales & a Super Pro Aero Lotus (* Ed.)

Mentioned: 140 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1448 Post(s)
Liked 2,177 Times in 957 Posts
That is a beautiful ST, from what I can see. I feel the price is reasonable. I've never seen one in this shade of blue. Stunning!

__________________
Bob
Enjoying the GA coast all year long!

Thanks for visiting my website: www.freewheelspa.com





pastorbobnlnh is offline  
Old 08-17-10, 04:59 AM
  #5  
afraid of whales
 
Mr IGH's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Front Range, CO
Posts: 4,306
Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 347 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 5 Times in 5 Posts
Very nice, looks bone stock down to the pedals (maybe that not a Brooks saddle). What's your inseam measurement (crotch to floor, not pants inseam)? That frame is similar in size to Euro/Asian 23" frames.
Mr IGH is offline  
Old 08-17-10, 08:03 AM
  #6  
Senior Member
 
Pars's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Aurora, IL
Posts: 2,472

Bikes: '73 Raleigh RRA, 1986 Trek 500 commuter

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 54 Post(s)
Liked 16 Times in 11 Posts
That one looks to be in very good condition. That said, I owned one new ('72), and my thoughts on it were
worst...
purchase...
ever...

Those things weigh 34 lbs or so and are nothing more than a glorified Varsity IMHO. I know there is a lot of EF Schwinn love here on the forum, but not me. Pretty color though Would be nice on a Paramount.
Pars is offline  
Old 08-17-10, 08:22 AM
  #7  
Chrome Freak
 
Rabid Koala's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Kuna, ID
Posts: 3,208

Bikes: 71 Chrome Paramount P13-9, 73 Opaque Blue Paramount P15, 74 Blue Mink Raleigh Pro, 91 Waterford Paramount, Holland Titanium x2

Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 26 Times in 14 Posts
Originally Posted by Pars
That one looks to be in very good condition. That said, I owned one new ('72), and my thoughts on it were
worst...
purchase...
ever...

Those things weigh 34 lbs or so and are nothing more than a glorified Varsity IMHO. I know there is a lot of EF Schwinn love here on the forum, but not me. Pretty color though Would be nice on a Paramount.
Not exactly a glorified Varsity, the tubing is chromoly and it is fillet brazed as opposed to electro-forged. They look similar, and Schwinn did not do a very good job explaining why they were not similar, much to Schwinn's detriment.
__________________
1971 Paramount P-13 Chrome
1973 Paramount P-15 Opaque Blue
1974 Raleigh Professional Blue Mink
1991 Waterford Paramount
Holland Titanium Dura Ace Group
Holland Titanium Ultegra Triple Group
Rabid Koala is offline  
Old 08-17-10, 08:50 AM
  #8  
rhm
multimodal commuter
 
rhm's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: NJ, NYC, LI
Posts: 19,852

Bikes: 1940s Fothergill, 1959 Allegro Special, 1963? Claud Butler Olympic Sprint, Lambert 'Clubman', 1974 Fuji "the Ace", 1976 Holdsworth 650b conversion rando bike, 1983 Trek 720 tourer, 1984 Counterpoint Opus II, 1993 Basso Gap, 2010 Downtube 8h, and...

Mentioned: 584 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1908 Post(s)
Liked 574 Times in 339 Posts
Originally Posted by Rabid Koala
Not exactly a glorified Varsity, the tubing is chromoly and it is fillet brazed as opposed to electro-forged. They look similar, and Schwinn did not do a very good job explaining why they were not similar, much to Schwinn's detriment.
Okay, so it only looks like an electro-forged frame, it's really fillet brazed chrome molybdenum; and it has a nice cotterless crank; and doubtless it has a lot more aluminum parts here and there. More expensive, more desirable... but what about Pars' complaint that it still weighted 34 lbs?
rhm is offline  
Old 08-17-10, 09:16 AM
  #9  
Senior Member
 
mparker326's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Knoxville, TN
Posts: 1,978

Bikes: Schwinn Paramount P15, Fisher Montare, Proteus, Rivendell Quickbeam

Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 12 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 4 Times in 4 Posts
Originally Posted by rhm
Okay, so it only looks like an electro-forged frame, it's really fillet brazed chrome molybdenum; and it has a nice cotterless crank; and doubtless it has a lot more aluminum parts here and there. More expensive, more desirable... but what about Pars' complaint that it still weighted 34 lbs?
A Varsity weighs 40+ pounds so by Schwinn standards the Sports Tourer is a light weight bike.

I own a Sports Tourer & a Paramount. My Sports Tourer is by far the most comfortable bike I own. It is much more Touring than Sports (esp. if you swap out those ridiculous sized chainrings to something more reasonable). The Sports Tourer is like driving a big ole Caprice Classic. You won't win any races on it, but it is a very comfortable bike.

Last edited by mparker326; 08-17-10 at 09:25 AM.
mparker326 is offline  
Old 08-17-10, 09:19 AM
  #10  
rhm
multimodal commuter
 
rhm's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: NJ, NYC, LI
Posts: 19,852

Bikes: 1940s Fothergill, 1959 Allegro Special, 1963? Claud Butler Olympic Sprint, Lambert 'Clubman', 1974 Fuji "the Ace", 1976 Holdsworth 650b conversion rando bike, 1983 Trek 720 tourer, 1984 Counterpoint Opus II, 1993 Basso Gap, 2010 Downtube 8h, and...

Mentioned: 584 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1908 Post(s)
Liked 574 Times in 339 Posts
Originally Posted by mparker326
A Varsity weighs 40+ pounds so by Schwinn standards it is a light weight bike.
Ooof. Well, then, I will stop pining about the '65 Super Sports that got away last month.
rhm is offline  
Old 08-17-10, 09:47 AM
  #11  
aka Tom Reingold
 
noglider's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: New York, NY, and High Falls, NY, USA
Posts: 40,691

Bikes: 1962 Rudge Sports, 1971 Raleigh Super Course, 1971 Raleigh Pro Track, 1974 Raleigh International, 1975 Viscount Fixie, 1982 McLean, 1996 Lemond (Ti), 2002 Burley Zydeco tandem

Mentioned: 510 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 7287 Post(s)
Liked 2,362 Times in 1,381 Posts
Yeah, for all the good materials and workmanship that went into the fillet brazed Schwinns, I would have hoped that they'd be light enough to ride pleasantly. I agree with wrk101. They were well made, but that doesn't mean they're the best ride for your money.
__________________
Tom Reingold, tom@noglider.com
New York City and High Falls, NY
Blogs: The Experienced Cyclist; noglider's ride blog

“When man invented the bicycle he reached the peak of his attainments.” — Elizabeth West, US author

Please email me rather than PM'ing me. Thanks.
noglider is offline  
Old 08-17-10, 10:36 AM
  #12  
Senior Member
 
cycleheimer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: New York Metro Area
Posts: 4,249

Bikes: '02 Litespeed, '99 Bianchi Alfana. '91 Fuji Saratoga, '84 Peugeot Canyon Express, '82 Moto GR, '81 Fuji America, '81 Fuji Royale; '78 Bridgestone Diamond Touring, '76 Fuji America, plus many more!

Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 178 Post(s)
Liked 222 Times in 126 Posts
Originally Posted by noglider
Yeah, for all the good materials and workmanship that went into the fillet brazed Schwinns, I would have hoped that they'd be light enough to ride pleasantly. I agree with wrk101. They were well made, but that doesn't mean they're the best ride for your money.
Schwinn bikes from the '80s will give him a much better ride for his money.
cycleheimer is offline  
Old 08-17-10, 10:55 AM
  #13  
Newbie
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Minneapolis
Posts: 2
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
My inseam measurement is 33-34 inches, and I am currently riding a hybrid Rockhopper with a 20" frame, so I am mainly looking to upgrade to a smoother ride on a lighter bike with a larger frame without spending much more than this one is listed at.

I'm not a collector, I'd be riding it almost every day on streets and bike paths around me, nowhere near off-road or anything. Am I looking in the wrong place here?

Thanks for all the feedback btw! I am on a steep learning curve!

Originally Posted by Mr IGH
Very nice, looks bone stock down to the pedals (maybe that not a Brooks saddle). What's your inseam measurement (crotch to floor, not pants inseam)? That frame is similar in size to Euro/Asian 23" frames.
kristopherjhoff is offline  
Old 08-17-10, 11:00 AM
  #14  
PanGalacticGargleBlaster
 
Zaphod Beeblebrox's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Smugglers Notch, Vermont
Posts: 7,536

Bikes: Upright and Recumbent....too many to list, mostly Vintage.

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 19 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 5 Times in 4 Posts
Originally Posted by rhm
Ooof. Well, then, I will stop pining about the '65 Super Sports that got away last month.
If you ditch the One Piece Crankset and the Schwinn Approved derailleurs you can shave quite a bit of weight off. I built a '72 for my old man and its a great rider. Its definitely no featherweight but it is fun to ride and its lighter than a varsity (which doesn't say much I know) but still heavier than something like a Super Course.
__________________
--Don't Panic.
Zaphod Beeblebrox is offline  
Old 08-17-10, 11:32 AM
  #15  
rhm
multimodal commuter
 
rhm's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: NJ, NYC, LI
Posts: 19,852

Bikes: 1940s Fothergill, 1959 Allegro Special, 1963? Claud Butler Olympic Sprint, Lambert 'Clubman', 1974 Fuji "the Ace", 1976 Holdsworth 650b conversion rando bike, 1983 Trek 720 tourer, 1984 Counterpoint Opus II, 1993 Basso Gap, 2010 Downtube 8h, and...

Mentioned: 584 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1908 Post(s)
Liked 574 Times in 339 Posts
Originally Posted by Zaphod Beeblebrox
If you ditch the One Piece Crankset and the Schwinn Approved derailleurs you can shave quite a bit of weight off. I built a '72 for my old man and its a great rider. Its definitely no featherweight but it is fun to ride and its lighter than a varsity (which doesn't say much I know) but still heavier than something like a Super Course.
Oh, I don't know, but I don't really believe it.

With the crank, I don't see how a single Z-shaped piece of steel, like 3/4" thick or less, that seamlessly integrates both crank arms and the spindle, can weigh that much more than two much thicker pieces of aluminum and steel bolts attaching them to a steel spindle. The excessive weight must come from somewhere else, like the massive chromed steel chain rings and bash guard. Can they be replaced with aluminum?

As for the derailleur... In my experience the main problem with a Huret Alvit derailleur is that it's a terrible derailleur; sure it's heavy, but that's beside the point. Almost anything else would shift better.

By the way, Pars said 34 lbs. Coincidentally, that's exactly what my '40 New World weighs, with its fillet brazed frame ("Finest Steel Tubing") and chromed steel everything else. I don't think there's a scrap of aluminum on that bike anywhere. The Sports Tourer just has to weigh less.
rhm is offline  
Old 08-17-10, 12:34 PM
  #16  
afraid of whales
 
Mr IGH's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Front Range, CO
Posts: 4,306
Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 347 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 5 Times in 5 Posts
Sports Tourer should be ~28lbs, same as a Super Course. Rear deraillieur is a Shimano or Campy.
Mr IGH is offline  
Old 08-17-10, 05:11 PM
  #17  
afraid of whales
 
Mr IGH's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Front Range, CO
Posts: 4,306
Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 347 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 5 Times in 5 Posts
Not drinking your hater-aid. It's a nice bike, plenty of good tires available. In the large meto areas bikes aren't as cheap as rural areas. A nice Varsity goes for $150 around here.
Mr IGH is offline  
Old 08-17-10, 06:38 PM
  #18  
Senior Member
 
Pars's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Aurora, IL
Posts: 2,472

Bikes: '73 Raleigh RRA, 1986 Trek 500 commuter

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 54 Post(s)
Liked 16 Times in 11 Posts
All I can say is as a poor student back then, forking the money out for one made me feel violated. The dealer would not cancel the order (I managed to figure out I didn't want it before it arrived), and I couldn't afford the extra $150 to upgrade to a Paramount, as that was a lot of money back then. I was never so happy as when I got my Raleigh International < 1 year later. $139 more... 10x the bike. Just trying to make sure that the OP understood that this is not a lightweight bike which was competitive with other similarly priced models at the time, cuz it wasn't. The internet and the ability to do accurate research makes things much different now than they were then. Sure, it rode smooth I guess, but not responsive at all, so it may be what someone is looking for. And it felt like 34 lbs.

And here are some Varsities (chicago):

https://chicago.craigslist.org/nwc/bik/1900104337.html
https://chicago.craigslist.org/sox/bik/1896818818.html
Pars is offline  
Old 08-17-10, 06:42 PM
  #19  
aka Tom Reingold
 
noglider's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: New York, NY, and High Falls, NY, USA
Posts: 40,691

Bikes: 1962 Rudge Sports, 1971 Raleigh Super Course, 1971 Raleigh Pro Track, 1974 Raleigh International, 1975 Viscount Fixie, 1982 McLean, 1996 Lemond (Ti), 2002 Burley Zydeco tandem

Mentioned: 510 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 7287 Post(s)
Liked 2,362 Times in 1,381 Posts
Mr IGH, I respect Schwinns for what they are. But $220 in 1973? Wow, that's a lot of money. I can understand Pars's frustration!
__________________
Tom Reingold, tom@noglider.com
New York City and High Falls, NY
Blogs: The Experienced Cyclist; noglider's ride blog

“When man invented the bicycle he reached the peak of his attainments.” — Elizabeth West, US author

Please email me rather than PM'ing me. Thanks.
noglider is offline  
Old 08-17-10, 09:20 PM
  #20  
Senior Member
 
fender1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Berwyn PA
Posts: 6,425

Bikes: I hate bikes!

Mentioned: 39 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 429 Post(s)
Liked 710 Times in 233 Posts
I sold that same model frame (size/color/year) and the frame/fork & headset. It weighed just shy of 11lbs! Those frames were internally sleeved, fillet brazed and the forks/stays were Hi-Ten. Only the 3 main tubes were 4130 (and that was thick-walled, straight gauge) tubing. A great frame to survive the coming apocalypse............or years of neglect and abuse!
fender1 is offline  
Old 08-17-10, 09:24 PM
  #21  
Senior Member
 
sailorbenjamin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Rhode Island (an obscure suburb of Connecticut)
Posts: 5,703

Bikes: one of each

Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 8 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 12 Times in 12 Posts
I'm pretty sure my S/T is less than 34 pounds.
The Ashtabula crank is something like 4 pounds, the 3 piece is more like 2.
The kickstand is at least a pound.
sailorbenjamin is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
oddjob2
Classic & Vintage
12
08-30-13 07:28 PM
dremel
Classic and Vintage Bicycles: Whats it Worth? Appraisals.
14
03-11-13 07:09 PM
Dianna
Classic and Vintage Bicycles: Whats it Worth? Appraisals.
16
04-23-11 10:10 AM
dbikingman
Classic & Vintage
1
09-08-10 03:00 PM
Taz
Classic & Vintage
6
04-06-10 05:55 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.