Debating on whether to use this crankset or not
#1
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Debating on whether to use this crankset or not
well that's my bike build basically. Im right in the middle of trading with someone here with an ofmega crankset.
link to my brakeset and the attached pictures
https://www.flickr.com/photos/41891783@N04/
things not shown
-nitto noodle bars
-gipiemme cronospecial hubs (shown but not up close, they're mounted)
-nuovo record front derailleur (rear is mounted)
well what do you guys think?
link to my brakeset and the attached pictures
https://www.flickr.com/photos/41891783@N04/
things not shown
-nitto noodle bars
-gipiemme cronospecial hubs (shown but not up close, they're mounted)
-nuovo record front derailleur (rear is mounted)
well what do you guys think?
#2
Junior Member
Thread Starter
I'm sure you guys know what crankset this is, but if not it's a mavic 631.
some call it the "starfish"
some call it the "starfish"
#3
Rustbelt Rider
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Canton, OH
Posts: 9,104
Bikes: 1990 Trek 1420 - 1978 Raleigh Professional - 1973 Schwinn Collegiate - 1974 Schwinn Suburban
Mentioned: 20 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 261 Post(s)
Liked 372 Times
in
177 Posts
Sure, why not? I've never been crazy about the style of them but they certainly are interesting.
__________________
|^^^^^^^^^^^^^^| ||
|......GO.BROWNS........| ||'|";, ___.
|_..._..._______===|=||_|__|..., ] -
"(@)'(@)"""''"**|(@)(@)*****''(@)
|^^^^^^^^^^^^^^| ||
|......GO.BROWNS........| ||'|";, ___.
|_..._..._______===|=||_|__|..., ] -
"(@)'(@)"""''"**|(@)(@)*****''(@)
#4
"Shake n Bake!"
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 226
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Im right in the middle of trading with someone here with an ofmega crankset.
#5
Junior Member
Thread Starter
With these cranks I have originality, but with the other cranks I get a more classic look.
idkidkidk
#6
Designer
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 1,368
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 13 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 5 Times
in
5 Posts
I've always liked the Mavic "Starfishes". But I never considered getting a set myself since I feel like they are better suited to a larger frame and I ride small (similar to your size).
__________________
#7
Junior Member
Thread Starter
thanks
#8
Spin Forest! Spin!
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Arrid Zone-a
Posts: 5,956
Bikes: I used to have many. And I Will again.
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 7 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 11 Times
in
10 Posts
That's a pretty fine example of a Mavic 'Starfish'. What are you trading for? It better be pretty high end like a Mistral in prestine condition.
These Mavics are getting rare.
These Mavics are getting rare.
#9
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 11,128
Bikes: 1986 Alan Record Carbonio, 1985 Vitus Plus Carbone 7, 1984 Peugeot PSV, 1972 Line Seeker, 1986(est.) Medici Aerodynamic (Project), 1985(est.) Peugeot PY10FC
Mentioned: 22 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 150 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 34 Times
in
27 Posts
The Mavic 631 "Starfish" crank is sort of an "aquired taste" item. I myself, a French cyclo fan am not really atrracted to it and would only consider it for an all French period build, just to complete a mid 80's to early 90's Mavic SSC group picture on a bike.
BTW, the big ring on it is not original. It should not have the triangular cutouts at the chainring bolt area....although it does make it a little bit more interesting looking with the cutouts.
Chombi
BTW, the big ring on it is not original. It should not have the triangular cutouts at the chainring bolt area....although it does make it a little bit more interesting looking with the cutouts.
Chombi
#10
Senior Member
hellojoben, I've always thought they were attractive. That said I think they look better on a frame with OS tubes, but what do I know?
Brad
Brad
#11
multimodal commuter
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: NJ, NYC, LI
Posts: 19,808
Bikes: 1940s Fothergill, 1959 Allegro Special, 1963? Claud Butler Olympic Sprint, Lambert 'Clubman', 1974 Fuji "the Ace", 1976 Holdsworth 650b conversion rando bike, 1983 Trek 720 tourer, 1984 Counterpoint Opus II, 1993 Basso Gap, 2010 Downtube 8h, and...
Mentioned: 584 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1908 Post(s)
Liked 574 Times
in
339 Posts
#12
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 11,128
Bikes: 1986 Alan Record Carbonio, 1985 Vitus Plus Carbone 7, 1984 Peugeot PSV, 1972 Line Seeker, 1986(est.) Medici Aerodynamic (Project), 1985(est.) Peugeot PY10FC
Mentioned: 22 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 150 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 34 Times
in
27 Posts
These smoothed out cranks that I think was borne out of the aero era of the mid 80's, just do not have the lasting visual impact as classic fluted cranks have had all these years.
Yes, the Mavic was a sort of exception amongst smooth cranks as it took the concept further than most, but all the smooth cranks that came afterwards kinda dulled the impact the Mavic might have had on cyclists (doesn't help that it was kinda heavy too).
Funny that I still remember how much of an impact smooth cranks of those times had on me, specially the Edco Competition. The Edco's looks impressed me so much that it was a dream component for me for some years through the mid 80's. But frankly, I now couldn't see what the big deal was with the Edco (other than it's rarity). It's still looks like a nice crank, but I might not hesistate picking an NOS Stronglight 106 over it these days.
I'm kinda struggling too with what to do with a Stronglight Delta (Stronglight's kinda aero-ish offering at that time) crank I found last year:
It should make an ideal crank for my Vitus Carbone, having the CF laminate on the big ring, but Dang, it's otherwise a generally dull looking crank, even with the CF applique on it.....so the fluted 630 Mavic crank has gotten a reprieve and is still doing duty on the bike.
Chombi
Yes, the Mavic was a sort of exception amongst smooth cranks as it took the concept further than most, but all the smooth cranks that came afterwards kinda dulled the impact the Mavic might have had on cyclists (doesn't help that it was kinda heavy too).
Funny that I still remember how much of an impact smooth cranks of those times had on me, specially the Edco Competition. The Edco's looks impressed me so much that it was a dream component for me for some years through the mid 80's. But frankly, I now couldn't see what the big deal was with the Edco (other than it's rarity). It's still looks like a nice crank, but I might not hesistate picking an NOS Stronglight 106 over it these days.
I'm kinda struggling too with what to do with a Stronglight Delta (Stronglight's kinda aero-ish offering at that time) crank I found last year:
It should make an ideal crank for my Vitus Carbone, having the CF laminate on the big ring, but Dang, it's otherwise a generally dull looking crank, even with the CF applique on it.....so the fluted 630 Mavic crank has gotten a reprieve and is still doing duty on the bike.
Chombi
#13
Junior Member
Thread Starter
I'm guessing that the crankset was brushed up against something to make the scratch on the drive side of the crank.
haha happy they're getting rare
#14
Junior Member
Thread Starter
It should make an ideal crank for my Vitus Carbone, having the CF laminate on the big ring, but Dang, it's otherwise a generally dull looking crank, even with the CF applique on it.....so the fluted 630 Mavic crank has gotten a reprieve and is still doing duty on the bike.
Chombi
Chombi
I also looked at those 630's on velobase. I really like the look of those.
lucky you have both haha
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
fskywalker
Road Cycling
5
03-08-10 10:02 PM