Lyotard Pedal Danger
#76
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 2,929
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
This thread has me fascinated. I was thinking about it as I rode home tonight, pumping away on my MKS Touring pedals that look oh-so-much like those Lyotards.
It seems to me that it as important to know where the load was applied as it is to know how much load was applied. If you have your foot fully and firmly inserted inthe pedal, maybe even strapped in, then your power is applied at the ball of your foot and probably goes into the spindle via the ball bearings (near the root of the shaft).
If you are just getting started or are sloppily pedalling, it is entirely possible your power (force) is going into the spindle via the outer bearings because you are pressing on the outboard part of the pedal - not via the ball of your foot.
The bending moment is going to VERY different for those two cases. I am certain of this because there is absolutely no way that flimsy central sleeve can carry any significant load from the outboard end of the pedal to the inboard bearing - it is too flexible. I wish I had my handbooks here at home to look up the relative stress for equal load applied at the outer versus inner bearings. I would not be at all surprised if it was 10:1, or more.
"Give me a big enough lever and I can move the Earth."
It seems to me that it as important to know where the load was applied as it is to know how much load was applied. If you have your foot fully and firmly inserted inthe pedal, maybe even strapped in, then your power is applied at the ball of your foot and probably goes into the spindle via the ball bearings (near the root of the shaft).
If you are just getting started or are sloppily pedalling, it is entirely possible your power (force) is going into the spindle via the outer bearings because you are pressing on the outboard part of the pedal - not via the ball of your foot.
The bending moment is going to VERY different for those two cases. I am certain of this because there is absolutely no way that flimsy central sleeve can carry any significant load from the outboard end of the pedal to the inboard bearing - it is too flexible. I wish I had my handbooks here at home to look up the relative stress for equal load applied at the outer versus inner bearings. I would not be at all surprised if it was 10:1, or more.
"Give me a big enough lever and I can move the Earth."
#77
十人十色
Thread Starter
Yes, that's what I thought, too. I wish I could've seen the crack as it could only add to the huge leap in understanding this thread has led me to. I'm very grateful for the help!
#78
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Boulder County, CO
Posts: 4,370
Bikes: '80 Masi Gran Criterium, '12 Trek Madone, early '60s Frejus track
Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 508 Post(s)
Liked 434 Times
in
331 Posts
If it were my pedals and nuts, I’d
1) Polish the pedal shafts in the area where the fractures are occurring to a 600 grit or better finish to minimize the stress risers and make subsequent inspections easier. Various abrasive papers and cloths make that reasonable even if you have to use them “shoe shine” method. Better if you can run the final polish marks parallel to the spindle rather than circumferential.
2) I’d tear down the pedals every few hundred to a thousand hours of riding (if you ride a couple plus hours a day that’s about once a year) and seriously eye ball the suspect area for cracks. Dye penetrant or magnetic particle inspection would be a bonus but is probably overkill if you’re diligent about looking for cracking. Less so after the first couple of thousand hours. There is a “fatigue limit” for steel parts. Barring impacts, steel parts (does not apply to aluminum ect.) subjected to ten to the seven cycles (10 million cycles) without failure are unlikely to ever fail. 1000 hours of cycling at 100 rpm equals 6 million cycles.
1) Polish the pedal shafts in the area where the fractures are occurring to a 600 grit or better finish to minimize the stress risers and make subsequent inspections easier. Various abrasive papers and cloths make that reasonable even if you have to use them “shoe shine” method. Better if you can run the final polish marks parallel to the spindle rather than circumferential.
2) I’d tear down the pedals every few hundred to a thousand hours of riding (if you ride a couple plus hours a day that’s about once a year) and seriously eye ball the suspect area for cracks. Dye penetrant or magnetic particle inspection would be a bonus but is probably overkill if you’re diligent about looking for cracking. Less so after the first couple of thousand hours. There is a “fatigue limit” for steel parts. Barring impacts, steel parts (does not apply to aluminum ect.) subjected to ten to the seven cycles (10 million cycles) without failure are unlikely to ever fail. 1000 hours of cycling at 100 rpm equals 6 million cycles.
In the days before clip-in MTB pedals (SPD, Crank Brothers, Look, & Time), Lyotard 460Ds were the favored pedal for professional cyclocross. They were rugged, smooth turning, and wide enough for quick entry and exit with muddy shoes. One standard setup then was football boots with all but the toe cleats removed, fitted with slotted cycling cleats, and doubled steel toeclips (to prevent squashing) bolted to Lyotard 460Ds. The straps were tightened only before the final sprint.
#79
十人十色
Thread Starter
The Mikashima Sylvan Touring pedals arrived yesterday. I've taken one apart and the spindle fits in the Lyotard 460D pedal body okay but it's too short to fit the lock-nut to the end after the bearing cone.
The spindle designs are the same:
[IMG]
IMG_5382 by Dawes-man, on Flickr[/IMG]
The Mikashima spindle looks to be of higher quality with the surface showing clear signs of having been bead blasted for strength, or 'shot peened', as mentioned earlier by Mike Mills.
[IMG]
IMG_5383 by Dawes-man, on Flickr[/IMG]
The spindle fits into the body okay but the very thick bearing cone fitted leaves no room for the washer and lock-nut:
IMG_5384 by Dawes-man, on Flickr
The balls in both the Lyotard and the Mikashima pedals measure exactly 3.9mm across and I think this, together with the general design of the pedals and spindles, clearly shows that Mikashima copied the Lyotard design.
And now? I've bought 2 pairs of the Mikashima pedals and will fit them to my Chesini Pista and my touring bike, the Peugeot. I've bought a pair of Constrictor platform pedals that will go on my Thanet (when it's finished), as they have short threads for steel cranks. I've bought a pair of Bramptons for the Hetchins MO. I've decided to take all my Lyotard pedals apart to polish the spindles and then check for cracks or imperfections.
I went to visit my English Lightweight collector friend yesterday and took the broken spindle and pedal to show him. He works for Honda Research & Development and said he would show the spindle to someone at work who would probably be able to say exactly what had happened. I shall post anything he tells me here.
In the meantime, I would like to thank everyone for your interest and suggestions. I have learnt a hell of a lot. Thank you!
The spindle designs are the same:
[IMG]
IMG_5382 by Dawes-man, on Flickr[/IMG]
The Mikashima spindle looks to be of higher quality with the surface showing clear signs of having been bead blasted for strength, or 'shot peened', as mentioned earlier by Mike Mills.
[IMG]
IMG_5383 by Dawes-man, on Flickr[/IMG]
The spindle fits into the body okay but the very thick bearing cone fitted leaves no room for the washer and lock-nut:
IMG_5384 by Dawes-man, on Flickr
The balls in both the Lyotard and the Mikashima pedals measure exactly 3.9mm across and I think this, together with the general design of the pedals and spindles, clearly shows that Mikashima copied the Lyotard design.
And now? I've bought 2 pairs of the Mikashima pedals and will fit them to my Chesini Pista and my touring bike, the Peugeot. I've bought a pair of Constrictor platform pedals that will go on my Thanet (when it's finished), as they have short threads for steel cranks. I've bought a pair of Bramptons for the Hetchins MO. I've decided to take all my Lyotard pedals apart to polish the spindles and then check for cracks or imperfections.
I went to visit my English Lightweight collector friend yesterday and took the broken spindle and pedal to show him. He works for Honda Research & Development and said he would show the spindle to someone at work who would probably be able to say exactly what had happened. I shall post anything he tells me here.
In the meantime, I would like to thank everyone for your interest and suggestions. I have learnt a hell of a lot. Thank you!
#80
Uff Da!
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 1,191
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 68 Post(s)
Liked 180 Times
in
90 Posts
Are the threads for the outer cone the same between the two?
If so, what about using the original Lyotard cone?
As I said earlier, I remember running into a complication(that I cannot remember the details of) but I was able to overcome it.
If so, what about using the original Lyotard cone?
As I said earlier, I remember running into a complication(that I cannot remember the details of) but I was able to overcome it.
#81
十人十色
Thread Starter
Unfortunately, no. Much bigger on the Mikashima. However, it has occurred to me that I could get the end re-threaded to the Lyotard size and then, as you suggest, use the original cone etc. The only problem I can foresee is if the Lyotard threads are... strange.
#82
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 2,929
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
Bead blasting and shot peening are different.
Bead blasting tends to remove material and/or roughen the surface. Shot peening uses larger shot (non-abrasive) that just bangs into the surface without removing material. It is a bulk process that replicates hitting the surface with a hammer - all over.
I have the MKS pedals on my most recent build. They are a nice pedal, probably a worthy heir to the Lyotard (probably better). I like the wide cages.
Bead blasting tends to remove material and/or roughen the surface. Shot peening uses larger shot (non-abrasive) that just bangs into the surface without removing material. It is a bulk process that replicates hitting the surface with a hammer - all over.
I have the MKS pedals on my most recent build. They are a nice pedal, probably a worthy heir to the Lyotard (probably better). I like the wide cages.
#83
十人十色
Thread Starter
Bead blasting and shot peening are different.
Bead blasting tends to remove material and/or roughen the surface. Shot peening uses larger shot (non-abrasive) that just bangs into the surface without removing material. It is a bulk process that replicates hitting the surface with a hammer - all over.
Bead blasting tends to remove material and/or roughen the surface. Shot peening uses larger shot (non-abrasive) that just bangs into the surface without removing material. It is a bulk process that replicates hitting the surface with a hammer - all over.
I'm sure they are better and I look forward to using them on 2 of my bikes.
#84
2Flit
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Orcas Washington and currently Circumnavigating in a Farrier F36 Trimaran
Posts: 88
Bikes: 1968 Rene Herse Gentleman's Bike; 1974/5 Jim Merz Custom-built; 1984 Rodriquez tandem; 2012 Bilenky Tandem; 1967 Cinelli SC; 1984 Specialized Exp. 68cm; 1971 Holdsworth 63cm(my first bike ever and owned since new!); 1994 Bridgestone MB5; 86'Trek420
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 38 Post(s)
Liked 170 Times
in
35 Posts
I have had an almost exactly similar breakage using this pedal. Mine was on a Rene Herse from 1968 and are the aluminum cages. My break was closer to the crank and looks VERY different in the break area. It has signs of initiating with a surface crack that was circumferential. There is darker metal staining from oxidation and deposits in this area that rings the break. My spindle must have been this way for some time preceding the catastrophic failure.
The new area of the break looks like a thousand zirconium diamonds all glittering!
I'll try to attach a picture if someone is interested in seeing the break. I would describe it as 60 grit sand paper roughness and as uniformly flat and shear except for one pointy bump about 0.5 mm high near the center. It is very sparkly.
It (in my opinion) Would be insane for anyone to continue ridding on these pedals. The low speed/pressure failure mentioned by DAWES is very concerning. Mine happened in an out of the saddle sprint over a rise at about 20 mph. I was in a left turn sprinting.... If it had been the LRFT pedal then I would have gone down with a hard slap. I was saved by the fact that this was the right pedal and I think only the Angels kept me upright. I am shaken and concerned
Don't use these pedals! This is a really big deal and there is something critically wrong with the design at this point in history. AND I do feel that the big guys are showing the stress first. I am 6'6" tall (199 cm for you euros) and am applying more force as I try to build up to 600 km brevets. The pedal broke like a balsa twig when it went.
The new area of the break looks like a thousand zirconium diamonds all glittering!
I'll try to attach a picture if someone is interested in seeing the break. I would describe it as 60 grit sand paper roughness and as uniformly flat and shear except for one pointy bump about 0.5 mm high near the center. It is very sparkly.
It (in my opinion) Would be insane for anyone to continue ridding on these pedals. The low speed/pressure failure mentioned by DAWES is very concerning. Mine happened in an out of the saddle sprint over a rise at about 20 mph. I was in a left turn sprinting.... If it had been the LRFT pedal then I would have gone down with a hard slap. I was saved by the fact that this was the right pedal and I think only the Angels kept me upright. I am shaken and concerned
Don't use these pedals! This is a really big deal and there is something critically wrong with the design at this point in history. AND I do feel that the big guys are showing the stress first. I am 6'6" tall (199 cm for you euros) and am applying more force as I try to build up to 600 km brevets. The pedal broke like a balsa twig when it went.
#86
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Fairplay Co
Posts: 9,582
Bikes: Current 79 Nishiki Custum Sport, Jeunet 620, notable previous bikes P.K. Ripper loop tail, Kawahara Laser Lite, Paramount Track full chrome, Raliegh Internatioanl, Motobecan Super Mirage. 59 Crown royak 3 speed
Mentioned: 26 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 786 Post(s)
Liked 1,706 Times
in
620 Posts
Thirty years after the last Lyotard 460D was manufactured we're finally seeing fatigue failures. I am sure nobody who made those pedals ever foresaw a 30+ year service life.
In the days before clip-in MTB pedals (SPD, Crank Brothers, Look, & Time), Lyotard 460Ds were the favored pedal for professional cyclocross. They were rugged, smooth turning, and wide enough for quick entry and exit with muddy shoes. One standard setup then was football boots with all but the toe cleats removed, fitted with slotted cycling cleats, and doubled steel toeclips (to prevent squashing) bolted to Lyotard 460Ds. The straps were tightened only before the final sprint.
In the days before clip-in MTB pedals (SPD, Crank Brothers, Look, & Time), Lyotard 460Ds were the favored pedal for professional cyclocross. They were rugged, smooth turning, and wide enough for quick entry and exit with muddy shoes. One standard setup then was football boots with all but the toe cleats removed, fitted with slotted cycling cleats, and doubled steel toeclips (to prevent squashing) bolted to Lyotard 460Ds. The straps were tightened only before the final sprint.
#87
2Flit
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Orcas Washington and currently Circumnavigating in a Farrier F36 Trimaran
Posts: 88
Bikes: 1968 Rene Herse Gentleman's Bike; 1974/5 Jim Merz Custom-built; 1984 Rodriquez tandem; 2012 Bilenky Tandem; 1967 Cinelli SC; 1984 Specialized Exp. 68cm; 1971 Holdsworth 63cm(my first bike ever and owned since new!); 1994 Bridgestone MB5; 86'Trek420
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 38 Post(s)
Liked 170 Times
in
35 Posts
Zukahn,
How did you determine a less than 10% failure rate?
Who collects these statistics?
How did you determine a less than 10% failure rate?
Who collects these statistics?
#88
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Austin,Texas
Posts: 802
Bikes: 73 Super Sport, 86 Tempo, 86 Peloton, 87 Super Sport, 83 Peugeot PFN10, 76 Super Course MK IV, 94 Univega Alpina 5.5
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 175 Post(s)
Liked 70 Times
in
34 Posts
What do you replace them with if you need French threading?
0430201173SS 106 by vonfilm, on Flickr
0430201173SS 103 by vonfilm, on Flickr
0430201173SS 106 by vonfilm, on Flickr
0430201173SS 103 by vonfilm, on Flickr
__________________
1973 Schwinn Super Sport
1986 Schwinn Peloton
1976 Raleigh Super Course Mk II(for wife)
1983 Gitane Super Corsa
1991 Trek 750 Multitrack
1973 Schwinn Super Sport
1986 Schwinn Peloton
1976 Raleigh Super Course Mk II(for wife)
1983 Gitane Super Corsa
1991 Trek 750 Multitrack
#90
Too many bikes
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Boston MA
Posts: 1,375
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Another case of a Lyotard pedal spindle break. I have 136R, a steel cage version with reflectors. Spindle broke future out on the spindle. Pictures tonight.
__________________
Looking for 24T or 21T Dura Ace uniglide cogs FW. Can trade NOS 12T.
Looking for 24T or 21T Dura Ace uniglide cogs FW. Can trade NOS 12T.
#93
Old fart
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Appleton WI
Posts: 24,935
Bikes: Several, mostly not name brands.
Mentioned: 153 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3571 Post(s)
Liked 3,367 Times
in
1,916 Posts
#94
Banned.
Join Date: May 2011
Location: on the beach
Posts: 4,859
Bikes: '73 falcon sr, '76 grand record, '84 davidson
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 59 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 21 Times
in
16 Posts
didn't read the whole thread, so maybe i missed it ... but if any of the pedals needed to replace (with mks sylvans) are french threaded, how does the op intend to tackle this issue?
#95
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Fairplay Co
Posts: 9,582
Bikes: Current 79 Nishiki Custum Sport, Jeunet 620, notable previous bikes P.K. Ripper loop tail, Kawahara Laser Lite, Paramount Track full chrome, Raliegh Internatioanl, Motobecan Super Mirage. 59 Crown royak 3 speed
Mentioned: 26 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 786 Post(s)
Liked 1,706 Times
in
620 Posts
#96
Old fart
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Appleton WI
Posts: 24,935
Bikes: Several, mostly not name brands.
Mentioned: 153 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3571 Post(s)
Liked 3,367 Times
in
1,916 Posts
#97
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: San Diego
Posts: 1,051
Bikes: 1989 Schwinn World Sport. 1994 Diamond Back Response Elite MTB. 1964 Schwinn Typhoon. 1974 Bridgestone Sprinter, 2015 Scott Sub 10 Citybike.
Mentioned: 17 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1687 Post(s)
Liked 78 Times
in
34 Posts
Dammit. Something else to worry about. Anybody ever have one of these break?
#99
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Maidstone, Kent, England
Posts: 2,637
Bikes: 1970 Holdsworth Mistral, Vitus 979, Colnago Primavera, Corratec Hydracarbon, Massi MegaTeam, 1935 Claud Butler Super Velo, Carrera Virtuoso, Viner, 1953 Claud Butler Silver Jubilee, 1954 Holdsworth Typhoon, 1966 Claud Butler Olympic Road, 1982 Claud
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 10 Post(s)
Liked 11 Times
in
10 Posts
#100
2Flit
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Orcas Washington and currently Circumnavigating in a Farrier F36 Trimaran
Posts: 88
Bikes: 1968 Rene Herse Gentleman's Bike; 1974/5 Jim Merz Custom-built; 1984 Rodriquez tandem; 2012 Bilenky Tandem; 1967 Cinelli SC; 1984 Specialized Exp. 68cm; 1971 Holdsworth 63cm(my first bike ever and owned since new!); 1994 Bridgestone MB5; 86'Trek420
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 38 Post(s)
Liked 170 Times
in
35 Posts
stress test
The bikes are up to it but not these pedals.
Read back up to my first post and my experience shearing one of these off. I suppose they are probably fine for a slow ride on the flat but they are now failing on us ridders. I don't collect vintag bikes, I ride vintage bikes and these pedals are now proving to be unsafe and they should no longer be on a bike that you plan to ride. Anything else is foolish , especially after reviewing the failures seen up-thread.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
cliffbar
Bicycle Mechanics
20
11-17-10 07:24 PM