Show your Trek
#2451
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2021
Posts: 1,498
Bikes: '38 Schwinn New World, ’69 Peugeot PX-10, '72 Peugeot PX-10, ‘7? Valgan, ’79 Holdsworth Pro, ’80 Peugeot TH-8 tandem, '87 Trek 400T, ‘7? Raleigh Sports, ‘7? Raleigh Superbe, ‘6? Hercules
Mentioned: 13 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 618 Post(s)
Liked 1,187 Times
in
589 Posts
#2452
tantum vehi
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Flathead Valley, MT
Posts: 4,421
Bikes: More than I care to admit
Mentioned: 147 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1112 Post(s)
Liked 775 Times
in
413 Posts
And you got 42mm Soma Grand Randonneurs in the back? It’s looking like a build I’d do myself.

__________________
1970 Gitane TdF; 1973 Gitane TdF
1979 Trek 710; 1981 Trek 412; 1981 Trek 710
1983 Specialized Stumpjumper Sport; 1985 Specialized Allez SE; 1988 Specialized Sirrus; 1989 Specialized Rock Combo
1984 Ross Mt. Hood
1988 Centurion Ironman Expert
1991 Bridgestone RB-1
1992 Serotta Colorado TG
2015 Elephant NFE
1979 Trek 710; 1981 Trek 412; 1981 Trek 710
1983 Specialized Stumpjumper Sport; 1985 Specialized Allez SE; 1988 Specialized Sirrus; 1989 Specialized Rock Combo
1984 Ross Mt. Hood
1988 Centurion Ironman Expert
1991 Bridgestone RB-1
1992 Serotta Colorado TG
2015 Elephant NFE
Likes For mountaindave:
#2453
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2021
Posts: 1,498
Bikes: '38 Schwinn New World, ’69 Peugeot PX-10, '72 Peugeot PX-10, ‘7? Valgan, ’79 Holdsworth Pro, ’80 Peugeot TH-8 tandem, '87 Trek 400T, ‘7? Raleigh Sports, ‘7? Raleigh Superbe, ‘6? Hercules
Mentioned: 13 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 618 Post(s)
Liked 1,187 Times
in
589 Posts
Yes, though clearance is pretty tight at the chain-stays. I think I'll dimple the stays just a bit for piece of mind, I just haven't got round to making some sort of dimpling jig.
Likes For ehcoplex:
#2454
tantum vehi
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Flathead Valley, MT
Posts: 4,421
Bikes: More than I care to admit
Mentioned: 147 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1112 Post(s)
Liked 775 Times
in
413 Posts
I’m in the same boat with my 710’s conversion. I can get away with 42s in dry conditions, but I hear scrubbing from grit in wet conditions. Just need to find one of those round tuits…
__________________
1970 Gitane TdF; 1973 Gitane TdF
1979 Trek 710; 1981 Trek 412; 1981 Trek 710
1983 Specialized Stumpjumper Sport; 1985 Specialized Allez SE; 1988 Specialized Sirrus; 1989 Specialized Rock Combo
1984 Ross Mt. Hood
1988 Centurion Ironman Expert
1991 Bridgestone RB-1
1992 Serotta Colorado TG
2015 Elephant NFE
1979 Trek 710; 1981 Trek 412; 1981 Trek 710
1983 Specialized Stumpjumper Sport; 1985 Specialized Allez SE; 1988 Specialized Sirrus; 1989 Specialized Rock Combo
1984 Ross Mt. Hood
1988 Centurion Ironman Expert
1991 Bridgestone RB-1
1992 Serotta Colorado TG
2015 Elephant NFE
#2455
Full Member
Join Date: May 2019
Location: Burien WA
Posts: 399
Bikes: Cannondale Synapse, LeMond Victoire, Bianchi Campione d'Italia, Kona Hei Hei, Ritchey Ultra, Schwinn "Paramount" PDG, '83 Trek 640
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 171 Post(s)
Liked 180 Times
in
122 Posts
I bought a 640 and it doesn't look like 42's will fit in the front fork...

#2456
Full Member
Join Date: May 2019
Location: Burien WA
Posts: 399
Bikes: Cannondale Synapse, LeMond Victoire, Bianchi Campione d'Italia, Kona Hei Hei, Ritchey Ultra, Schwinn "Paramount" PDG, '83 Trek 640
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 171 Post(s)
Liked 180 Times
in
122 Posts
Posting this here, but it's probably for posterity. Trek 640 frame that I bought off CL and the seller shipped to me from across the country. It's a touch too small, despite my best efforts at reading the geometry from the old catalogs. It's mocked up here as a possible 650b conversion, but, like I said, I probably need to go for the next size larger. The stem is maxed out and I'm not sure even a Technomic would make it work.

Likes For mhespenheide:
#2457
tantum vehi
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Flathead Valley, MT
Posts: 4,421
Bikes: More than I care to admit
Mentioned: 147 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1112 Post(s)
Liked 775 Times
in
413 Posts
Mine has a replacement fork from an’85-ish Nashbar Touré built for 27” wheels and cantis so I had room. Pretty sure they still would fit with the original fork though. It’s a ‘79 710 (see the photos in my sig in desktop mode).
__________________
1970 Gitane TdF; 1973 Gitane TdF
1979 Trek 710; 1981 Trek 412; 1981 Trek 710
1983 Specialized Stumpjumper Sport; 1985 Specialized Allez SE; 1988 Specialized Sirrus; 1989 Specialized Rock Combo
1984 Ross Mt. Hood
1988 Centurion Ironman Expert
1991 Bridgestone RB-1
1992 Serotta Colorado TG
2015 Elephant NFE
1979 Trek 710; 1981 Trek 412; 1981 Trek 710
1983 Specialized Stumpjumper Sport; 1985 Specialized Allez SE; 1988 Specialized Sirrus; 1989 Specialized Rock Combo
1984 Ross Mt. Hood
1988 Centurion Ironman Expert
1991 Bridgestone RB-1
1992 Serotta Colorado TG
2015 Elephant NFE
Likes For mountaindave:
Likes For romanlotus:
#2459
The Expert

I bought it from the original owner and it was 100% all original.
Likes For romanlotus:
Likes For romanlotus:
Likes For romanlotus:
#2463
tantum vehi
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Flathead Valley, MT
Posts: 4,421
Bikes: More than I care to admit
Mentioned: 147 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1112 Post(s)
Liked 775 Times
in
413 Posts
That was an amazing find - even the tires are original! Like the owner bought it, put it in a hermetically sealed box for 40 years and then decided to sell.

__________________
1970 Gitane TdF; 1973 Gitane TdF
1979 Trek 710; 1981 Trek 412; 1981 Trek 710
1983 Specialized Stumpjumper Sport; 1985 Specialized Allez SE; 1988 Specialized Sirrus; 1989 Specialized Rock Combo
1984 Ross Mt. Hood
1988 Centurion Ironman Expert
1991 Bridgestone RB-1
1992 Serotta Colorado TG
2015 Elephant NFE
1979 Trek 710; 1981 Trek 412; 1981 Trek 710
1983 Specialized Stumpjumper Sport; 1985 Specialized Allez SE; 1988 Specialized Sirrus; 1989 Specialized Rock Combo
1984 Ross Mt. Hood
1988 Centurion Ironman Expert
1991 Bridgestone RB-1
1992 Serotta Colorado TG
2015 Elephant NFE
#2464
Master Parts Rearranger
Join Date: Mar 2015
Location: Portlandia's Kuiper Belt, OR
Posts: 4,381
Bikes: 1989 Schwinn Paramount OS - 1982 Trek 720 - 1982 Trek 715 - 1981 Trek 710 - 1985 Trek 620 - 1985 Schwinn Voyageur SP - 1989 Cannondale SR - 2006 Orbea Onix - 2009 Specialized Tricross
Mentioned: 214 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1434 Post(s)
Liked 1,629 Times
in
821 Posts
Any day is a good day for a fully Reynolds 531 Trek, and that thing is spotless!
Likes For RiddleOfSteel:
#2465
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2015
Location: Richmond, Virginia
Posts: 8,781
Bikes: Waterford Paramount Touring, Giant CFM-2, Raleigh Sports 3-speeds in M23 & L23, Schwinn Cimarron oddball build, Marin Palisades Trail dropbar conversion, Nishiki Cresta GT
Mentioned: 65 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2556 Post(s)
Liked 2,082 Times
in
1,354 Posts
More pix of that tall Elance. I'm astonished how decent it is overall despite the obviously trashed appearance. No dents or cracks that I can find, the BB and HS spin freely and it's straight. Even the top tube cable guides are undamaged. Damn, this would make a good project for someone but not for me.
It sure ain't pretty but would make a decent ride for somebody.

I don't know the Trek line by heart but recall seeing these 531 frames with Cr-Mo (specifically NOT 531) forks. Kind of an odd offering by the company.




Haven't tried a seatpost yet but assume it takes a 27.2.

It sure ain't pretty but would make a decent ride for somebody.

I don't know the Trek line by heart but recall seeing these 531 frames with Cr-Mo (specifically NOT 531) forks. Kind of an odd offering by the company.




Haven't tried a seatpost yet but assume it takes a 27.2.


Likes For thumpism:
#2466
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2021
Posts: 1,498
Bikes: '38 Schwinn New World, ’69 Peugeot PX-10, '72 Peugeot PX-10, ‘7? Valgan, ’79 Holdsworth Pro, ’80 Peugeot TH-8 tandem, '87 Trek 400T, ‘7? Raleigh Sports, ‘7? Raleigh Superbe, ‘6? Hercules
Mentioned: 13 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 618 Post(s)
Liked 1,187 Times
in
589 Posts
More pix of that tall Elance. I'm astonished how decent it is overall despite the obviously trashed appearance. No dents or cracks that I can find, the BB and HS spin freely and it's straight. Even the top tube cable guides are undamaged. Damn, this would make a good project for someone but not for me.
It sure ain't pretty but would make a decent ride for somebody.
I don't know the Trek line by heart but recall seeing these 531 frames with Cr-Mo (specifically NOT 531) forks. Kind of an odd offering by the company.

Haven't tried a seatpost yet but assume it takes a 27.2.
It sure ain't pretty but would make a decent ride for somebody.
I don't know the Trek line by heart but recall seeing these 531 frames with Cr-Mo (specifically NOT 531) forks. Kind of an odd offering by the company.

Haven't tried a seatpost yet but assume it takes a 27.2.
I does seem these Trek Elance frames are quite liked by those who have/ride them, even if they aren't highly regarded. I've only been able to try the one I picked up and reno'd on the rollers so far, so can't give a real-world impression. Funny thing is, I actually bought it to build up as a 650b conversion for a friend, but it turned out to be smaller than thought- he's quite tall. But it's my size, so I've built it up for myself. Your frame would be more his size..
#2467
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2021
Posts: 1,498
Bikes: '38 Schwinn New World, ’69 Peugeot PX-10, '72 Peugeot PX-10, ‘7? Valgan, ’79 Holdsworth Pro, ’80 Peugeot TH-8 tandem, '87 Trek 400T, ‘7? Raleigh Sports, ‘7? Raleigh Superbe, ‘6? Hercules
Mentioned: 13 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 618 Post(s)
Liked 1,187 Times
in
589 Posts
thumpism , curious what the BB on your frame is. As far as I can tell, '87 was the only year with the '3 main tubes 531' and solid, sparkly dark blue (red & black being the other option), so I assume ours are the same year. Mine has a Hatta BB, but it's got threaded studs that take a nut.....
Ah, but just now I'm thinking maybe yours is a 400D, while mine's a 400T, which might explain it...
Ah, but just now I'm thinking maybe yours is a 400D, while mine's a 400T, which might explain it...
#2468
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2017
Location: NJ
Posts: 591
Bikes: 68 SS, 72 Fuji Finest, 72 PX-10, 77 Pana Pro 7000, 84 Pinnarello Treviso NR, 84 Trek 520, 88 Project KOM, 90 Trek 750, 91 Trek 930
Mentioned: 10 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 175 Post(s)
Liked 172 Times
in
121 Posts
86 400 Elance was also 3 main tubes 531 with a tange fork and 4130 stays.
__________________
Last new bike 1991
Last new bike 1991
Likes For dmark:
#2469
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2021
Posts: 1,498
Bikes: '38 Schwinn New World, ’69 Peugeot PX-10, '72 Peugeot PX-10, ‘7? Valgan, ’79 Holdsworth Pro, ’80 Peugeot TH-8 tandem, '87 Trek 400T, ‘7? Raleigh Sports, ‘7? Raleigh Superbe, ‘6? Hercules
Mentioned: 13 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 618 Post(s)
Liked 1,187 Times
in
589 Posts
#2470
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: NW Ohio
Posts: 3,224
Bikes: 1984 Miyata 310, 1986 Schwinn Sierra, 2011 Jamis Quest, 1980 Peugeot TH8 Tandem, 1992 Performance Parabola, 1987 Ross Mt. Hood, 1988 Schwinn LeTour, 1988 Trek 400T, 1981 Fuji S12-S LTD, 197? FW Evans
Mentioned: 22 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 437 Post(s)
Liked 641 Times
in
366 Posts
Posting this here, but it's probably for posterity. Trek 640 frame that I bought off CL and the seller shipped to me from across the country. It's a touch too small, despite my best efforts at reading the geometry from the old catalogs. It's mocked up here as a possible 650b conversion, but, like I said, I probably need to go for the next size larger. The stem is maxed out and I'm not sure even a Technomic would make it work.


I agree, a larger frame would be the ideal solution, but a Technomic might work while you are searching.
#2471
Extraordinary Magnitude
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Waukesha WI
Posts: 13,393
Bikes: 1978 Trek TX700; 1978/79 Trek 736; 1984 Specialized Stumpjumper Sport; 1984 Schwinn Voyageur SP; 1985 Trek 620; 1985 Trek 720; 1986 Trek 400 Elance; 1987 Schwinn High Sierra; 1990 Miyata 1000LT
Mentioned: 83 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2504 Post(s)
Liked 1,398 Times
in
790 Posts
I'd guess it was purely a cost-saving decision to forgo 531 for the fork & stays (and may possibly have had as much to do with exchange rates, trade agreements, etc., at the time..). I've casually looked for a definitive description of what the real-world differences are between 'chrome-moly' and 'manganese-moly' but haven't come up with anything- at least that seemed 'definitive' (and described something that I personally might notice.... or at least understand!).
I does seem these Trek Elance frames are quite liked by those who have/ride them, even if they aren't highly regarded. I've only been able to try the one I picked up and reno'd on the rollers so far, so can't give a real-world impression. Funny thing is, I actually bought it to build up as a 650b conversion for a friend, but it turned out to be smaller than thought- he's quite tall. But it's my size, so I've built it up for myself. Your frame would be more his size..
I does seem these Trek Elance frames are quite liked by those who have/ride them, even if they aren't highly regarded. I've only been able to try the one I picked up and reno'd on the rollers so far, so can't give a real-world impression. Funny thing is, I actually bought it to build up as a 650b conversion for a friend, but it turned out to be smaller than thought- he's quite tall. But it's my size, so I've built it up for myself. Your frame would be more his size..
Look at the difference in the 1985 and 1986 catalog. (very loosely figure- 700 series bikes were more prestigious and expensive and went down from there). In 1985 there was:
700 series bikes (531 main frame with 531 stays and fork),
600 series bikes (531/Reynolds CrMo),
500 series bikes (501/Tange Mangalloy),
400 series bikes (True Temper CrMo/Tange Mangalloy).
In 1986 that changed to:
700 series bikes (531 main frame with 531 stays and fork)
500 series bikes (531/Tange CrMo)
400 series bikes (531/Tange CrMo)
300 series bikes (IshiwataCrMo/Ishiwata CrMo)
They cut out 600 series bikes- but the bikes that were essentially the same bikes were moved down in precedence to the the 400-500 level. A 'Tre-tubi' 531/CrMo bike was a step above entry level for Trek. While it speaks of the adage "Trek's entry level bikes were better than most companies' mid level bikes," it also speaks of the perceived value of 531.
ehcoplex The simple real-world difference between 531 and CrMo- is that it's stronger per it's weight. A CrMo tube would need to be drawn thicker, and therefore heavier to have the same strength as a 531 tube.

__________________
*Recipient of the 2006 Time Magazine "Person Of The Year" Award*
Commence to jigglin’ huh?!?!
"But hey, always love to hear from opinionated amateurs." -says some guy to Mr. Marshall.
Commence to jigglin’ huh?!?!
"But hey, always love to hear from opinionated amateurs." -says some guy to Mr. Marshall.
Likes For The Golden Boy:
#2472
Master Parts Rearranger
Join Date: Mar 2015
Location: Portlandia's Kuiper Belt, OR
Posts: 4,381
Bikes: 1989 Schwinn Paramount OS - 1982 Trek 720 - 1982 Trek 715 - 1981 Trek 710 - 1985 Trek 620 - 1985 Schwinn Voyageur SP - 1989 Cannondale SR - 2006 Orbea Onix - 2009 Specialized Tricross
Mentioned: 214 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1434 Post(s)
Liked 1,629 Times
in
821 Posts
Exactly. Trek and others were moving to aluminum etc, so I think there was also an "Everything [steel] must go!" mentality, especially as many 'lower level' Treks (the Elances and left over '85 frames) had some version or amount of 531 in them. They're good frames, the Elances, but there is no mistaking the extra weight of the non-531 tubing used and resulting less supple ride. We're talking an approximately 350g difference in a 25.5" frameset between a 700-level frame and anything below that, at least from the many that I've had and weighed. Put some true 35mm tires of quality at an appropriate pressure, and that will overcome the 'lesser' tubed frame's stiffer ride. Though I suppose if you have nicer roads that Seattle proper, it's not as needed. Glass smooth country roads with 25mm Gatorskins at 100 psi doesn't feel bad at all.
Likes For RiddleOfSteel:
#2473
Junior Member
1985 Trek 660
1985 Trek 660, 531 Reynolds tubing w/Cinelli BB, Superbe Pro components, more photos here:
https://www.pedalroom.com/bike/1985-trek-660-47601
https://www.pedalroom.com/bike/1985-trek-660-47601

Likes For brewerkz:
#2474
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2015
Location: Richmond, Virginia
Posts: 8,781
Bikes: Waterford Paramount Touring, Giant CFM-2, Raleigh Sports 3-speeds in M23 & L23, Schwinn Cimarron oddball build, Marin Palisades Trail dropbar conversion, Nishiki Cresta GT
Mentioned: 65 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2556 Post(s)
Liked 2,082 Times
in
1,354 Posts
thumpism , curious what the BB on your frame is. As far as I can tell, '87 was the only year with the '3 main tubes 531' and solid, sparkly dark blue (red & black being the other option), so I assume ours are the same year. Mine has a Hatta BB, but it's got threaded studs that take a nut.....
Ah, but just now I'm thinking maybe yours is a 400D, while mine's a 400T, which might explain it...
Ah, but just now I'm thinking maybe yours is a 400D, while mine's a 400T, which might explain it...

Likes For thumpism:
#2475
Full Member
Join Date: May 2019
Location: Burien WA
Posts: 399
Bikes: Cannondale Synapse, LeMond Victoire, Bianchi Campione d'Italia, Kona Hei Hei, Ritchey Ultra, Schwinn "Paramount" PDG, '83 Trek 640
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 171 Post(s)
Liked 180 Times
in
122 Posts
A Technomic stem is about 40 mm taller than a normal stem. I measured mine and it is 150 mm from the minimum insertion line to the top, so it might be enough to put the bars at saddle height.
I agree, a larger frame would be the ideal solution, but a Technomic might work while you are searching.
I agree, a larger frame would be the ideal solution, but a Technomic might work while you are searching.