When is a 27.2 seatpost not a 27.2 seatpost?
#1
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Evanston, IL
Posts: 5,084
Bikes: many
Mentioned: 63 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1442 Post(s)
Liked 1,387 Times
in
758 Posts
When is a 27.2 seatpost not a 27.2 seatpost?
I am building up a mid-80s Trek 770 frame. My understanding is that all Trek bikes of that era should have had 27.2mm seatposts. I bought a no-name seatpost which is clearly marked "27.2" but it simply won't fit. I don't currently have a set of calipers to figure out precisely which part is wrong. I'll be doing that soon. I did measure with a small metric ruler and figured the seat tube inside dimension was 27.2.
Am I mistaken about the 27.2mm seat tube dimension or is it likely the seatpost is
mismarked?
Am I mistaken about the 27.2mm seat tube dimension or is it likely the seatpost is
mismarked?
#3
)) <> ((
check to see that the seat tube wasn't squished by the previous owner using a smaller seatpost. a strong screwdriver can help.
#5
multimodal commuter
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: NJ, NYC, LI
Posts: 19,808
Bikes: 1940s Fothergill, 1959 Allegro Special, 1963? Claud Butler Olympic Sprint, Lambert 'Clubman', 1974 Fuji "the Ace", 1976 Holdsworth 650b conversion rando bike, 1983 Trek 720 tourer, 1984 Counterpoint Opus II, 1993 Basso Gap, 2010 Downtube 8h, and...
Mentioned: 584 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1908 Post(s)
Liked 574 Times
in
339 Posts
I would be pretty surprised if ALL Trek's from any era took 27.2 posts. I'm sure all the butted 531 frames did, and the Columbus frames as well, but bikes made from other kinds of tubing may have taken thinner posts. Lower end models, in particular, probably took thinner posts.
#6
)) <> ((
I would be pretty surprised if ALL Trek's from any era took 27.2 posts. I'm sure all the butted 531 frames did, and the Columbus frames as well, but bikes made from other kinds of tubing may have taken thinner posts. Lower end models, in particular, probably took thinner posts.
#8
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 20,305
Mentioned: 130 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3464 Post(s)
Liked 2,827 Times
in
1,995 Posts
Got another bike with a 27.2? If so, remove the seat post from it and test THAT post in your reluctant Trek, and check the "no name" in the other frame.
Good check to make sure you do not get stuck with a frozen post in your other bike too.
Good check to make sure you do not get stuck with a frozen post in your other bike too.
#9
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Evanston, IL
Posts: 5,084
Bikes: many
Mentioned: 63 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1442 Post(s)
Liked 1,387 Times
in
758 Posts
Well, the caliper tells the tale, though I'm still a bit perplexed. Side-to-side the seat collar does appear to be 27.2. It's smaller front-to-back, as small as 26.9. Wouldn't clamping a smaller seatpost make it smaller side-to-side? It doesn't help that the seatpost seems to be as large as 27.3 in some directions (okay across other diameters).
#10
www.theheadbadge.com
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Southern Florida
Posts: 28,510
Bikes: https://www.theheadbadge.com
Mentioned: 124 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2420 Post(s)
Liked 4,381 Times
in
2,090 Posts
Well, the caliper tells the tale, though I'm still a bit perplexed. Side-to-side the seat collar does appear to be 27.2. It's smaller front-to-back, as small as 26.9. Wouldn't clamping a smaller seatpost make it smaller side-to-side? It doesn't help that the seatpost seems to be as large as 27.3 in some directions (okay across other diameters).
-Kurt
#12
Old fart
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Appleton WI
Posts: 24,778
Bikes: Several, mostly not name brands.
Mentioned: 153 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3583 Post(s)
Liked 3,395 Times
in
1,929 Posts
I would be pretty surprised if ALL Trek's from any era took 27.2 posts. I'm sure all the butted 531 frames did, and the Columbus frames as well, but bikes made from other kinds of tubing may have taken thinner posts. Lower end models, in particular, probably took thinner posts.
#13
Old fart
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Appleton WI
Posts: 24,778
Bikes: Several, mostly not name brands.
Mentioned: 153 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3583 Post(s)
Liked 3,395 Times
in
1,929 Posts
#14
surly old man
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Carlisle, PA
Posts: 3,392
Bikes: IRO Mark V, Karate Monkey half fat, Trek 620 IGH, Cannondale 26/24 MTB, Amp Research B3, and more.
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 46 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 42 Times
in
18 Posts
I have an 85 620 with butted 531 that takes a 26.8
jim
jim
__________________
Cross Check Nexus7, IRO Mark V, Trek 620 Nexus7, Karate Monkey half fat, IRO Model 19 fixed, Amp Research B3, Surly 1x1 half fat fixed, and more...
--------------------------
SB forever
Cross Check Nexus7, IRO Mark V, Trek 620 Nexus7, Karate Monkey half fat, IRO Model 19 fixed, Amp Research B3, Surly 1x1 half fat fixed, and more...
--------------------------
SB forever
#15
Senior Member
Since this mystery is already solved and the OP knows his seat tube is screwed up, I'd like to ask another question.
It's some how bad for the bike to use a smaller post, right? I've got a 531 frame that takes a 27.2 and a really nice 26.8 post. It's a shame to have it laying around and have a lesser quality post in my bike, but I'm guessing there's a reason it would be bad to use it?
It's some how bad for the bike to use a smaller post, right? I've got a 531 frame that takes a 27.2 and a really nice 26.8 post. It's a shame to have it laying around and have a lesser quality post in my bike, but I'm guessing there's a reason it would be bad to use it?
#16
Large Member
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Tejas
Posts: 2,533
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times
in
1 Post
Since this mystery is already solved and the OP knows his seat tube is screwed up, I'd like to ask another question.
It's some how bad for the bike to use a smaller post, right? I've got a 531 frame that takes a 27.2 and a really nice 26.8 post. It's a shame to have it laying around and have a lesser quality post in my bike, but I'm guessing there's a reason it would be bad to use it?
It's some how bad for the bike to use a smaller post, right? I've got a 531 frame that takes a 27.2 and a really nice 26.8 post. It's a shame to have it laying around and have a lesser quality post in my bike, but I'm guessing there's a reason it would be bad to use it?
#17
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 909
Bikes: Casati, Look, Torelli, Ridley, and a bunch of steel bikes from the 80s and the 90s..
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 11 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
screw driver time. If not, I think this is a better method, cut a sliver or wedge of wood(to protect the paint and not do damage if you slip) and drive the split open just a hair. Grease the 27.2 post, it should slip in there without too much effort. Tighten the seat post binder and you should be good to go.
#18
Senior Member
#19
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Hudson Valley, NY
Posts: 254
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times
in
3 Posts
The problem with the smaller seat post is that clamping it down tightly deforms the seat tube, the apparent source of the OP's problem. It also puts you at somewhat greater risk of the seat post slipping down in the seat tube when you really don't want it to, although if you clamp the collar tightly enough, I suspect you'd be OK. If you really want to use the smaller seat post, I'd recommend using a shim. I don't think you can get a 26.8 to 27.2 shim (I'd be happy to be proved wrong), so you'd need to do the ol' beer can trick or something similar. Some people think it's a bit risky, but plenty of others swear by it.
__________________
Steve
Steve
#20
Cisalpinist
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Holland
Posts: 5,557
Bikes: blue ones.
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 16 Times
in
11 Posts
to answer the original question in the most literal sense: when you let Italians do the measurements. My 27.2 campagnolo post perfectly fits my 1990 concorde, but a nice Aero Selcof post in the same nominal diameter doesn't.
#21
Senior Member
[QUOTE=strock;12741764]The problem... so you'd need to do the ol' beer can trick.QUOTE]
Of course! Why didn't i think of that? Guess I can use this post afterall.
Of course! Why didn't i think of that? Guess I can use this post afterall.
#23
Senior Member
It's a RaceFace Revolution in 26.8mm. If you've got one, or a quality post of similar design in 27.2, I'd be up for a trade. I really like the post, though, so if the shim works then I'd probably only want to trade for the same post in 27.2.
#25
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Evanston, IL
Posts: 5,084
Bikes: many
Mentioned: 63 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1442 Post(s)
Liked 1,387 Times
in
758 Posts
Thanks. The wedge trick worked. Couldn't get a wood wedge to hold in place, but an old screwdriver did...