Bike Forums

Bike Forums (https://www.bikeforums.net/forum.php)
-   Classic & Vintage (https://www.bikeforums.net/classic-vintage/)
-   -   A Shimano Question... (https://www.bikeforums.net/classic-vintage/760425-shimano-question.html)

Giacomo 1 08-15-11 04:00 PM

A Shimano Question...
 
What is the order of quality in Shimano groups from worst to best?

My bike has a full Shimano 105 group, and was wondering where it stacks up in the Shimano world...

Thanks!:thumb:

3speed 08-15-11 04:02 PM

I don't know them all myself, but if you search something like "shimano road hierarchy" in Yahoo, you'll be able to find it fairly easily. 105 if pretty good.

Puget Pounder 08-15-11 04:11 PM


Originally Posted by 3speed (Post 13087391)
I don't know them all myself, but if you search something like "shimano road hierarchy" in Yahoo, you'll be able to find it fairly easily. 105 if pretty good.

Ya-hoo..?

Bianchigirll 08-15-11 04:20 PM


Originally Posted by 3speed (Post 13087391)
I don't know them all myself, but if you search something like "shimano road hierarchy" in Yahoo, you'll be able to find it fairly easily. 105 if pretty good.


Originally Posted by Puget Pounder (Post 13087423)
Ya-hoo..?

This is C&V what is wrong with searching on Yahoo? I am not sure I ever googled something.

OP: from the top down it has been Dura Ace, 600/Ultegra, then 105 for years except the 2 or so years Sante was sandwiched in between DA and 600.

below 105 I beleiv RSX is still next followed by Tiagra but back in the early '90s RX-100 was the next step down and the 500EX, 400EX, then Exage groups.

VeloBase may be a bit easier to find the group rankings. http://velobase.com/ViewBrand.aspx?B...d0d2106&From=T

Giacomo 1 08-15-11 04:25 PM

I think most of my confusion came into where the 600 fell in, but I can see it is actually now the Ultegra, so it is a step-up from my 105 gruppo.

RobbieTunes 08-15-11 07:14 PM

In 1987 or so, the "new" 105, while positioned below the 6200 series 600EX, was often preferred. Shimano followed that up with the much better 600 "tricolor," the 6400 series.

lostarchitect 08-15-11 07:16 PM

I think Sora is below Tiagra now.

bionnaki 08-15-11 08:34 PM

currently it is: da, ultegra, 105, tiagra, sora.

105 being a good, equal balance of weight, cost, quality, performance.

khatfull 08-15-11 08:38 PM

Yes, 105 of all flavors has always been a sweet spot for price/performance IMHO. Nothing at all wrong with a 105 group.

well biked 08-15-11 08:52 PM

Not trying to offend dura ace users/owners, but I got a kick out of a sign-off that Sheldon once used regarding the Shimano hierarchy:

"Dura Ace is for suckers."
Sheldon "105" Brown

khatfull 08-15-11 09:20 PM


Originally Posted by well biked (Post 13088627)
Not trying to offend dura ace users/owners, but I got a kick out of a sign-off that Sheldon once used regarding the Shimano hierarchy:

"Dura Ace is for suckers."
Sheldon "105" Brown

Hahaha, that's great...

That said, I do have a DA7700 bike:

1) I was specifically going for a bling factor and
2) A member made me a deal that was simply "unrefusable".

So I have DA...

http://home.comcast.net/~khatfull/im...pusfinalsm.jpg

well biked 08-15-11 09:24 PM


Originally Posted by khatfull (Post 13088728)
Hahaha, that's great...

That said, I do have a DA7700 bike:

1) I was specifically going for a bling factor and
2) A member made me a deal that was simply "unrefusable".

So I have DA...

It is indeed blingy. Beautiful bike.:)

pastorbobnlnh 08-16-11 04:45 AM


Originally Posted by khatfull (Post 13088728)
Hahaha, that's great...

That said, I do have a DA7700 bike:

1) I was specifically going for a bling factor and
2) A member made me a deal that was simply "unrefusable".

So I have DA...

...and I have 105 (on a pastor's budget)! ;)

1993 Version
http://i125.photobucket.com/albums/p...5R699Front.jpg

1996 Version
http://i125.photobucket.com/albums/p...00FullSide.jpg

Giacomo 1 08-16-11 06:40 AM


Originally Posted by khatfull (Post 13088728)
Hahaha, that's great...

That said, I do have a DA7700 bike:

1) I was specifically going for a bling factor and
2) A member made me a deal that was simply "unrefusable".

So I have DA...

If what I read in my search was true, it looks that the 105 has the same interior components as the Dura and Ultegra, but not the bling factor on the outside.

What do you think?

Oh, and very pretty Fuji!

khatfull 08-16-11 08:18 AM


Originally Posted by Giacomo 1 (Post 13089530)
If what I read in my search was true, it looks that the 105 has the same interior components as the Dura and Ultegra, but not the bling factor on the outside.

What do you think?

Oh, and very pretty Fuji!

Thanks.

There'll be some differences, weight being one but we're talking grams. All three, properly adjusted, lubricated, and maintained should provide roughly equal shifting performance. IMHO anyway.

20grit 08-16-11 09:41 AM

Let's not forget Golden Arrow which is essentially 105 level... Just cooler.

miamijim 08-16-11 09:43 AM

Triomphe/Victory<NR<SR<Exage<105<600/Ultegra<Dura Ace

khatfull 08-16-11 09:46 AM


Originally Posted by miamijim (Post 13090343)
Triomphe/Victory<NR<SR<Exage<105<600/Ultegra<Dura Ace

Super Record < Exage?

:popcorn

And I thought I was getting in trouble in my thread! :)

horribleoldman 08-16-11 09:49 AM


Originally Posted by Giacomo 1 (Post 13089530)
If what I read in my search was true, it looks that the 105 has the same interior components as the Dura and Ultegra, but not the bling factor on the outside.

not quite true, there is a trickle down effect but 105 lags a few years behind DA/Ultegra. This can often be seen with the difference in hood shape between DA and 105. DA also has ti parts, and more exactingly machined bits.

miamijim 08-16-11 09:51 AM


Originally Posted by horribleoldman (Post 13090380)
not quite true, there is a trickle down effect but 105 lags a few years behind DA/Ultegra. This can often be seen with the difference in hood shape between DA and 105. DA also has ti parts, and more exactingly machined bits.

Very true but the trickle down is technology only....I dont think a 105 ever had the same parts as 600 and 600 never had the same parts a Dura Ace.

NukeouT 08-16-11 10:17 AM

I have some of the RX-100 gruppo on my Trek. Turns out it is now the Sora grouppo.

It's under 105 Shimano stuff, but even so, it is reliable and works way better than no-name stuff or older Shimano stuff.

ChrisM2097 08-16-11 10:37 AM

It seems as if Shimano put things in order on their website:

http://techdocs.shimano.com/techdocs/blevel.jsp

On the left, click the drop-down box for "Road Bike", or "Mountain Bike".

Dura-Ace > Ultegra > 105 > Tiagra > Sora > 2200...

XTR > Saint > DXR > XT > SLX > LX > Hone > Deore > Alivio > Acera > Altus > Tourney

NukeouT 08-19-11 11:49 AM


Originally Posted by ChrisM2097 (Post 13090684)
Dura-Ace > Ultegra > 105 > Tiagra > Sora > 2200>A050

Yay for my Sora **** not being lowest tier. Thread, thanks for helping confirm this.

embankmentlb 08-19-11 12:28 PM

It could be said Dura Ace is Ultegra with a titanium upgrade. If modern is your thing, Shimano is quality stuff down through Sora!

sillygolem 08-19-11 01:07 PM

Respect the Tourney: It offers an easy and cheap way to get modern shifting on freewheel bikes. If low-end Shimano isn't to your liking, there are numerous copies, like this one...
http://www.disraeligears.co.uk/Site/...1-filtered.jpg


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:36 AM.


Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.