| Drillium Dude |
08-28-11 12:40 PM |
Quote:
Originally Posted by joe englert
(Post 13144357)
Well, it think i should not have even mentioned the cinelli. That was really an afterthought. I just wanted opinions on the repaint effect on value for a vintage bike.
|
No, it was good to bring up the Cinelli. I think the jury's still out on repaints versus value, at least to some buyers. While I will not get a cent-for-cent return on my Colnago Super, for example, I've been offered in the neighborhood of $3000 for it - twice. I'm not that hard-up, however - and I had the restoration done for me, not for resale. But, as someone else pointed out: would someone offer $5000 for it were it wearing original clothing?
However, this thread will assist you in future auctions. I agree with most other posts: the issue with the auction was not so much the fact it was repainted, it was lack of information provided to potential customers. Close-up pics of the components and frame details coupled with a seriously detailed breakdown of component models and condition would've greatly enhanced your auction.
Personally, I'm rather surprised. I found the auction a few days ago and was amazed. I've seen you post numerous times and you seem pretty knowledgeable and have some lovely bikes. No offense intended, but the first thing to cross my amazed mind when I saw the auction was: "that can't be the same Joe Englert from Bike Forums listing this!" I mean, it seemed to me whomever listed it pulled it out of a garage, checked a few names on components and shot from the hip while putting the auction together.
Again, not trying to beat you up here. Lots of detail never, ever hurts. Lack of it, as witnessed in this case, does. The low finishing price was definitely due more to lackluster representation than whether or not the SC had original paint.
PM me sometime if you'd like to talk Ebay auction strategy. I'm no expert, but I'm no slouch either :) I makes me some money on Ebay!
DD
|