![]() |
A couple of unimportant questions.
Hi All, This morning I was readjusting the headset on my '89 Cannondale crit bike (no idea why it's loosened up) and the Vuelta was on the tube. While piddling with the bike my attention centered on the front forks of those on TV. I guess there's a good reason for them to have no offset, but I prefer the gracefull offset on my bike's fork, and in it's day was a pretty serious race bike.
My questions are a) Why no offset anymore? and b) Just for my own piece of mind, what is the term for the reason that one BB nut and one crankarm pedal are reverse threaded... I know the term, but just can't remember. TIA, Brad |
The rotation of the ball bearings apply force to the outside circumference (sp?), the reverse threading is so the theoretical force applied by the bearing friction applies a tightening effect to the threaded assembly, or words to that effect.
|
Straight forks have their offset at the crown and not in the fork blades... damn you Colnago.
|
Originally Posted by treebound
(Post 13169234)
The rotation of the ball bearings apply force to the outside circumference (sp?), the reverse threading is so the theoretical force applied by the bearing friction applies a tightening effect to the threaded assembly, or words to that effect.
Brad |
there's a name or term for this physical effect that I just..can't ..remember |
Originally Posted by bradtx
(Post 13169358)
Yeah, but there's a name or term for this physical effect that I just..can't ..remember.
Brad |
I think the bending effect adds to the friction factors involved, it also can lead to thread failures and gouged legs.
|
Originally Posted by Sixty Fiver
(Post 13169270)
Straight forks have their offset at the crown and not in the fork blades... damn you Colnago.
|
|
I believe the word you are looking for is precession.
http://users.rcn.com/jimmuller/pics/rotation.gif This is C&V - my fork is supposed to be bent like that! |
Originally Posted by DrJim
(Post 13169411)
I think the word you're looking for is precession. Explanations of this are very difficult but my impression is that the one given above misses the mark a bit. Essentially, at least for the pedals, the bending effect in association with the rotation actually causes the pedal to unscrew in the direction opposite to what would logically be caused by the turning alone.
|
Originally Posted by jimmuller
(Post 13169669)
I believe the word you are looking for is precession.
Originally Posted by DrJim
(Post 13169686)
I might add that if you want to demonstrate this precession
:lol: |
Originally Posted by Ex Pres
(Post 13169717)
Now something's not quite right about this. I'm Jim (Carter), then we had Jim (Muller), followed by DrJim.
:lol: |
Must be a Jim dandy of an answer then.
(ducking and running lest they jimmy open the doors here and chase me down) |
I don't see this as "precession". This is a designer using the residual frictional forces from the bearings in a way that does not contribute to loosening the threaded assembly.
|
Originally Posted by Mike Mills
(Post 13169850)
I don't see this as "precession". This is a designer using the residual frictional forces from the bearings in a way that does not contribute to loosening the threaded assembly.
|
Originally Posted by Mike Mills
(Post 13169850)
I don't see this as "precession". This is a designer using the residual frictional forces from the bearings in a way that does not contribute to loosening the threaded assembly.
http://www.sheldonbrown.com/gloss_p.html |
Possibly so, but us Mikes know stuff as well.
I'm not an engineer, but I am a designer. http://www.sheldonbrown.com/brandt/left.html edited to add the Jobst Brandt link because he yelled at me online once for misquoting something out of his wheel building book. It may not have been actual yelling per se, but it was somewhat stern and corrective to my understanding. |
Originally Posted by treebound
(Post 13169948)
Possibly so, but us Mikes know stuff as well.
I'm not an engineer, but I am a designer. |
Ich bin ein Engineer, too, although I haven't been employed in that field since '83.
|
Originally Posted by treebound
(Post 13169948)
Possibly so, but us Mikes know stuff as well.
I'm not an engineer, but I am a designer. http://www.sheldonbrown.com/brandt/left.html edited to add the Jobst Brandt link because he yelled at me online once for misquoting something out of his wheel building book. It may not have been actual yelling per se, but it was somewhat stern and corrective to my understanding. |
Originally Posted by DrJim
(Post 13170003)
My "pissin contest" reply was added before your edit. Perhaps we are neering agreement?
|
Everyone is named Jim these days. That's why I go by James now -or even amesja (ultra-pig latin anyone?) I worked at a place that had about 30 employees and we have FIVE Jims. Come on parents, can't you think of more original names? I am really sick of being a hyphenated Jim with the initial for my last name.
Jim, Big Jim, Little Jim, Bigger-than-little-Jim-but-smaller-than-big-Jim-Jim... |
Originally Posted by Amesja
(Post 13170217)
Everyone is named Jim these days. That's why I go by James now -or even amesja (ultra-pig latin anyone?) I worked at a place that had about 30 employees and we have FIVE Jims. Come on parents, can't you think of more original names? I am really sick of being a hyphenated Jim with the initial for my last name.
Jim, Big Jim, Little Jim, Bigger-than-little-Jim-but-smaller-than-big-Jim-Jim... |
I'm just the opposite. I never really preferred James over Jim until the last few years, but I have ALWAYS hated Jimmy. It always has seemed like such a pejorative to me. I have a few cousins who insist on calling me that and it always annoys the heck out of me ;)
|
| All times are GMT -6. The time now is 01:10 AM. |
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.