Bike Forums

Bike Forums (https://www.bikeforums.net/forum.php)
-   Classic & Vintage (https://www.bikeforums.net/classic-vintage/)
-   -   Trek (https://www.bikeforums.net/classic-vintage/765792-trek.html)

cj51974 09-05-11 04:00 PM

Trek
 
How did Trek do there numbering system? Is a Trek 470 better than a 2000?

sloar 09-05-11 04:17 PM

higher number the better

JohnDThompson 09-05-11 04:22 PM


Originally Posted by sloar (Post 13182413)
higher number the better

In general. The exception would be the 170 -- a custom built Reynolds 753 frame bike.

kroozer 09-05-11 05:11 PM

I think the 3-digit ones were steel and the 4-digit ones aluminum.
-20's (420, 520, 620, 720) were touring, -60's (560, 660, 760) were racing.

wrk101 09-05-11 06:09 PM

+1 3 digits are steel, four digits aluminum. And then they mucked it all up by recycling the same model numbers, for example, the 720 started as a top of the line touring bike in the 1980s, then reappeared in the 1990s as a basic hybrid.

Picchio Special 09-05-11 06:23 PM


Originally Posted by JohnDThompson (Post 13182440)
In general. The exception would be the 170 -- a custom built Reynolds 753 frame bike.

And they're classics, too - thanks John.

frenchbikefan 09-05-11 07:49 PM

hmm your logic doesn't add up the technium 440 is an aluminum bike.

Kobe 09-05-11 08:02 PM


Originally Posted by frenchbikefan (Post 13183419)
hmm your logic doesn't add up the technium 440 is an aluminum bike.


That would be a Raleigh I believe.

frenchbikefan 09-05-11 08:07 PM

heres my sign... doo doo doo. my momma says i'm special but my daddy says i'm stupid. Guess it was a long day.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 08:09 AM.


Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.