What stem angle do I need, and are they available?
#1
Senior Member
Thread Starter
What stem angle do I need, and are they available?
I am running into a problem finding a stem for my Bianchi. The head tube angle is pretty steep, so everything I've tried on it leaves the top of the stem angled down. Everyone here would most likely agree that looks like crap, am I right? So, does anyone know of a correct angle quill stem that is available? A 90* might look okay, but might have a little rise. Does anyone have an old Bianchi stem in a 90-100mm they would part with. I am kind of stumped at this point.,,,,BD
I have a 26.0 clamp Scott Drop Anatomic that I would love to use with it, but if the only thing available is 25.4 I won't be heartbroken. Just looking for the level stem look more than anything else.
I have a 26.0 clamp Scott Drop Anatomic that I would love to use with it, but if the only thing available is 25.4 I won't be heartbroken. Just looking for the level stem look more than anything else.
__________________
So many bikes, so little dime.
So many bikes, so little dime.
#2
Old fart
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Appleton WI
Posts: 24,779
Bikes: Several, mostly not name brands.
Mentioned: 153 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3583 Post(s)
Liked 3,395 Times
in
1,929 Posts
Pictures?
#4
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 2,754
Mentioned: 8 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 83 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 13 Times
in
11 Posts
Angled down looks like crap? I think you have that backwards, angled up looks like crap. But a traditional 73 degree (or -17degree) Stem will only angle down a tiny bit on a steep head angle frame, just barely noticeable. The only road bike I have where this is evident is my '76 Colnago using a early 70's Cinelli 1A (which are sometimes a bit steeper angled than the later ones.) I do not know of any Bianchi road frames that used a super steep head-tube, at least nothing more drastic than 74 degrees?
Maybe you have a track stem or the bike has been in a front end collision?
Maybe you have a track stem or the bike has been in a front end collision?
#5
Senior Member
Thread Starter
It's not a track stem, and the bike has not been wrecked. I tried 6 different stems, and they all angled down. Bike is an early 80's Nuova Racing, repainted black. I bought the frame without a fork.
__________________
So many bikes, so little dime.
So many bikes, so little dime.
Last edited by Bikedued; 12-27-11 at 01:24 AM.
#6
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 2,754
Mentioned: 8 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 83 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 13 Times
in
11 Posts
Quill to threadless adapter stems looks like crap (my opinion of course). I have an early 80's Nuovo Racing and a Cinelli 1A sits dead level with the top tube. Mine's smaller size (55cm), but the head-tube should not be steeper than 73 degrees on that bike.
I think the problem you are having is using the threadless style stems which are way steeper as they are usually meant to angle up. So if you are trying to flip it, yes it will angle down too steeply. Unless you can find one that is -17 degrees. But it looks like you have it set up to fit you in the photo, so why change it? A level stem will just need more quill out to get the rise you need.
I think the problem you are having is using the threadless style stems which are way steeper as they are usually meant to angle up. So if you are trying to flip it, yes it will angle down too steeply. Unless you can find one that is -17 degrees. But it looks like you have it set up to fit you in the photo, so why change it? A level stem will just need more quill out to get the rise you need.
#7
Senior Member
Thread Starter
No I was trying quill stems. I know this looks like crap, which is why I wished to change it. It was all I had in a pinch, and the bike had already been sitting for months waiting on a fork. If all you're going to do is make smart remarks disguised as help, then why bother. Thanks for your help...
Moderators please delete this thread.
Moderators please delete this thread.
__________________
So many bikes, so little dime.
So many bikes, so little dime.
#8
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 23,223
Mentioned: 654 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4722 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 3,036 Times
in
1,874 Posts
With all due respect, something does sound wrong. To the best of my knowledge, the Nuovo Racing never came with a head angle steeper than 74, as previously mentioned. You can see a very slight downward pitch to the sample in the 1983 catalog, but only if you're looking for it. It certainly doesn't jump out at you.
I too would have suspected a front end crash. Baring that, and given the number of stems you've tried, the only other possibility that I can think of is that someone set up the tooling incorrectly and there was a batch manufactured with incorrect head angles. I'm genuinely curious and would appreciate it if would measure the head angle.
The only classic styled, forged aluminum stem that I'm aware of with with rise is the Nitto Dirt Drop, but that has quite a steep rise. One way to get a slight rise would be to use an adjustable stem, but IMO that would look even worse. The other alternative is to start looking for late 1980s to early 1990s ATB stems. There were some with a true 90 degree angle, giving approximately 17 degree rise. Of course, these were primarily TIG welded steel.
I too would have suspected a front end crash. Baring that, and given the number of stems you've tried, the only other possibility that I can think of is that someone set up the tooling incorrectly and there was a batch manufactured with incorrect head angles. I'm genuinely curious and would appreciate it if would measure the head angle.
The only classic styled, forged aluminum stem that I'm aware of with with rise is the Nitto Dirt Drop, but that has quite a steep rise. One way to get a slight rise would be to use an adjustable stem, but IMO that would look even worse. The other alternative is to start looking for late 1980s to early 1990s ATB stems. There were some with a true 90 degree angle, giving approximately 17 degree rise. Of course, these were primarily TIG welded steel.
#9
Thrifty Bill
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Mountains of Western NC
Posts: 23,523
Bikes: 86 Katakura Silk, 87 Prologue X2, 88 Cimarron LE, 1975 Sekai 4000 Professional, 73 Paramount, plus more
Mentioned: 96 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1236 Post(s)
Liked 964 Times
in
628 Posts
+1 ATB stems will work. It will be angling up. As far as how it looks, I wouldn't worry about it. Its all about what works for you.
This one is > 90 degrees.
+1 I had a early 80's Nuovo Racing and the stem was dead level with the top tube as well. Something is not right.
This one is > 90 degrees.
+1 I had a early 80's Nuovo Racing and the stem was dead level with the top tube as well. Something is not right.
Last edited by wrk101; 12-27-11 at 10:38 AM.
#10
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 2,754
Mentioned: 8 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 83 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 13 Times
in
11 Posts
No I was trying quill stems. I know this looks like crap, which is why I wished to change it. It was all I had in a pinch, and the bike had already been sitting for months waiting on a fork. If all you're going to do is make smart remarks disguised as help, then why bother. Thanks for your help...
Moderators please delete this thread.
Moderators please delete this thread.
The "crap" remarks were just in response to your own (which you've now edited out) and meant to be tounge in cheek. Sorry, I forgot to use the smart ass emoticon to signal that.
#11
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: EagleRiver AK
Posts: 1,306
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 28 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 60 Times
in
33 Posts
You mentioned it did not have original fork. If your replacement fork is a bit shorter than the original, that will steepen the HTA by 1° per 20mm of fork length. Is the top tube level or sloping a bit too?
Finding a 90° cast aluminum quill stem for 1" threaded fork is going to be tough. About the time that MTB were using similar deminsion stems, most all production stems went to using TIG welded tubular steel or aluminum rather than cast and then went to threadless and 1-1/8" steer.
A custom made lugged or fillet brazed CrMo stem would be cool, coul be made to any angle but they are pricey!
Finding a 90° cast aluminum quill stem for 1" threaded fork is going to be tough. About the time that MTB were using similar deminsion stems, most all production stems went to using TIG welded tubular steel or aluminum rather than cast and then went to threadless and 1-1/8" steer.
A custom made lugged or fillet brazed CrMo stem would be cool, coul be made to any angle but they are pricey!
#12
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Sorry I was having a bad day the other day I guess? No big deal. I have some new pics, showing the whole bike, and the new stem, bars, and Lizard Skins wrap. The wrap is really grippy, and super comfy.
The top tube is not sloping at all, I think it was just made with a steep head tube possibly? The fork is probably curved less on the tips, but doesn't seem to be too short. The handling is "lively" for sure! The longer stem and bars with longer ramps seemed to slow it down a bit, for which I am grateful. It is FUN to ride!
As you can see the frame doesn't look bent, at least to me it doesn't? I can usually spot a bent frame or fork even on a pic.... I will just have to deal with the downward stem angle. It's not as bad as it seemed, really?,,,,BD
The top tube is not sloping at all, I think it was just made with a steep head tube possibly? The fork is probably curved less on the tips, but doesn't seem to be too short. The handling is "lively" for sure! The longer stem and bars with longer ramps seemed to slow it down a bit, for which I am grateful. It is FUN to ride!
As you can see the frame doesn't look bent, at least to me it doesn't? I can usually spot a bent frame or fork even on a pic.... I will just have to deal with the downward stem angle. It's not as bad as it seemed, really?,,,,BD
__________________
So many bikes, so little dime.
So many bikes, so little dime.
Last edited by Bikedued; 12-30-11 at 07:52 PM.
#13
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Ann Arbor, MI
Posts: 16,869
Bikes: 1980 Masi, 1984 Mondonico, 1984 Trek 610, 1980 Woodrup Giro, 2005 Mondonico Futura Leggera ELOS, 1967 PX10E, 1971 Peugeot UO-8
Mentioned: 49 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1854 Post(s)
Liked 663 Times
in
505 Posts
You mentioned it did not have original fork. If your replacement fork is a bit shorter than the original, that will steepen the HTA by 1° per 20mm of fork length. Is the top tube level or sloping a bit too?
Finding a 90° cast aluminum quill stem for 1" threaded fork is going to be tough. About the time that MTB were using similar deminsion stems, most all production stems went to using TIG welded tubular steel or aluminum rather than cast and then went to threadless and 1-1/8" steer.
A custom made lugged or fillet brazed CrMo stem would be cool, coul be made to any angle but they are pricey!
Finding a 90° cast aluminum quill stem for 1" threaded fork is going to be tough. About the time that MTB were using similar deminsion stems, most all production stems went to using TIG welded tubular steel or aluminum rather than cast and then went to threadless and 1-1/8" steer.
A custom made lugged or fillet brazed CrMo stem would be cool, coul be made to any angle but they are pricey!
Didn't we have this same discussion not long ago?
#14
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Hey? Do they make FSA external bottom Brackets in Italian diameter? I have a VERY nice FSA crank that was given to me the other day, and it would look awesome on this bike!! It's black with silver acccents, and fits the look of the bike perfectly.,,,,BD
__________________
So many bikes, so little dime.
So many bikes, so little dime.
#15
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Ann Arbor, MI
Posts: 16,869
Bikes: 1980 Masi, 1984 Mondonico, 1984 Trek 610, 1980 Woodrup Giro, 2005 Mondonico Futura Leggera ELOS, 1967 PX10E, 1971 Peugeot UO-8
Mentioned: 49 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1854 Post(s)
Liked 663 Times
in
505 Posts
Say what?
#16
Thrifty Bill
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Mountains of Western NC
Posts: 23,523
Bikes: 86 Katakura Silk, 87 Prologue X2, 88 Cimarron LE, 1975 Sekai 4000 Professional, 73 Paramount, plus more
Mentioned: 96 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1236 Post(s)
Liked 964 Times
in
628 Posts
That head tube angle looks really weird. I certainly do not see any sign of ripples or buckling, TT and DT look straight, but it sure doesn't look right to me. Replacement fork is also a sign. Anytime I see a missing fork or a replacement fork, I assume crashed bike. Then I look for evidence, or the lack of evidence either way. Sweet ride regardless.
I would be tempted to go with a threadless adapter. and then try a couple of different angles of threadless stems to get it all level..
I would be tempted to go with a threadless adapter. and then try a couple of different angles of threadless stems to get it all level..
#17
is just a real cool dude
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: The Thumb, MI
Posts: 3,162
Mentioned: 12 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 30 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 27 Times
in
11 Posts
Could you show closer up shots of under the top tube and down tube by the lugs? It's probably just a reflection but I thought I saw some something with the tubing. I'm no master of being able to read angles just by looking at them but the head tube does look kind of steep. Maybe that's why the original fork wasn't included with the bike. The reflection of the light on the tubing seems to change on both tubes vaguely.
#18
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 2,754
Mentioned: 8 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 83 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 13 Times
in
11 Posts
I really do not see an esthetic issue with the stem like it is. Yeah it's angled down a bit, much better than pointing up in my opinion. Large frames can have a steep head-tube just as very small frames can be a bit slack. The front wheel does look a bit close to to the down-tube so I still suspect that something is not as it was originally intended. But if it rides straight and you like it I would not lose any sleep over it.
I've owned a few early 60's Legnano's, and in my size the head-tubes are very slack. I always hated the way they handled. I had one that had been crashed and the head tube was bent at least 2-3 degrees. That one was the only one I like to ride.
I've owned a few early 60's Legnano's, and in my size the head-tubes are very slack. I always hated the way they handled. I had one that had been crashed and the head tube was bent at least 2-3 degrees. That one was the only one I like to ride.
#19
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Bigtime head scratching going on over here since I just found this pic?? Did Bianchi do custom head tube angles from customer request? The angle of my head tube looks almost exactly like this Pista?,,,,BD
https://4.bp.blogspot.com/_28uD9_g-UJ...29d4e1eeb8.jpg
https://4.bp.blogspot.com/_28uD9_g-UJ...29d4e1eeb8.jpg
__________________
So many bikes, so little dime.
So many bikes, so little dime.
#20
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 23,223
Mentioned: 654 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4722 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 3,036 Times
in
1,874 Posts
It's hard to tell from the pics if the tubes are bent or not. However, that front wheel is abnormally close to the down tube, for one reason or another.
#21
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: EagleRiver AK
Posts: 1,306
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 28 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 60 Times
in
33 Posts
Quick measurement of the HTA from your picture shows about 78°, extremely steep! I highly doubt that you will find a cast -12° to make it level. A 90° stem angling up at 12° would not necessarily look classic but would be esthetically pleasing.
#23
Senior Member
Thread Starter
I measured it today at work, and it is indeed a 78* head tube, and a 73* seat tube? Why do I always end up with the oddball stuff? All I wanted was a black Italian bike. I may swap the parts over to my other Columbus frame, the 85 Super Sport. This frame is awesome and corners like a bobcat on steroids, but I honestly think it is too much for me. I don't want to get tired or lazy someday and end up on the pavement for my trouble. Yes it is fun, but I can't see myself doing more than a few miles at a time on it. I also have the Club Fuji, but would it seem silly to have an 8 speed Campy group on a Japanese bike? Am I overthinking it?,,,,BD
__________________
So many bikes, so little dime.
So many bikes, so little dime.
#24
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 2,754
Mentioned: 8 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 83 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 13 Times
in
11 Posts
I measured it today at work, and it is indeed a 78* head tube, and a 73* seat tube? Why do I always end up with the oddball stuff? All I wanted was a black Italian bike. I may swap the parts over to my other Columbus frame, the 85 Super Sport. This frame is awesome and corners like a bobcat on steroids, but I honestly think it is too much for me. I don't want to get tired or lazy someday and end up on the pavement for my trouble. Yes it is fun, but I can't see myself doing more than a few miles at a time on it. I also have the Club Fuji, but would it seem silly to have an 8 speed Campy group on a Japanese bike? Am I overthinking it?,,,,BD
It might a simple matter to pull the head tube out to wear it belongs, worth looking into anyway.
#25
Randomhead
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Happy Valley, Pennsylvania
Posts: 24,387
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4 Post(s)
Liked 3,687 Times
in
2,510 Posts