Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Classic & Vintage
Reload this Page >

English 3 speed shifter cable routing

Notices
Classic & Vintage This forum is to discuss the many aspects of classic and vintage bicycles, including musclebikes, lightweights, middleweights, hi-wheelers, bone-shakers, safety bikes and much more.

English 3 speed shifter cable routing

Old 02-15-12, 02:24 PM
  #1  
Banned.
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Oklahoma
Posts: 680
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
English 3 speed shifter cable routing

I noticed on some English 3 speed bikes the shifter cable is routed a long the upper horizontal bar and over a pulley. Other models are routed along the down-tube. Both ending up at the Sturmey Archer hub.

Does anyone know if routing the shifter cable works better one way verses the other?
silvercreek is offline  
Old 02-15-12, 02:35 PM
  #2  
rhm
multimodal commuter
 
rhm's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: NJ, NYC, LI
Posts: 19,808

Bikes: 1940s Fothergill, 1959 Allegro Special, 1963? Claud Butler Olympic Sprint, Lambert 'Clubman', 1974 Fuji "the Ace", 1976 Holdsworth 650b conversion rando bike, 1983 Trek 720 tourer, 1984 Counterpoint Opus II, 1993 Basso Gap, 2010 Downtube 8h, and...

Mentioned: 584 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1908 Post(s)
Liked 574 Times in 339 Posts
Yes, the top tube and pulley method is better, for two reasons.

First of all, there is less friction with less housing; so you get a cleaner shift.

Second, with the top tube routing the cable approaches the hub at approx a right angle to the dropout, which means moving the wheel in the dropout doesn't throw the hub adjustment off. If the cable approaches from the BB, even a tiny movement of the axle is enough to throw the hub out of adjustment.

The above is true of older hubs by Sturmey Archer, as well as Shimano, F&S, Bendix, &c. It does not apply to modern IGHs on which the fulcrum is attached to a plate attached to the axle.
rhm is offline  
Old 02-15-12, 04:02 PM
  #3  
Senior Member
 
zukahn1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Fairplay Co
Posts: 9,512

Bikes: Current 79 Nishiki Custum Sport, Jeunet 620, notable previous bikes P.K. Ripper loop tail, Kawahara Laser Lite, Paramount Track full chrome, Raliegh Internatioanl, Motobecan Super Mirage. 59 Crown royak 3 speed

Mentioned: 26 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 789 Post(s)
Liked 1,738 Times in 629 Posts
I have had 3 speeds with both setups. The top tube pulley routing does work better it seems easier to get the cable adjustment right and tends to stay adjusted better and work smother in general.
zukahn1 is online now  
Old 02-15-12, 04:45 PM
  #4  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 228
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 4 Times in 4 Posts
I'll second what rhm stated. On my DL-1 and Sports (recently sold) the cable uses the pulley mechanism and works very nicely. On the R20 folder and Trent Sports, both use a fully enclosed cable system with a stop on the chainstay tube. Adjustment is fiddly when removing and replacing the rear wheel as in fixing a flat tire. Not a big deal after a while but in the beginning it's a pain. PG.
PolishGuy is offline  
Old 02-15-12, 07:11 PM
  #5  
Membership Not Required
 
wahoonc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: On the road-USA
Posts: 16,855

Bikes: Giant Excursion, Raleigh Sports, Raleigh R.S.W. Compact, Motobecane? and about 20 more! OMG

Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 70 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 15 Times in 14 Posts
Prefer the upper routing. It was changed around 1980 on the diamond framed bike.

Aaron
__________________
Webshots is bailing out, if you find any of my posts with corrupt picture files and want to see them corrected please let me know. :(

ISO: A late 1980's Giant Iguana MTB frameset (or complete bike) 23" Red with yellow graphics.

"Cycling should be a way of life, not a hobby.
RIDE, YOU FOOL, RIDE!"
_Nicodemus

"Steel: nearly a thousand years of metallurgical development
Aluminum: barely a hundred
Which one would you rather have under your butt at 30mph?"
_krazygluon
wahoonc is offline  
Old 02-15-12, 08:42 PM
  #6  
Senior Member
 
Grand Bois's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Pinole, CA, USA
Posts: 17,392
Mentioned: 24 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 443 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 27 Times in 25 Posts
I haven't had to readjust after removing the wheel because I can see exactly where the wheel was by the marks in the paint. It's a good thing because my S5/2 has two cables.



The cable routing is non-traditional, but it works well. The housing is non-compressable and I think that helps. I treated it as just another index system because that's what it is.




This one is completely traditional. The pulley is an old steel one and the fulcrum clip is reliable stainless. It works great, but three speeds is just not enough. I may switch to a new 5 speed.



My bikes are conversions. I wish I would have found the real thing while they were still cheap.
Grand Bois is offline  
Old 02-15-12, 09:40 PM
  #7  
Cottered Crank
 
Amesja's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Chicago
Posts: 3,401

Bikes: 1954 Raleigh Sports 1974 Raleigh Competition 1969 Raleigh Twenty 1964 Raleigh LTD-3

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 8 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 11 Times in 7 Posts
Another issue with the BB routing is that the cable can easily be pinched by a thrown chain or forgetting to put the cable back on the hub after a wheel change/tire repair. The second thing is really easy to do when you are in a hurry and late and a bit flustered by having a flat.

A kinked cable will shift poorly with a greater chance of neutrals in 2nd gear as well as be much harder to get into that sweet spot as far as adjustment. That's because it will not be straight and will be springy at the kink and not want to slack into 3rd as easily so it has to be adjusted looser -creating potential problems with 2nd. Once a cable is kinked it is pretty much shot and can't be easily straightened.
Amesja is offline  
Old 02-16-12, 08:35 PM
  #8  
PHT
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Gloucester MA
Posts: 216
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
I agree with most of these posts about the shifting, but I'd like to add that it can be annoying when loading the bike on a traditional car rack for transport. With my pulley setup, I have to remove the cable from the wheel every time I put the bike on the back of the car (which is relatively frequent since I bring the thing with me almost any time I have free time at a destination.)

Not a huge deal, but I am sure I will break the brittle plastic pulley wheel soon.
PHT is offline  
Old 02-16-12, 08:40 PM
  #9  
Hopelessly addicted...
 
photogravity's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Central Maryland
Posts: 4,955

Bikes: 1949 Hercules Kestrel, 1950 Norman Rapide, 1970 Schwinn Collegiate, 1972 Peugeot UE-8, 1976 Raleigh Sports, 1977 Raleigh Sports, 1977 Jack Taylor Tandem, 1984 Davidson Tandem, 2010 Bilenky "BQ" 650B Constructeur Tandem, 2011 Linus Mixte

Mentioned: 13 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 10 Times in 9 Posts
Originally Posted by PHT
I agree with most of these posts about the shifting, but I'd like to add that it can be annoying when loading the bike on a traditional car rack for transport. With my pulley setup, I have to remove the cable from the wheel every time I put the bike on the back of the car (which is relatively frequent since I bring the thing with me almost any time I have free time at a destination.)

Not a huge deal, but I am sure I will break the brittle plastic pulley wheel soon.

Get a metal one.
You will need to scroll about 2/3 down the page to see it.
photogravity is offline  
Old 02-16-12, 10:41 PM
  #10  
Cottered Crank
 
Amesja's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Chicago
Posts: 3,401

Bikes: 1954 Raleigh Sports 1974 Raleigh Competition 1969 Raleigh Twenty 1964 Raleigh LTD-3

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 8 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 11 Times in 7 Posts
Bookmarked!

Get a steel fulcrum sleeve while you are at it. I replace the plastic one on every bike I service -sometimes on my bikes that I restore to sell if it has a metal one I replace that with a plastic one too! Now that I know I can get metal ones I probably won't be doing that any more
Amesja is offline  
Old 02-17-12, 04:46 AM
  #11  
Membership Not Required
 
wahoonc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: On the road-USA
Posts: 16,855

Bikes: Giant Excursion, Raleigh Sports, Raleigh R.S.W. Compact, Motobecane? and about 20 more! OMG

Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 70 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 15 Times in 14 Posts
Originally Posted by PHT
I agree with most of these posts about the shifting, but I'd like to add that it can be annoying when loading the bike on a traditional car rack for transport. With my pulley setup, I have to remove the cable from the wheel every time I put the bike on the back of the car (which is relatively frequent since I bring the thing with me almost any time I have free time at a destination.)

Not a huge deal, but I am sure I will break the brittle plastic pulley wheel soon.
When I transport mine on the car rack I put it in 3rd gear to slacken the cable before loading up. Haven't damaged anything yet. FWIW I use a Saris Bones.

+1 on the steel pulley and fulcrum. I replaced most of mine on my by bikes.

Aaron
__________________
Webshots is bailing out, if you find any of my posts with corrupt picture files and want to see them corrected please let me know. :(

ISO: A late 1980's Giant Iguana MTB frameset (or complete bike) 23" Red with yellow graphics.

"Cycling should be a way of life, not a hobby.
RIDE, YOU FOOL, RIDE!"
_Nicodemus

"Steel: nearly a thousand years of metallurgical development
Aluminum: barely a hundred
Which one would you rather have under your butt at 30mph?"
_krazygluon
wahoonc is offline  
Old 02-17-12, 07:46 AM
  #12  
Senior Member
 
Pompiere's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: NW Ohio
Posts: 3,408

Bikes: 1984 Miyata 310, 1986 Schwinn Sierra, 2011 Jamis Quest, 1980 Peugeot TH8 Tandem, 1992 Performance Parabola, 1987 Ross Mt. Hood, 1988 Schwinn LeTour, 1988 Trek 400T, 1981 Fuji S12-S LTD, 197? FW Evans

Mentioned: 24 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 523 Post(s)
Liked 968 Times in 507 Posts
When I converted an old Kabuki ten-speed to three-speed, I used the down tube routing because Kabuki already had a pully cable guide screwed into the side of the bottom bracket casting. It seemed a shame not to use it. I never gave a thought to changing the adjustment when you change a tire, I just thought that was part of riding a three-speed.
Pompiere is offline  
Old 02-17-12, 07:53 AM
  #13  
aka Tom Reingold
 
noglider's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: New York, NY, and High Falls, NY, USA
Posts: 40,481

Bikes: 1962 Rudge Sports, 1971 Raleigh Super Course, 1971 Raleigh Pro Track, 1974 Raleigh International, 1975 Viscount Fixie, 1982 McLean, 1996 Lemond (Ti), 2002 Burley Zydeco tandem

Mentioned: 511 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 7334 Post(s)
Liked 2,431 Times in 1,420 Posts
rhm, I never thought about that! I will remember that (which is better than bookmarking, if you can manage it).
__________________
Tom Reingold, tom@noglider.com
New York City and High Falls, NY
Blogs: The Experienced Cyclist; noglider's ride blog

“When man invented the bicycle he reached the peak of his attainments.” — Elizabeth West, US author

Please email me rather than PM'ing me. Thanks.
noglider is offline  
Old 02-17-12, 08:00 AM
  #14  
Get off my lawn!
 
Velognome's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: The Garden State
Posts: 6,031

Bikes: 1917 Loomis, 1923 Rudge, 1930 Hercules Renown, 1947 Mclean, 1948 JA Holland, 1955 Hetchins, 1957 Carlton Flyer, 1962 Raleigh Sport, 1978&81 Raleigh Gomp GS', 2010 Raliegh Clubman

Mentioned: 9 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 93 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 98 Times in 48 Posts
When I was converting from a derailleur to an IGH, rhm and others explained, as witnessed above, the benifits of Toptube/Fulcrum and the pitfalls with going under the BB. Throwing caution to the wind, I followed the existing routing, downtube & under the BB, using the brazed on cable stops already on the frame. After 2 years of almost daily riding in all weather, a few flat tires.......It shifts as smooth as my bikes with toptube routing, I stand and pedal on hills and wheel shift/IGH adjustment has not been a problem. I suppose these could all be an issue, but it has not been the case in my experience. Also I noticed Pashley routed the cable under the BB on their new Clubman bikes.

Comp GS with the Downtube cable run
Attached Images
File Type: jpg
P8170186.jpg (106.6 KB, 270 views)
Velognome is offline  
Old 02-17-12, 08:26 AM
  #15  
rhm
multimodal commuter
 
rhm's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: NJ, NYC, LI
Posts: 19,808

Bikes: 1940s Fothergill, 1959 Allegro Special, 1963? Claud Butler Olympic Sprint, Lambert 'Clubman', 1974 Fuji "the Ace", 1976 Holdsworth 650b conversion rando bike, 1983 Trek 720 tourer, 1984 Counterpoint Opus II, 1993 Basso Gap, 2010 Downtube 8h, and...

Mentioned: 584 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1908 Post(s)
Liked 574 Times in 339 Posts
Wow, you guys are brave! Well, I am sure glad no one got hurt by doing things the less-better way. Nonetheless, let us consider how we got here.

The question was: which is better? The answer is: the top tube is better.
rhm is offline  
Old 02-17-12, 09:08 AM
  #16  
Hopelessly addicted...
 
photogravity's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Central Maryland
Posts: 4,955

Bikes: 1949 Hercules Kestrel, 1950 Norman Rapide, 1970 Schwinn Collegiate, 1972 Peugeot UE-8, 1976 Raleigh Sports, 1977 Raleigh Sports, 1977 Jack Taylor Tandem, 1984 Davidson Tandem, 2010 Bilenky "BQ" 650B Constructeur Tandem, 2011 Linus Mixte

Mentioned: 13 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 10 Times in 9 Posts
Originally Posted by rhm
The question was: which is better? The answer is: the top tube is better.
+1 Besides, it looks more classy atmo!
photogravity is offline  
Old 02-17-12, 09:42 AM
  #17  
Senior Member
 
mparker326's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Knoxville, TN
Posts: 1,977

Bikes: Schwinn Paramount P15, Fisher Montare, Proteus, Rivendell Quickbeam

Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 12 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 4 Times in 4 Posts
My issue with the lower mount is that the heel of my big foot sometimes hit the cable.
mparker326 is offline  
Old 02-17-12, 09:47 AM
  #18  
Get off my lawn!
 
Velognome's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: The Garden State
Posts: 6,031

Bikes: 1917 Loomis, 1923 Rudge, 1930 Hercules Renown, 1947 Mclean, 1948 JA Holland, 1955 Hetchins, 1957 Carlton Flyer, 1962 Raleigh Sport, 1978&81 Raleigh Gomp GS', 2010 Raliegh Clubman

Mentioned: 9 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 93 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 98 Times in 48 Posts
Well, I am sure glad no one got hurt by doing things the less-better way
Sometimes ya gotta just think outside the fulcrum.

My issue with the lower mount is that the heel of my big foot sometimes hit the cable.
With enough force and movement to shift the gears?

Last edited by Velognome; 02-17-12 at 09:50 AM.
Velognome is offline  
Old 02-17-12, 09:50 AM
  #19  
Hopelessly addicted...
 
photogravity's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Central Maryland
Posts: 4,955

Bikes: 1949 Hercules Kestrel, 1950 Norman Rapide, 1970 Schwinn Collegiate, 1972 Peugeot UE-8, 1976 Raleigh Sports, 1977 Raleigh Sports, 1977 Jack Taylor Tandem, 1984 Davidson Tandem, 2010 Bilenky "BQ" 650B Constructeur Tandem, 2011 Linus Mixte

Mentioned: 13 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 10 Times in 9 Posts
Originally Posted by mparker326
My issue with the lower mount is that the heel of my big foot sometimes hit the cable.
OK, yeti, maybe you just need to get a smaller foot!
photogravity is offline  
Old 02-17-12, 09:52 AM
  #20  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 2,307
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 62 Post(s)
Liked 14 Times in 12 Posts
Originally Posted by mparker326
My issue with the lower mount is that the heel of my big foot sometimes hit the cable.
I solved this problem by routing the cable on the other side, past my smaller foot.

Edit: Darn you, PG! I never can seem to get to the low-hanging fruit fast enough.
Roll-Monroe-Co is offline  
Old 02-17-12, 10:04 AM
  #21  
Hopelessly addicted...
 
photogravity's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Central Maryland
Posts: 4,955

Bikes: 1949 Hercules Kestrel, 1950 Norman Rapide, 1970 Schwinn Collegiate, 1972 Peugeot UE-8, 1976 Raleigh Sports, 1977 Raleigh Sports, 1977 Jack Taylor Tandem, 1984 Davidson Tandem, 2010 Bilenky "BQ" 650B Constructeur Tandem, 2011 Linus Mixte

Mentioned: 13 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 10 Times in 9 Posts
Originally Posted by roll-monroe-co
i solved this problem by routing the cable on the other side, past my smaller foot.

Edit: Darn you, pg! I never can seem to get to the low-hanging fruit fast enough.
Though your post is just as, if not more so, witty atmo!

Last edited by photogravity; 02-17-12 at 10:06 AM. Reason: too many commas. d'oh!
photogravity is offline  
Old 02-17-12, 10:56 AM
  #22  
Cottered Crank
 
Amesja's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Chicago
Posts: 3,401

Bikes: 1954 Raleigh Sports 1974 Raleigh Competition 1969 Raleigh Twenty 1964 Raleigh LTD-3

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 8 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 11 Times in 7 Posts
Originally Posted by rhm
Wow, you guys are brave! Well, I am sure glad no one got hurt by doing things the less-better way. Nonetheless, let us consider how we got here.

The question was: which is better? The answer is: the top tube is better.
Top tube is better.
Top tube with braze-on pulley mount: BEST
Amesja is offline  
Old 02-17-12, 11:11 AM
  #23  
Hopelessly addicted...
 
photogravity's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Central Maryland
Posts: 4,955

Bikes: 1949 Hercules Kestrel, 1950 Norman Rapide, 1970 Schwinn Collegiate, 1972 Peugeot UE-8, 1976 Raleigh Sports, 1977 Raleigh Sports, 1977 Jack Taylor Tandem, 1984 Davidson Tandem, 2010 Bilenky "BQ" 650B Constructeur Tandem, 2011 Linus Mixte

Mentioned: 13 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 10 Times in 9 Posts
I have only one bike with that setup at the moment, my 1951 Raleigh Lenton Tourist.


Lenton Tourist - 25 by Sallad Rialb, on Flickr
photogravity is offline  
Old 02-17-12, 12:24 PM
  #24  
PHT
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Gloucester MA
Posts: 216
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
Thanks for the link with the steel pulley wheel! I do actually have maybe one or two amongst the pile of plastic pulley wheels i have hanging around, but I thought they were rare enough to not be wasted on a rider. Or at least my super rusty rider. Now that I know there are others available, I wont worry too much about using them!

And yes, putting the gear in third does help with removal of the cable from the guide!
PHT is offline  
Old 05-03-12, 07:45 AM
  #25  
Banned.
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Oklahoma
Posts: 680
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Is there anything particularly wrong with the plastic pulley wheel that warrants a steel replacement?
silvercreek is offline  

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.