Explaining steel to a carbon rider?
#1
Steel80's
Thread Starter
Explaining steel to a carbon rider?
After a small group ride with some experienced riders, I was a little tongue-tied when one of them (with a BD Immortal something) asked about the advantages of steel. I, and another guy, had snappy answers about it being cheaper and heavier, but then I tried to explain about road feel, the solid feeling of riding on rails, not feeling isolated from it, yet not buzzed & pounded. Not wanting others to mock my choices, I certainly wouldn't say it's because I can't get used to riding a piece of Chinese plastic. To me, a diamond frame is what a road bike looks like, and steel OK, aluminum, too) is what it feels like.
Maybe this is one of those "if you have to ask, I can't explain" questions. When people ask you, what's your response?
Maybe this is one of those "if you have to ask, I can't explain" questions. When people ask you, what's your response?
#2
Senior Member
They won't know until they experience it. I'm a believer after being a carbon rider. And I am still amazed of the riding quality of a nice
steel bike.
steel bike.
__________________
Semper fi
Semper fi
#3
aka Tom Reingold
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: New York, NY, and High Falls, NY, USA
Posts: 40,502
Bikes: 1962 Rudge Sports, 1971 Raleigh Super Course, 1971 Raleigh Pro Track, 1974 Raleigh International, 1975 Viscount Fixie, 1982 McLean, 1996 Lemond (Ti), 2002 Burley Zydeco tandem
Mentioned: 511 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 7348 Post(s)
Liked 2,465 Times
in
1,433 Posts
I tell them it's heavier and cheaper. Not only that, it's older.
__________________
Tom Reingold, tom@noglider.com
New York City and High Falls, NY
Blogs: The Experienced Cyclist; noglider's ride blog
“When man invented the bicycle he reached the peak of his attainments.” — Elizabeth West, US author
Please email me rather than PM'ing me. Thanks.
Tom Reingold, tom@noglider.com
New York City and High Falls, NY
Blogs: The Experienced Cyclist; noglider's ride blog
“When man invented the bicycle he reached the peak of his attainments.” — Elizabeth West, US author
Please email me rather than PM'ing me. Thanks.
#4
Wookie Jesus inspires me.
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 2,215
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times
in
2 Posts
I tell them it's impossible to generalize so I try tobe more specific. For example, I tell them that my Gunnar feels springier and more lively than a a Carbon roubaix. The roubaix felt more dampening and like a piece of wood.
However, I think a lot of bike feel is actually the wheels and the tires, so I try to hype up the other aspects of steel. Durable, repairable, long history, etc... It's kind of silly to trash on another product to promote yours ya know?
However, I think a lot of bike feel is actually the wheels and the tires, so I try to hype up the other aspects of steel. Durable, repairable, long history, etc... It's kind of silly to trash on another product to promote yours ya know?
#5
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: NW Burbs, Chicago
Posts: 12,054
Mentioned: 201 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3015 Post(s)
Liked 3,802 Times
in
1,408 Posts
I'd tell them it is different. Not better or worse. I prefer different riding experiences, and steel is one option.
#6
It's MY mountain
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Mt.Diablo
Posts: 10,002
Bikes: Klein, Merckx, Trek
Mentioned: 70 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4338 Post(s)
Liked 2,980 Times
in
1,617 Posts
It's just different and some people like it better. Part of it is tradition and some people like that too.
#8
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 20,305
Mentioned: 130 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3464 Post(s)
Liked 2,829 Times
in
1,995 Posts
Beyond that, steel came before carbon fibre. It's more cost effective, yes its heavier and you can ride in those steel only bicycle races.
https://menofsteelracing.com/
#9
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2012
Posts: 111
Bikes: 1985 Peugeot PH501
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I don't buy bikes new, and would not feel comfortable riding a used CF bike (maybe that's stupid but I just wouldn't). I'd rather have something more likely to bend than to catastrophically crack.
#10
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: NW Burbs, Chicago
Posts: 12,054
Mentioned: 201 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3015 Post(s)
Liked 3,802 Times
in
1,408 Posts
I have a steel bike that is 7.0kg. I have seen one that is 6.0kg. With a UCI weight limit of 6.8, weight is irrelevant.
And on a completely different note (and absolutely not directed to you or your post), I give this thread another 5 posts before it becomes a carbon sucks and steel is real thread.
#11
Senior Member
A bike that rides great is a bike that rides great, regardless of material. I never evangelize about steel because I don't necessarily think it's better - just different and like anything, it has pros and it has cons. If someone is really interested to know what a steel bike rides like, offer to let them ride yours. If they're intent on ribbing you for riding steel, do the talking with your legs - those guys are dorks, anyway :-)
#12
Banned.
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Carlsbad, CA
Posts: 6,434
Bikes: '09 Felt F55, '84 Masi Cran Criterium, (2)'86 Schwinn Pelotons, '86 Look Equippe Hinault, '09 Globe Live 3 (dogtaxi), '94 Greg Lemond, '99 GT Pulse Kinesis
Mentioned: 19 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 389 Post(s)
Liked 270 Times
in
153 Posts
I tell them I need the extra weight to give them any hope of keeping up.
But seriously, why do you feel the need to justify your choice? They know very well the advantages and disadvantages. IMO, they're just asking so they can mock your choices.
And there's no need to mock their choice of Chinese plastic either. Sometimes my family mocks me for not eating chicken, cow, human or pig cadavers, but I never take their bait. It's a personal choice, not a social agenda.
But seriously, why do you feel the need to justify your choice? They know very well the advantages and disadvantages. IMO, they're just asking so they can mock your choices.
And there's no need to mock their choice of Chinese plastic either. Sometimes my family mocks me for not eating chicken, cow, human or pig cadavers, but I never take their bait. It's a personal choice, not a social agenda.
#13
Banned.
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 27,199
Mentioned: 34 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 378 Post(s)
Liked 1,409 Times
in
909 Posts
Explaining steel to a carbon rider
1. find a blank wall space 3' wide x 7' tall
2. facing wall, stand 1' away, feet shoulder width apart
3. place hands on wall, palms flat, shoulder width apart
4. quickly snap head forward and down, impacting forehead against wall
5. continue until the urge to explain dissipates
A few get it, most don't. Pick your battles.
My response?
What, you don't recycle?
Greg Lemond.
Craftsmanship.
Character.
Consistency.
When I'm riding a bike, I want to look down and see a tube made of steel, about the same size as my...
When I'm shifting a bike, I don't want to hear a hollow echo.
I just like it, and I have 3 or 4 more. The cost is about as much as your wheels.
I'm not competitive; it's killing me to keep up.
And, hey, that's a pretty cool bike you have; I'll bet it's light and stiff.
Walk away.
1. find a blank wall space 3' wide x 7' tall
2. facing wall, stand 1' away, feet shoulder width apart
3. place hands on wall, palms flat, shoulder width apart
4. quickly snap head forward and down, impacting forehead against wall
5. continue until the urge to explain dissipates
A few get it, most don't. Pick your battles.
My response?
What, you don't recycle?
Greg Lemond.
Craftsmanship.
Character.
Consistency.
When I'm riding a bike, I want to look down and see a tube made of steel, about the same size as my...
When I'm shifting a bike, I don't want to hear a hollow echo.
I just like it, and I have 3 or 4 more. The cost is about as much as your wheels.
I'm not competitive; it's killing me to keep up.
And, hey, that's a pretty cool bike you have; I'll bet it's light and stiff.
Walk away.
Last edited by RobbieTunes; 05-29-12 at 08:59 PM.
#14
Cisalpinist
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Holland
Posts: 5,557
Bikes: blue ones.
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 16 Times
in
11 Posts
Reverse psychology: race 'm, saying meekly that you're so weak that they can beat you even on a steel bike... Once they take the bait put them on a steel bike. The nice ride will reel 'm in.
#15
Banned.
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Carlsbad, CA
Posts: 6,434
Bikes: '09 Felt F55, '84 Masi Cran Criterium, (2)'86 Schwinn Pelotons, '86 Look Equippe Hinault, '09 Globe Live 3 (dogtaxi), '94 Greg Lemond, '99 GT Pulse Kinesis
Mentioned: 19 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 389 Post(s)
Liked 270 Times
in
153 Posts
"I love rap music, but I'm tired of defending it. Whatever kind of music was playing on popular radio stations when you lost your virginity... you're locked in--that will be your favorite music for the rest of your life."
#18
Old fart
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Appleton WI
Posts: 24,784
Bikes: Several, mostly not name brands.
Mentioned: 153 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3587 Post(s)
Liked 3,400 Times
in
1,934 Posts
"Steel is real."
/thread
/thread
#19
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 20,305
Mentioned: 130 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3464 Post(s)
Liked 2,829 Times
in
1,995 Posts
Higher capital cost for carbon, but lower labor cost. In the long run, carbon is cheaper.
I have a steel bike that is 7.0kg. I have seen one that is 6.0kg. With a UCI weight limit of 6.8, weight is irrelevant.
And on a completely different note (and absolutely not directed to you or your post), I give this thread another 5 posts before it becomes a carbon sucks and steel is real thread.
I have a steel bike that is 7.0kg. I have seen one that is 6.0kg. With a UCI weight limit of 6.8, weight is irrelevant.
And on a completely different note (and absolutely not directed to you or your post), I give this thread another 5 posts before it becomes a carbon sucks and steel is real thread.
Most likely my next bike will be a carbon fibre frame, with 33 steel ones in the shed, one Mod bike will not be too bad... And on that one I could care less about the UCI weight minimum, I'm going to go with whatever it ends up, my guess 12 lbs. about.
#20
Mostly Mischief
I'm big with long legs and ride 63-65cm steel frames with a fist full of post showing. They are beautiful things.
But in that size my carbon bike is definitely safer on descents and windy conditions. Never had any of that dreaded speed wobble I feared from all those years on steel. And since I like keeping my bones intact I ride carbon mostly, although I wish I had a sub 150 lb body that could fit on a 56cm Columbus frame.
But in that size my carbon bike is definitely safer on descents and windy conditions. Never had any of that dreaded speed wobble I feared from all those years on steel. And since I like keeping my bones intact I ride carbon mostly, although I wish I had a sub 150 lb body that could fit on a 56cm Columbus frame.
#21
Senior Member
Feel.I've never ridden carbon fiber but I have a titanium.I was on a 4 mile descent flying happilly at 30MPH+ and thinking" I wish I was on my Pinarello."Love the liveliness of steel and yes there is a difference in types of steel.Subtle,like fine wines.
#22
I'm doing it wrong.
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 4,875
Bikes: Rivendell Appaloosa, Rivendell Frank Jones Sr., Trek Fuel EX9, Kona Jake the Snake CR, Niner Sir9
Mentioned: 85 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 9742 Post(s)
Liked 2,812 Times
in
1,664 Posts
I have yet to get the steel frame question, but I have had the friction shifting question thrown at me. Cheaper, easier to repair and set up and I like dropping through the whole rear cluster in one motion.
I prefer steel because of the look, the ride feels right to me, and lugged carbon frames look like crap compared to steel and I would prefer to ride lugged bikes. I have ridden a few carbon bikes (Trek's Madone comes to mind) and I would much rather descend a hill on my steel bike. Probably has more to do with geometry though.
I prefer steel because of the look, the ride feels right to me, and lugged carbon frames look like crap compared to steel and I would prefer to ride lugged bikes. I have ridden a few carbon bikes (Trek's Madone comes to mind) and I would much rather descend a hill on my steel bike. Probably has more to do with geometry though.
#23
Banned.
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Carlsbad, CA
Posts: 6,434
Bikes: '09 Felt F55, '84 Masi Cran Criterium, (2)'86 Schwinn Pelotons, '86 Look Equippe Hinault, '09 Globe Live 3 (dogtaxi), '94 Greg Lemond, '99 GT Pulse Kinesis
Mentioned: 19 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 389 Post(s)
Liked 270 Times
in
153 Posts
Oh, who'm I kiddin'.... If that statement were true, I'd be more pining after bikes like this...
Last edited by calamarichris; 05-29-12 at 03:59 PM.
#24
working on my sandal tan
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: CID
Posts: 22,629
Bikes: 1991 Bianchi Eros, 1964 Armstrong, 1988 Diamondback Ascent, 1988 Bianchi Premio, 1987 Bianchi Sport SX, 1980s Raleigh mixte (hers), All-City Space Horse (hers)
Mentioned: 98 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3871 Post(s)
Liked 2,568 Times
in
1,579 Posts
I rarely have to "explain" to my group why I like old steel bikes (with downtube shifters if they have any). I just laugh with them, and spend most of my time at the front of the group on rides.
#25
Newbie
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Sandy, UT
Posts: 71
Bikes: Gunnar Roadie, Gunnar Sport, Surly LHT, Gary Fisher Genesis
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
It's the overall ride, and I like it. But I agree with those who point out -- different strokes for different folks. I personally feel steel does provide the best overall ride. I tell people that, and it's what I generally ride. But, I'm not on a crusade about it.