Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Classic & Vintage
Reload this Page >

Anyone Weigh Their Vintage Wheelsets?

Notices
Classic & Vintage This forum is to discuss the many aspects of classic and vintage bicycles, including musclebikes, lightweights, middleweights, hi-wheelers, bone-shakers, safety bikes and much more.

Anyone Weigh Their Vintage Wheelsets?

Old 06-23-12, 08:07 AM
  #1  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
OldsCOOL's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: northern michigan
Posts: 13,317

Bikes: '77 Colnago Super, '76 Fuji The Finest, '88 Cannondale Criterium, '86 Trek 760, '87 Miyata 712

Mentioned: 19 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 659 Post(s)
Liked 595 Times in 313 Posts
Anyone Weigh Their Vintage Wheelsets?

I'm not trying to go weight weeny, just curious as to the weight of the wheels on this '89 Technium. They are Rigida 700c alloy 36 spoke wheels.
OldsCOOL is offline  
Old 06-23-12, 08:11 AM
  #2  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
OldsCOOL's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: northern michigan
Posts: 13,317

Bikes: '77 Colnago Super, '76 Fuji The Finest, '88 Cannondale Criterium, '86 Trek 760, '87 Miyata 712

Mentioned: 19 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 659 Post(s)
Liked 595 Times in 313 Posts
The skewers/QR's are relatively heavy, this is what is noticeable.
OldsCOOL is offline  
Old 06-23-12, 09:17 AM
  #3  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: B.C.
Posts: 189

Bikes: ritcheys{2** rm blizzard Geo elrick drop frame and acollection of parts bikes in waiting

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Age and wearing

Originally Posted by OldsCOOL
The skewers/QR's are relatively heavy, this is what is noticeable.
Jan Hiene of "Off the Beaten Track" did some tests on weight of rims after use . Revolving weight , tire size and pressure are critical for us old guys Comfort rules over weight !
lee kenney is offline  
Old 06-23-12, 09:50 AM
  #4  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
OldsCOOL's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: northern michigan
Posts: 13,317

Bikes: '77 Colnago Super, '76 Fuji The Finest, '88 Cannondale Criterium, '86 Trek 760, '87 Miyata 712

Mentioned: 19 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 659 Post(s)
Liked 595 Times in 313 Posts
Originally Posted by lee kenney
Jan Hiene of "Off the Beaten Track" did some tests on weight of rims after use . Revolving weight , tire size and pressure are critical for us old guys Comfort rules over weight !
I'm only 54 and still riding 23's
OldsCOOL is offline  
Old 06-23-12, 10:03 AM
  #5  
)) <> ((
 
illwafer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: San Diego, CA
Posts: 2,411
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 9 Post(s)
Liked 3 Times in 3 Posts
the wheels on a 1985 trek 510 i had were pretty light. they were rigida and helocomatic. didn't weigh them though.
illwafer is offline  
Old 06-23-12, 10:48 AM
  #6  
Senior Member
 
auchencrow's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Detroit
Posts: 10,327
Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 17 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 39 Times in 31 Posts
I didn't weigh them after I built them up with (not the lightest) straight 14 gauge spokes and Rally Tubulars, but the wheels on my Motobecane LeChampion are still very light, due to the Fiamme Ergal weighing only 9.9 oz's (280 grams) each. (...Thanks again to Rootboy for providing them.)
__________________
- Auchen
auchencrow is offline  
Old 06-23-12, 10:49 AM
  #7  
Senior Member
 
Chombi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 11,138

Bikes: 1986 Alan Record Carbonio, 1985 Vitus Plus Carbone 7, 1984 Peugeot PSV, 1972 Line Seeker, 1986(est.) Medici Aerodynamic (Project), 1985(est.) Peugeot PY10FC

Mentioned: 22 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 150 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 34 Times in 27 Posts
If you are serious about weenifying your bike, Wheelset-wise, It's best to try out tubular rims and tires. One thing I noticed about going weenie with clinchers, the narrower and lighter you go with the rims and tires, the more the ride quality seems to get harsh. Most basic tubular setups are as good or usually much better than the best clinchers you can get. So weight and ride quality will usually be on the plus side compared to clinchers.
For example, My ultralight 32H clincher (Can't remember the rim brand but I think it was the lightest and narrowest that Rigida made) wheelset with very light and narrow Hutchinson Atom tires feel like bone shakers compared to my 32H 330GL/Vittoria Rally tubs. they weigh close to the same, with the tubs just slightly lighter, but the tubs, even with the cheapy tires feel so much better in terms of ride quality. My other tubular wheelsets with nicer tires feel even better.

Chombi

Last edited by Chombi; 06-23-12 at 11:01 AM.
Chombi is offline  
Old 06-23-12, 10:54 AM
  #8  
Senior Member
 
rootboy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Wherever
Posts: 16,755
Mentioned: 92 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 556 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 132 Times in 78 Posts
"An ounce off the wheels is worth two off the rest of the bike."

Old Weenie maxim.
rootboy is offline  
Old 06-23-12, 11:07 AM
  #9  
Senior Member
 
rekmeyata's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: NE Indiana
Posts: 9,183

Bikes: 2020 Masi Giramondo 700c; 2013 Lynskey Peloton; 1992 Giant Rincon; 1989 Dawes needs parts; 1985 Trek 660; 1985 Fuji Club; 1984 Schwinn Voyager; 1984 Miyata 612; 1977 Raleigh Competition GS

Mentioned: 10 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1111 Post(s)
Liked 243 Times in 196 Posts
I have a set of Torelli Master Series laced with 36 spokes DT Revolution spokes on the front and 36 DT competition spokes on the rear all connected to Suntour Superbe hubs. The rims weigh a total of 1580 grams including the rear cluster which wheelsets sold are never weighed with the cluster.
rekmeyata is offline  
Old 06-23-12, 11:11 AM
  #10  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 20,323
Mentioned: 129 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3449 Post(s)
Liked 2,800 Times in 1,974 Posts
Originally Posted by rekmeyata
I have a set of Torelli Master Series laced with 36 spokes DT Revolution spokes on the front and 36 DT competition spokes on the rear all connected to Suntour Superbe hubs. The rims weigh a total of 1580 grams including the rear cluster which wheelsets sold are never weighed with the cluster.
Sub 1,500 grams for a wheel set should be pretty easy to do, and with tubulars even easier.
Now the weight of that freewheel.... the difference between a 14-21 and a 14-28 is significant.
In general, old wheels most often weigh less until one compares to carbon stuff.
repechage is offline  
Old 06-23-12, 11:22 AM
  #11  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
OldsCOOL's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: northern michigan
Posts: 13,317

Bikes: '77 Colnago Super, '76 Fuji The Finest, '88 Cannondale Criterium, '86 Trek 760, '87 Miyata 712

Mentioned: 19 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 659 Post(s)
Liked 595 Times in 313 Posts
Originally Posted by rekmeyata
I have a set of Torelli Master Series laced with 36 spokes DT Revolution spokes on the front and 36 DT competition spokes on the rear all connected to Suntour Superbe hubs. The rims weigh a total of 1580 grams including the rear cluster which wheelsets sold are never weighed with the cluster.
That's pretty light.
OldsCOOL is offline  
Old 06-23-12, 11:24 AM
  #12  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
OldsCOOL's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: northern michigan
Posts: 13,317

Bikes: '77 Colnago Super, '76 Fuji The Finest, '88 Cannondale Criterium, '86 Trek 760, '87 Miyata 712

Mentioned: 19 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 659 Post(s)
Liked 595 Times in 313 Posts
Originally Posted by rootboy
"An ounce off the wheels is worth two off the rest of the bike."

Old Weenie maxim.
In gearhead terms (auto) that's what we call unsprung weight. Good to keep it at a minimum when you can.

When changing out tires on both roadies this spring from Bontrager 25's to Michelin Krylion foldable 23's....wow.
OldsCOOL is offline  
Old 06-23-12, 11:25 AM
  #13  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
OldsCOOL's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: northern michigan
Posts: 13,317

Bikes: '77 Colnago Super, '76 Fuji The Finest, '88 Cannondale Criterium, '86 Trek 760, '87 Miyata 712

Mentioned: 19 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 659 Post(s)
Liked 595 Times in 313 Posts
Originally Posted by lee kenney
Jan Hiene of "Off the Beaten Track" did some tests on weight of rims after use . Revolving weight , tire size and pressure are critical for us old guys Comfort rules over weight !
Forgot to say thanx!

https://janheine.wordpress.com/author/janheine/
OldsCOOL is offline  
Old 06-23-12, 02:29 PM
  #14  
MIKE is my name!
 
puchfinnland's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: finland,baltimore
Posts: 2,886

Bikes: hans lutz, , puch mistral ultima,2x Austro Daimler Smoked chrome Ultima,Austro Daimler Mixte,Austro Daimler 531 mixte, flying arrow,F Moser,

Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 7 Post(s)
Liked 20 Times in 4 Posts
just happen to have some info handy

36H Mavic argent 10 rims = 325.5 g x 2 = 651g
Campy record hubs w/ skewers = 530g
DT Revolution 2.0/1.5 spokes = 390g
Marchisio alloy freewheel = 265g
WOLBER 290 tyres = 580g
total = 2416g

the campy skewers weigh A LOT- this could be changed if I want to go with modern skewers

puchfinnland is offline  
Old 06-23-12, 04:04 PM
  #15  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
OldsCOOL's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: northern michigan
Posts: 13,317

Bikes: '77 Colnago Super, '76 Fuji The Finest, '88 Cannondale Criterium, '86 Trek 760, '87 Miyata 712

Mentioned: 19 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 659 Post(s)
Liked 595 Times in 313 Posts
Originally Posted by puchfinnland
just happen to have some info handy

36H Mavic argent 10 rims = 325.5 g x 2 = 651g
Campy record hubs w/ skewers = 530g
DT Revolution 2.0/1.5 spokes = 390g
Marchisio alloy freewheel = 265g
WOLBER 290 tyres = 580g
total = 2416g

the campy skewers weigh A LOT- this could be changed if I want to go with modern skewers

Excellent. Thank you
OldsCOOL is offline  
Old 06-23-12, 04:35 PM
  #16  
feros ferio
 
John E's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: www.ci.encinitas.ca.us
Posts: 21,765

Bikes: 1959 Capo Modell Campagnolo; 1960 Capo Sieger (2); 1962 Carlton Franco Suisse; 1970 Peugeot UO-8; 1982 Bianchi Campione d'Italia; 1988 Schwinn Project KOM-10;

Mentioned: 44 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1384 Post(s)
Liked 1,294 Times in 819 Posts
Vintage wheelsets w/ 32 or 36 spokes/wheel often have a lower moment of inertia (what really counts during acceleration, and the basis for the "ounce off the rims or tires is worth two off anywhere else" axiom) than modern reduced-spoke-count wheelsets, whose sole benefit is reduced aerodynamic turbulence. Contrary to current fashion, the average bicyclist is far better off w/ more spokes per wheel, rather than fewer.
__________________
"Far and away the best prize that life offers is the chance to work hard at work worth doing." --Theodore Roosevelt
Capo: 1959 Modell Campagnolo, S/N 40324; 1960 Sieger (2), S/N 42624, 42597
Carlton: 1962 Franco Suisse, S/N K7911
Peugeot: 1970 UO-8, S/N 0010468
Bianchi: 1982 Campione d'Italia, S/N 1.M9914
Schwinn: 1988 Project KOM-10, S/N F804069
John E is offline  
Old 06-23-12, 05:42 PM
  #17  
Senior Member
 
sailorbenjamin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Rhode Island (an obscure suburb of Connecticut)
Posts: 5,703

Bikes: one of each

Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 8 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 12 Times in 12 Posts
I just got a pair of chinese made 28" single speed wheels for my Raleigh Tourist.
17 pounds.
sailorbenjamin is offline  
Old 06-23-12, 10:25 PM
  #18  
Senior Member
 
rekmeyata's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: NE Indiana
Posts: 9,183

Bikes: 2020 Masi Giramondo 700c; 2013 Lynskey Peloton; 1992 Giant Rincon; 1989 Dawes needs parts; 1985 Trek 660; 1985 Fuji Club; 1984 Schwinn Voyager; 1984 Miyata 612; 1977 Raleigh Competition GS

Mentioned: 10 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1111 Post(s)
Liked 243 Times in 196 Posts
Originally Posted by John E
Vintage wheelsets w/ 32 or 36 spokes/wheel often have a lower moment of inertia (what really counts during acceleration, and the basis for the "ounce off the rims or tires is worth two off anywhere else" axiom) than modern reduced-spoke-count wheelsets, whose sole benefit is reduced aerodynamic turbulence. Contrary to current fashion, the average bicyclist is far better off w/ more spokes per wheel, rather than fewer.
This is very true. But I think there are some modern light and aero rims on the market with higher spoke counts. Kinlin XR270 comes to mind as one really nice compromise between weight and aerodynamics, and their spoke count is as high as 32. See this build up: https://www.prowheelbuilder.com/cw/?step=review
rekmeyata is offline  
Old 06-23-12, 10:31 PM
  #19  
RFC
Senior Member
 
RFC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Scottsdale, AZ
Posts: 4,466

Bikes: many

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 18 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 16 Times in 13 Posts
Originally Posted by rootboy
"An ounce off the wheels is worth two off the rest of the bike."

Old Weenie maxim.
Actually, I have read it is more like 9:1
RFC is offline  
Old 06-23-12, 10:32 PM
  #20  
RFC
Senior Member
 
RFC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Scottsdale, AZ
Posts: 4,466

Bikes: many

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 18 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 16 Times in 13 Posts
In other words, nobody has weighed them.
RFC is offline  
Old 06-23-12, 10:53 PM
  #21  
Banned.
 
Drillium Dude's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: PAZ
Posts: 12,394
Mentioned: 255 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2588 Post(s)
Liked 4,823 Times in 1,709 Posts
^ It took 20 posts, but someone answered the question

When my ex left, she took everything she could move in 12 hours and that included the bathroom scale; I'm planning on getting a good digital scale this week and will report back the all-up weight of my newly-acquired Mavic SSC tubular wheelset.

DD
Drillium Dude is offline  
Old 06-23-12, 10:57 PM
  #22  
cowboy, steel horse, etc
 
LesterOfPuppets's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: The hot spot.
Posts: 44,801

Bikes: everywhere

Mentioned: 71 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 12635 Post(s)
Liked 7,528 Times in 3,989 Posts
I've weighed a couple. The results were disheartening, however. IIRC, my 36 hole 3-cross Nisi/Record/Sachs 7-speed 13-24 rear wheel alone was around 1500g with 22mm sewup on.
LesterOfPuppets is offline  
Old 06-23-12, 11:34 PM
  #23  
KingoftheMountain wannabe
 
Savagewolf's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Independence, Oregon
Posts: 1,157

Bikes: V.O. Pass Hunter & Specialized Hardrock

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
I'd be afraid to weigh mine. One of the first things I noticed when I unpacked my bike this week was how heavy the wheels felt in comparison to my more modern road bikes.
Savagewolf is offline  
Old 06-24-12, 09:24 AM
  #24  
curmudgineer
 
old's'cool's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Chicago SW burbs
Posts: 4,429

Bikes: 2 many 2 fit here

Mentioned: 8 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 263 Post(s)
Liked 111 Times in 70 Posts
Unlike the frame and most of the rest of the bike, there is another property of wheels that matters in addition to mass, which is moment of inertia, as someone mentioned above. Because moment of inertia is partially a function of mass, that leads to the various axioms about the relative importance of wheel mass to overall mass. In fact, considering only steady speed riding, for a moment, whether on a flat, or uphill, or downhill, the mass of the wheels is no more or less important than the mass of the rest of the bike.
However, when accelerating or decelerating, the wheels' moment of inertia becomes important. Because of moment of inertia, when accelerating or decelerating, an ounce of mass in the rim or tire requires as much effort to accelerate or decelerate as 4 ounces of mass in a non-rotating component. An ounce in the spokes, on the other hand, since their mass is distributed from the hub to the rim, is equivalent to about 2 ounces in an non-rotating component, again, only when accelerating or decelerating. And the hubs, since their mass is concentrated near the centre, make a minimal contribution to the moment of inertia, and might as well be considered non-rotating, as far as their effect on acceleration and deceleration are concerned.

Last edited by old's'cool; 06-24-12 at 08:24 PM. Reason: kant spel
old's'cool is offline  
Old 06-24-12, 10:39 AM
  #25  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 20,323
Mentioned: 129 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3449 Post(s)
Liked 2,800 Times in 1,974 Posts
Originally Posted by John E
Vintage wheelsets w/ 32 or 36 spokes/wheel often have a lower moment of inertia (what really counts during acceleration, and the basis for the "ounce off the rims or tires is worth two off anywhere else" axiom) than modern reduced-spoke-count wheelsets, whose sole benefit is reduced aerodynamic turbulence. Contrary to current fashion, the average bicyclist is far better off w/ more spokes per wheel, rather than fewer.
Why I see so many racers training on low spoke count wheels is truly amazing.
I would want 32's as they are easy to locate and just feel that much faster on my race wheels.
repechage is offline  

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.