I agree, they only look good on certain bikes. Local builder Hampsten uses them a lot. IMO, they look best when they are a close match to the tubes.

http://farm9.staticflickr.com/8008/7...cb9a6199f2.jpghttp://www.velocipedesalon.com/forum...esol-web-9.jpg

I think the Wound Up forks look best on lugged bikes if the crown is left polished and the OP's Paramount is titanium TIG welded, but I don't find them at all unattractive on TIG'd bikes if the blades and the crown are painted to match the frame. I don't think the straight blades would look out of place on the Paramount since the original Time fork has straight blades. Just MHO.

Wow, I can't believe how much advice you guys gave me. Thank you very much!

I've been inspecting my fork over the last few days and the carbon seems quite smooth. Even in the "gash" that some people say looks recessed, the carbon layer doesn't appear torn. If the bike had been outright crashed I suppose there would be more obvious damage.

I think I'll go with a Wound Up fork, eventually. I'm still sitting on the fence about whether to replace the original yet. A 13 year old fork in that condition does not leave me confident.

Since you guys were so helpful, I was wondering what other suggestions you had for the bike. I made a thread for suggestions here.

I do know that the Match Paramounts from that era have a reputation for horribly fragile paint (some say it's just the clear coat,) so it wouldn't surprise me if the fork is fine. Having said that, I don't know if the Serotta-built bikes & Time carbon forks went to the same painter, but the information is probably out there and the people involved are still active in the industry.