![]() |
Sizing considerations when choosing an MTB for drop bar conversion?
I'm interested in finding a mtb to add drop bars to, but I was wondering about sizing.. do you want to go with a slightly larger than normal MTB side, like how road bike sizing is bigger than mtbs? i'm talking about traditional horizontal top tubes, not slanted ones.
i've been seeing this one bike on CL.. it's a 22.5 which is on the larger side but still in my size range for me at 5'11". I'm thinking it might be better suited for a drop bar conversion compared to a 19" frame i've been eyeing. The DB Apex I ride now is 20" and overall the sizing is good, though i feel like i could stretch out a tiny bit more when going all out. the larger frame will give me the longer top tube so that's why i'm thinking it woud be more suited for a drop bar conversion. any thoughts from people who've actually done the conversion? |
Check the TT length, that is the biggest challenge to me. My next conversion will be the 20 inch Cimarron I picked up. I usually ride a 18 t0 19 inch mtb, and a 22 inch road bike. Road bike stem, or are you planning to use the MTB stem? MTB stems tend to stretch you out even more.
I am thinking the 20 inch Cimarron will put me between the two sizes. Assuming you get the MTB at a reasonable cost, I would try it out regardless. |
I second the effective top tube begin he most critical measurement.
80's mountain bikes were closer to a Touring bike geometry. As time went on that changed. The top tube got longer making the reach longer to make more room for knees when standing and climbing steep hills when off the saddle. The BB also came up for ground clearance and the top tube dropped to make a shorter stand-over so you didn't hurt yourself on uneven terrain when you dismounted. If you tried to go for a french fit on a modern mountain bike you would have one heck of a reach even with a short stem. |
Originally Posted by wrk101
(Post 14736570)
Check the TT length, that is the biggest challenge to me.
looks like the 19" bike's TT is right around the same length as the one i've got now.. 56cm head tube angle is 70, 73 for seat tube on both bikes i'm looking at. my current mtb has a 68 head tube angle which is why the TT is shorter even though the seat tube is longer Road bike stem, or are you planning to use the MTB stem? MTB stems tend to stretch you out even more. Assuming you get the MTB at a reasonable cost, I would try it out regardless. |
Originally Posted by Grim
(Post 14736667)
If you tried to go for a french fit on a modern mountain bike you would have one heck of a reach even with a short stem.
|
Frame size is also going to be dependent on the intented use. If the bike is going to stay on the road such a beater or gravel road bike, a taller frame will be more comfortable, off road trail riding you'll want a shorter frame. Some of the TT's can be longish, but as you plan to use a MTB stem that will bring the bars up and not stretch you out too much. I ride a 62-65cm Road bike and am happy on a 60cm MTB frame with drops. My conversion is a '81 Giant Iguana
|
Originally Posted by Velognome
(Post 14737610)
Frame size is also going to be dependent on the intented use. If the bike is going to stay on the road such a beater or gravel road bike, a taller frame will be more comfortable, off road trail riding you'll want a shorter frame. Some of the TT's can be longish, but as you plan to use a MTB stem that will bring the bars up and not stretch you out too much. I ride a 62-65cm Road bike and am happy on a 60cm MTB frame with drops. My conversion is a '81 Giant Iguana
|
I did a mock up on the Cimmarron tonight. Cockpit definitely too long with the MTB stem. I may try a road stem on it instead.
+1 I will have the same problem on front brake routing, as the current route goes through the center of the stem. I will need to squeeze in one of those HS mounted cable stops instead. |
Originally Posted by frantik
(Post 14738776)
cool thanks for your insight. the intent would be almost excursively as a road rider. i was thinking a frame closer to my road bike size would make more sense for that application. why are taller frames more comfortable?
|
^ but doesn't a riser stem accomplish the same thing?
earlier today i was thinking maybe the 19" would be an ok choice, now i'm back to thinking the 22.5" would be better... or... *gasp* getting neither and waiting longer lol |
Since a lot of vintage MTBs were measured by the (short in relation to everything else) seat tube, you'll probably want to use a "smaller" size. Here's an old picture of my 20.5" Diamondback next to my 23" Bianchi, which have the same TT length, and are set up roughly the same (the bars have come down a little on the DB):
http://s36.photobucket.com/albums/e2...k/IMG_2679.jpg |
As one example, I ride most often a 22" road bike, in a mtb. I ride an 18" most often. I would not want to set that frame up with drop bars, for that I would want a 20" most probably, but as has been mentioned, the top tube length really plays a significant influence.
|
Originally Posted by wrk101
(Post 14738835)
I will need to squeeze in one of those HS mounted cable stops instead.
|
Originally Posted by ThermionicScott
(Post 14739273)
Since a lot of vintage MTBs were measured by the (short in relation to everything else) seat tube, you'll probably want to use a "smaller" size. Here's an old picture of my 20.5" Diamondback next to my 23" Bianchi, which have the same TT length, and are set up roughly the same (the bars have come down a little on the DB):
http://s36.photobucket.com/albums/e2...k/IMG_2679.jpg the two bikes i'm looking at are both 1989 diamondbacks actually :) i think the 20.5" size would be ideal but not sure if going smaller or bigger is best if not going with the ideal size. |
Originally Posted by frantik
(Post 14739241)
^ but doesn't a riser stem accomplish the same thing?
earlier today i was thinking maybe the 19" would be an ok choice, now i'm back to thinking the 22.5" would be better... or... *gasp* getting neither and waiting longer lol http://i246.photobucket.com/albums/g...Sale2110-1.jpg Also, this one could be fun. http://i246.photobucket.com/albums/g...0/DSC08218.jpg |
^ hah i've been thinking bout hitting u up, but i'm cheap and u drive a hard bargain ;) but u got a pic of the kuwahara?
|
Originally Posted by frantik
(Post 14739768)
^ hah i've been thinking bout hitting u up, but i'm cheap and u drive a hard bargain ;) but u got a pic of the kuwahara?
|
oh the 1st pic wasn't loading the 1st time. what's the tubing on the Kuwahara? looks pretty damn nice actually.. is that a repaint?
and just realized the smaller wheel on the cannondale.. that does look fun. I don't really need a new bike, but my apex doesn't handle too well at high speeds. most mtbs don't, i know.. but a lil steeper head tube would go a long way. I'm used to being able to ride where ever i want on an mtb too, and fat tires are way more comfy |
It's the original paint but the stickers are long gone. It has more relaxed geometry and I'm guessing it to be Tange chromo.
Originally Posted by frantik
(Post 14739851)
oh the 1st pic wasn't loading the 1st time. what's the tubing on the Kuwahara? looks pretty damn nice actually.. is that a repaint?
and just realized the smaller wheel on the cannondale.. that does look fun. I don't really need a new bike, but my apex doesn't handle too well at high speeds. most mtbs don't, i know.. but a lil steeper head tube would go a long way. I'm used to being able to ride where ever i want on an mtb too, and fat tires are way more comfy |
Many MTB's will have a seat tube angle similar to a road bike's, but the older one's will have a more layed-back angle, which will definitely steal from the frame's effective top tube length unless the saddle is situated radically rearward as compared to a road bike.
As far as the head tube angle though, the MTB frame will just about always have a slacker head tube angle than a road bike, something that can make the handling quite floppy when using road bars with anything but a shorter horiz stem extension. So, for both of the above reasons, I find that larger MTB frames with modest stem extension are the only good candidates for road-bar conversion, not that these actually make so much of a good all-around road bike. Compared to a build-up using a proper road frame, the MTB framed bike will typically have a high bb, a stiff ride and will tend to be heavy. If ridden in a brisk road biking group, the steering may also have a different response than the bikes that surround you. The advantage would be added durability of the frame and wheels, plus the generous tire clearances which can accomodate fenders with ease. |
Originally Posted by frantik
(Post 14739378)
nice ascent.. 88? and you've got two brake levers but only one brake huh? :D
the two bikes i'm looking at are both 1989 diamondbacks actually :) i think the 20.5" size would be ideal but not sure if going smaller or bigger is best if not going with the ideal size. |
I'd venture to guess that the Kuwahara is Tange.
http://i246.photobucket.com/albums/g...Sale2115-1.jpg I've got this Norco I'm about to sell, too. I realized I can't keep them all. :( http://i246.photobucket.com/albums/g...r_Sale2137.jpg |
Originally Posted by dddd
(Post 14743045)
Many MTB's will have a seat tube angle similar to a road bike's, but the older one's will have a more layed-back angle, which will definitely steal from the frame's effective top tube length unless the saddle is situated radically rearward as compared to a road bike.
As far as the head tube angle though, the MTB frame will just about always have a slacker head tube angle than a road bike, something that can make the handling quite floppy when using road bars with anything but a shorter horiz stem extension. So, for both of the above reasons, I find that larger MTB frames with modest stem extension are the only good candidates for road-bar conversion, not that these actually make so much of a good all-around road bike. Compared to a build-up using a proper road frame, the MTB framed bike will typically have a high bb, a stiff ride and will tend to be heavy. If ridden in a brisk road biking group, the steering may also have a different response than the bikes that surround you. The advantage would be added durability of the frame and wheels, plus the generous tire clearances which can accomodate fenders with ease. http://i246.photobucket.com/albums/g...r_Sale2138.jpg Hey frantik, if you decide to go the larger route, I've got this frame, too. ;) http://i246.photobucket.com/albums/g...r_Sale2126.jpg |
The bars you choose will have an impact on the geometry as well. If you pick something with a lot of reach, a longer top tube might be problematic.
I'm currently putting some Midge (dirtdrop) bars on my Stumpjumper. The word on those is to set them up to ride mainly in the drops. So you have to get the stem pretty high, which would be more difficult with a smaller frame. |
Originally Posted by calstar
(Post 14739288)
You probably know this but if the HS stack height won't allow the cable stop(not enough thread engagement) there are others that mount on the fork crown brake hole(assuming there is a brake hole).
|
| All times are GMT -6. The time now is 12:53 PM. |
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.