Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Classic & Vintage
Reload this Page >

Hybrid viability as a touring rig - feedback/experiences

Search
Notices
Classic & Vintage This forum is to discuss the many aspects of classic and vintage bicycles, including musclebikes, lightweights, middleweights, hi-wheelers, bone-shakers, safety bikes and much more.

Hybrid viability as a touring rig - feedback/experiences

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-26-13, 09:52 AM
  #1  
Ellensburg, WA
Thread Starter
 
scozim's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Ellensburg, WA
Posts: 3,755

Bikes: See my signature

Mentioned: 77 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 313 Post(s)
Liked 457 Times in 160 Posts
Hybrid viability as a touring rig - feedback/experiences

I have been seriously considering finding a C&V touring bike for awhile. My ideal would be an '84 Gitane Grantour but they don't come up for sale very often. I have a drop bar Trek 800 Antelope conversion that I initially planned to try some light touring but I don't like the weight and can't seem to get it as comfortable as I like even though it rides well.

I've toyed with another mtb drop bar conversion but based on the first experience am a little more hesitant. As I've contemplated all this I forgot that I had just built (and converted to drop bar) a late 80's Peugeot Limestone 70c hybrid (bike courtesy of Roger M). It's already equipped with canti brakes and a triple (now). I'm already planning on having new wheels built up with the existing hubs.

Has anyone toured on a hybrid? What's the experience been? This can't fit a lowrider front rack which would be preferred but that's not a deal breaker. I know it'd be fine for easy overnight camping but am seriously wanting to do at least a week tour in the next year or so.

__________________
1984 Gitane Tour de France; 1968 Peugeot PL8; 1982 Nishiki Marina 12; 1984 Peugeot PSV; 1993 Trek 950 mtb; 1983 Vitus 979; Colnago Super, mid-80's Bianchi Veloce, 1984 or 85 Vitus 979




scozim is offline  
Old 03-26-13, 10:35 AM
  #2  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Pearland, Texas
Posts: 7,579

Bikes: Cannondale, Trek, Raleigh, Santana

Mentioned: 13 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 308 Post(s)
Liked 3 Times in 3 Posts
scozim, The old line "You can tour on anything." is appropriate. Nothing wrong using a hybrid as most will accept fenders and racks. The touring forum can guide you on some of the basics.

Brad
bradtx is offline  
Old 03-26-13, 11:02 AM
  #3  
Thrifty Bill
 
wrk101's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Mountains of Western NC
Posts: 23,523

Bikes: 86 Katakura Silk, 87 Prologue X2, 88 Cimarron LE, 1975 Sekai 4000 Professional, 73 Paramount, plus more

Mentioned: 96 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1236 Post(s)
Liked 964 Times in 628 Posts
Some friends of mine rode coast to coast on a pair of Cannondale hybrids, and also rode all over the Canadian Rockies. Does that bike have canti studs (I kind of see some on the fork). If so, I would be putting cantis back on there.
wrk101 is offline  
Old 03-26-13, 11:13 AM
  #4  
feros ferio
 
John E's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: www.ci.encinitas.ca.us
Posts: 21,793

Bikes: 1959 Capo Modell Campagnolo; 1960 Capo Sieger (2); 1962 Carlton Franco Suisse; 1970 Peugeot UO-8; 1982 Bianchi Campione d'Italia; 1988 Schwinn Project KOM-10;

Mentioned: 44 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1391 Post(s)
Liked 1,322 Times in 835 Posts
I don't see any problem, as long as you can adjust the seat and handlebar position for a comfortable fit.
__________________
"Far and away the best prize that life offers is the chance to work hard at work worth doing." --Theodore Roosevelt
Capo: 1959 Modell Campagnolo, S/N 40324; 1960 Sieger (2), S/N 42624, 42597
Carlton: 1962 Franco Suisse, S/N K7911
Peugeot: 1970 UO-8, S/N 0010468
Bianchi: 1982 Campione d'Italia, S/N 1.M9914
Schwinn: 1988 Project KOM-10, S/N F804069
John E is offline  
Old 03-26-13, 11:17 AM
  #5  
Ellensburg, WA
Thread Starter
 
scozim's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Ellensburg, WA
Posts: 3,755

Bikes: See my signature

Mentioned: 77 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 313 Post(s)
Liked 457 Times in 160 Posts
Yes, I was struggling with the canti brakes at the time I took the photo. I now have the cantis back on it. It fits pretty well and runs 700X38 tires right now. Suntour bar end shifters and Deore XT rear derailleur.
__________________
1984 Gitane Tour de France; 1968 Peugeot PL8; 1982 Nishiki Marina 12; 1984 Peugeot PSV; 1993 Trek 950 mtb; 1983 Vitus 979; Colnago Super, mid-80's Bianchi Veloce, 1984 or 85 Vitus 979




scozim is offline  
Old 03-26-13, 11:26 AM
  #6  
Wrench Savant
 
balindamood's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: 61 Degrees North
Posts: 2,304

Bikes: Yes

Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 42 Post(s)
Liked 93 Times in 38 Posts
The late 80's to mid 90's hybrids do just fine as touring rigs IMHO. You may have to change the components a bit. The 1990 Trek 790 and 770 where idendical geometry wise to the 520 touring. Only the tubing was different.
balindamood is offline  
Old 03-26-13, 12:25 PM
  #7  
missing in action
 
Chris_in_Miami's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 4,483
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 42 Post(s)
Liked 49 Times in 29 Posts
You don't need mid-fork bosses to run a lowrider rack, and many racks don't line up with them properly anyway. Go for it!
Chris_in_Miami is offline  
Old 03-26-13, 01:00 PM
  #8  
Senior Member
 
cyclotoine's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Yukon, Canada
Posts: 8,759
Mentioned: 13 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 113 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 16 Times in 14 Posts
I agree with the chorus. Use the Peugeot.

I will add this. If the touring bug bites you hard you will inevitably be drawn off the beaten path. Off the beaten path you will find traditional touring bikes don't hold up well. You may be at first drawn to the Long Haul Truckers and Soma Sagas, but you will find that the 42mm tires even still leave something to be desired. You will begin thinking about the Surly Troll and Ogre or salsa fargo. Do yourself a favour and skip the middle step and go straight to the MTB tired touring bikes, it just makes sense... handles better in loose stuff with a load and is more comfortable. I think an Ogre is in my future. I will also add that I have toured with drop bars and MTB bars and bar ends. I prefer the later when the going gets rough.
__________________
1 Super Record bike, 1 Nuovo Record bike, 1 Pista, 1 Road, 1 Cyclocross/Allrounder, 1 MTB, 1 Touring, 1 Fixed gear
cyclotoine is offline  
Old 03-26-13, 05:37 PM
  #9  
Senior Member
 
clasher's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Kitchener, ON
Posts: 2,737
Mentioned: 16 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 229 Post(s)
Liked 147 Times in 102 Posts
I did a 1000km on a specialized hybrid that I put drop bars on. To make it way less C&V it was made out of aluminum and had v-brakes! Probably lighter than an LHT and a third the price... did fine for me.
clasher is offline  
Old 03-26-13, 06:09 PM
  #10  
Ellensburg, WA
Thread Starter
 
scozim's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Ellensburg, WA
Posts: 3,755

Bikes: See my signature

Mentioned: 77 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 313 Post(s)
Liked 457 Times in 160 Posts
I think you're convincing me. I'll focus my money more on a few key components, especially wheels. I'll also probably move back to round chain rings. I haven't tried heel clearance yet. Then it's on to the right front rack. I'm not a big fan of the slanted top tube but this bike rides nice enough I can ignore it.
__________________
1984 Gitane Tour de France; 1968 Peugeot PL8; 1982 Nishiki Marina 12; 1984 Peugeot PSV; 1993 Trek 950 mtb; 1983 Vitus 979; Colnago Super, mid-80's Bianchi Veloce, 1984 or 85 Vitus 979




scozim is offline  
Old 03-26-13, 06:12 PM
  #11  
The Rabbi
 
seely's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 5,123
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 16 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times in 3 Posts
For a front rack, I use this on my Schwinn conversion. Works pretty well, though since its a little short you can only run some small panniers. I don't ride with much weight up front anyway though.
seely is offline  
Old 03-26-13, 07:42 PM
  #12  
Ellensburg, WA
Thread Starter
 
scozim's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Ellensburg, WA
Posts: 3,755

Bikes: See my signature

Mentioned: 77 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 313 Post(s)
Liked 457 Times in 160 Posts
Originally Posted by seely
For a front rack, I use this on my Schwinn conversion. Works pretty well, though since its a little short you can only run some small panniers. I don't ride with much weight up front anyway though.

I've got something very similar and probably the same size.
__________________
1984 Gitane Tour de France; 1968 Peugeot PL8; 1982 Nishiki Marina 12; 1984 Peugeot PSV; 1993 Trek 950 mtb; 1983 Vitus 979; Colnago Super, mid-80's Bianchi Veloce, 1984 or 85 Vitus 979




scozim is offline  
Old 03-27-13, 12:39 AM
  #13  
Senior Member
 
Glennfordx4's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: South Jersey
Posts: 1,959

Bikes: Too many Bicycles to list

Mentioned: 10 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 90 Post(s)
Liked 137 Times in 45 Posts
My uncle turned a C-Dale H400 hybrid he got from me into a decent touring bike, I know he tested it out by doing a trip up the C&O Canal, twice actually, the first time he was caught in a flood & had to abandon the bike & was rescued by boat. https://www.tbd.com/blogs/tbd-latest/...und-10325.html He equipped the bike with drop bars & Suntour friction barcons, racks, 700x32 tires & fenders,the gearing was changed a little also. He likes it and has no heel strike with his panniers loaded. I don't have the pictures of it finished on hand, but this is what he started with,
Glennfordx4 is offline  
Old 03-27-13, 09:51 AM
  #14  
Senior Member
 
cyclotoine's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Yukon, Canada
Posts: 8,759
Mentioned: 13 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 113 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 16 Times in 14 Posts
The type of rack and panniers you have can have a much greater impact on heel clearance/strike than chainstay length. Hybrids and touring bikes generally have very similar chainstay lengths (43-46cm ish). So you can select a rack and panniers with adjustable clips you are all set.
__________________
1 Super Record bike, 1 Nuovo Record bike, 1 Pista, 1 Road, 1 Cyclocross/Allrounder, 1 MTB, 1 Touring, 1 Fixed gear
cyclotoine is offline  
Old 03-27-13, 10:13 AM
  #15  
Junior Member
 
SeaStew's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Ross-Shire, Scotland/Vancouver, WA.
Posts: 21

Bikes: Trek 7.2 FX ( Disc brake )

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Hello everyone, I'm somewhat new to this place, new as in I browse more than I actually post. I'm actually about to put the money down for my first ever brand spanking new bike from my LBS. After a lot of research I have decided to buy a Trek 7.2fx with disc brakes. It will be mainly for everyday commuting and for the love of riding. My last bike was a Novara Radonee from the 80's which I'm fairly certain that it was too small for me ( I bought it rashly) anyway I would like to do some light touring on it nothing major but maybe weekend tours to the coast and maybe up into the mountains on some old logging roads that are kinda close to me. I was just wondering what adjustments I would have to make to this bike if any at all to make this all possible. Oh and is this a good bike? I'm kind of new to all this.

Thank you,

Sean.
SeaStew is offline  
Old 03-27-13, 10:53 AM
  #16  
Ellensburg, WA
Thread Starter
 
scozim's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Ellensburg, WA
Posts: 3,755

Bikes: See my signature

Mentioned: 77 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 313 Post(s)
Liked 457 Times in 160 Posts
Originally Posted by SeaStew
Hello everyone, I'm somewhat new to this place, new as in I browse more than I actually post. I'm actually about to put the money down for my first ever brand spanking new bike from my LBS. After a lot of research I have decided to buy a Trek 7.2fx with disc brakes. It will be mainly for everyday commuting and for the love of riding. My last bike was a Novara Radonee from the 80's which I'm fairly certain that it was too small for me ( I bought it rashly) anyway I would like to do some light touring on it nothing major but maybe weekend tours to the coast and maybe up into the mountains on some old logging roads that are kinda close to me. I was just wondering what adjustments I would have to make to this bike if any at all to make this all possible. Oh and is this a good bike? I'm kind of new to all this.

Thank you,

Sean.
I've looked at the Novara's - usually pretty decent quality. 1) do you still have it and 2) can you post photos?
__________________
1984 Gitane Tour de France; 1968 Peugeot PL8; 1982 Nishiki Marina 12; 1984 Peugeot PSV; 1993 Trek 950 mtb; 1983 Vitus 979; Colnago Super, mid-80's Bianchi Veloce, 1984 or 85 Vitus 979




scozim is offline  
Old 03-27-13, 11:14 AM
  #17  
Junior Member
 
SeaStew's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Ross-Shire, Scotland/Vancouver, WA.
Posts: 21

Bikes: Trek 7.2 FX ( Disc brake )

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by scozim
I've looked at the Novara's - usually pretty decent quality. 1) do you still have it and 2) can you post photos?


This is the bike here it's actually on craigslist right now. I know the set-up may look weird but it worked out for me no problem. Just looking for a new bike which all the miles will be my miles.

https://portland.craigslist.org/clk/bik/3704894856.html
SeaStew is offline  
Old 03-27-13, 11:49 AM
  #18  
Senior Member
 
cyclotoine's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Yukon, Canada
Posts: 8,759
Mentioned: 13 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 113 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 16 Times in 14 Posts
Originally Posted by SeaStew
Hello everyone, I'm somewhat new to this place, new as in I browse more than I actually post. I'm actually about to put the money down for my first ever brand spanking new bike from my LBS. After a lot of research I have decided to buy a Trek 7.2fx with disc brakes. It will be mainly for everyday commuting and for the love of riding. My last bike was a Novara Radonee from the 80's which I'm fairly certain that it was too small for me ( I bought it rashly) anyway I would like to do some light touring on it nothing major but maybe weekend tours to the coast and maybe up into the mountains on some old logging roads that are kinda close to me. I was just wondering what adjustments I would have to make to this bike if any at all to make this all possible. Oh and is this a good bike? I'm kind of new to all this.

Thank you,

Sean.
You should post this as a new thread in the touring forum. The folks there would be very happy to discuss this. I think a question like this deserves it's own thread. I don't see any modifications necessary to do what you describe. I do think you will need to accessorize with fenders, racks and panniers, and I would also choose a tire with the most volume your bike can safely fit with fenders and some more tread for logging roads.
__________________
1 Super Record bike, 1 Nuovo Record bike, 1 Pista, 1 Road, 1 Cyclocross/Allrounder, 1 MTB, 1 Touring, 1 Fixed gear
cyclotoine is offline  
Old 03-27-13, 12:08 PM
  #19  
Phyllo-buster
 
clubman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Nova Scotia
Posts: 8,844

Bikes: roadsters, club bikes, fixed and classic

Mentioned: 133 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2297 Post(s)
Liked 2,047 Times in 1,253 Posts
It might be fussy to properly mount a rack on that sloping frame. Rear panniers might clip your heels as well. I second that the touring forum will be the best place to get updated info. When I toured, I appreciated the fit and design of a dedicated loaded touring bike (C-dale T1000). Low riders, extra rack/mudguard braze ons, cage bosses, tire clearance, frame strength and comfort can make all the difference on a loaded tour.

edit. Two different posters...same advice applies.
clubman is offline  
Old 03-27-13, 12:19 PM
  #20  
Shifting is fun!
 
non-fixie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: South Holland, NL
Posts: 11,000

Bikes: Yes, please.

Mentioned: 279 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2193 Post(s)
Liked 4,587 Times in 1,764 Posts
I have tried this route, with mixed results. I made a touring rig out of a Koga-Miyata hybrid and while I liked the relatively long wheelbase and ample clearances, I did not like the high BB shell. It left my feet dangling at every traffic light.
__________________
Are we having fun, or what ...



non-fixie is offline  
Old 03-27-13, 12:19 PM
  #21  
Junior Member
 
SeaStew's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Ross-Shire, Scotland/Vancouver, WA.
Posts: 21

Bikes: Trek 7.2 FX ( Disc brake )

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
I have just re-posted my question as a new thread. Thank you guys for the help.
SeaStew is offline  
Old 03-27-13, 01:16 PM
  #22  
Senior Member
 
cyclotoine's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Yukon, Canada
Posts: 8,759
Mentioned: 13 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 113 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 16 Times in 14 Posts
Originally Posted by non-fixie
I have tried this route, with mixed results. I made a touring rig out of a Koga-Miyata hybrid and while I liked the relatively long wheelbase and ample clearances, I did not like the high BB shell. It left my feet dangling at every traffic light.
This is precisely why I think a sloping top tube it great on a touring bike. Especially if you are touring on logging roads.. you don't want a super low BB, but you want stand-over so a sloping top tube is usually the way to go.
__________________
1 Super Record bike, 1 Nuovo Record bike, 1 Pista, 1 Road, 1 Cyclocross/Allrounder, 1 MTB, 1 Touring, 1 Fixed gear
cyclotoine is offline  
Old 03-27-13, 01:36 PM
  #23  
Ellensburg, WA
Thread Starter
 
scozim's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Ellensburg, WA
Posts: 3,755

Bikes: See my signature

Mentioned: 77 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 313 Post(s)
Liked 457 Times in 160 Posts
Originally Posted by cyclotoine
This is precisely why I think a sloping top tube it great on a touring bike. Especially if you are touring on logging roads.. you don't want a super low BB, but you want stand-over so a sloping top tube is usually the way to go.
Being a newb at this type of cycling adventure that's not something I had thought of. But, it makes a whole lot of sense.
__________________
1984 Gitane Tour de France; 1968 Peugeot PL8; 1982 Nishiki Marina 12; 1984 Peugeot PSV; 1993 Trek 950 mtb; 1983 Vitus 979; Colnago Super, mid-80's Bianchi Veloce, 1984 or 85 Vitus 979




scozim is offline  
Old 03-27-13, 03:00 PM
  #24  
Shifting is fun!
 
non-fixie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: South Holland, NL
Posts: 11,000

Bikes: Yes, please.

Mentioned: 279 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2193 Post(s)
Liked 4,587 Times in 1,764 Posts
Originally Posted by cyclotoine
This is precisely why I think a sloping top tube it great on a touring bike. Especially if you are touring on logging roads.. you don't want a super low BB, but you want stand-over so a sloping top tube is usually the way to go.
No, no. I probably haven't made myself clear enough. When I ride in built-up area's (with lots of traffic lights, pedestrian crossings and coffee bars), which is part of my touring experience, I want to be able to stop without having to get off the saddle. On a road or touring frame the tips of my toes will reach the ground. Not so on a hybrid. I will either have to get off, or fall over. Both are kind of tiresome. Sloping top tubes, whichever kind, don't make no difference. My legs are long enough.

So I ditched the hybrid, and toured last summer on a Gijs van Tuyl touring bike. For this year I've got a Peugeot PR60 lined up. Spring project.
__________________
Are we having fun, or what ...



non-fixie is offline  
Old 03-27-13, 04:34 PM
  #25  
Senior Member
 
cyclotoine's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Yukon, Canada
Posts: 8,759
Mentioned: 13 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 113 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 16 Times in 14 Posts
Originally Posted by non-fixie
No, no. I probably haven't made myself clear enough. When I ride in built-up area's (with lots of traffic lights, pedestrian crossings and coffee bars), which is part of my touring experience, I want to be able to stop without having to get off the saddle. On a road or touring frame the tips of my toes will reach the ground. Not so on a hybrid. I will either have to get off, or fall over. Both are kind of tiresome. Sloping top tubes, whichever kind, don't make no difference. My legs are long enough.

So I ditched the hybrid, and toured last summer on a Gijs van Tuyl touring bike. For this year I've got a Peugeot PR60 lined up. Spring project.
I understood.

What I was getting at was that in the world of adventure touring you want a bit higher of a BB and with fat tires they get even higher. As you pointed out, you are higher off the ground as a result and putting your foot down at rest requires you to lean the bike even more. The more you have to lean the bike over the more uncomfortable it becomes as you add weight to the equation. The OP sighted some fire roads and an intended destination. My point was that given a higher BB and thus a higher top tube, straddling your bike may be a more common position while at a stop than on top of the seat. As a result there is an advantage to having a sloped top tube for such a touring style.
__________________
1 Super Record bike, 1 Nuovo Record bike, 1 Pista, 1 Road, 1 Cyclocross/Allrounder, 1 MTB, 1 Touring, 1 Fixed gear
cyclotoine is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.