Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Classic & Vintage
Reload this Page >

Columbus SL vs Columbus TENAX

Notices
Classic & Vintage This forum is to discuss the many aspects of classic and vintage bicycles, including musclebikes, lightweights, middleweights, hi-wheelers, bone-shakers, safety bikes and much more.

Columbus SL vs Columbus TENAX

Old 08-13-13, 03:16 PM
  #1  
Junior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Posts: 9
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Columbus SL vs Columbus TENAX

My good friend and I were having a back-and-forth argument over which tubing is better. He has a mid 80s' Schwinn Tempo (TENAX) while I own an early 80s' Faggin Campione Del Mondo (SL). We bet a case of beer on whose frame is generally "better" than the other's.

Any idea?


Here are some pictures.

https://imgur.com/a/f5wpa

Last edited by vintagebikeman; 08-13-13 at 03:32 PM.
vintagebikeman is offline  
Old 08-13-13, 03:20 PM
  #2  
Fat Guy on a Little Bike
 
KonAaron Snake's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Philadelphia, PA
Posts: 17,228

Bikes: Two wheeled ones

Mentioned: 42 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1254 Post(s)
Liked 343 Times in 173 Posts
Better how? SL was more expensive and lighter.
KonAaron Snake is offline  
Old 08-13-13, 03:27 PM
  #3  
Senior Member
 
Chombi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 11,138

Bikes: 1986 Alan Record Carbonio, 1985 Vitus Plus Carbone 7, 1984 Peugeot PSV, 1972 Line Seeker, 1986(est.) Medici Aerodynamic (Project), 1985(est.) Peugeot PY10FC

Mentioned: 22 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 150 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 33 Times in 27 Posts
Well, in the least, your bike says "World Champion" in Italian on its name, while his bikes model name sometimes reminds us all of that horrible car that Ford used to make....... But he can get back at you with the first name on your bike too.... I dunno, I think it's a tie.
Go to the bar together, celebrate and get drunk.....
Chombi is offline  
Old 08-13-13, 03:28 PM
  #4  
Senior Member
 
bibliobob's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Sacramento, CA
Posts: 3,090

Bikes: '53/'54 Bianchi CDM, '62ish Altenburger Cinelli Mod B, '69 Rene Herse Competition, '72 Motobecane Grand Record, '73-74 Colnago Super,, '73-74 Cinelli SC, '78ish counterfeit Confente, '82 Medici Gran Turismo, '67ish Mondia Speciale, Eddy Merckx Pro

Mentioned: 15 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 72 Post(s)
Liked 190 Times in 66 Posts
He owes you some beer....
bibliobob is offline  
Old 08-13-13, 03:28 PM
  #5  
Junior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Posts: 9
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
That is exactly what I am looking for. Better in terms of weight, performance, price (we both bought ours from CL for roughly the same price), and overall quality of the alloy.
vintagebikeman is offline  
Old 08-13-13, 03:32 PM
  #6  
Senior Member
 
mapleleafs-13's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Toronto
Posts: 1,814

Bikes: Pinarello Veneto, Pinarello Montello, Bianchi Celeste

Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 25 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
This isn't even a debate.

Columbus runs circles around tenax.

Plus Italian bikes > American bikes

mapleleafs-13 is offline  
Old 08-13-13, 03:37 PM
  #7  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 19,878
Mentioned: 128 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3262 Post(s)
Liked 2,545 Times in 1,817 Posts
Originally Posted by mapleleafs-13
This isn't even a debate.

Columbus runs circles around tenax.

Plus Italian bikes > American bikes

You might have to weigh the Faggin. Way back we found that there was on some of their bikes such a close call between the Columbus SL and Columbus tretubi Faggin frames that we decided just to stock the Faggin tretubi, same weight and $100+ dollars cheaper.

Isn't the better bike the fastest up the hill anyway?
repechage is offline  
Old 08-13-13, 03:39 PM
  #8  
Decrepit Member
 
Scooper's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Santa Rosa, California
Posts: 10,489

Bikes: Waterford 953 RS-22, several Paramounts

Mentioned: 70 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 633 Post(s)
Liked 67 Times in 56 Posts
Originally Posted by KonAaron Snake
Better how? SL was more expensive and lighter.
+1

Here's the Columbus Tenax decal.



According to Columbus distributor Nova Cycle Supply, much of the tubing used by Schwinn in the late eighties/early nineties and labeled as Tenax is actually Cromor. Other Columbus tubing may also have been labeled Tenax.



Cromor was double-butted seamed chromoly, but in the drawing and butting process the seam weld became so homogeneous that it's virtually seamless.

Here are the butting profiles for SL and Cromor showing the slightly thicker wall thickness of Cromor. The SL tubeset weight was 1925 grams, while the Cromor tubeset weight was 2190 grams.



__________________
- Stan

my bikes

Science doesn't care what you believe.

Last edited by Scooper; 08-13-13 at 05:54 PM. Reason: added Tenax decal
Scooper is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
zazenzach
Classic & Vintage
7
02-14-21 02:58 AM
Stormy Archer
Classic & Vintage
18
06-27-18 06:57 AM
vtr1000sp2
Classic & Vintage
13
03-18-17 08:24 PM
vintagebikeman
Classic & Vintage
1
08-12-13 10:56 PM
stripes
Framebuilders
0
03-15-10 02:51 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service - Do Not Sell or Share My Personal Information -

Copyright © 2023 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.