FD for 46/36/24 triple crank?
#1
Mmmmm potatoes
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Idaho
Posts: 1,921
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
FD for 46/36/24 triple crank?
I'm probably posting this in the wrong forum. I've got a Univega Alpina Pro steel mountain bike. I'm replacing the crank with a LX triple (46/36/24) from Ebay. I also picked up a bottom swing Deore FD-M591. The Deore FD doesn't seem like it will work with the crank. The inner cage plate won't clear the middle chainring when I've set the outer plate to be 1-2mm from the outer chainring.
The original crank and FD are LX FC-M560 (46/36/26) and LX FD-M561, respectively. The inner FD plate is smaller than the Deore one.
After doing some more research, I found a SLX FD-M660 that might work. I wanted to get some opinions on its suitability for this crank. I need a 28.6mm clamp, bottom swing, and clearance for 46T chainring and 22T capacity. It seems to fit the bill, but has anyone used this FD with a similar crank?
thanks
The original crank and FD are LX FC-M560 (46/36/26) and LX FD-M561, respectively. The inner FD plate is smaller than the Deore one.
After doing some more research, I found a SLX FD-M660 that might work. I wanted to get some opinions on its suitability for this crank. I need a 28.6mm clamp, bottom swing, and clearance for 46T chainring and 22T capacity. It seems to fit the bill, but has anyone used this FD with a similar crank?
thanks
#2
working on my sandal tan
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: CID
Posts: 22,625
Bikes: 1991 Bianchi Eros, 1964 Armstrong, 1988 Diamondback Ascent, 1988 Bianchi Premio, 1987 Bianchi Sport SX, 1980s Raleigh mixte (hers), All-City Space Horse (hers)
Mentioned: 98 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3868 Post(s)
Liked 2,560 Times
in
1,574 Posts
Close enough to the right forum.
Yeah, checking the specs for that guy, it doesn't want a big ring larger than 42T: https://www.shimano.com/publish/conte..._mountain.html
My advice would be to "go back in time" and get an FD that's spec'd for a 46-48T big ring. What's wrong with the original FD-M561?
Yeah, checking the specs for that guy, it doesn't want a big ring larger than 42T: https://www.shimano.com/publish/conte..._mountain.html
My advice would be to "go back in time" and get an FD that's spec'd for a 46-48T big ring. What's wrong with the original FD-M561?
#3
feros ferio
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: www.ci.encinitas.ca.us
Posts: 21,766
Bikes: 1959 Capo Modell Campagnolo; 1960 Capo Sieger (2); 1962 Carlton Franco Suisse; 1970 Peugeot UO-8; 1982 Bianchi Campione d'Italia; 1988 Schwinn Project KOM-10;
Mentioned: 44 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1384 Post(s)
Liked 1,295 Times
in
820 Posts
I have a period-correct, if not original, SunTour XC 7000 on my Schwinn, with a 48-40-28 or 48-40-24 ringset. With the latter configuration I have to be a little careful on upshifts out of low, but otherwise both work fine.
__________________
"Far and away the best prize that life offers is the chance to work hard at work worth doing." --Theodore Roosevelt
Capo: 1959 Modell Campagnolo, S/N 40324; 1960 Sieger (2), S/N 42624, 42597
Carlton: 1962 Franco Suisse, S/N K7911
Peugeot: 1970 UO-8, S/N 0010468
Bianchi: 1982 Campione d'Italia, S/N 1.M9914
Schwinn: 1988 Project KOM-10, S/N F804069
"Far and away the best prize that life offers is the chance to work hard at work worth doing." --Theodore Roosevelt
Capo: 1959 Modell Campagnolo, S/N 40324; 1960 Sieger (2), S/N 42624, 42597
Carlton: 1962 Franco Suisse, S/N K7911
Peugeot: 1970 UO-8, S/N 0010468
Bianchi: 1982 Campione d'Italia, S/N 1.M9914
Schwinn: 1988 Project KOM-10, S/N F804069
#4
Mmmmm potatoes
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Idaho
Posts: 1,921
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
The crank arm is bent, and the derailleurs are broken. You linked to the 10 speed version, but I think the specs are similar to the 9 speed. Any thoughts on the SLX FD? Is it as simple as finding one that will handle the large chain ring?
#5
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Fairplay Co
Posts: 9,584
Bikes: Current 79 Nishiki Custum Sport, Jeunet 620, notable previous bikes P.K. Ripper loop tail, Kawahara Laser Lite, Paramount Track full chrome, Raliegh Internatioanl, Motobecan Super Mirage. 59 Crown royak 3 speed
Mentioned: 26 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 786 Post(s)
Liked 1,706 Times
in
620 Posts
+1 According to spec's the LX Stuff you have should work fine with this setup is there some reason you don't want to run use the LX stuff you have. The only potential issue I could see is if you have the wrong length BB for your new crank.
#6
working on my sandal tan
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: CID
Posts: 22,625
Bikes: 1991 Bianchi Eros, 1964 Armstrong, 1988 Diamondback Ascent, 1988 Bianchi Premio, 1987 Bianchi Sport SX, 1980s Raleigh mixte (hers), All-City Space Horse (hers)
Mentioned: 98 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3868 Post(s)
Liked 2,560 Times
in
1,574 Posts
If it needs to be a new part, you might be stuck with lower-end "road" FDs meant for wider chains, like the Tourney FD-A073 (max ring 50T), or the FD-2403 "Claris" (max ring 50T.)
(My "go back in time" reference meant to all the good used Deore FDs floating around that will handle a 46T big ring, 20+ capacity, and that were well-made...)
#7
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Fairplay Co
Posts: 9,584
Bikes: Current 79 Nishiki Custum Sport, Jeunet 620, notable previous bikes P.K. Ripper loop tail, Kawahara Laser Lite, Paramount Track full chrome, Raliegh Internatioanl, Motobecan Super Mirage. 59 Crown royak 3 speed
Mentioned: 26 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 786 Post(s)
Liked 1,706 Times
in
620 Posts
OK know things make a little more sense if you need to replace stuff nearly any M series FD from the 80's to mid 90's should work based on Shimano specs and experiance you can pic one up dirt cheap off ebay, a bike coop or a more freindly established LBS. I'm surprised the one you have doesn't work.
#8
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: NJ
Posts: 3,084
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 5 Times
in
4 Posts
Here's my take/experience wit this.... even if you get a fairly modern (9speed era) Shimano mtb FD that will handle a 48t
big ring, you'll still run into problems b/c the cage is stepped and it wants a 12t gap between the big'n'middle, and
a 10t gap between middle'n'little. You can make it work, but it will be sloppy, b/c they essentially optimized the geo f or
their own Shimano-branded 48/36/26 cranks.
Best bet, as others stated, would be to get an 80s/early 90s mtb FD. Most will take a 48t top, and lack the radical steps
in the cage that demand specific tooth counts. I have an early 90s Suntour XC Expert that came on a microdrive bike, but handles
a 48t top, plus most of the various deerhead/mt60/exage FDs I've come across take a 48t top as well. These are easily sourced, and most often do not cost much....
IME, the 6- and 7-speed FD's handle wider chain better than the 9- and 10-speed ones do.... less rub and whatnot.
Good luck!
big ring, you'll still run into problems b/c the cage is stepped and it wants a 12t gap between the big'n'middle, and
a 10t gap between middle'n'little. You can make it work, but it will be sloppy, b/c they essentially optimized the geo f or
their own Shimano-branded 48/36/26 cranks.
Best bet, as others stated, would be to get an 80s/early 90s mtb FD. Most will take a 48t top, and lack the radical steps
in the cage that demand specific tooth counts. I have an early 90s Suntour XC Expert that came on a microdrive bike, but handles
a 48t top, plus most of the various deerhead/mt60/exage FDs I've come across take a 48t top as well. These are easily sourced, and most often do not cost much....
IME, the 6- and 7-speed FD's handle wider chain better than the 9- and 10-speed ones do.... less rub and whatnot.
Good luck!
#10
1, 2, 3 and to the 4X
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 324
Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 17 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
Friction or index?
Friction - even though contemporary Shimano MTB triple FDs are specced for 42 or 44 tooth max chainrings they will shift 48. Deore, SLX, Deore LX (recently discontinued here in the States as far as I can tell) and XT should work fine.
Index - For best results seek out a similar vintage FD so the profile of the chainrings and inner/outer cage plates match up. The pull ratio of the shifter for your given crankset is also a limiting factor.
You could also try moving the FD up a bit more than the sticker recommends. Not optimal, but functional.
Friction - even though contemporary Shimano MTB triple FDs are specced for 42 or 44 tooth max chainrings they will shift 48. Deore, SLX, Deore LX (recently discontinued here in the States as far as I can tell) and XT should work fine.
Index - For best results seek out a similar vintage FD so the profile of the chainrings and inner/outer cage plates match up. The pull ratio of the shifter for your given crankset is also a limiting factor.
You could also try moving the FD up a bit more than the sticker recommends. Not optimal, but functional.
#11
Mmmmm potatoes
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Idaho
Posts: 1,921
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
The front shifter is friction (SRAM X.0 gripshift). I haven't yet mounted the chain (still waiting on RD to arrive), but I can try the Deore FD. It just doesn't look like it will work. Kind of a hassle to send it back to Amazon.