Touring Bike for Long Leg, Short Torso Male
01-09-14, 02:49 PM
#1
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Mcminnville, Oregon
Posts: 144
Bikes: 1984 Fuji Espree, 1995 Rockhopper
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Touring Bike for Long Leg, Short Torso Male
Curious if you might have suggestions for a vintage touring bike for someone with the following specs. Obviously, I need a frame with a short top tube to seat tube ratio. The only bike I've found that might work so far is the Panasonic Touring Deluxe. I test rode one last summer and should have snapped it up when I had the chance. Any others you can think of?
Measurements
-------------------------------------------
Inseam: 35.5 (90cm)
Trunk: 25 (63.5cm)
Forearm: 14 (35.5cm)
Arm: 25.5 (64.8cm)
Thigh: 24.75 (62.9cm)
Lower Leg: 21.25 (54cm)
Sternal Notch: 59 (150cm)
Total Body Height: 73 (185cm)
The Eddy Fit (cm)
-------------------------------------------
Seat tube range c-c: 59.6 - 60.1
Seat tube range c-t: 61.4 - 61.9
Top tube length: 53.7 - 54.1
Stem Length: 10.1 - 10.7
BB-Saddle Position: 76.5 - 78.5
Saddle-Handlebar: 54.7 - 55.3
Saddle Setback: 9.9 - 10.3
Measurements
-------------------------------------------
Inseam: 35.5 (90cm)
Trunk: 25 (63.5cm)
Forearm: 14 (35.5cm)
Arm: 25.5 (64.8cm)
Thigh: 24.75 (62.9cm)
Lower Leg: 21.25 (54cm)
Sternal Notch: 59 (150cm)
Total Body Height: 73 (185cm)
The Eddy Fit (cm)
-------------------------------------------
Seat tube range c-c: 59.6 - 60.1
Seat tube range c-t: 61.4 - 61.9
Top tube length: 53.7 - 54.1
Stem Length: 10.1 - 10.7
BB-Saddle Position: 76.5 - 78.5
Saddle-Handlebar: 54.7 - 55.3
Saddle Setback: 9.9 - 10.3
01-09-14, 03:41 PM
#2
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Bethesda/Baltimore MD
Posts: 3,847
Bikes: '72 Moto Grand Record, '72 Gitane tandem, '72 Raleigh Super Course, '73 Raleigh Gran Sport, '73 and '76 Colnagos Super, '76 Fiorelli Coppi, '78 Raleigh SBDU Team Pro, '78 Trek 930, '81 Holdsworth Special 650B, '86 Masi GC, '87 Panasonic DX5000
Mentioned: 62 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 727 Post(s)
Liked 387 Times
in
219 Posts
Most larger sized '70s Raleighs had relatively short top tubes. I have a '79 Team Pro that's 65cm x 60cm tt, a '73 Gran Sport 61x57.5, and a '73 Super Course 63x58. Those top tubes are still not as short as your Eddy fit would dictate, but I'm not sure too many production frames had tt's that short with a 60+ ST.
__________________
The man who dies with the most toys…is dead. - Rootboy
The man who dies with the most toys…is dead. - Rootboy
01-09-14, 03:45 PM
#3
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 18,117
Mentioned: 121 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2653 Post(s)
Liked 1,688 Times
in
1,241 Posts
Originally Posted by jeirvine
Most larger sized '70s Raleighs had relatively short top tubes. I have a '79 Team Pro that's 65cm x 60cm tt, a '73 Gran Sport 61x57.5, and a '73 Super Course 63x58. Those top tubes are still not as short as your Eddy fit would dictate, but I'm not sure too many production frames had tt's that short with a 60+ ST.
Easier to tool up that way.
01-09-14, 04:44 PM
#4
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Schwenksville, Pa
Posts: 2,810
Bikes: '80 Mercian Olympic, '07 Rivendell AHH, '16 Clockwork All-Rounder, '22 New Albion Privateer
Mentioned: 14 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 256 Post(s)
Liked 236 Times
in
146 Posts
I had a 65cm Raleigh Alyeska that a 58-9 cm top tube. It was way too short for me, that's why I tried mustache bars on it.
[IMG]
[IMG]
__________________
01-09-14, 06:05 PM
#5
feros ferio
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: www.ci.encinitas.ca.us
Posts: 21,266
Bikes: 1959 Capo Modell Campagnolo; 1960 Capo Sieger (2); 1962 Carlton Franco Suisse; 1970 Peugeot UO-8; 1982 Bianchi Campione d'Italia; 1988 Schwinn Project KOM-10;
Mentioned: 41 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1241 Post(s)
Liked 895 Times
in
604 Posts
Originally Posted by repechage
A number of Japanese bikes of the early to mid 70's also had shorter top tubes for the bigger sizes, we used to think that Nishiki used the same angles and top tube length for the 21" through 25" frame.
Easier to tool up that way.
Easier to tool up that way.
__________________
"Far and away the best prize that life offers is the chance to work hard at work worth doing." --Theodore Roosevelt
Capo: 1959 Modell Campagnolo, S/N 40324; 1960 Sieger (2), S/N 42624, 42597
Carlton: 1962 Franco Suisse, S/N K7911
Peugeot: 1970 UO-8, S/N 0010468
Bianchi: 1982 Campione d'Italia, S/N 1.M9914
Schwinn: 1988 Project KOM-10, S/N F804069
"Far and away the best prize that life offers is the chance to work hard at work worth doing." --Theodore Roosevelt
Capo: 1959 Modell Campagnolo, S/N 40324; 1960 Sieger (2), S/N 42624, 42597
Carlton: 1962 Franco Suisse, S/N K7911
Peugeot: 1970 UO-8, S/N 0010468
Bianchi: 1982 Campione d'Italia, S/N 1.M9914
Schwinn: 1988 Project KOM-10, S/N F804069
01-09-14, 07:12 PM
#6
The Drive Side is Within
Panasonics and the Raleigh USA Alyeska/Kodiak/Wyoming will do ya. My Panasonic is 66 CTT / 58. My 25" Alyeska is as above.
I have long arms, but can stretch out plenty for my needs on a 58 cm tt.
I have long arms, but can stretch out plenty for my needs on a 58 cm tt.
__________________
The bicycle, the bicycle surely, should always be the vehicle of novelists and poets. Christopher Morley
The bicycle, the bicycle surely, should always be the vehicle of novelists and poets. Christopher Morley
01-09-14, 07:25 PM
#7
The Drive Side is Within
https://portland.craigslist.org/clk/bik/4280343076.html
https://portland.craigslist.org/mlt/bik/4271414046.html
https://portland.craigslist.org/wsc/bik/4255442269.html
https://portland.craigslist.org/yam/bik/4233737668.html
Lots of cool touring bikes to check out, though.
https://portland.craigslist.org/mlt/bik/4271414046.html
https://portland.craigslist.org/wsc/bik/4255442269.html
https://portland.craigslist.org/yam/bik/4233737668.html
Lots of cool touring bikes to check out, though.
__________________
The bicycle, the bicycle surely, should always be the vehicle of novelists and poets. Christopher Morley
The bicycle, the bicycle surely, should always be the vehicle of novelists and poets. Christopher Morley
01-09-14, 08:08 PM
#8
tgbikes
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Omaha Ne.
Posts: 147
Bikes: Volpe,Eros, Voyageur, LHT, Ochsner
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
I am 71 in tall with 90cm inseam, and found that the short TT can mean bad toe overlap. I ride a 60 cm LHT with 8 cm stem. For me it's better than flopping over on a slow turn, I am 67.
01-10-14, 01:04 AM
#9
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Mcminnville, Oregon
Posts: 144
Bikes: 1984 Fuji Espree, 1995 Rockhopper
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Chuckk
Where did you get those numbers for the "Eddy Fit" from?
https://www.competitivecyclist.com/St...ulatorBike.jsp
01-10-14, 01:07 AM
#10
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Mcminnville, Oregon
Posts: 144
Bikes: 1984 Fuji Espree, 1995 Rockhopper
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Originally Posted by KOBE
I had a 65cm Raleigh Alyeska that a 58-9 cm top tube. It was way too short for me, that's why I tried mustache bars on it.
01-10-14, 01:12 AM
#11
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Mcminnville, Oregon
Posts: 144
Bikes: 1984 Fuji Espree, 1995 Rockhopper
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Originally Posted by repechage
A number of Japanese bikes of the early to mid 70's also had shorter top tubes for the bigger sizes, we used to think that Nishiki used the same angles and top tube length for the 21" through 25" frame.
Easier to tool up that way.
Easier to tool up that way.
01-10-14, 06:00 AM
#12
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Knoxville, TN
Posts: 1,978
Bikes: Schwinn Paramount P15, Fisher Montare, Proteus, Rivendell Quickbeam
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 12 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times
in
3 Posts
Schwinn Voyageur. I had an 89 with a 63cm seat tube and a 57cm top tube.
01-10-14, 08:16 AM
#13
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Tampa Bay, Florida
Posts: 1,731
Bikes: 87 Bridgestone 550 (Shocking Electric Metallic Pink)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times
in
2 Posts
86 Trek Elance 400T, ST 63.5cm, TT 58.5cm....Reynolds 531 frame
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
dan3324
Classic & Vintage
24
08-28-17 01:27 AM
circleback
Long Distance Competition/Ultracycling, Randonneuring and Endurance Cycling
5
12-20-10 07:02 AM
OneArmedScissor
Road Cycling
7
07-25-10 07:24 AM
