![]() |
Compatibility charts?
Back in the day when I dabbled in 356s (waaay before the Internet), there was a compatibility chart floating around of VW parts (with part numbers) that would fit our precious Porsches. It was valuable for a starving student trying to keep his 356 running.
I've been reminded of this chart multiple times in the last few days, at least as it relates to our vintage bikes, and wonder if such a thing would be useful for C&V bike parts. Obviously, lots of connection schemes are sort of standardized (derailleur hangers, brake mounting, seat post and stem diameters, etc), so you could often substitute a set of SunTour Superbe brakes for Campy NR if you were so inclined. I'm not worried about swapping entire parts, more about parts of parts (pieces parts?) Still, incomplete parts get sold from time-to-time. Here are some compatibility questions:
These are just a few examples. I think it might be kind of useful to create some sort of compatibility chart (or charts) as parts (or pieces of parts) get harder to find. |
some compatibility information can be gleaned from the Howard Sutherland bicycle workshop manuals.
have found them to be of immense help through the years. http://www.sutherlandsbicycle.com/ |
I had the LBS stock those campy pads. They work great for NR/SR brakes. They cost me $25.00
|
|
It's a keen idea, but compiling that kind of extensive database is kind of impossible without some kind of major investment.
To wit... A lot of that type of information IS already available on dozens of sites across the web (including this one) albeit in a fragmented way, and some of it is in foreign languages (which is fine for those of us who can read them, but obviously not so much for those who can't). Still, to have it all under one roof would take an operation as dedicated as Wikipedia, and would probably need to be updated every six months or so- not to mention the whole process of vetting the information for empirical accuracy, in addition to occasional translation & legal accountability (which in turn implies the existence of a legal team). so... $$$. That's all very expensive & time-consuming, even for a volunteer effort (and how many years would it take before it's useable?). I mean, look at Wikipedia or Linux; public broadcasting, at all the fund drives & donation requests; bandwidth & printing aren't free, after all. :innocent: |
Originally Posted by Pars
(Post 16545629)
The examples I posted were just that. I didn't mean that people should start hunting around for solutions to those particular problems. |
| All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:05 PM. |
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.