Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Classic & Vintage
Reload this Page >

Glockner Rad vs Sekine Medaille?

Search
Notices
Classic & Vintage This forum is to discuss the many aspects of classic and vintage bicycles, including musclebikes, lightweights, middleweights, hi-wheelers, bone-shakers, safety bikes and much more.

Glockner Rad vs Sekine Medaille?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 08-17-14, 07:46 PM
  #1  
Junior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Posts: 5
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Glockner Rad vs Sekine Medaille?

Hi,

I'm a road cyclist but a newbie to vintage bicycles. I've been looking for a vintage 70s and earlier bike for casual use. I've found two that I like, but want some info and opinion from you guys.

1. Glockner Rad (Austria)

Anyone have info on this company, and the year this bike was produced? I can't find anything. I want to put drop handle bars, is that a good idea with this bike since the handbar looks vintage?



2. 1975 Sekine Medaille (Canada).
I want to replace the seat and handle bar tape with brown leather.




Thank you for the help.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg
image.jpg (67.4 KB, 9 views)
File Type: jpg
image.jpg (100.8 KB, 21 views)
File Type: jpg
image.jpg (65.9 KB, 20 views)
biohish is offline  
Old 08-17-14, 08:06 PM
  #2  
Extraordinary Magnitude
 
The Golden Boy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Waukesha WI
Posts: 13,646

Bikes: 1978 Trek TX700; 1978/79 Trek 736; 1984 Specialized Stumpjumper Sport; 1984 Schwinn Voyageur SP; 1985 Trek 620; 1985 Trek 720; 1986 Trek 400 Elance; 1987 Schwinn High Sierra; 1990 Miyata 1000LT

Mentioned: 84 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2608 Post(s)
Liked 1,700 Times in 936 Posts
I guess rather than going into it already deciding what you're going to do with it... get something close to what you want, and try riding it for a bit to see if it'll meet your needs.

That way you don't spend a load of time, money and energy tearing up a perfectly good 40 year old bike only to figure out it's not what you wanted.
__________________
*Recipient of the 2006 Time Magazine "Person Of The Year" Award*

Commence to jigglin’ huh?!?!

"But hey, always love to hear from opinionated amateurs." -says some guy to Mr. Marshall.
The Golden Boy is offline  
Old 08-17-14, 08:26 PM
  #3  
Senior Member
 
RoadTire's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 1,968

Bikes: '09 Trek 2.1 * '75 Sekine * 2010 Raleigh Talus 8.0 * '90 Giant Mtb * Raleigh M20 * Fuji Nevada mtb

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
I vote for the Sekine if it fits, 'cause I still have mine from '75. They are a "sleeper," meaning the bike is better than it's resale price for some reason.
__________________
FB4K - Every October we wrench on donated bikes. Every December, a few thousand kids get bikes for Christmas. For many, it is their first bike, ever. Every bike, new and used, was donated, built, cleaned and repaired. Check us out on FaceBook: FB4K.

Disclaimer: 99% of what I know about cycling I learned on BF. That would make, ummm, 1% experience. And a lot of posts.
RoadTire is offline  
Old 08-17-14, 08:53 PM
  #4  
curmudgineer
 
old's'cool's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Chicago SW burbs
Posts: 4,417

Bikes: 2 many 2 fit here

Mentioned: 8 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 263 Post(s)
Liked 112 Times in 70 Posts
I don't know anything about the Glockner, but if the Sekine is in as good condition as it appears to be, and fits you, it looks like a pretty good bet. All component sizes should be more or less standard, in modern terms, so replacements and upgrades should be no problem. It already has nice features like downtube shifters and aluminum fenders, which are a nice touch for a boom bike.
old's'cool is offline  
Old 08-17-14, 08:57 PM
  #5  
Junior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Posts: 5
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Golden Boy, I was just planning on adding drop handle bars, keeping the original handlebar (if that is original) on the side, can put back at any time. It looks to me that both frames look relatively similar. I have ridden a Sekine before, a friend's, many years ago just a couple of times and it was fine. I don't think riding them will be a problem. I mainly want to know if anyone knows anything about the quality of the Glockner and what year that Rad model was produced, because I cannot find anything online, which is surprising.
biohish is offline  
Old 08-17-14, 08:58 PM
  #6  
Junior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Posts: 5
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Yean, I noticed that they are pretty cheap for the apparent quality, especially the ones produced in Canada post 1973. thanks

Old's'cool yeah agree, seems like a great bike, BUT, I do want to know more about the Glockner now, simply because I cant find anything on it making me curious.
biohish is offline  
Old 08-18-14, 04:51 AM
  #7  
Senior Member
 
randyjawa's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Thunder Bay, Ontario, Canada - burrrrr!
Posts: 11,674

Bikes: 1958 Rabeneick 120D, 1968 Legnano Gran Premio, 196? Torpado Professional, 2000 Marinoni Piuma

Mentioned: 210 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1372 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1,751 Times in 938 Posts
The Sekine is the better bicycle to start with if riding is your primary goal. I have owned dozens of Sekine bicycles in days gone by...

__________________
"98% of the bikes I buy are projects".
randyjawa is offline  
Old 08-18-14, 06:12 AM
  #8  
Junior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Posts: 5
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Randy... Thanks. Seems the consensus is the Sekine. I like you site. Question, the Sekine is a 21inch frame. I ride a 56cm specialized tarmac for road but according to the owner he's 5'11" and the 21 Sekine is fine. I'm the same height. Is it a decent fit for a Sekine or should I look fur a 22inch? Thanks
biohish is offline  
Old 08-18-14, 08:58 AM
  #9  
Senior Member
 
randyjawa's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Thunder Bay, Ontario, Canada - burrrrr!
Posts: 11,674

Bikes: 1958 Rabeneick 120D, 1968 Legnano Gran Premio, 196? Torpado Professional, 2000 Marinoni Piuma

Mentioned: 210 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1372 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1,751 Times in 938 Posts
Better stick with the 56 or close to it, in my opinion. I am five foot ten inches and, though I can ride a 54cm, I prefer a 56cm for comfort sake. Height has something but not everything to do with size choice. Short torso, long legs demands a larger fit. So, too, in my case, does the rider's age. I can no longer feel comfortable on the smaller size due to a busted neck which gets awfully sore, thanks to the need to curl my neck up to allow me to see where I am going. The point is, you need to know you and what you want the bike for.
__________________
"98% of the bikes I buy are projects".
randyjawa is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
kwcnc
Classic and Vintage Bicycles: Whats it Worth? Appraisals.
7
04-11-16 07:41 AM
matthewdarrin
Classic & Vintage
4
09-14-15 05:50 PM
darksworm
Classic and Vintage Bicycles: Whats it Worth? Appraisals.
1
04-27-15 12:20 PM
CaptFinny
Classic and Vintage Bicycles: Whats it Worth? Appraisals.
7
05-14-13 03:00 PM
_dylan
Classic & Vintage
14
07-10-12 01:48 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.