Bike Forums
1  2  3  4 
Page 3 of 4
Go to

Bike Forums (https://www.bikeforums.net/forum.php)
-   Classic & Vintage (https://www.bikeforums.net/classic-vintage/)
-   -   Why I Love The Classics (https://www.bikeforums.net/classic-vintage/992940-why-i-love-classics.html)

iab 02-08-15 01:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dddd (Post 17538036)
Stucky pretty well describes the aesthetic disaster that so many of today's bikes are, not that some of them aren't more tastefully rendered.

And on the flip side, I have seen plenty of vintage paint that would make most anyone gag. Bad taste is timeless.

OldsCOOL 02-08-15 01:41 PM

This.

http://i62.photobucket.com/albums/h8...07330679B4.jpg

iab 02-08-15 01:48 PM

What's with the red tire?

Not classic.

OldsCOOL 02-08-15 02:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by iab (Post 17538186)
What's with the red tire?

Not classic.

It'll wear out soon.

non-fixie 02-08-15 03:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by top506 (Post 17537723)
That's back there.
How about Crusader Rabbit and Rags? Colonel Bleep?

Top

I was either too young or they weren't aired here in Holland. Probably both. I think the first TV entered our household in'65 or '66.

dddd 02-08-15 04:43 PM

I used to wonder if I was the only rider who didn't find brifters to be particularly ergonomic.

Having to twist the wrist outward to sweep the stack can be painful and even dangerous when decelerating over bumpy ground, while the one-swipe downshift using friction DT shifters can wait until the speed is scrubbed off.

Under ideal conditions and during competitive riding, a freshly-tuned brifter system is sweet indeded, but after a bike has sat for an extended period it's the friction-shifted bike that can be trusted to shift properly. It can be the STI shifter that gums up, or it can be the lengthy cable housings that do your modern bike in, but the newer bikes need more frequent renewal efforts.

To me it is analogous to the pre-1979 motorcycles, with their generously-sized fuel jets. These bikes start right up, with their old fuel, even after years of sitting, while the later bikes (with their downsized EPA-compliant carburetor jetting) cannot be trusted to run properly or to even start.
And when the older bike has kick-start and magneto ignition, there is further no worry about a weak battery spoiling the fun.

bcsaltchucker 02-08-15 04:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Stucky (Post 17537294)
What the heck kind of brifters do you have? Even the Sora brifters on my first road bike had FD trim.....

I have Sram Rival on my roadie bike. It has one position on the small ring and two for the big ring. basically once I get to the 6th cog, the FD is rubbing, so I am on the big ring from then on up. Can use almost the whole cluster on the big ring. and that works OK as I run a 46 for a big ring. Works out fine for tight selection of gear inches. Just a bit annoying that I have to change the FD a lot more than I would have on other bikes in the past. (No I do not need bigger than 46, as it is hilly as heck here, twisty and I can spin the 46-11 to 60kph anyways if need be)

So looking fwd to SRAM electric, LOL.

desconhecido 02-08-15 05:53 PM

Is that a Record high flange? Not much more beautiful than that. Built some wheels last month with the current Record hubs and they make me sick every time I look at them. Ugly as a mud fence.

h2oxtc 02-08-15 06:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by bcsaltchucker (Post 17538561)
I have Sram Rival on my roadie bike. It has one position on the small ring and two for the big ring. basically once I get to the 6th cog, the FD is rubbing, so I am on the big ring from then on up.

I don't have any bikes with SRAM, however it sounds to me like your FD may not be set up ideally. Certainly with any Shimano or Campy I've had I could use the entire range of the cassette, perhaps not wisely due to cross chaining, but it could reach the top and bottom sprockets without rubbing on the FD.

dddd 02-08-15 08:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by h2oxtc (Post 17538763)
I don't have any bikes with SRAM, however it sounds to me like your FD may not be set up ideally. Certainly with any Shimano or Campy I've had I could use the entire range of the cassette, perhaps not wisely due to cross chaining, but it could reach the top and bottom sprockets without rubbing on the FD.

Not to mention that using the small ring with the smallest cogs is particularly troublesome, wearing parts faster, putting the oft near-slack chain on top of the chainstay and clanging or snagging on the big ring, and greatly increasing the fatigue-inducing cyclic stress on not only the entire drivetrain but on the entire load path, including the frame.
Remember, the driveside dropout attachment area is so often the first point of fatigue failure, as it in line with the drivetrain's load path, as is the bottom bracket and rear axle.

Contrarily, crossing the chain to the largest sprockets imposes lower loading, keeps the chain moving faster for quicker shifting response, prevents contact between chain and chainstay, etc.

Also, using next-narrower chain than spec'd with a particular gruppo will minimize or eliminate the need to trim the front derailer.

Salubrious 02-08-15 08:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RobbieTunes (Post 17537690)
Generally, when we meet to ride, we look at bikes and make few comments, as everyone's mind is on the next bunch of miles. Yesterday's ride brought a newbie named Zach on his aluminum aero Cervelo, and a regular named Mike on his new Look full carbon. I've somehow convinced him (probably by not buying it) to use the 10-sp carbon Record that came on it, and now, of course, he's hooked. Boy, that was easy. Another new guy started riding about a year ago, 58 years old, and is hooked. Other than noting my friend's redone Kestrel and my modern steel, we didn't say much, and we were off. Nothing much would have been said if I'd been on my steel '80's bikes; we've all ridden before, for the most part, and I've never had a new guy comment on something like that; it would seem fairly forward of a thing to do.

During the ride, you do what you do, whether it's on friction, DT indexed, bar end or brifter/Ergo. I've ridden all during group rides and never gave it a second thought. Yesterday, the new old guy never shifted and his saddle was too low. He mashed into, across, and with the wind. He loved it. The new young guy out-rode us all until the breakaway with 10 to go. My friend's Kestrel stopped going to the big ring, so I swapped with him just before the breakaway, taking the 39/12 to places it may have never been before. My friend thinks the modern steel is sliced bread. The Look had to turn around at 1/3 of the way, since he has 5 kids and about an hour is all he ever gets. One of our riders is healed from a lacerated kidney that he got when he went down on his tri-bike (while in the tuck). I've ridden with these guys for years, and all we ever do is ride. I've ridden DT shifters, friction and indexed, and bar end and brifter/ergos. It's never seemed to matter, and I can tell you that, in my experience, DT shifting is pretty nice in rolling hill country.

After the ride, we talk of speed, the dogs, and the breakaway. Then we start talking bikes, and the appreciation for the older stuff tends to come forth at that time. The newer bikes are just newer bikes, and they get a once-over, but the older stuff gets the curiousity, the longer looks. That craft and art form doesn't sway them from what they roll on, but they do appreciate it. When the ride is over, and we actually have some time, the bicycle as a modern art form takes over, and we look everything over, and share unsupported beliefs.

As for old and new, I still prefer a classic bike. I grew up looking down at slender steel tubes, and the imprint is still with me. Like iab, I appreciate the time and thought process behind the way bikes and components were made, not to advertise, but to say "I did this and I'm proud of it." I like how lugs dress up a tube, and still serve a function. I like how older bikes have places that shine and need maintenance, and how you may not want to ride them in the rain, and how you actually have to use grease in chunks, and how they're mechanical.

Doesn't mean I won't ride the most modern and advanced I can afford, given my priorities.

+1. Poetry.

SJX426 02-08-15 08:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by desconhecido (Post 17538685)
Is that a Record high flange? Not much more beautiful than that. Built some wheels last month with the current Record hubs and they make me sick every time I look at them. Ugly as a mud fence.

[MENTION=188405]desconhecido[/MENTION] If you are referring to my post, no. Motobecane ordered Tipo hubs with Record cutouts on the flanges. There are no oil holes or oil hole clips on those hubs.

KJK 02-08-15 11:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Stucky (Post 17534863)
A sad realization: I'll bet at least half of the people on these forums have never used downtube shifters.

I used them today and everyday I ride. [Gives thumbs up sign]

Stucky 02-08-15 11:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by bcsaltchucker (Post 17538561)
I have Sram Rival on my roadie bike. It has one position on the small ring and two for the big ring. basically once I get to the 6th cog, the FD is rubbing, so I am on the big ring from then on up. Can use almost the whole cluster on the big ring. and that works OK as I run a 46 for a big ring. Works out fine for tight selection of gear inches. Just a bit annoying that I have to change the FD a lot more than I would have on other bikes in the past. (No I do not need bigger than 46, as it is hilly as heck here, twisty and I can spin the 46-11 to 60kph anyways if need be)

So looking fwd to SRAM electric, LOL.

Dayum! If they can't get the mechanical right.... I used to kinda want to try SRAM....but after everything I've read, including what you just said, I think I'll be sticking with 'Mano! It's just plain ridiculous for the FD not to trim in the low position....especially when even Shimano's lowliest group does it. I mean, that double-tap business sounds like it'd be cool and all...but....DAYUM!

Quote:

Originally Posted by KJK (Post 17539558)
I used them today and everyday I ride. [Gives thumbs up sign]

I can't wait till I'll be able to say the same!

desconhecido 02-08-15 11:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SJX426 (Post 17539231)
@desconhecido If you are referring to my post, no. Motobecane ordered Tipo hubs with Record cutouts on the flanges. There are no oil holes or oil hole clips on those hubs.

The picture with the record style cutouts and lack of oil hole clip puzzled me. I have an ordinary pair of high flange round cutout TIpos and they have polished up well also. Not as nice as yours -- I have work to do.

SJX426 02-09-15 05:16 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by desconhecido (Post 17539579)
...... I have an ordinary pair of high flange round cutout TIpos and they have polished up well also. Not as nice as yours -- I have work to do.

Yup! I understand!
[IMG]https://farm6.staticflickr.com/5590/...ac39244d_b.jpgP1020426 by superissimo_83, on Flickr[/IMG]

Just noticed the magnet on the spoke! Didn't know it was there! This is on the to do list.

OldsCOOL 02-09-15 05:54 AM

Love the high flanges! They just gleam in the sun!

Stucky 02-09-15 10:04 AM

Man! It's been a long time since I've seen those nice cut-out high-flange hubs! I had forgotten how nice they are! All the money we pay for therse modern bikes, and what do we get? Smooth black, indistinguishable from what you see on Walmart bikes! The classics ride every bit as good (if not better) than the modern stuff...and offer beauty while doing so!

iab 02-09-15 06:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by OldsCOOL (Post 17539779)
Love the high flanges! They just gleam in the sun!

High flanges are definitely cool. But my modern hubs eliminated spoke elbows making wheel builds vastly more reliable.

https://farm8.staticflickr.com/7173/...c7cba0af_b.jpgCampagnolo Gran Sport Hubs by iabisdb, on Flickr

Stucky 02-09-15 08:28 PM

1 Attachment(s)
Quote:

Originally Posted by iab (Post 17541705)
High flanges are definitely cool. But my modern hubs eliminated spoke elbows making wheel builds vastly more reliable.

https://farm8.staticflickr.com/7173/...c7cba0af_b.jpgCampagnolo Gran Sport Hubs by iabisdb, on Flickr


old's'cool 02-09-15 09:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by iab (Post 17541705)
High flanges are definitely cool. But my modern hubs eliminated spoke elbows making wheel builds vastly more reliable.

Dunno what kind of reliability hairs we're splitting here, but my experience and observation has been that spoke failures are generally attributable to faulty build, inattentive maintenance, or faulty materials. I don't see an inherent design defect with spoke elbows per se. Now it is true that the above issues will tend to manifest at the elbow, which probably sees the highest cyclic stress, so I don't deny that failures, when they occur, will usually be at the elbow.

iab 02-09-15 09:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by old's'cool (Post 17542108)
Dunno what kind of reliability hairs we're splitting here, but my experience and observation has been that spoke failures are generally attributable to faulty build, inattentive maintenance, or faulty materials. I don't see an inherent design defect with spoke elbows per se. Now it is true that the above issues will tend to manifest at the elbow, which probably sees the highest cyclic stress, so I don't deny that failures, when they occur, will usually be at the elbow.

I buy what you are saying. But a modern wheel with straight pulls are typically 20/24. Lighter, aero, reliable. Again, splitting hairs, but there has been nothing revolutionary in bikes for 100 years. Just an extremely slow evolution. What I don't get is why the need to bash the present to celebrate the past. Not pointing fingers at you, just an observation when these threads appear in C&V once every month or so.

dddd 02-09-15 11:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by iab (Post 17542136)
I buy what you are saying. But a modern wheel with straight pulls are typically 20/24. Lighter, aero, reliable. Again, splitting hairs, but there has been nothing revolutionary in bikes for 100 years. Just an extremely slow evolution. What I don't get is why the need to bash the present to celebrate the past. Not pointing fingers at you, just an observation when these threads appear in C&V once every month or so.

Ok, not meaning to demonize the modern stuff just because it's modern.

But low-count wheels, as reliable as they have become, still occasionally fail in a multitude of ways.

A broken spoke with one of these wheels usually ends the ride, where in the past we soldiered on after opening up the brakes.
Or it might be one of those cracks at the rim, where a spoke loses tension. Same problem.

A dinged rim isn't un-common, but getting a replacement rim for some of these modern wheels can be impossible.
A few years goes by, and finding the special spokes can similarly be incredibly difficult.

Same goes for tubeless tires/rims, where a not-uncommon flat out on the road takes a group of riders 45 minutes to get sorted out. Last time this happened it was a local shop owner's bike.

Just saying that there is an extremely practical side to using more-traditional wheel "systems", just as downtube friction shifters are reassuringly reliable and fuss-free.

Please don't get me started on the issues some are having with today's press-fitted bottom brackets and myriad headset architectures.

OldsCOOL 02-10-15 05:01 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dddd (Post 17542357)
Ok, not meaning to demonize the modern stuff just because it's modern.

But low-count wheels, as reliable as they have become, still occasionally fail in a multitude of ways.

A broken spoke with one of these wheels usually ends the ride, where in the past we soldiered on after opening up the brakes.
Or it might be one of those cracks at the rim, where a spoke loses tension. Same problem.

A dinged rim isn't un-common, but getting a replacement rim for some of these modern wheels can be impossible.
A few years goes by, and finding the special spokes can similarly be incredibly difficult.

Same goes for tubeless tires/rims, where a not-uncommon flat out on the road takes a group of riders 45 minutes to get sorted out. Last time this happened it was a local shop owner's bike.

Just saying that there is an extremely practical side to using more-traditional wheel "systems", just as downtube friction shifters are reassuringly reliable and fuss-free.

Please don't get me started on the issues some are having with today's press-fitted bottom brackets and myriad headset architectures.

Agreed. It's that simplicity of the classic road bike that I (and others) love. Sophistication has a price and liability in the area of longevity and reliability.

drewvick 02-10-15 06:17 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Insidious C. (Post 17535461)
My top three reasons:
1. Because I am a grumpy old man
2. My outdated bike is my excuse for not being the fastest rider
3. Because any bike without a horizontal top tube is horribly wrong

+1

1 - Because my 1988 Peugeot lasted longer than my hair (and abs)
2 - I am cheap
3 - Any excuse to hang out in the shed


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:26 AM.
1  2  3  4 
Page 3 of 4
Go to


Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.