27" Tire Advice (Schwalbe vs. Continental)
#1
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2015
Location: Milwaukee, WI
Posts: 13
Bikes: 1982 Trek 614 21Spd / Comfortcycle Delta Trike
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
27" Tire Advice (Schwalbe vs. Continental)
I would appreciate input on 2 tires. I am getting my 1982 Trek 614 back in good riding condition after not using it very much over the last few years. I am looking at 27x1.25 Schwalbe Marathon and Continental Tour Ride tires. The Continental has a max PSI of 80, and the Schwalbe has a max PSI of 95.
I am leaning towards the Schwalbe Marathon, but I have read they can be “heavy” riding, and have a higher rolling resistance.
As an FYI, for input about me, I am 6’6” and weigh 250 lbs. (A light duty tire is not going to survive!) I need to rebuild leg muscle in left leg after a pretty serious femur break. I won’t be doing long distance riding any time soon, but would like to build into it, and be back in condition before it’s time for a new set of tires. To begin with, extra rolling resistance maybe good, but I don’t want it long term. However, with my weight without any additional load, I think the extra PSI in the Schwalbe would be beneficial.
What are your thoughts? Have you used either (or both) tires?
I am leaning towards the Schwalbe Marathon, but I have read they can be “heavy” riding, and have a higher rolling resistance.
As an FYI, for input about me, I am 6’6” and weigh 250 lbs. (A light duty tire is not going to survive!) I need to rebuild leg muscle in left leg after a pretty serious femur break. I won’t be doing long distance riding any time soon, but would like to build into it, and be back in condition before it’s time for a new set of tires. To begin with, extra rolling resistance maybe good, but I don’t want it long term. However, with my weight without any additional load, I think the extra PSI in the Schwalbe would be beneficial.
What are your thoughts? Have you used either (or both) tires?
#2
Abuse Magnet
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Colorado
Posts: 1,704
Bikes: '91 Mtn Tek Vertical, '74 Raleigh Sports, '72 Raleigh Twenty, '84 Univega Gran Turismo, '09 Surly Karate Monkey, '92 Burley Rock-n-Roll
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 93 Post(s)
Liked 28 Times
in
16 Posts
I really like my Marathons...I'm not sure where "heavy" or "hard" is coming from, but I've heard that, too. I'm 320, and the 26x1.75 Marathons on my MTB commuter feel pretty good. I like them well enough that I'm putting 700Cx38 Marathons on my Raleigh Sports I'm working on.
However, Continental makes good stuff as well. I'd think you'd do good with either.
However, Continental makes good stuff as well. I'd think you'd do good with either.
#3
In a Land Without Winter
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: Tucson, AZ
Posts: 3,720
Bikes: Schwinn Volare ('78); Raleigh Competition GS ('79)
Mentioned: 27 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 639 Post(s)
Liked 271 Times
in
152 Posts
Neither. Panaracer Pasela PT. They're on all my 27" bikes and they're awesome; I wouldn't even consider anything else for myself. PT = Protection Technology, i.e., puncture resistance. The tires themselves are light, fast, and long-lasting. And the skinwalls are *perfect* on a vintage bike.
...they're not overly pricey, either.
EDIT: Full disclosure: I haven't used the Schwalbe tires and have no personal experience with them. Continentals, I've only ridden in 700x23 and cannot speak to the ride on the wider versions.
...they're not overly pricey, either.

EDIT: Full disclosure: I haven't used the Schwalbe tires and have no personal experience with them. Continentals, I've only ridden in 700x23 and cannot speak to the ride on the wider versions.
__________________
A race bike in any era is a highly personal choice that at its "best" balances the requirements of fit, weight, handling, durability and cost tempered by the willingness to toss it and oneself down the pavement at considerable speed. ~Bandera
A race bike in any era is a highly personal choice that at its "best" balances the requirements of fit, weight, handling, durability and cost tempered by the willingness to toss it and oneself down the pavement at considerable speed. ~Bandera
Last edited by Fahrenheit531; 03-07-15 at 10:57 AM.
#4
The Rabbi
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 5,125
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 15 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times
in
2 Posts
According to the info I could find, the Schwalbe is within 5g of the Continental, and generally, tires are +/- 10g of spec anyway. So, we can say they pretty much weigh the same. Both are heavier touring oriented tires, relatively low thread count, puncture resistant casings, etc. I really doubt riding the two tires back-to-back, you're going to notice a difference. That said, in general, Schwalbe seems to be a cut above Conti quality-wise, but you do pay a bit more as well.
#5
The Rabbi
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 5,125
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 15 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times
in
2 Posts
Neither. Panaracer Pasela PT. They're on all my 27" bikes and they're awesome; I wouldn't even consider anything else for myself. PT = Protection Technology, i.e., puncture resistance. The tires themselves are light, fast, and long-lasting. And the skinwalls are *perfect* on a vintage bike.
...they're not overly pricey, either.
...they're not overly pricey, either.

#6
In a Land Without Winter
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: Tucson, AZ
Posts: 3,720
Bikes: Schwinn Volare ('78); Raleigh Competition GS ('79)
Mentioned: 27 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 639 Post(s)
Liked 271 Times
in
152 Posts
I would agree here as well, BUT...the Pasela casing is pretty darn thin at the tread, and extremely thin on the sidewall. I like them a lot and run them on most of my bikes, but with 170lbs on them I wear them out pretty fast, and the sidewalls have no abrasion resistance whatsoever, even on the PT models (where I suspect they save some of the weight).

I will defer to your sensible response.
__________________
A race bike in any era is a highly personal choice that at its "best" balances the requirements of fit, weight, handling, durability and cost tempered by the willingness to toss it and oneself down the pavement at considerable speed. ~Bandera
A race bike in any era is a highly personal choice that at its "best" balances the requirements of fit, weight, handling, durability and cost tempered by the willingness to toss it and oneself down the pavement at considerable speed. ~Bandera
#7
aka Tom Reingold
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: High Falls, NY, USA
Posts: 39,640
Bikes: 1962 Rudge Sports, 1971 Raleigh Super Course, 1971 Raleigh Pro Track, 1974 Raleigh International, 1975 Viscount Fixie, 1982 McLean, 1996 Lemond (Ti), 2002 Burley Zydeco tandem
Mentioned: 481 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6742 Post(s)
Liked 1,338 Times
in
862 Posts
Can you get the Marathon Supreme? I hear it rides lighter than it is. If not, get the Continental.
For arcane reasons, it's not correct to call this size 27x1.25, even though it is the same numerically as 27x1-1/4. Some bike tires are expressed in decimals and others in fractions. Switching between them implies a different size. The only accurate sizing system is ISO, formerly known as ETRTO. The ISO spec for your size is 630x32, because that is an actual measurement in millimeters.
For arcane reasons, it's not correct to call this size 27x1.25, even though it is the same numerically as 27x1-1/4. Some bike tires are expressed in decimals and others in fractions. Switching between them implies a different size. The only accurate sizing system is ISO, formerly known as ETRTO. The ISO spec for your size is 630x32, because that is an actual measurement in millimeters.
__________________
Tom Reingold, tom@noglider.com
New York City and High Falls, NY
Blogs: The Experienced Cyclist; noglider's ride blog
“When man invented the bicycle he reached the peak of his attainments.” — Elizabeth West, US author
Please email me rather than PM'ing me. Thanks.
Tom Reingold, tom@noglider.com
New York City and High Falls, NY
Blogs: The Experienced Cyclist; noglider's ride blog
“When man invented the bicycle he reached the peak of his attainments.” — Elizabeth West, US author
Please email me rather than PM'ing me. Thanks.
#9
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: Great White North (VT)
Posts: 485
Bikes: Falcon SR 76, Romic, Trek 660, GT Talera, Shogun 500 Touring
Mentioned: 9 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 94 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
Have you considered Gatorskins? Pumped up to about 90 psi, they are a smooth rolling, tough tire.
BTW, I'm a Clydesdale (6'2'' 220) and I also use 27 x 1 Paselas on a couple of bikes without issues.
BTW, I'm a Clydesdale (6'2'' 220) and I also use 27 x 1 Paselas on a couple of bikes without issues.
#11
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2015
Location: Milwaukee, WI
Posts: 13
Bikes: 1982 Trek 614 21Spd / Comfortcycle Delta Trike
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
@ All Replies
Thanks all for the input. According to the Schwalbe website, the Marathon Racer and Supreme are not available in the 27x1-1/4 size. I had considered Panaracer Pasela PT, but had warnings about sidewall strength. "You might be from Wisconsin if the roads are smoother in the winter because all the potholes are filled in with snow!" Due to pothole "splash out", there can be a lot of small stones along the side of the roads, particularly in the spring. I've had sidewall damage in the past for the stones I missed running over, but still got to close too.
I looked at the Gatorskins, but not too seriously. Wasn't sure how they would do on packed bike trails. I can take a closer look at them also.
Thanks all for the input. According to the Schwalbe website, the Marathon Racer and Supreme are not available in the 27x1-1/4 size. I had considered Panaracer Pasela PT, but had warnings about sidewall strength. "You might be from Wisconsin if the roads are smoother in the winter because all the potholes are filled in with snow!" Due to pothole "splash out", there can be a lot of small stones along the side of the roads, particularly in the spring. I've had sidewall damage in the past for the stones I missed running over, but still got to close too.
I looked at the Gatorskins, but not too seriously. Wasn't sure how they would do on packed bike trails. I can take a closer look at them also.
#12
Senior Member
Schwalbe Marathons are a large profile tire. They're good comfort tires that really fill out 27"x1-1/4" rims. Nice tire for hybrid riding. The Continentals are small profile tires. Good tire for fast pace riding. Nice for road biking.
#13
Nigel
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: San Jose, CA
Posts: 2,991
Bikes: 1980s and 1990s steel: CyclePro, Nishiki, Schwinn, SR, Trek........
Mentioned: 12 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 383 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times
in
3 Posts
I'd like to suggest something a bit different:
Avenir Discovery Aramid 27 x 1-1/8 Road Tire Black
It is ETRTO 28-630. I had these on my World Tourist until I converted to 622 (700c). They are strong and long lasting (the cups on my cheap hub wore out, not the tires). They are lively and tough. I am recently down to just under 350lbs, your 250lbs light weight is not an issue. The roads here - amazingly - are rougher than the roads in Minnesota (Belle Plaine <> Minneapolis-St Paul area), despite the lack of freeze.
Avenir Discovery Aramid 27 x 1-1/8 Road Tire Black
It is ETRTO 28-630. I had these on my World Tourist until I converted to 622 (700c). They are strong and long lasting (the cups on my cheap hub wore out, not the tires). They are lively and tough. I am recently down to just under 350lbs, your 250lbs light weight is not an issue. The roads here - amazingly - are rougher than the roads in Minnesota (Belle Plaine <> Minneapolis-St Paul area), despite the lack of freeze.