Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Classic & Vintage
Reload this Page >

1966 Raleigh Professional

Search
Notices
Classic & Vintage This forum is to discuss the many aspects of classic and vintage bicycles, including musclebikes, lightweights, middleweights, hi-wheelers, bone-shakers, safety bikes and much more.

1966 Raleigh Professional

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-23-15, 09:28 PM
  #1  
Friendship is Magic
Thread Starter
 
3alarmer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Sacramento, CA
Posts: 22,984

Bikes: old ones

Mentioned: 304 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 26402 Post(s)
Liked 10,374 Times in 7,203 Posts
1966 Raleigh Professional

.
...interesting in that I've never actually seen a first production year Raleigh Pro. It came in with some other stuff to the bike co-op as a donation, looked to be my size, so I bought it about three years ago. It was obviously stolen at one time, had all the elements of a tweaker ride, from the mattress saddle to the upturned bars. The original paint, whatever it was, was buried under some kind of flat black rattle can finish, the wheels were either gone or toasted (I forget which). It did have the original crank (too difficult to remove, I guess), and I think maybe one of the derailleurs.

Anyway, it seemed worthy of at least a low budget restoration (as a rider, not a show bike). I finally finished it up last week. Interesting mostly as history, it rides about like you'd think, relatively comfortable in terms of bumps (long wheelbase), climbs ok out of the saddle, feels pretty high in terms of BB height and center of gravity. As set up here, it moves out pretty good for something from 1966.

Attached Images
File Type: jpg
Raleigh Pro (1966 black) 017.jpg (101.9 KB, 348 views)
File Type: jpg
File Type: jpg
File Type: jpg
File Type: jpg
File Type: jpg
Raleigh Pro (1966 black) 009.jpg (103.8 KB, 138 views)
__________________
3alarmer is offline  
Old 03-23-15, 09:47 PM
  #2  
Senior Member
 
Kactus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Tacoma, WA
Posts: 2,520

Bikes: 1962 Schwinn Paramount P12, 1971 Schwinn Paramount P13-9

Mentioned: 30 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 344 Post(s)
Liked 33 Times in 20 Posts
Very cool! Enjoy riding it, you can always do a period correct resto later if you choose.
Kactus is offline  
Old 03-24-15, 05:02 AM
  #3  
South Carolina Ed
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Greer, SC
Posts: 3,889

Bikes: Holdsworth custom, Macario Pro, Ciocc San Cristobal, Viner Nemo, Cyfac Le Mythique, Giant TCR, Tommasso Mondial, Cyfac Etoile

Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 344 Post(s)
Liked 291 Times in 138 Posts
Beauty. Were Record brakes available in 1966?
sced is offline  
Old 03-24-15, 05:39 AM
  #4  
Senior Member
 
daf1009's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Alpharetta, GA
Posts: 2,982

Bikes: LESS than I did a year ago!

Mentioned: 17 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 70 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 6 Times in 5 Posts
What a great find! I love having production bikes that have some sort of "historical significance"...and you have one! Very cool...and...you made the "best of a bad situation" with the paint job...I would have hoped for original paint...but...you never know what others would do!

And as @Kactus said, you can always do a more historical resto in the future...if you want...very cool though...congrats!
daf1009 is offline  
Old 03-24-15, 06:20 AM
  #5  
rhm
multimodal commuter
 
rhm's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: NJ, NYC, LI
Posts: 19,808

Bikes: 1940s Fothergill, 1959 Allegro Special, 1963? Claud Butler Olympic Sprint, Lambert 'Clubman', 1974 Fuji "the Ace", 1976 Holdsworth 650b conversion rando bike, 1983 Trek 720 tourer, 1984 Counterpoint Opus II, 1993 Basso Gap, 2010 Downtube 8h, and...

Mentioned: 584 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1908 Post(s)
Liked 574 Times in 339 Posts
Why do you think it's a '66? The earliest one I've seen was a '69, and that had semi-wrapped seat stays, and a bridge for center pull brakes.
__________________
www.rhmsaddles.com.
rhm is offline  
Old 03-24-15, 06:32 AM
  #6  
~>~
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: TX Hill Country
Posts: 5,931
Mentioned: 87 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1112 Post(s)
Liked 180 Times in 119 Posts
Originally Posted by 3alarmer
...interesting in that I've never actually seen a first production year Raleigh Pro.
Nice frames, glad that you got it back in service.
The shot in stays and clearance for NR brakes looks to me like a MK IV, wish I'd never sold mine.....

Check out Sheldon Brown's Retro Raleighs for pics:

Retro Raleighs: Professionals

-Bandera
Bandera is offline  
Old 03-24-15, 06:50 AM
  #7  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 20,305
Mentioned: 130 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3464 Post(s)
Liked 2,828 Times in 1,995 Posts
Originally Posted by rhm
Why do you think it's a '66? The earliest one I've seen was a '69, and that had semi-wrapped seat stays, and a bridge for center pull brakes.
Yes, looks as bandora writes as a Mark IV, nothing wrong with that, could also be a MKII.
repechage is offline  
Old 03-24-15, 07:25 AM
  #8  
Senior Member
 
jeirvine's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Baltimore MD
Posts: 3,332

Bikes: '72 Motobecane Grand Record, '72 Gitane tandem, '72 Raleigh Super Course, '73 Raleigh Gran Sport, '73 Colnago Super, '76 Fiorelli Coppi, '78 Raleigh SBDU Team Pro, '78 Trek 930, '81 Holdsworth Special 650B, '86 Masi GC, ’94 Bridgestone RB-T

Mentioned: 67 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 786 Post(s)
Liked 518 Times in 281 Posts
If the cranks are original and it is a '66, they would be 151 BCD. Do they have a date stamp? If so then they would be at least '73.
__________________
The man who dies with the most toys…is dead. - Rootboy
jeirvine is offline  
Old 03-24-15, 08:18 AM
  #9  
Phyllo-buster
 
clubman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Nova Scotia
Posts: 8,846

Bikes: roadsters, club bikes, fixed and classic

Mentioned: 133 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2297 Post(s)
Liked 2,054 Times in 1,254 Posts
Those are 144 cranks...
clubman is offline  
Old 03-24-15, 09:20 AM
  #10  
Friendship is Magic
Thread Starter
 
3alarmer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Sacramento, CA
Posts: 22,984

Bikes: old ones

Mentioned: 304 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 26402 Post(s)
Liked 10,374 Times in 7,203 Posts
Originally Posted by rhm
Why do you think it's a '66? The earliest one I've seen was a '69, and that had semi-wrapped seat stays, and a bridge for center pull brakes.
... the registration codes here.

Yet another number system was introduced in 1966. This new system applied to the high-end (i.e. Reynolds 531) frames, and involved the placing of a character at the beginning of the serial number. The character began at the start of the alphabet, and indicated year of manufacture. Detail about the numerals that follow the alphabet are sketchy, and are presumably sequential serial numbers of some kind.
[TABLE="class: grid, width: 512"]
[TR]
[TD="align: left"]1966: A, followed by four numerals
1967: B, followed by four numerals
1968: C, followed by four numerals
1969: D, followed by four numerals[/TD]
[TD="align: left"]1970: E, followed by four numerals
1971: F, followed by four numerals
1972: G, followed by four numerals
1973: H, followed by four numerals[/TD]
[/TR]
[/TABLE]
Note: While this numbering scheme is generally true, there may have been some crossover use of letters at the beginning/end of each year (e.g. a "G" serial number may have been built into a bike in 1973, but the frame may have been built in 1972).

I'm just reading the frame number, which is clearly marked. My understanding after some research is that there was quite a bit of variation in production of these, even within the same year.

But it is certainly true that the numbering system has some variations as well. I'm not ready to take any component on this as more definitive than the frame number. Like I said, it had been in a very mysterious and abusive environment prior to its arrival at the co-op.
__________________
3alarmer is offline  
Old 03-24-15, 09:23 AM
  #11  
Friendship is Magic
Thread Starter
 
3alarmer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Sacramento, CA
Posts: 22,984

Bikes: old ones

Mentioned: 304 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 26402 Post(s)
Liked 10,374 Times in 7,203 Posts
Originally Posted by sced
Beauty. Were Record brakes available in 1966?
...no idea, but all the early ones I've seen were set up with centerpulls.
__________________
3alarmer is offline  
Old 03-24-15, 09:36 AM
  #12  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 20,305
Mentioned: 130 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3464 Post(s)
Liked 2,828 Times in 1,995 Posts
Originally Posted by 3alarmer
...no idea, but all the early ones I've seen were set up with centerpulls.
Campagnolo brakes were introduced in 1968, but were very low in production numbers, the early brakes from this period are most quickly identifiable as they have no stampings on the caliper arms.
They bring princely sums at auction, sometimes reaching $1k or beyond with the early levers.

The components and metalwork of the bike indicate later than the frame number. 1967 was also a significant Campagnolo introduction year, the Nuovo Record bottom bracket with the R*fled cups, 144 bolt hole circle for the cranks, the earliest version of the Nuovo Record rear mechanism.
repechage is offline  
Old 03-24-15, 09:43 AM
  #13  
rhm
multimodal commuter
 
rhm's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: NJ, NYC, LI
Posts: 19,808

Bikes: 1940s Fothergill, 1959 Allegro Special, 1963? Claud Butler Olympic Sprint, Lambert 'Clubman', 1974 Fuji "the Ace", 1976 Holdsworth 650b conversion rando bike, 1983 Trek 720 tourer, 1984 Counterpoint Opus II, 1993 Basso Gap, 2010 Downtube 8h, and...

Mentioned: 584 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1908 Post(s)
Liked 574 Times in 339 Posts
Originally Posted by 3alarmer
... the registration codes here.
So your serial number starts with an A?

Well, as you say, these things vary a lot; but even those variants that don't conform to the catalog were made in large numbers. The real question, I think, would be: when was the Professional introduced? , Sheldon Brown's page on the Professional mentions a couple 1973 models with A... serial numbers as well.

But it doesn't matter. It's a great catch.
__________________
www.rhmsaddles.com.
rhm is offline  
Old 03-24-15, 09:46 AM
  #14  
Friendship is Magic
Thread Starter
 
3alarmer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Sacramento, CA
Posts: 22,984

Bikes: old ones

Mentioned: 304 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 26402 Post(s)
Liked 10,374 Times in 7,203 Posts
Originally Posted by repechage
Campagnolo brakes were introduced in 1968, but were very low in production numbers, the early brakes from this period are most quickly identifiable as they have no stampings on the caliper arms.
They bring princely sums at auction, sometimes reaching $1k or beyond with the early levers.

The components and metalwork of the bike indicate later than the frame number. 1967 was also a significant Campagnolo introduction year, the Nuovo Record bottom bracket with the R*fled cups, 144 bolt hole circle for the cranks, the earliest version of the Nuovo Record rear mechanism.
...maybe I was unclear. Every component you see on that bike came from my parts collection. The frame details might be indicative of something, and certainly it could be from some other year. The seatpost bolt was interesting to figure out, because it turned out to be SAE. Not unusual for a Raleigh, I guess.
__________________

Last edited by 3alarmer; 03-24-15 at 09:50 AM.
3alarmer is offline  
Old 03-24-15, 09:47 AM
  #15  
Friendship is Magic
Thread Starter
 
3alarmer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Sacramento, CA
Posts: 22,984

Bikes: old ones

Mentioned: 304 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 26402 Post(s)
Liked 10,374 Times in 7,203 Posts
Originally Posted by rhm
So your serial number starts with an A?
...yes. That's really the only reason I posted this. It seemed somewhat interesting because of that.
__________________
3alarmer is offline  
Old 03-24-15, 11:16 AM
  #16  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 17,155
Mentioned: 481 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3808 Post(s)
Liked 6,679 Times in 2,607 Posts
I've had at least one 1973 Worksop Raleigh (based on decals and other features) that had an A serial #, so those variations are certainly out there. Actually, now that I think about it, I've never seen a confirmed 1966 with an A serial #!
nlerner is offline  
Old 03-24-15, 11:20 AM
  #17  
If I own it, I ride it
 
CV-6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Cardinal Country
Posts: 5,580

Bikes: Lejeune(14), Raleigh, Raysport, Jan De Reus, Gazelle, Masi, B. Carré(4), Springfield, Greg Lemond, Andre Bertin, Schwinn Paramount

Mentioned: 56 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 591 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 662 Times in 311 Posts
What the chart you are referring to does not indicate is that in 1973, "A" reappeared.

Peter Kohler's Raleigh Pro page is probably the most complete info on Raleigh Pros. I own an A serialed Pro dated 1974 because it is silver and that is when the silver Raleigh Pros were introduced.

Your frame was built in 1973. It is a Mk IV
__________________
Please do not "like" my posts. This isn't Facebook.

Lynn Travers

Photos

CV-6 is offline  
Old 03-24-15, 11:22 AM
  #18  
Senior Member
 
Pars's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Aurora, IL
Posts: 2,418

Bikes: '73 Raleigh RRA, 1986 Trek 500 commuter

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 54 Post(s)
Liked 16 Times in 11 Posts
Sheldon also posted a 1973 RRA that had an A serial number. Whatever, nice catch!
Pars is offline  
Old 03-24-15, 11:45 AM
  #19  
Senior Member
 
Kactus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Tacoma, WA
Posts: 2,520

Bikes: 1962 Schwinn Paramount P12, 1971 Schwinn Paramount P13-9

Mentioned: 30 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 344 Post(s)
Liked 33 Times in 20 Posts
Here is an article re: Raleigh Professionals. It indicates 1968 was the first year. It says the 'A' prefix in the serial # indicates a 1973.
ipernity: Raleigh Professionals Marks I-V, 1968-1981 by Peter Kohler

We seem to have somewhat of a mystery here!

Last edited by Kactus; 03-24-15 at 11:49 AM.
Kactus is offline  
Old 03-24-15, 12:00 PM
  #20  
incazzare.
 
lostarchitect's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Catskills/Brooklyn, NY
Posts: 6,970

Bikes: See sig

Mentioned: 18 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 40 Post(s)
Liked 55 Times in 38 Posts
Originally Posted by nlerner
I've had at least one 1973 Worksop Raleigh (based on decals and other features) that had an A serial #, so those variations are certainly out there. Actually, now that I think about it, I've never seen a confirmed 1966 with an A serial #!
+1. Actually I think I may have had 2 73's with "A" serials.
__________________
1964 JRJ (Bob Jackson), 1973 Wes Mason, 1974 Raleigh Gran Sport, 1986 Schwinn High Sierra, 2000ish Colian (Colin Laing), 2011 Dick Chafe, 2013 Velo Orange Pass Hunter
lostarchitect is offline  
Old 03-24-15, 12:44 PM
  #21  
Shifting is fun!
 
non-fixie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: South Holland, NL
Posts: 11,003

Bikes: Yes, please.

Mentioned: 280 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2197 Post(s)
Liked 4,599 Times in 1,764 Posts
What a beautiful machine! I love the black. I'd be heavily inclined to spend another $100 or so for some tan-walls, classic drops, polished stem and cotton bar wrap for that period look & feel. Great bike. Or did I already say that?

__________________
Are we having fun, or what ...



non-fixie is offline  
Old 03-24-15, 01:58 PM
  #22  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 20,305
Mentioned: 130 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3464 Post(s)
Liked 2,828 Times in 1,995 Posts
Originally Posted by 3alarmer
...maybe I was unclear. Every component you see on that bike came from my parts collection. The frame details might be indicative of something, and certainly it could be from some other year. The seatpost bolt was interesting to figure out, because it turned out to be SAE. Not unusual for a Raleigh, I guess.
When you wrote "with original crank" when you purchased the bike, I assumed that was the same crank in your build up.

Try that seat binder bolt from the back side to verify the fit, SAE might work, but my hunch is that it is a class "B" fit, and/or it was tapped to accept.
repechage is offline  
Old 03-24-15, 02:21 PM
  #23  
Friendship is Magic
Thread Starter
 
3alarmer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Sacramento, CA
Posts: 22,984

Bikes: old ones

Mentioned: 304 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 26402 Post(s)
Liked 10,374 Times in 7,203 Posts
Originally Posted by repechage
When you wrote "with original crank" when you purchased the bike, I assumed that was the same crank in your build up.

Try that seat binder bolt from the back side to verify the fit, SAE might work, but my hunch is that it is a class "B" fit, and/or it was tapped to accept.
...look, with all due respect, I can fit a machine screw with reasonable success. I got no idea about whether it was tapped by someone else. It can be whatever you want it to be, I'm not emotionally invested here. I put up some pictures because I thought it of interest, not to get into some contest of expertise. My expertise on these is limited to what I've seen and what I've read on the innerwebz. I have had it bouncing around for several years here, and by the time I looked at the serial, whatever came with it was gone to the bins or other projects. Sure it could be a 1973, 1974, or any year where they pulled an earlier manufactured frame from somewhere and built and shipped it.

Think of it as just a bicycle. If I could change the title, I'd add a question mark....which I think you can say about a lot of these bikes
__________________
3alarmer is offline  
Old 03-24-15, 02:23 PM
  #24  
Friendship is Magic
Thread Starter
 
3alarmer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Sacramento, CA
Posts: 22,984

Bikes: old ones

Mentioned: 304 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 26402 Post(s)
Liked 10,374 Times in 7,203 Posts
Originally Posted by CV-6
What the chart you are referring to does not indicate is that in 1973, "A" reappeared.

Peter Kohler's Raleigh Pro page is probably the most complete info on Raleigh Pros. I own an A serialed Pro dated 1974 because it is silver and that is when the silver Raleigh Pros were introduced.

Your frame was built in 1973. It is a Mk IV
...OK, thanks.
__________________
3alarmer is offline  
Old 03-24-15, 02:28 PM
  #25  
Friendship is Magic
Thread Starter
 
3alarmer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Sacramento, CA
Posts: 22,984

Bikes: old ones

Mentioned: 304 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 26402 Post(s)
Liked 10,374 Times in 7,203 Posts
Originally Posted by CV-6
What the chart you are referring to does not indicate is that in 1973, "A" reappeared.

Peter Kohler's Raleigh Pro page is probably the most complete info on Raleigh Pros. I own an A serialed Pro dated 1974 because it is silver and that is when the silver Raleigh Pros were introduced.

Your frame was built in 1973. It is a Mk IV
G" higher serial nos (4000s up) and "A" serial nos. (1973) models have dimpled chainstays and show considerably greater front fork rake. "G"s still have mudguard eyelets, "A"s do not. Very high "A"s (9000s) have "CC" cut-out on the bb undershell. 170 mm cranks. Campagnolo Superleggero pedals marked "1037 on pedal body. New slanted white block letter "RALEIGH" logo on down tube, "Professional" script on top tube now in white instead of gold, "Carlton" on seat tube and Reynolds 531 triangle decals on fork blades. REG white/"chrome" plastic frame pump with Carlton block logo decal.
...this definitely has fender eyelets. Would you call this "greater" fork rake ? I do not really know.
__________________
3alarmer is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.