Bike Forums

Bike Forums (https://www.bikeforums.net/forum.php)
-   Clydesdales/Athenas (200+ lb / 91+ kg) (https://www.bikeforums.net/clydesdales-athenas-200-lb-91-kg/)
-   -   Clyde Nutrition and Weight Loss Advice Thread (https://www.bikeforums.net/clydesdales-athenas-200-lb-91-kg/231402-clyde-nutrition-weight-loss-advice-thread.html)

Air 10-20-06 07:46 PM

I've been chewing on all of these posts for a while and truthfully I'm still really confused about nutrition. I'm probably just really dense.

In the meantime - another question partly related. Today I went on about a 12 mile ride, over a bridge and with traffic/starting/stopping and walking up stairs my calculations came out to about 700 calories burned.

What does that translate in terms of fat? If I'm keeping track of my calories and fat intake can I cancel out a fatty meal by riding? Say if the formula of 9 grams of calories = 1 gram of fat holds true how is that 700 burned calories distributed?

SimonEd 10-20-06 07:58 PM

Just work out your daily needs and then take off 1000 calories worth in fats and carbs and your fat% will take care of itself. If you go too low you will lose too much lean body mass. I have been on this for 6 weeks and have lost about 6 pounds. I also run and lift weights though so I play with the carbs a little more due to its Anaerobic nature and it being fuelled differently than cardio exercise.

Anyway, on this plan you will lose about 100g a day.

If you can jog then do that, it will burn more calories fastert than a bike (not as much fun though) it also mixes things up and you can increase your bone density from it.

If you can find a place to lift do that too, remember the bigger your LBM the more calories you are burning all the time.

While its supposidly impossible to build muscle while on a negative calorie diet, you will find that you will be gaining good weight dispite the low calorie intake, just make sure you are eating primarily low glycemic index carbs and a good low animal fat protein.

robtown 10-20-06 08:10 PM


Originally Posted by Air
How does one measure LBM besides going into a tank at the Dr.'s office?

This stuff is great by the way.

The Burn the Fat, Feed the Muscle program I've used recommends using a single measurment caliper. The measurement is of the skin fat near your appendix. After getting consistent measurments it gives you a fat percentage. You use that to calculate fat weight. Lean weight is everything else.

robtown 10-20-06 08:14 PM


Originally Posted by Air
I've been chewing on all of these posts for a while and truthfully I'm still really confused about nutrition. I'm probably just really dense.

In the meantime - another question partly related. Today I went on about a 12 mile ride, over a bridge and with traffic/starting/stopping and walking up stairs my calculations came out to about 700 calories burned.

What does that translate in terms of fat? If I'm keeping track of my calories and fat intake can I cancel out a fatty meal by riding? Say if the formula of 9 grams of calories = 1 gram of fat holds true how is that 700 burned calories distributed?

You have your measurments off - 4 calories per gram of carbs or protein and 9 calories per gram of fat.
If you burned 700 calories in an hour and your needs are 200 calories per hour, then you have 500 calories you could eat. If you burn 700 calories a lot will come out of glycogen stores in your body. If and when that translates to fat it will come from wherever your body chooses. Many think that fat usually comes of in the last on first off order. For me, and probably most men, the belly fat is last.

Tom Stormcrowe 10-20-06 08:26 PM


Originally Posted by robtown
You have your measurments off - 4 calories per gram of carbs or protein and 9 calories per gram of fat.
If you burned 700 calories in an hour and your needs are 200 calories per hour, then you have 500 calories you could eat. If you burn 700 calories a lot will come out of glycogen stores in your body. If and when that translates to fat it will come from wherever your body chooses. Many think that fat usually comes of in the last on first off order. For me, and probably most men, the belly fat is last.

Robtown, tha last fat to burn is belly fat all right, but not the fat external to the abdominal wall, but the brown fat internal to the ab. wall. If the intake matches the burn rate to maintain glycogen levels, hen the excess will burn from protein and fat stores. That's the reason we supplement with protein at about 1.5 grams/Kg body mass....to prevent LBM loss. This allows the body to stay in lipid metabolism primarily and lose weight.

1Kg fat = 7700kcals (1 kilocalorie = 1 food calorie)(1 lb = 3500 calories or Kcals)

I linked to the site I got the info from, bookmark it! It appears to have some fantastic resources!

SimonEd 10-21-06 05:39 AM


That's the reason we supplement with protein at about 1.5 grams/Kg body mass....to prevent LBM loss. This allows the body to stay in lipid metabolism primarily and lose weight.
Just to make it sound a little less painful, its 3 pints of protein drink from the top manufactuers. EAS for example, make a product called Myoplex that has 42g of protein per serving. If you can get into this its a great weight off your mind regarding maintaining LBM. Of course 1 pint of a watery choco drink on a cold morning isnt exactly appetizing, but its got to be done. This will cover someone with about 80Kgs / 180lbs of Lean Body Mass.

You can have more, but its probably wiser to supplement the protein drink with BCAA's to keep down the cost and the stress to the kidneys :)

Dont forget to hydrate, make carrying a water bottle, or at least having one at arms length par for the course. If you are not peeing like a race horse all the time, you need more! ;)

BasicJim 10-23-06 12:55 PM

Is there a book that breaks this down in simple terms? I am trying to understand all this and I understand my intake needs to be X calories, of which I should be taking in 30/60/10.

What foods help me meet that? I know I should be staying away from white breads, going with whole grain breads, whole wheat pasta, brown rice, right? What else? Anyone know of a good site to see what to eat?

Mike_Morrow 10-23-06 01:47 PM


Originally Posted by BasicJim
Is there a book that breaks this down in simple terms? I am trying to understand all this and I understand my intake needs to be X calories, of which I should be taking in 30/60/10.

What foods help me meet that? I know I should be staying away from white breads, going with whole grain breads, whole wheat pasta, brown rice, right? What else? Anyone know of a good site to see what to eat?


Jim,

Whole grains are better than more refined grains but you don't have to eat wheat bread, whole wheat pasta and brown rice. The simple fact is you need to "Take in less calories than you burn" how you choose to do that is what YOU need to figure out. You need some type of food plan you can be consistent with and maintain for a protracted period of time. What works for others here might not work for you, not because the plan doesn't work but because YOU can't stick to it. It is all about eating less and moving more. Whatever YOUR program ends being it needs to work for YOU it also needs to be something that you can do day in and day out and not feel "terribly" deprived.

Don't buy into folks who will tell you that one plan is so much better than another for losing weight, as long as they are both fairly balanced, restrict your calories and don't have you doing odd things like eating 27 grapefruits a day any plan you can consistently follow will likely work for you.

Tom Stormcrowe 10-23-06 03:28 PM


Originally Posted by BasicJim
Is there a book that breaks this down in simple terms? I am trying to understand all this and I understand my intake needs to be X calories, of which I should be taking in 30/60/10.

What foods help me meet that? I know I should be staying away from white breads, going with whole grain breads, whole wheat pasta, brown rice, right? What else? Anyone know of a good site to see what to eat?

Jim, Mike said it better than I might have. You have the general idea down quite well, actually.

Here are a couple of resources that are reputable and reliable:
http://www.nal.usda.gov/fnic/foodcomp/search/
http://www.fns.usda.gov/nutritionlink/
http://www.mypyramid.gov/

These are US Government sites and quite good.

BasicJim 10-23-06 03:39 PM


Originally Posted by Mike_Morrow
Jim,
The simple fact is you need to "Take in less calories than you burn" how you choose to do that is what YOU need to figure out. You need some type of food plan you can be consistent with and maintain for a protracted period of time. What works for others here might not work for you, not because the plan doesn't work but because YOU can't stick to it. It is all about eating less and moving more. Whatever YOUR program ends being it needs to work for YOU it also needs to be something that you can do day in and day out and not feel "terribly" deprived.

Thanks Mike,

I have been watching my calorie intake and find myself at the "top of my intake limit" some days, but most of the time I am what I fear maybe too low. I am trying to find foods that will maximize the nutrition with the lowest calorie count.

My biggest fear right now is not taking in enough calories and losing muscle rather than fat. I have gone from 250lbs to 212lbs through cycling and not changing my terrible diet, but I did the same thing last year, then when winter hits, I don't ride and I keep eating like I am riding. So now I am trying to keep active over the winter (first snowflakes today!) and I am trying to cut down on my calorie intake.

I am keeping between 1800 and 2250 calories and exercising at least an hour a day. Sometimes it's walking to the grocery store (5mi total) some times running 3 miles, and sometimes hitting the trainer. During the summer I ride at least an hour a day, then 3-4 hrs/day on the weekend.

My goal is to go to Hell Week and be below 190 lbs.

Thanks for everyone in here being so inspirational.

momod 10-23-06 06:48 PM

someone already got this im sure but I use the accumeasure single point caliper. They should be withing 1% of the gold standard when done correctly, but more importantly it will give you a consistent readings that will help you gauge your progress.


http://www.accumeasurefitness.com/pr...tness3000.html

the best way to figure BMR is to use the Katch Mcardle formula.. you will need LBM for that.

BMR (men and women) = 370 + (21.6 X lean mass in kg)

then multiply by your activity factor.

Activity factor

Sedentary = BMR X 1.2 (little or no exercise, desk job)
Lightly active = BMR X 1.375 (light exercise/sports 1-3 days/wk)
Mod. active = BMR X 1.55 (moderate exercise/sports 3-5 days/wk)
Very active = BMR X 1.725 (hard exercise/sports 6-7 days/wk)
Extr. Active = BMR X 1.9 (hard daily exercise/sports & physical job or 2 X day training, marathon, football camp.


Things to remember.

chart your progress weekly.
Its not about weight, its about your lbm to fat ratio.
eat 5-6 meals throughout the day
remain in a total 5-10% max cal deficet, too low and your metabolism will slow
always eat hi glycemic carbs with a protein
try to eat whole foods with high thermic value
If you have to eat your hi glycemic foods post workout
Do your cardio fasted before breakfast if weight loss is your goal
drink lots of water.
Strength train

NEVER EVER eat..

trans fats
refined sugar
fried foods


with strength training and a good diet you can keep most of your LBM. I went from 226 @ 24% to 205 @ 10% in a year following these guidelines and some serious cardio.

226*.24= 53.76 lbs fat and 172 lbm to 205*.10= 20.05 and 175 lbm so I know it can be done and I was 36 at that time. Its just a matter of discipline, you can have any body you want!

momod 10-23-06 06:50 PM


Originally Posted by BasicJim
Is there a book that breaks this down in simple terms? I am trying to understand all this and I understand my intake needs to be X calories, of which I should be taking in 30/60/10.

What foods help me meet that? I know I should be staying away from white breads, going with whole grain breads, whole wheat pasta, brown rice, right? What else? Anyone know of a good site to see what to eat?


best book ever for teaching laymen nutrition..

http://www.burnthefat.com/


Tom is a little sensational but its the real deal and he teaches you how it all works, you will never diet again. You will just eat well.

Air 10-24-06 09:36 AM

Peanut Butter - good or bad? 2 tablespoons is not that much but it's loaded in fat. I finished a ride yesterday and had peanut butter on top of a banana but it actually sent my fat allowance over.

[Thanks for the info above; don't know how 'grams' got in there before calories but it wasn't supposed to! :D]

momod 10-24-06 10:23 AM


Originally Posted by Air
Peanut Butter - good or bad? 2 tablespoons is not that much but it's loaded in fat. I finished a ride yesterday and had peanut butter on top of a banana but it actually sent my fat allowance over.

[Thanks for the info above; don't know how 'grams' got in there before calories but it wasn't supposed to! :D]


not necessarily bad post workout its just very dense from a calorie standpoint and contains alot of sodium

Grim 08-20-08 06:41 PM

Here are my before and afters. The before is about 7 years ago before I hit my heaviest at 240 this Feb and before I had a Heart attack 5 years ago. I made some life choices and bicycle commuting for the health benefits this year was what has been the biggest help.


About 7-8 years ago somewhere around 230-235lb in a XL shirt

http://www.bikeforums.net/attachment...7&d=1219278877

Today at 207lb in a large shirt.
http://www.bikeforums.net/attachment...8&d=1219278897

Air 08-21-08 05:08 AM

Hey Grim!

Those pics aren't coming through for me but you probably want this thread anyway ;)

lunchbox1972 08-21-08 09:58 AM

First the disclaimer: I'm no expert, no doctor, this is only information that has worked for me.

April 30th 2008, I had a heart attack. I was 35 and I left the hospital on May 2nd after having 2 stents put in to clear out 90% blockages in my right coronary artery, I weighed 262 pounds and I'm 5'10". I was/am overweight. I was active before, hiking and such, but not on a regular basis. I set a goal to get to 215 pounds, I've since revised that and will be heading slowly for 200.

This morning, Aug 21st (my 14 year wedding anniversary), I weighed 216.5. That is 45.5 pounds in about 3.5 months. It's not all water, nor is it all muscle weight.

I have lost about 5 inches from my belly and at least 3 inches from my hips, 2 inches from my neck and I've added to my quads and lost about 1.5 inches of fat on my calves. I've had to take 2 links out of my watches, I've lost about an inch in my wrist. I've also taking about 3 inches off my chest. By biceps have lost about 1.5 inches, but my forearms have remained the same. According to several sites and an body fat tester, I sit at about 23%, I'd like to see 15%, or so. That goes with the 200 pounds, it should be fairly close.

I got out of the Army in January of 96 and I weighed 205 pounds, not super lean, but not fat either. Overweight by their standards, but I also taped under the body fat limit. A lot under the limit.

Enough of the history. I knew what I should have been doing, but chose not to do it.

I follow the diet from my cardiologist. 30/30/40. 30% protein, 30% fat, 40% carbs, or as close as I can get to it. I also keep my saturated fat to less than 10% of total calories and sugars are kept very low as well. I use a website to monitor my food on a daily basis and I intake between 1800-2000 calories in a day, on average. There are times that I'm less and times that I'm more. I don't add calories back in for my commuting, or other workouts. I don't hardly eat fast food anymore and when I do it's only certain places that are able to meet my requirements.. Taco Bell will actually do this with 3 cruncy tacos, but I do Subway mostly.. Double stacked turkey, no cheese and lots of veggies. I also quit drinking regular soda. I used to drink 1000+ calories a day of the stuff.

I pretty much quit red meat, because of the cholesterol content, as well as dairy. I still eat them, just not very much. I eat lots of chicken, tuna, turkey, and salmon. I stay away from refined carbs (white bread, etc).

I'll give you a typical day, today:

Breakfast:

2 pieces of wheat toast with 2 tablespoons of peanut butter.
1 banana.

485 calories

Snack:

2 stalks celery, with 1 tablespoon of peanut butter.

120 calories

Lunch:

1 chicken breast
1 slice of wheat toast
2/3 cup of cottage cheese

467 calories

Dinner:

It's my anniversay, so I'll eat whatever we happen to get, but it will probably still be fairly healthy.

That so far gives me: 36% protein, 29% fat, and 35% carbs. I know my dinner will have more fat and carbs, or at least it most likely will.

The biggest problem I've had is that I have trouble eating 30% protein. I was only doing 20% or so, for awhile, because I was having trouble finding good high protein sources.. I've also added some fat back into my diet. From some things I've read, good fats are just that, good. The Mediteranian diet is fairly close to some of this.

Remember that I'm a commuter, so I have to be able to have things here, or take them on my back.. Normally I'd have brown rice and veggies for lunch, but I didn't have them ready for this mornings ride.

Just after my heart attack is when I had the greatest weight loss. In the 2 weeks I had off, before I had to go back to work, I lost almost 20 pounds, I was going 1 pound per day. I was very leary about what I would eat. I was probably on eating about 1200 calories a day. I was scared, which is a great motivator. I also did not excercise, except for some walking, during this time.

I started riding my bike around the beginning of June. I had rode previous to this event, but never farther than 5 miles. I started with 4 miles and averaged about 11 mph. I slowly worked my way up to about 6 miles, until I saw my cardiologist 6 weeks out. He gave me the thumbs up to go for all I want. Really, he didn't give me any limits. I started doing 10+ miles, then about the middle of July I went for a 30 mile ride with friends. I was averaging about 15 mph with my MTB and some Conti slicks.

I like it so much that I bought a 07 Felt Z80 and picked it up on August 1st, sort of a birthday present for myself. I started commuting to work on the 4th, about 20 miles a day, 3+ days a week (if I can). It's been 20 days since I got the bike and I have 180 miles on it. I love it. I averaged 19.8 mph to work this morning and I've cut between 10-15 minutes off my bike commute since I started 2 weeks ago. I do a 20-35 mile ride on the weekends and we are planning a 50 miler, I will work up to a century.

If you have any questions on diet, I'll tell you what has worked for me. I can't give you all kinds of formulas, or numbers, or anything like that.. Only the cold, hard, evidence of my fat loss. It may not work for everybody and you have to have the proper motivation.. It's actually very easy for me now, but the first month was kind of saddening..

Overall, I'm happy to be here and I count this event as a blessing in my life. Oviously it wasn't my time to go and I have some more things to accomplish here, I'm sure my wife and kids are happy about that.

This forum has been a great inspiration and the people are very friendly here. :)

Missbumble 08-21-08 10:08 AM

Lunchbox! great info! So glad that youa re here supporting us. Way to go on the revocery and food plan - Looking Good! when do we see before and after pics! OH and everyone ofcourse wants to see the bike...

lunchbox1972 08-21-08 10:24 AM

Well, I can do pictures of the bike today, if I get the time. I have it here at work.. I can probably do before and after too. There are event pictures from work that will probably show some decent before.

I'll see what I can do..

Oh yeah, I also have a HRM. When I ride I try to keep my HR in the 150's while I'm spinning the pedals. I average about 147 bpm on a regular day. According to it, I burn just shy of 500 calories, each way.

I feel great, that's the most important thing. My cholesterol is lower than it's been in years, lower than I've ever seen it. When I went for a flight status physical, I was 21, my cholesterol was 496. The flight surgeon commented about me still being alive. I still didn't get it then. The lowest I saw it, before the heart attack, was 230 and I was on 80mg of Lipitor a day.. When I got admitted to the hospital my cholesterol was 319. 6 weeks later, it was 143.

I take 10/40 of Vytorin and 500mg of Niaspan each day. The 143 number came before the Niaspan and I have not had it tested since then. The Niaspan is to raise my good cholesterol, which was low, at 33. It should be higher than 40, the excercise that I'm doing should also raise it, as well as the tuna and salmon, among other things.

That reminds me.. I need to go have it checked and see where I'm at.

lunchbox1972 08-21-08 11:10 AM

Edited for content.... Posted in other thread.

lunchbox1972 08-21-08 11:13 AM


Originally Posted by momod (Post 3264798)
not necessarily bad post workout its just very dense from a calorie standpoint and contains alot of sodium

Hey momod, I just noticed that you're in Tucson too.. We should do a ride one of these weekends.

Grim 08-21-08 03:30 PM


Originally Posted by Air (Post 7314425)
Hey Grim!

Those pics aren't coming through for me but you probably want this thread anyway ;)

Well thats the thread I thought was posting too I think I followed a link from the post and got crossed up. I guess I had a Blond Moment (to bad I'm not blond).

squirrell 08-22-08 04:14 AM

I've read all on this post--or at least tried to understand some of it!--and am still frustrated and confused. After seeing my weight loss go drop 15 pounds a month the first 3 months to 10 pounds over the last almost 2 months, I am ready to scream!

And, I've tried it all--more calories, less calories. More carbs, less carbs. More riding, less riding. Faster riding, slower riding. Interval riding, non-interval riding. Nothing seems to click. Oh, sometimes I'll get a drop of 2 pounds overnight or 3 pounds in a week--then back to no loss for weeks at a time.

I am beginning to wonder if long-distance (long to me!) cycling is compatible with weight loss since I have to eat more to power my rides. I'm doing between 100-130 miles a week now, and I have to begin to question if that is what has stalled my weight loss.

Please--other Clydes and Athenas! Tell me it ain't so! I love to ride and don't want to go back to 15 mile rides all the time. But I am really at the end of my chain here.

Air 08-22-08 04:44 AM

I'm finding input--> output and salt has more to do with my weight loss than anything else. And by that I mean literally what goes in and what comes out of you. If you're not eating enough fiber to push everything else out you may not notice losses as much and notice weird trends. Also plateauing really, really sucks.

How do your clothes feel? How much do you weigh now? Caloric intake? Making sure that intake is REALLY the right intake? (No matter how much I count if I order/takeout food I gain weight - period. I try not to eat out anymore, I don't go to dinner get togethers because I just can't seem to get an accurate count).

At 100-130 miles a week if you're keeping up a decent balanced diet you might be putting some muscle on which won't show up on a scale. What kind of effort do you do when you're riding? Do you use a heart monitor?

Also you may just be plateauing and have to mix up the cycling - some sprints along with longer rides.

HOWEVER - 5 pounds a month is STILL 5 pounds a month in the right direction. The harder you are on yourself about a positive trend of loss the more likely you'll get really fed up and reach for the cheeseburger and undo what you have.

steve2k 08-22-08 06:59 AM

I have nothing to add other than thanks to the guys contributing to this thread, even though there is some solid science at the foundation it seems that everyone is having different results and there is no clear answer on how to lose weight. If nothing else this has been interesting and motivating reading. I wish I'd read it before lunch, I may have made a better choice.

squirrell 08-22-08 12:29 PM

I mentioned on another thread that I monitor calories closely--keep to 1200 a day plus eat what I burn up so the deficit comes from decreased basic intake. I don't eat at--i keep sodium under 1600 a day if I can. ETc. ETc. ETc.

However, I am building leg muscles--I know that! Even though you can't see my thighs yet because of the fat still there. I can "feel" the muscles and know they're there and growing. And, my calves are starting to look great! I'm going light weight training for upper body and core 2x a week that has my arms just starting to tone as well.

I keep telling myself it's the muscles, it's the muscles, it's the muscles. And I know I'm losing, just not fast enough for me I guess. SIGH

Not giving up this time though! My this time next year, I'll be an Athena Alumni!

Tom Stormcrowe 08-22-08 12:37 PM

Squirrel, you're just at a "set point" right now. Your body was here fr a while and it feels comfortable there + yes, you are building muscle as well as burning fat, so occasional bouts of plateau are normal....

What you can do is shock the body out of it by varying your routine. Do some periodization drills of varying intensity and duration. In short, break the adaptive syndrome cycle. You've just hit a threshold of maximum efficiency, so change the variables. Here are some useful links for you:

http://www.asimba.com/periodization.shtml

http://www.drlenkravitz.com/Articles/circuitperiod.html

http://www.unm.edu/~lkravitz/Article...odization.html


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 07:37 PM.


Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.