Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Clydesdales/Athenas (200+ lb / 91+ kg)
Reload this Page >

Trek 7.3 or 7.5 that is the Question

Notices
Clydesdales/Athenas (200+ lb / 91+ kg) Looking to lose that spare tire? Ideal weight 200+? Frustrated being a large cyclist in a sport geared for the ultra-light? Learn about the bikes and parts that can take the abuse of a heavier cyclist, how to keep your body going while losing the weight, and get support from others who've been successful.

Trek 7.3 or 7.5 that is the Question

Old 07-09-07, 08:19 AM
  #1  
Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Shelby Township Michigan
Posts: 30
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Trek 7.3 or 7.5 that is the Question

I was in the LBS on Saturday getting new pedals (because my Fat AZZ broke one), and I took the Trek 7.3FX out for a long test ride. There is a huge difference in speed between the FX, and my MTB.

I road that thing like I stole it.....man was it fast compared to my MTB.

I also did ride the Trek 7500, and it was not to my liking.
I would recommend the 7500 to somebody an older, or to somebody with back problems.
I am 31, but my mind still thinks I am 18, and skinny, so the upright position was not for me.

So now my delima is what bike I buy the 7.3, or 7.5.
The 7.5 is about $200 more that the 7.3, but has much nicer components.

I honestly don't have the money for either, because I just bought my MTB, a new house, central air, and a LCD TV in the past 2 months.

I don't want to buy the 7.3, and then 2 weeks later wish I had the 7.5.

Anybody out there go through this same delima
Skoper is offline  
Old 07-09-07, 08:31 AM
  #2  
On my TARDIScycle!
 
KingTermite's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Eastside Seattlite Termite Mound
Posts: 3,925

Bikes: Trek 520, Trek Navigator 300, Peugeot Versailles PE10DE

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Well, its usually my opinion that its worth a little extra to get the better components.


However, in your case, I'm wondering if its just "I want" syndrome. If you just got all that stuff recently, I'd try to force myself to hold off and see if you are still jonesin' for it in about 5-6 months.
__________________
Originally Posted by coffeecake
- it's pretty well established that Hitler was an *******.
KingTermite is offline  
Old 07-09-07, 08:31 AM
  #3  
Out fishing with Annie on his lap, a cigar in one hand and a ginger ale in the other, watching the sunset.
 
Tom Stormcrowe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: South Florida
Posts: 16,056

Bikes: Techna Wheelchair and a Sun EZ 3 Recumbent Trike

Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 9 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 22 Times in 17 Posts
You already answered your own question:

Originally Posted by Skoper
I was in the LBS on Saturday getting new pedals (because my Fat AZZ broke one), and I took the Trek 7.3FX out for a long test ride. There is a huge difference in speed between the FX, and my MTB.

I road that thing like I stole it.....man was it fast compared to my MTB.

I also did ride the Trek 7500, and it was not to my liking.
I would recommend the 7500 to somebody an older, or to somebody with back problems.
I am 31, but my mind still thinks I am 18, and skinny, so the upright position was not for me.
__________________
. “He who fights with monsters might take care lest he thereby become a monster. And if you gaze for long into an abyss, the abyss gazes also into you.”- Fredrick Nietzsche

"We can judge the heart of a man by his treatment of animals." - Immanuel Kant
Tom Stormcrowe is offline  
Old 07-09-07, 10:09 AM
  #4  
Chubby super biker
 
bdinger's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Nebraska
Posts: 1,980
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
Depending on your size, you may go with the 7.3 over the 7.5 simply due to the wheelset. The ones on the 7.5 are low spoke count and fast, but they are low spoke count. Or in other words, not nearly as tough .

I ride a 7.3 and love it, chose it over the 7.5 for that reason specifically. I'd recommend replacing the saddle, NOBODY likes the stock one, but aside from that they are great, versatile rides.
bdinger is offline  
Old 07-09-07, 11:33 AM
  #5  
Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Shelby Township Michigan
Posts: 30
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
I was worried about the wheels, and also the carbon fork on the 7.5
The guy was really pushing the 7.5 to me, but at 170lbs, he is not going to have the issues I will be having.
I bought my MTB (GF Wahoo) about 6 weeks ago, and ride it everyday.
The only problem is I do all paved trail riding.
I just moved, and do not have anybody to ride the dirt with.
I am very lucky my sub backs a rail trail, so I try to get in a min of 10 miles a day, and them I do a distance 2 X a week. I am up to 20 miles.

My goal is to do 50 by October, and I think that with the FX my distance riding will be much more enjoyable.
(It also has a cool bell on it....hahaha get outa my way)

I can still remember my first ride. I was out of water, and dead tired after 2 miles.
Skoper is offline  
Old 07-09-07, 06:39 PM
  #6  
Senior Member
 
Wogster's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Toronto (again) Ontario, Canada
Posts: 6,931

Bikes: Old Bike: 1975 Raleigh Delta, New Bike: 2004 Norco Bushpilot

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 5 Times in 5 Posts
Originally Posted by Skoper
I was worried about the wheels, and also the carbon fork on the 7.5
The guy was really pushing the 7.5 to me, but at 170lbs, he is not going to have the issues I will be having.
I bought my MTB (GF Wahoo) about 6 weeks ago, and ride it everyday.
The only problem is I do all paved trail riding.
I just moved, and do not have anybody to ride the dirt with.
I am very lucky my sub backs a rail trail, so I try to get in a min of 10 miles a day, and them I do a distance 2 X a week. I am up to 20 miles.

My goal is to do 50 by October, and I think that with the FX my distance riding will be much more enjoyable.
(It also has a cool bell on it....hahaha get outa my way)

I can still remember my first ride. I was out of water, and dead tired after 2 miles.
You can gain a lot of paved trail and road performance with different tires. When your riding in dirt, mud, snow, etc you want wide, knobby tires with low air pressure, to maximize traction, the knobs dig into the surface.

On hard surfaces like asphalt and concrete, traction is actually better with a smooth tire, because knobs can't dig into the surface, and will just ride on top, giving a lot less surface area. There is also the question of rolling resistance, this is the frictional resistance of the tires to roll along the surface, and the solution is to go with a narrower tire, at a higher pressure. There is one thing that is confusing, some measurements are in American units (inches), and some are in Metric. To resolve the confusion, we refer to the master mechanic, Sheldon Browns article on Tire Sizes

Where it gets confusing is that the old 27" is marked in inch widths, as are most MTB tires, and Sheldon's chart is in mm. Simply multiply inches by 25.4 or divide mm by 25.4 to get the other unit. I currently run 36mm wide tires (1.4 inch) on my MTB, and get a lot better road performance, then with the old 2.5" knobby tires.
Wogster is offline  
Old 07-10-07, 01:01 AM
  #7  
user friendly
 
doctortalk121's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 264
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
xxx

Last edited by doctortalk121; 08-12-07 at 01:31 PM.
doctortalk121 is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.