Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Clydesdales/Athenas (200+ lb / 91+ kg)
Reload this Page >

Specialized Sequoia or Touring Bike ?

Search
Notices
Clydesdales/Athenas (200+ lb / 91+ kg) Looking to lose that spare tire? Ideal weight 200+? Frustrated being a large cyclist in a sport geared for the ultra-light? Learn about the bikes and parts that can take the abuse of a heavier cyclist, how to keep your body going while losing the weight, and get support from others who've been successful.

Specialized Sequoia or Touring Bike ?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-30-08, 09:15 AM
  #1  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Georgia
Posts: 176
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 17 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Specialized Sequoia or Touring Bike ?

It is getting decision time. Most riding will be for fitness/weight loss of about 30 - 40 miles. I plan to do 2 or 3 century rides as well. I am overweight at 275 (5' 10"), so I go no where fast. Just a nice steady and comfortable pace. Definitely prefer a more upright riding position. Tried a Specialized Roubaix, but still could not get bars high enough. So I need something that will allow a more upright riding position.

One definite possibility is the Spec Sequoia Elite. Owned one quite a few years back. I liked the bike. Seems the only thing that I didn't like was when I was standing to climb, the seat was hitting the back of my legs too much. On other road type bikes that I have owned this didn't happen. Sequoia seems to fit my riding needs and would be comfortable for centuries. However, cannot find any to test ride.

Other possibility is a touring bike. Considering LHT, Novara Randonee, and Fuji Touring. Only finding Randonee to test ride. I have had steel frame road bikes (Fuji Roubaix Pro) in the past and loved the ride. Granted these bikes would be heavier, but as I said, I'm not going anywhere fast anyway. They allow a more upright riding position. I know that I can find a Randonee to test, possibly a Fuji Touring, but no LHT or Trek 520's to be found in stock. I will not do any major touring to speak of.

So, what to do as the money is burning my pocket?
mkwdrs is offline  
Old 05-30-08, 10:26 AM
  #2  
Vorsprung durch Technik
 
epcolt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Fairmont, WV
Posts: 310

Bikes: 2007 Specialized Crossroads, 1985 Raleigh Sportif

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
The Sequoia is more of a touring/upright frame. I was looking at them at the shop yesterday. Owner said they are more comfortable for regular riding than the Allez.
epcolt is offline  
Old 05-30-08, 11:30 AM
  #3  
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: SF Bay ARea
Posts: 19

Bikes: 2007 Specialized Roubaix

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
I was deciding between a Sequoia Elite and a Roubaix Elite. I ended up with a Roubaix because I wanted the carbon frame, but ended up on a 56 instead of a 54 Sequoia. The Sequoia is a nice bike!
blewgo is offline  
Old 05-30-08, 12:35 PM
  #4  
Senior Member
 
badgermac's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Milwaukee, WI
Posts: 209

Bikes: 2013 Specialized Tarmac Sport; 2010 Specialized Allez Steel Double; 2015 Specialized Roubaix Sport; 2013 Jamis Satellite Sport

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Liked 3 Times in 3 Posts
Just got my Sequoia the other day. Haven't had time to take it out on a longer voyage, but I love the time I've had on it thus far!
badgermac is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.