Gearing question
#1
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Cape May NJ
Posts: 101
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Gearing question
Hi folks,
I have a question about gearing:
My Specialized Sequoia has a 50x42x30 chain ring and 11-28t cassette.
The Specialized Allez has a 52x42x30 chain ring and 12-26t cassette.
The gearing between the two would seem close but what is the actual difference and benefits of each? Would it be worthwhile to eventually changing the Sequoia's gear set to that of the Allez?
Thanks!
I have a question about gearing:
My Specialized Sequoia has a 50x42x30 chain ring and 11-28t cassette.
The Specialized Allez has a 52x42x30 chain ring and 12-26t cassette.
The gearing between the two would seem close but what is the actual difference and benefits of each? Would it be worthwhile to eventually changing the Sequoia's gear set to that of the Allez?
Thanks!
#2
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Columbus, OH
Posts: 11,375
Bikes: '08 Surly Cross-Check, 2011 Redline Conquest Pro, 2012 Spesh FSR Comp EVO, 2015 Trek Domane 6.2 disc
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 7 Times
in
6 Posts
Check out the top and bottom gearing, because all the stuff in between can be duplicated.
At a modest 90rpm cadence, the 50/11 gearing puts you at 32.6mph while the 52/12 drops you to 31mph. A negligible difference.
At the same cadence, 30/26 is 8.3mph and 30/28 gives you 7.7mph. It's only a 2.2 gear inch difference, which you would barely notice.
If you're going to change gearing on the bike, allow me to make a suggestion which would give you a similar gearing range while eliminating some maintenance hassle and component weight:
A 50/34 compact double up front, and an 11 - 32 cassette and mtn rear derailleur. I run a similar combo (48/34 compact, 11-32 cass.) on my brevet bike and it has been awesome for every climbing situation I've found myself in.
At a modest 90rpm cadence, the 50/11 gearing puts you at 32.6mph while the 52/12 drops you to 31mph. A negligible difference.
At the same cadence, 30/26 is 8.3mph and 30/28 gives you 7.7mph. It's only a 2.2 gear inch difference, which you would barely notice.
If you're going to change gearing on the bike, allow me to make a suggestion which would give you a similar gearing range while eliminating some maintenance hassle and component weight:
A 50/34 compact double up front, and an 11 - 32 cassette and mtn rear derailleur. I run a similar combo (48/34 compact, 11-32 cass.) on my brevet bike and it has been awesome for every climbing situation I've found myself in.
__________________
"I feel like my world was classier before I found cyclocross."
- Mandi M.
"I feel like my world was classier before I found cyclocross."
- Mandi M.
#3
Member
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 34
Bikes: 2003 Richard Sachs, 2002 Rivendell Custom, 2008 Pereira Custom, 2008 Davidson custon ti, 1980 Colnago super; 2004 Rambouillet; 2004 Quickbeam; Colnago Masterlight; 2001 Heron road, 1972, 1973 (x2) and 1986 Paramounts, Bob Jackson, JAck Taylor, Gunnar
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
The computation of gear inches is simple and answers your question, as noted by Clifton in the post above. Take a minute or 30 and read up on on line gear calculator, gear inches, meters development and so forth - - https://sheldonbrown.com/gearing/index.html
and you will answer all your own gearing questions.
With modern 9 and 10 speed cassettes, you really only need to know your high and your low. IMHO, the folks that actually need anything greater than a 100 inch gear are pretty few and far between. Compact cranks are the way to go - in fact, one of my bikes is built up with a 28-42 White Industries double crankset, providing a REALLY compact double... which I love.
Good luck, happy trails...
and you will answer all your own gearing questions.
With modern 9 and 10 speed cassettes, you really only need to know your high and your low. IMHO, the folks that actually need anything greater than a 100 inch gear are pretty few and far between. Compact cranks are the way to go - in fact, one of my bikes is built up with a 28-42 White Industries double crankset, providing a REALLY compact double... which I love.
Good luck, happy trails...
#5
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Paradise, TX
Posts: 2,087
Bikes: Soma Pescadero, Surly Pugsley, Salsa Fargo, Schwinn Klunker, Gravity SS 27.5, Monocog 29er
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 186 Post(s)
Liked 234 Times
in
166 Posts
You likely wouldn't be able to tell the difference. You'll only use the 50/11 when going downhill in the drops letting gravity do all the work anyway. The extra two teeth on the lower gear may let you spin a little more on long climbs, but likely won't be the difference between riding and having to walk.
#6
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Central Coast, California
Posts: 3,370
Bikes: Colnago C-50, Calfee Dragonfly Tandem, Specialized Allez Pro, Peugeot Competition Light
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
...If you're going to change gearing on the bike, allow me to make a suggestion which would give you a similar gearing range while eliminating some maintenance hassle and component weight:
A 50/34 compact double up front, and an 11 - 32 cassette and mtn rear derailleur. I run a similar combo (48/34 compact, 11-32 cass.) on my brevet bike and it has been awesome for every climbing situation I've found myself in.
A 50/34 compact double up front, and an 11 - 32 cassette and mtn rear derailleur. I run a similar combo (48/34 compact, 11-32 cass.) on my brevet bike and it has been awesome for every climbing situation I've found myself in.
The real difference is in the cassettes. Two teeth on the chainrings is nothing. I'd say, which one do you like better for the type of riding that you do and when the cassette that you like the least wears out replace it with one that matches the one you like.