Notices
Clydesdales/Athenas (200+ lb / 91+ kg) Looking to lose that spare tire? Ideal weight 200+? Frustrated being a large cyclist in a sport geared for the ultra-light? Learn about the bikes and parts that can take the abuse of a heavier cyclist, how to keep your body going while losing the weight, and get support from others who've been successful.

Trek drops the Pilot?

Old 09-24-10, 06:46 PM
  #1  
Exit3
Banned.
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Swamps of Jersey
Posts: 119
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Trek drops the Pilot?

I was shocked to see that Trek decided to get rid of it's Pilot series for 2011. I always thought they were nice bikes designed for a more relaxed ride. I thought they'd be a perfect fit for the Clyde class. Did I miss something here? Is Trek willing to give up customers to Specialized with it's Sectuer/Roubaix line? My old 2000 is a bit long in tooth and I'd like to stay loyal to Trek but I don"t know what to get now? Portland?
Exit3 is offline  
Old 09-25-10, 05:34 AM
  #2  
CraigB
Starting over
 
CraigB's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Indianapolis
Posts: 4,077

Bikes: 1990 Trek 1500; 2006 Gary Fisher Marlin; 2011 Cannondale Synapse Alloy 105; 2012 Catrike Trail

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 9 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
It's my understanding that while the specific Pilot model has been dropped, the frame geometry has not. Apparently they're now designating the degree of "aggressive vs comfort" aspect of the their frame geometries with some sort of letter designation in the technical specs for the frames. Unfortunately I have yet to be able to remember those letter designations. I think if you ask a dealer, they'll tell you it's mostly based on head tube angle and length.
CraigB is offline  
Old 09-25-10, 06:13 AM
  #3  
pinsonp2 
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Taylor, MI
Posts: 170

Bikes: 2008 Trek 2.1 WSD, 2010 Specialized Amira Elite, 2011 Trek Madone 5.2 WSD

Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 19 Post(s)
Liked 8 Times in 5 Posts
H1 = most agressive (formerly pro fit, I think), H3 = least agressive. That leaves the H2 somewhere in between. When you look at the geometry of a particular model it will tell you which style it equates to (their big buyers guide has them grouped by fit styles). Some models, like the higher end Madones, can be had it multiple fits.
pinsonp2 is offline  
Old 09-25-10, 08:48 AM
  #4  
Kevin in TN
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 27

Bikes: Nashbar Carbon Road Bike, Trek 1.5

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Important to note that you only get to pick between H1, H2, and H3 when you buy a madone.

The 1 and 2 series are H2 geometry.

The H3 aluminum bike is the Lexa. Yes, it's for women only.


Personally I bought a 1.5 a month ago after test riding several relaxed-geometry road bikes, and found that it was as good a value and I could get the same riding position just by changing to a stem with more rise. It may not have the curved seat stays or whatever that a typical plush bike has but honestly I couldn't tell a difference between it and the secteur. And if I ever want to start doing more aggressive riding I can just swap the stem out.

I'm pretty happy with it.
Kevin in TN is offline  
Old 09-25-10, 10:08 AM
  #5  
Exit3
Banned.
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Swamps of Jersey
Posts: 119
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Thanks for the replies. I am just amazed that they would want to make this more complicated than it has to be. My eyes already glazed over from those responses and I think it would be easier to just consider The Specialized or Cannondale models that are already marked as being a more comfort oriented ride. Maybe a hard core racer would be interested in analyzing frame styles, etc. etc. But the casual rider whowants a comfy ride would rather just pick a bike than swap/adjust stems and what have you. To me it seems like a cost savings move on Trek's part that I think some bean counter came up with, instead of a guy who wants to get more riders out there.
Exit3 is offline  
Old 09-25-10, 11:00 AM
  #6  
Kevin in TN
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 27

Bikes: Nashbar Carbon Road Bike, Trek 1.5

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Well the secteur, synapse, and defy are all great bikes. No reason to stick with Trek unless you have a lance obsession.
Kevin in TN is offline  
Old 09-25-10, 11:09 AM
  #7  
Wogster
Senior Member
 
Wogster's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Toronto (again) Ontario, Canada
Posts: 6,932

Bikes: Norco Bushpilot (out of commission), Raleigh Delta

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Exit3 View Post
Thanks for the replies. I am just amazed that they would want to make this more complicated than it has to be. My eyes already glazed over from those responses and I think it would be easier to just consider The Specialized or Cannondale models that are already marked as being a more comfort oriented ride. Maybe a hard core racer would be interested in analyzing frame styles, etc. etc. But the casual rider whowants a comfy ride would rather just pick a bike than swap/adjust stems and what have you. To me it seems like a cost savings move on Trek's part that I think some bean counter came up with, instead of a guy who wants to get more riders out there.
If you think a company has made their product too complicated, then vote with your wallet. Being able to buy a relaxed geometry several models instead of just one, does have it's benefits though.
Wogster is offline  
Old 09-25-10, 11:10 AM
  #8  
CraigB
Starting over
 
CraigB's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Indianapolis
Posts: 4,077

Bikes: 1990 Trek 1500; 2006 Gary Fisher Marlin; 2011 Cannondale Synapse Alloy 105; 2012 Catrike Trail

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 9 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
Originally Posted by Kevin in TN View Post
Well the secteur, synapse, and defy are all great bikes. No reason to stick with Trek unless you have a lance obsession.
Absolutely. All are terrific companies with great product. You can also add Jamis's Xenith Endura and Ventura lines to that list.
CraigB is offline  
Old 09-28-10, 11:15 AM
  #9  
1855Cru
Senior Member
 
1855Cru's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 313

Bikes: 2015 Specialized Diverge Comp Carbon, 2011 Cervelo R3, 2011 Trek 2.1, 2011 Trek X-Caliber

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
H3 i sthe designation for a comfort ride. I just bought a Trek 2.1 H3 and it is a very relaxed comfortable ride.
1855Cru is offline  
Old 09-30-10, 09:02 PM
  #10  
rideorglide
Senior Member
 
rideorglide's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Long Island
Posts: 529

Bikes: Leader 780-R; Rockhopper FSR;Trek 660; Kona Blast Hardtail

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
n+1 bikes is always good until the garage is full and the wallet empty.
rideorglide is offline  
Old 09-30-10, 09:09 PM
  #11  
CraigB
Starting over
 
CraigB's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Indianapolis
Posts: 4,077

Bikes: 1990 Trek 1500; 2006 Gary Fisher Marlin; 2011 Cannondale Synapse Alloy 105; 2012 Catrike Trail

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 9 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
Originally Posted by 1855Cru View Post
H3 i sthe designation for a comfort ride. I just bought a Trek 2.1 H3 and it is a very relaxed comfortable ride.
It sounds from your post that the H3 is obviously not just in the Madone line and the women-specific Lexa. That's good to know.
CraigB is offline  
Old 10-01-10, 06:41 AM
  #12  
1855Cru
Senior Member
 
1855Cru's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 313

Bikes: 2015 Specialized Diverge Comp Carbon, 2011 Cervelo R3, 2011 Trek 2.1, 2011 Trek X-Caliber

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by CraigB View Post
It sounds from your post that the H3 is obviously not just in the Madone line and the women-specific Lexa. That's good to know.
Yes that's correct. H3 is a new option for 2011 for the 2.1 and I',m guessing the 2.3 and 1 series too
1855Cru is offline  
Old 10-01-10, 06:51 AM
  #13  
CraigB
Starting over
 
CraigB's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Indianapolis
Posts: 4,077

Bikes: 1990 Trek 1500; 2006 Gary Fisher Marlin; 2011 Cannondale Synapse Alloy 105; 2012 Catrike Trail

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 9 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
Originally Posted by 1855Cru View Post
Yes that's correct. H3 is a new option for 2011 for the 2.1 and I',m guessing the 2.3 and 1 series too
It's good for the end user that they're offering that degree of choice, but it seems like a nightmare for the shop owners trying to decide on what they want to stock for the sales floor. It's going to be like US autos, with the dealers having to pick and choose among bunches of options and option packages and predicting which ones will be the most popular with their potential customers.
CraigB is offline  
Old 10-01-10, 04:37 PM
  #14  
Kevin in TN
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 27

Bikes: Nashbar Carbon Road Bike, Trek 1.5

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by CraigB View Post
It sounds from your post that the H3 is obviously not just in the Madone line and the women-specific Lexa. That's good to know.

Hrm. I guess my LBS just didn't want to order them then. I'm a little miffed about this. I probably would have gotten a 1.5H3 if I could/had known.

But I'm happy enough with my 1.5H2 I guess.
Kevin in TN is offline  
Old 11-12-10, 09:22 PM
  #15  
Roasted
huffy owns
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Pennsylvania.
Posts: 572

Bikes: Catrike Expedition, KHS XC 204 mountain bike, Nashbar SS Road Bike

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Hate to bump this but in searching through the forums I was curious to see what the Pilot bike was all about. I'm just getting into road biking (mountain biking is kind of my sweet spot) and I thought the idea between H1/2/3 was a great idea, but that got me wondering if Trek had an answer to those alternatives before. Some companies have pro/performance fit. Is that what the Pilot was? Was the Pilot the performance fit of Trek? Because now you can choose different H1/H2/H3 alternatives through certain model bikes (2.1, 5 series, 6 series) if you want a bike in that series with a relaxed fit.

What series did the Pilot come in? Was the H1/H2/H3 alternative a direct replacement to the Pilot series bikes?
Roasted is offline  
Old 11-12-10, 10:10 PM
  #16  
CraigB
Starting over
 
CraigB's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Indianapolis
Posts: 4,077

Bikes: 1990 Trek 1500; 2006 Gary Fisher Marlin; 2011 Cannondale Synapse Alloy 105; 2012 Catrike Trail

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 9 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
Just about every bike manufacturer has their own name for the less-aggressive geometry road bikes they make. In the old days it was basically racing or touring. Now it's racing, pro, performance, endurance, plush, relaxed and touring (and probably others I've missed). Whether Trek used the specific term "performance" to indicate a slightly less aggressive geometry than their full-on racing bikes, I don't know, but your basic premise is right - the Pilot was the less extreme, (presumably) more comfy road bike in the line.

And yes, at least as it was explained to me, the H3 geometry models are the replacements for the Pilots.
CraigB is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
JohnsonRay
General Cycling Discussion
7
06-21-13 10:47 PM
robbyville
Road Cycling
11
05-05-13 05:40 AM
donheff
Fifty Plus (50+)
25
04-26-12 05:46 PM
ThinLine
Road Cycling
7
08-14-11 03:39 PM
Gar596
Road Cycling
4
11-04-10 05:43 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off


Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service - Do Not Sell My Personal Information -

Copyright 2021 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.