Cycling and bicycle discussion forums. 
   Click here to join our community Log in to access your Control Panel  

Go Back   > >

Clydesdales/Athenas (200+ lb / 91+ kg) Looking to lose that spare tire? Ideal weight 200+? Frustrated being a large cyclist in a sport geared for the ultra-light? Learn about the bikes and parts that can take the abuse of a heavier cyclist, how to keep your body going while losing the weight, and get support from others who've been successful.

User Tag List

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 11-01-10, 06:26 AM   #1
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 4,819
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 42 Post(s)
36" inseam, 6'6", 250lbs

a fit aquaintance is looking for a not expensive (<$1000) multipurpose around town bike and I was thinking of helping him build up a simple around town bike with bars about 1" below the seat . It seems that most 62cm production frames have 24" top tubes, is that long enough for you tall folks? I was thinking something like a Surly Karate Monkey because it's sturdy and the high bb would be good for 180 cranks and the effective tt is almost 25". Setting it up initially as a one speed to keep cost down. Are there 62cm bikes/frames you very tall people have found are big enough?
LeeG is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-01-10, 10:56 AM   #2
Pedals, Paddles and Poles
Daspydyr's Avatar
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Vegas Valley, NV
Bikes: Santa Cruz Tallboy, Ridley Noah, Scott Spark 20
Posts: 5,427
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 150 Post(s)
I would think that Craigslist would be a draw out affair as you would need to shop for a couple of months. But I like getting a used bike. More bike for the bucks.

I am 6'3" with a 34 inseam. I ride a 58cm frame on a Roubaix and a 21" frame on my MTB. They fits me very well. I recently rode a 115 mile century and no complaints. I would think that a 62 would be comfortable for your friend. Surly is a great bike. You are on the right track.
I think its disgusting and terrible how people treat Lance Armstrong, especially after winning 7 Tour de France Titles while on drugs!

I can't even find my bike when I'm on drugs. -Willie N.
Daspydyr is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-01-10, 12:20 PM   #3
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Uncertain
Posts: 8,654
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
I'd check that inseam measurement if I were you. I am 6'3", do not have long legs for my height and have a 35" inseam, so 36" at 6'6" seems as if it might be short. A cyclists inseam is measured crotch to floor, wearing shoes, not the trouser inseam. Is your friend aware of that?

Anyway, if the measurement is correct he'll have a long torso, so don't worry about the long top tube. My own bikes range from a 58cm frame to a 61cm - their geometries, and my riding position, vary but they all fit. I'd be surprised if you couldn't make a 62 cm fit him, but it's extremely dangerous to give bike fitting advice over the internet. People's proportions, and their suppleness, vary too much to size bikes on inseam measurement alone.
chasm54 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-01-10, 06:06 PM   #4
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Grid Reference, SK
Bikes: I never learned to ride a bike. It is my deepest shame.
Posts: 3,769
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
I am 6'4" and I have considered the Karate Monkey and pretty much ruled it out. THe top tube is long, but the head tube is short, so with a 22" frame I am likely to have the seapost ~10" out of the frame, which would put the bars ~6-8" below the saddle... and that is not how I want my bike to fit.

I was considering, however, getting a Kona UNit... long top tube and long head tube for a really big fit.

Edit: the XL size Kona also comes with 180mm cranks.
LarDasse74 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-02-10, 11:29 AM   #5
Senior Member
Kobe's Avatar
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Schwenksville, Pa
Posts: 2,330
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 88 Post(s)
Hey, are you building this bike for me. Those are my measurements exactly.

This is my most modern bike. A 2001 Jamis Nova.

It has exactly the same measurements as you described, 62cm st and 61cm tt. It also has a higher bottom bracket. I did have to add the ugly stem riser and use a 140mm stem. When I first got it I felt a bit cramped, but I find it very comfortable with those additions to the stem.

I think your friend will be fine on the Surly, you almost have to be, because not much is made in larger sizes that are not custom.
Kobe is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-08-10, 05:40 AM   #6
Mazama's Avatar
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Flori-Duh
Bikes: Co-Motion Mazama
Posts: 881
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Trek had a hybrid (7200) with a 25" frame back in 2007. I'm not sure if it, or something similar, is still in production.
Mazama is offline   Reply With Quote

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 01:40 PM.

  • Ask a Question
    get answers from real people!
Click to start entering your question.