Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Clydesdales/Athenas (200+ lb / 91+ kg)
Reload this Page >

Clyde Calorie Counting - with exercise

Notices
Clydesdales/Athenas (200+ lb / 91+ kg) Looking to lose that spare tire? Ideal weight 200+? Frustrated being a large cyclist in a sport geared for the ultra-light? Learn about the bikes and parts that can take the abuse of a heavier cyclist, how to keep your body going while losing the weight, and get support from others who've been successful.

Clyde Calorie Counting - with exercise

Old 07-08-12, 10:57 AM
  #1  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 155

Bikes: Crossrip Elite, Bikesdirect tarck bike custom build

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Clyde Calorie Counting - with exercise

Hello All,

I started down a road I imagine many of us have gone down - calorie counting. I saw a dietician recently and she recommended a smartphone app - MyFitnessPal. It's a standard calorie counter, but one neat feature is a barcode scanner, so instead of keying everything in you can just scan the UPC on an item and it'll most likely have the calories and nutrition information in there already. And ince some people on the internet seem to love entering data, many common fast food items (Jimmy Johns, Starbucks, etc) are already in there.

You enter in some data, like current weight, height, goal weight, fitness goals, and it'll compute your ideal calorie needs. Similar to calories from food, you can enter exercise in your diary, and it'll compute the calorie expenditure.

This is my question: anyone know how accurate the exercise calculations are?

I just finished a 2 hour, 25 mile ride, with an average speed of 12.5. Entering this into MyFitnessPal (120 minutes of cycling 12-14 miles per hour), given my weight, yields a calorie expenditure of 2093 calories.

That figure seems a little extreme - perhaps for someone who is totally out of shape, but I like to think I'm not. I did have a largish breakfast, and stopped part way through for a treat at Starbucks, but I feel like I should be demolished after that - I'm merely a bit tired and hungry.

If these are accurate, well, I guess I have some license to eat a lot, because I just spent 3/4 of my daily calorie needs in 2 hours. If it's not, I need to work on a more accurate measurement. Thoughts?
umazuki is offline  
Old 07-08-12, 11:13 AM
  #2  
Space for rent
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: South East
Posts: 278
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Those are notoriously inaccurate. A good rule of thumb that many use is simply to multiply 25-30 calories per mile. Even then, that is an estimate...however it is closer to realistic and far more conservative. That works out to 750-900 calories. That's still an achievement. However, it's easy to eat those away so be careful about looking for permission to eat. That is a large glass of Milk and 2 lemon filled Krispy Kreme donuts.

You will hear many folks say you need a power meter to accurately know your calories expended, and they would be correct, however it would be overkill for most riders.
Joemess is offline  
Old 07-08-12, 11:18 AM
  #3  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 587
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
I'm in the same boat.

I do a 40 mile round trip commute. I do each leg @ around 1 Hr. 30 Min. According to myfitnesspal.com that means that I have burned 3000 calories. Couple that with what they say is my basic metabolic rate (if that's the right term) I have around 5000 calories to maintain my weight.

Which isn't the goal - but they're saying I can swallow 4k calories and still lose weight. I am a bit suspicious of that claim.

I try to keep it reasonable and keep riding. I'm losing weight and inches. That's good enough for now.
SkippyX is offline  
Old 07-08-12, 03:15 PM
  #4  
Senior Member
 
CommuteCommando's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Southern CaliFORNIA.
Posts: 3,078

Bikes: KHS Alite 500, Trek 7.2 FX , Masi Partenza, Masi Fixed Special, Masi Cran Criterium

Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 27 Post(s)
Liked 19 Times in 11 Posts
I use MyFatSecret, and like you are reporting for MyFitnessPal, the exercise Cals. are way high. I now have a Garmin Edge500 w/HRM, and the Cal. readings I get there seem a lot more reasonable.
CommuteCommando is offline  
Old 07-08-12, 06:49 PM
  #5  
Senior Member
 
Chaco's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Encinitas CA
Posts: 865

Bikes: Scott CR1 Team

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 20 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
The Garmin 500 is the only thing I've ever used that I think even came close to reality. If I work pretty hard, I can get just above 30 cals per mile. If I take it easier, it's more like 25 per mile.
Chaco is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
gnappi
Fifty Plus (50+)
17
07-15-19 07:08 PM
mrfreezesdefy3
Clydesdales/Athenas (200+ lb / 91+ kg)
62
02-17-15 09:08 AM
ashtabula
Training & Nutrition
65
10-08-14 03:54 PM
Flordia ride
Training & Nutrition
11
05-06-14 01:07 PM
ScarcelyAware
Training & Nutrition
25
05-26-11 12:54 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.